Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mike Barker is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mike Barker.


empirical software engineering and measurement | 2007

Proposal of a Complete Life Cycle In-Process Measurement Model Based on Evaluation of an In-Process Measurement Experiment Using a Standardized Requirement Definition Process

Yoshiki Mitani; Tomoko Matsumura; Mike Barker; Seishiro Tsuruho; Katsuro Inoue; Ken-ichi Matsumoto

This poster reports on a solution to ERP project cost estimation and on results from its first experimental application.


asia-pacific software engineering conference | 2007

Accountability and Traceability in Global Software Engineering (ATGSE2007)

Katsuro Inoue; Mike Barker

An Overview of the new workshop on Accountability and Traceability in Global Software Engineering (ATGSE2007) will be introduced here.


International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering | 2011

An empirical study of development visualization for procurement by in-process measurement during integration and testing

Yoshiki Mitani; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa; Seishiro Tsuruho; Akito Monden; Mike Barker; Ken-ichi Matsumoto

This study describes a new method of development visualization along with empirical evidence of its usefulness. Typically, development activities such as program design, programming, and unit testing are not disclosed to the procurement organization (project owner). However, during integration and testing, various issues require collaboration between the procurement organization and developers. When this occurs, it is important to make the development process visible. Recent reports indicate the usefulness for project management of various in-process project measurements which allow visualization of the formerly invisible software project progress [1–6]. Based on this background, the authors investigated a case study where in-process measurement during the integration and test phase helped to make development issues visible. In this study, data obtained from the integration and testing phase were compared to a development process model. This model was based on the authors experience, and provided a vivid picture of the development activity. By applying in-process measurements in collaboration during the integration test phase, the development activity was clearly visualized, and the procurement organization understood problems.


Software Process and Product Measurement | 2007

An Empirical Study of Process and Product Metrics Based on In-process Measurements of a Standardized Requirements Definition Phase

Yoshiki Mitani; Tomoko Matsumura; Mike Barker; Seishiro Tsuruho; Katsuro Inoue; Ken-ichi Matsumoto

This paper focuses on in-process project measurement in the requirements definition phase based on progress with standardization of this phase. The authors have verified the utility of in-process project measurement in a real mid-scale multi-vendor distributed project. This trial was successful, but limited to a part of the total development process. The project measurement target was limited to later processes such as the coding and testing phases where the output products were easy to acquire. The requirements definition phase where process and product were not standardized was difficult to measure. However, a newly provided governmental process guideline standardizes the process and product for the requirements definition phase, and the authors had an opportunity to measure such a requirements definition effort. This paper presents an empirical study of in-process project measurement in the standardized requirements definition phase, verifies the usefulness of this measurement for project management, and reveals the possibility of creating a new software metrics field using these measurements.


IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering | 2013

Assessing the Cost Effectiveness of Fault Prediction in Acceptance Testing

Akito Monden; Takuma Hayashi; Shoji Shinoda; Kumiko Shirai; Junichi Yoshida; Mike Barker; Ken-ichi Matsumoto


Archive | 2006

A Proposal for Analysis and Prediction for Software Projects using Collaborative Filterin g, In-Process Measurements and a Benchmarks Database

Yoshiki Mitani; Nahomi Kikuchi; Tomoko Matsumura; Naoki Ohsugi; Akito Monden; Yoshiki Higo; Katsuro Inoue; Mike Barker; Kenichi Matsumoto


Archive | 2005

An empirical trial of multi-dimensional in-process measurement and feedback on a governmental multi-vendor software project

Yoshiki Mitani; Nahomi Kikuchi; Tomoko Matsumura; Satoshi Iwamura; Mike Barker; Kenichi Matsumoto


IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems | 2012

Customizing GQM Models for Software Project Monitoring

Akito Monden; Tomoko Matsumura; Mike Barker; Koji Torii; Victor R. Basili


international conference on software engineering | 2006

Effects of software industry structure on a research framework for empirical software engineering

Yoshiki Mitani; Nahomi Kikuchi; Tomoko Matsumura; Satoshi Iwamura; Yoshiki Higo; Katsuro Inoue; Mike Barker; Ken-ichi Matsumoto


Archive | 2010

Putting a TAG on Software: Purchaser-Centered Software Engineering

Mike Barker; Ken-ichi Matsumoto; Katsuro Inoue

Collaboration


Dive into the Mike Barker's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ken-ichi Matsumoto

Nara Institute of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Tomoko Matsumura

Nara Institute of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Yoshiki Mitani

Nara Institute of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Akito Monden

Nara Institute of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Seishiro Tsuruho

Kochi University of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Naoki Ohsugi

Nara Institute of Science and Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge