Mihriye Mete

Effect of Statins Alone Versus Statins Plus Ezetimibe on Carotid Atherosclerosis in Type 2 Diabetes The SANDS (Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study) Trial

OBJECTIVES This secondary analysis from the SANDS (Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study) trial examines the effects of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with statins alone versus statins plus ezetimibe on common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) in patients with type 2 diabetes and no prior cardiovascular event. BACKGROUND It is unknown whether the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy affects subclinical atherosclerosis. METHODS Within an aggressive group (target LDL-C <or=70 mg/dl; non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <or=100 mg/dl; systolic blood pressure <or=115 mm Hg), change in CIMT over 36 months was compared in diabetic individuals >40 years of age receiving statins plus ezetimibe versus statins alone. The CIMT changes in both aggressive subgroups were compared with changes in the standard subgroups (target LDL-C <or=100 mg/dl; non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <or=130 mg/dl; systolic blood pressure <or=130 mm Hg). RESULTS Mean (95% confidence intervals) LDL-C was reduced by 31 (23 to 37) mg/dl and 32 (27 to 38) mg/dl in the aggressive group receiving statins plus ezetimibe and statins alone, respectively, compared with changes of 1 (-3 to 6) mg/dl in the standard group (p < 0.0001) versus both aggressive subgroups. Within the aggressive group, mean CIMT at 36 months regressed from baseline similarly in the ezetimibe (-0.025 [-0.05 to 0.003] mm) and nonezetimibe subgroups (-0.012 [-0.03 to 0.008] mm) but progressed in the standard treatment arm (0.039 [0.02 to 0.06] mm), intergroup p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS Reducing LDL-C to aggressive targets resulted in similar regression of CIMT in patients who attained equivalent LDL-C reductions from a statin alone or statin plus ezetimibe. Common carotid artery IMT increased in those achieving standard targets. (Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study [SANDS]; NCT00047424).

Effect of Lower Targets for Blood Pressure and LDL Cholesterol on Atherosclerosis in Diabetes: The SANDS Randomized Trial

CONTEXT Individuals with diabetes are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), but more aggressive targets for risk factor control have not been tested. OBJECTIVE To compare progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in adults with type 2 diabetes treated to reach aggressive targets of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of 70 mg/dL or lower and systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 115 mm Hg or lower vs standard targets of LDL-C of 100 mg/dL or lower and SBP of 130 mm Hg or lower. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized, open-label, blinded-to-end point, 3-year trial from April 2003-July 2007 at 4 clinical centers in Oklahoma, Arizona, and South Dakota. Participants were 499 American Indian men and women aged 40 years or older with type 2 diabetes and no prior CVD events. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized to aggressive (n=252) vs standard (n=247) treatment groups with stepped treatment algorithms defined for both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary end point was progression of atherosclerosis measured by common carotid artery intimal medial thickness (IMT). Secondary end points were other carotid and cardiac ultrasonographic measures and clinical events. RESULTS Mean target LDL-C and SBP levels for both groups were reached and maintained. Mean (95% confidence interval) levels for LDL-C in the last 12 months were 72 (69-75) and 104 (101-106) mg/dL and SBP levels were 117 (115-118) and 129 (128-130) mm Hg in the aggressive vs standard groups, respectively. Compared with baseline, IMT regressed in the aggressive group and progressed in the standard group (-0.012 mm vs 0.038 mm; P < .001); carotid arterial cross-sectional area also regressed (-0.02 mm(2) vs 1.05 mm(2); P < .001); and there was greater decrease in left ventricular mass index (-2.4 g/m(2.7) vs -1.2 g/m(2.7); P = .03) in the aggressive group. Rates of adverse events (38.5% and 26.7%; P = .005) and serious adverse events (n = 4 vs 1; P = .18) related to blood pressure medications were higher in the aggressive group. Clinical CVD events (1.6/100 and 1.5/100 person-years; P = .87) did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS Reducing LDL-C and SBP to lower targets resulted in regression of carotid IMT and greater decrease in left ventricular mass in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Clinical events were lower than expected and did not differ significantly between groups. Further follow-up is needed to determine whether these improvements will result in lower long-term CVD event rates and costs and favorable risk-benefit outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00047424.

Effect of Statins Alone Versus Statins Plus Ezetimibe on Carotid Atherosclerosis in Type 2 Diabetes

OBJECTIVES This secondary analysis from the SANDS (Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study) trial examines the effects of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with statins alone versus statins plus ezetimibe on common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) in patients with type 2 diabetes and no prior cardiovascular event. BACKGROUND It is unknown whether the addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy affects subclinical atherosclerosis. METHODS Within an aggressive group (target LDL-C <or=70 mg/dl; non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <or=100 mg/dl; systolic blood pressure <or=115 mm Hg), change in CIMT over 36 months was compared in diabetic individuals >40 years of age receiving statins plus ezetimibe versus statins alone. The CIMT changes in both aggressive subgroups were compared with changes in the standard subgroups (target LDL-C <or=100 mg/dl; non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <or=130 mg/dl; systolic blood pressure <or=130 mm Hg). RESULTS Mean (95% confidence intervals) LDL-C was reduced by 31 (23 to 37) mg/dl and 32 (27 to 38) mg/dl in the aggressive group receiving statins plus ezetimibe and statins alone, respectively, compared with changes of 1 (-3 to 6) mg/dl in the standard group (p < 0.0001) versus both aggressive subgroups. Within the aggressive group, mean CIMT at 36 months regressed from baseline similarly in the ezetimibe (-0.025 [-0.05 to 0.003] mm) and nonezetimibe subgroups (-0.012 [-0.03 to 0.008] mm) but progressed in the standard treatment arm (0.039 [0.02 to 0.06] mm), intergroup p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS Reducing LDL-C to aggressive targets resulted in similar regression of CIMT in patients who attained equivalent LDL-C reductions from a statin alone or statin plus ezetimibe. Common carotid artery IMT increased in those achieving standard targets. (Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study [SANDS]; NCT00047424).

Group interpersonal psychotherapy for low-income women with posttraumatic stress disorder

Abstract The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of group interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for low-income women with chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) subsequent to interpersonal trauma. Non-treatment-seeking predominantly minority women were recruited in family planning and gynecology clinics. Individuals with interpersonal trauma histories (e.g., assault, abuse, and molestation) who met criteria for current PTSD (N=48) were randomly assigned to treatment or a wait list. Assessments were conducted at baseline, treatment termination, and 4-month follow-up; data analysis used a mixed-effects regression approach with an intent-to-treat sample. The results showed that IPT was significantly more effective than the wait list in reducing PTSD and depression symptom severity. IPT participants also had significantly lower scores than waitlist individuals on four interpersonal functioning subscales: Interpersonal Sensitivity, Need for Social Approval, Lack of Sociability, and Interpersonal Ambivalence.

124I Positron Emission Tomography Versus 131I Planar Imaging in the Identification of Residual Thyroid Tissue and/or Metastasis in Patients Who Have Well-Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE (124)I emits a positron and can be imaged with a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner. The objective of this study was to compare the ability of diagnostic (124)I PET images versus (131)I planar whole-body imaging in detecting residual thyroid tissue and/or metastatic well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC). METHODS Patients were recruited prospectively for this study who (i) had WDTC, (ii) were suspected of having metastatic WDTC, and (iii) were referred for (131)I whole-body dosimetry. The prescribed activity was 1-2 mCi (37-74 MBq) and 1.7 mCi (62.9 MBq) for (131)I and (124)I, respectively. For each image, one blinded reader (D.V.N.) categorized every focus of (131)I and (124)I radioiodine uptake as 1 = definite physiological uptake/artifact, 2 = most likely physiological uptake/artifact, 3 = indeterminate, 4 = residual thyroid tissue/metastases in the neck/bed, 5 = most likely metastases, or 6 = definite metastases. Foci categorized as 4, 5, or 6 were considered positive. When available, foci categorized as 4, 5, or 6 were correlated with other diagnostic studies. RESULTS Of the 25 patients, 8 patients (32%) had more positive foci on (124)I images than on (131)I, of which 3 patients to date have had metastases confirmed in one or more of the additional positive (124)I foci. (124)I demonstrated the same number of foci as on (131)I in 16 patients (14 with no positive foci, and 2 with two positive and five positive foci each). One patient had one additional positive focus on (131)I not seen on (124)I, which has not yet been confirmed as a metastasis. A total of 97 positive foci were identified on either (124)I or (131)I. (124)I identified 49 positive foci not seen with (131)I, and (131)I identified one positive focus not seen with (124)I. CONCLUSION Relative to (131)I planar whole-body imaging, (124)I PET identified as many as 50% more foci of radioiodine uptake suggestive of additional residual thyroid tissue and/or metastases in as many as 32% more patients who had WDTC.

Dietary Patterns and Their Association with Cardiovascular Risk Factors in a Population Undergoing Lifestyle Changes: The Strong Heart Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) are disproportionately high in American Indians (AI), and changes in lifestyle may be responsible. It is not known whether diverse dietary patterns exist in this population and whether the patterns are associated with CVD risk factors. This article describes the relationships between dietary patterns and CVD risk factors in this high-risk population. METHODS AND RESULTS Nutrition data were collected via food frequency questionnaire from 3438 Strong Heart Study (SHS) participants, ≥ age 15 y. All participants were members of 94 extended families. The final sample consisted of 3172 men and women. Diet patterns were ascertained using factor analysis with the principal component factoring method. We derived four predominant dietary patterns: Western, traditional AI/Mexican, healthy, and unhealthy. Participants following the Western pattern had higher LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) (p < 0.001), slightly higher systolic blood pressure (BP) (p < 0.001), lower HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) (p < 0.001), and slightly lower homeostasis model assessment estimates of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in the lowest vs. highest deciles of adherence to this pattern (p < 0.001). The traditional diet was associated with higher HDL-C (p < 0.001), but higher body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (p < 0.001). Followers of the healthy pattern had lower systolic BP, LDL-C, BMI, and HOMA-IR in increasing deciles (p < 0.001). The unhealthy pattern was associated with higher LDL-C. CONCLUSIONS Dietary patterns reflect the changing lifestyle of AI and several of the patterns are associated with CVD risk factors. Evolving methods of food preparation have made the traditional pattern less healthy.

Efficacy of dosimetric versus empiric prescribed activity of 131I for therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer.

Abstract Background: The optimal management of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) consists of thyroidectomy followed by radioiodine (131I) therapy. The prescribed activity of 131I can be determined using two approaches: 1) empiric prescribed activity of 131I (E-Rx); and 2) dosimetry-based prescribed activity of 131I (D-Rx). Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the relative treatment efficacy and side effects of D-Rx vs. E-Rx. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with distant metastases and/or locoregionally advanced radioiodine-avid DTC who were treated with either D-Rx or E-Rx. Response to treatment was based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1 criteria. Results: The study group consisted of 87 patients followed for 51 ± 35 months, of whom 43 were treated with D-Rx and 44 with E-Rx. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, gender, and status of metastases revealed that the D-Rx group tended to be 70% less likely to progress (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.087–1.02; P = 0.052) and more likely to obtain complete response (CR) compared to the E-Rx group (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2–53.5; P = 0.029). There was an association in the D-Rx group between the observed CR and percentage of maximum tolerable activity given as a first treatment of 131I (P = 0.030). The advantage of D-Rx was specifically apparent in the locoregionally advanced group because CR was significantly higher in D-Rx vs. E-Rx in this group of patients (35.7 vs. 3.3%; P = 0.009). The rates of partial response, stable disease, and progression-free survival, as well as the frequency of side effects, were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion: Higher efficacy of D-Rx with a similar safety profile compared to E-Rx supports the rationale for employing individually prescribed activity in high-risk patients with DTC.

Radioiodine Treatment of Metastatic Thyroid Cancer: Relative Efficacy and Side Effect Profile of Preparation by Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal Versus Recombinant Human Thyrotropin

BACKGROUND To effectively treat differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) with radioiodine (RAI) it is necessary to raise serum thyrotropin (TSH) levels either endogenously by thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) or exogenously by administration of recombinant human TSH (rhTSH). The aim of our study was to compare the relative efficacy and side effect profile of rhTSH versus THW preparation for RAI therapy of metastatic DTC. METHODS Fifty-six patients (31 women and 25 men) with RAI-avid distant metastases of DTC treated with either rhTSH-aided (n=15) or THW-aided RAI (n=41) and followed for 72±36.2 months were retrospectively analyzed. The groups were comparable in regard to mean size of target lesions (rhTSH vs. THW 6.4 vs. 4.8 cm, p=0.41), mean baseline thyroglobulin level (6995 vs. 5544 ng/mL, p=0.83), distribution of micronodular and macronodular pulmonary metastases (67% vs. 63%, p=0.54, 13% vs. 15% p=0.64, respectively), osseous (53% vs. 29%, p=0.09), brain (0% vs. 2%, p=0.73), and liver/kidney metastases (13% vs. 2%, p=0.61). Patients in the rhTSH group were older (rhTSH vs. THW mean 62 vs. 49 years, p=0.01), and received lower cumulative RAI dose (256 vs. 416 mCi, p=0.03), which was more frequently based on dosimetric calculations (80% vs. 46%, p=0.024). Responses to treatment were based on RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS Adjusted by age rates of complete response (CR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), and progression free survival (PFS) were not different between the groups (rhTSH vs. THW CR hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% CI 0.08-11.42, p=0.982; SD HR 3.22, 95% CI 0.79-13.18, p=0.104, PD HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.52-1.26, p=0.094; PFS HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.14-1.23, p=0.112). The only independent risk factor for nonresponding to treatment and presentation with PD was age (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.11, p=0.008). Age was also an independent factor affecting PFS (HR 1.04 for each year, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, p=0.001). Rates of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, xerostomia, and restrictive pulmonary disease after RAI were not significantly different (rhTSH vs. THW 30% vs. 28%, p=0.61, 10% vs. 0%, p=0.37, 0% vs. 12%, p=0.20, 0% vs. 2%, p=0.73, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Patients with metastatic DTC prepared with rhTSH achieve comparable benefit of RAI therapy as those treated after THW.

Hyponatremia Is Associated With Increased Osteoporosis and Bone Fractures in a Large US Health System Population

CONTEXT The significance of studies suggesting an increased risk of bone fragility fractures with hyponatremia through mechanisms of induced bone loss and increased falls has not been demonstrated in large patient populations with different types of hyponatremia. OBJECTIVE This matched case-control study evaluated the effect of hyponatremia on osteoporosis and fragility fractures in a patient population of more than 2.9 million. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Osteoporosis (n = 30 517) and fragility fracture (n = 46 256) cases from the MedStar Health database were matched on age, sex, race, and patient record length with controls without osteoporosis (n = 30 517) and without fragility fractures (n = 46 256), respectively. Cases without matched controls or serum sodium (Na(+)) data or with Na(+) with a same-day blood glucose greater than 200 mg/dL were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Incidence of diagnosis of osteoporosis and fragility fractures of the upper or lower extremity, pelvis, and vertebrae were the outcome measures. RESULTS Multivariate conditional logistic regression models demonstrated that hyponatremia was associated with osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures, including chronic [osteoporosis: odds ratio (OR) 3.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.59-4.39; fracture: OR 4.61, 95% CI 4.15-5.11], recent (osteoporosis: OR 3.06, 95% CI 2.81-3.33; fracture: OR 3.05, 95% CI 2.83-3.29), and combined chronic and recent hyponatremia (osteoporosis: OR 12.09, 95% CI 9.34-15.66; fracture: OR 11.21, 95% CI 8.81-14.26). Odds of osteoporosis or fragility fracture increased incrementally with categorical decrease in median serum Na(+). CONCLUSIONS These analyses support the hypothesis that hyponatremia is a risk factor for osteoporosis and fracture. Additional studies are required to evaluate whether correction of hyponatremia will improve patient outcomes.

Relationship between glycemic control and depression among American Indians in the Strong Heart Study

OBJECTIVES To examine the relationship between depression and glycemic control in the Strong Heart Study (SHS), a longitudinal study of cardiovascular disease in American Indians. METHODS This cross-sectional analysis focused on the relationship between depression, diabetes and glycemic control among 2832 individuals aged > or =15 years. Depression was measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies of Depression Scale and diabetes by American Diabetes Association criteria. An ordered logit regression model was used to assess whether diabetes was related to level of depression (none, mild, moderate, severe). Multiple logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between A1c and severe depression in participants with diabetes. RESULTS Rates of depression were higher in men and women with diabetes when compared to those without diabetes, respectively (P<.05). For every 1-U increase in A1c, the odds of severe depression increased by 22% (OR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.05-1.42). Female sex (OR 2.97, 95% CI: 1.32-6.69) and body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.08) also were significantly associated with increased risk for severe depression. Although BMI appears to be significantly associated with increased risk for severe depression, the magnitude of this effect was small. CONCLUSIONS Individuals with diabetes have higher rates of depression than those without diabetes, consistent with other populations. There is a positive relationship between severity of depression and A1c levels; men and women with severe depression have higher A1c levels than those with moderate-to-no depression.