Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mike Herdman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mike Herdman.


Quality of Life Research | 2011

Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

Mike Herdman; Claire Gudex; A Lloyd; Mathieu F. Janssen; Paul Kind; David Parkin; Gouke J. Bonsel; Xavier Badia

PurposeThis article introduces the new 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) health status measure.MethodsEQ-5D currently measures health using three levels of severity in five dimensions. A EuroQol Group task force was established to find ways of improving the instrument’s sensitivity and reducing ceiling effects by increasing the number of severity levels. The study was performed in the United Kingdom and Spain. Severity labels for 5 levels in each dimension were identified using response scaling. Focus groups were used to investigate the face and content validity of the new versions, including hypothetical health states generated from those versions.ResultsSelecting labels at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles produced two alternative 5-level versions. Focus group work showed a slight preference for the wording ‘slight-moderate-severe’ problems, with anchors of ‘no problems’ and ‘unable to do’ in the EQ-5D functional dimensions. Similar wording was used in the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. Hypothetical health states were well understood though participants stressed the need for the internal coherence of health states.ConclusionsA 5-level version of the EQ-5D has been developed by the EuroQol Group. Further testing is required to determine whether the new version improves sensitivity and reduces ceiling effects.


Pediatrics | 2009

Being bullied: Associated factors in children and adolescents 8 to 18 years old in 11 European countries

Filippos Analitis; Mariska Klein Velderman; Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer; S.B. Detmar; Michael Erhart; Mike Herdman; Silvina Berra; Jordi Alonso; Luis Rajmil

OBJECTIVES. To analyze the prevalence of bullying victims among children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years in 11 European countries and to investigate the associated sociodemographic, physical, and psychosocial factors. METHODS. Being a bullying victim was measured by using the social acceptance (bullying) scale from the Kidscreen-52, a health-related quality-of-life questionnaire administered to 16 210 children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 and their parents in postal or school-based surveys in 11 European countries. Standardized mean differences (effect size) were computed to measure the percentage of children/adolescents scoring 1 SD below the mean on the Kidscreen bullying scale. Logistic regression models were used to determine which sociodemographic, physical, and psychosocial factors were associated with being bullied. RESULTS. The percentage of children being bullied was 20.6% for the entire sample, ranging from 10.5% in Hungary to 29.6% in the United Kingdom. In almost all countries the factors most strongly associated with being bullied were younger age, having probable mental health problems, having a low score on the Kidscreen-52 moods and emotions dimensions, and poor social support. Using the grand mean for all countries as the reference category, there was an above-average likelihood of children or adolescents reporting that they had been victims of bullying in 5 countries (Austria, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom), and a below-average likelihood in 3 countries (France, Greece, Hungary). CONCLUSIONS. This study indicated considerable variation between countries in the prevalence of those perceiving themselves to be victims of bullying but also revealed a clear profile of those likely to be bullied. The study also suggests that the Kidscreen bullying scale could be useful in identifying potential bullying victims.


Quality of Life Research | 2010

Discriminative capacity of the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 as measures of health status in population health survey

Oriol Cunillera; Ricard Tresserras; Luis Rajmil; Gemma Vilagut; Pilar Brugulat; Mike Herdman; Anna Mompart; Antonia Medina; Yolanda Pardo; Jordi Alonso; John Brazier; Montse Ferrer

PurposeTo compare the EQ-5D, SF-6D, and SF-12 in terms of their capacity to discriminate between groups defined by relevant socio-demographic and health characteristics in a general population survey.MethodsData were obtained from the 2006 Catalan Health Interview Survey, a representative sample (nxa0=xa04,319) of the general population of Catalonia (Spain). Effect sizes (ES) and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to evaluate the instruments’ capacity to distinguish between groups based on socio-demographic variables, recent health problems, perceived health, psychological distress, and selected chronic conditions.ResultsAll instruments showed a similar discriminative capacity between groups based on socio-demographic variables, recent medical visit (ESxa0=xa00.47–0.55), activity limitations (ESxa0=xa00.92–0.98), perceived health (ESxa0=xa00.97–1.33), and psychological well-being (ESxa0=xa01.17–1.57). Effect sizes between respondents with and without any of fourteen selected chronic conditions were large (0.76–1.04) for 4, moderate (0.55–0.74) for 8, and small (0.17–0.39) for two on the EQ-5D index. A similar pattern was observed for the SF-12 but ES were predominantly moderate (7 conditions) or small (6 conditions) on the SF-6D.ConclusionsThe EQ-5D and SF-12 were largely comparable in estimating the health burden of chronic conditions, recent health problems, and social inequalities. The SF-6D was less sensitive than the EQ-5D index and SF-12, particularly for physical chronic conditions.


Quality of Life Research | 2008

Changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a population-based sample of children and adolescents after 3 years of follow-up

Jorge A Palacio-Vieira; Ester Villalonga-Olives; Jose M. Valderas; Mireia Espallargues; Mike Herdman; Silvina Berra; J. Alonso; Luis Rajmil

ObjectivesTo assess changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children and adolescents over a 3-year period and to examine factors associated with change.MethodsA representative sample of Spanish children and adolescents aged 8–18xa0years and their parents completed the KIDSCREEN-52 questionnaire at baseline and again after 3xa0years. Data were also collected on gender, pubertal development (PD), and family socio-economic status (SES). Change in HRQOL over time was evaluated using effect sizes (ES). Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to analyze associations among changes in KIDSCREEN scores, socio-demographic factors, and pubertal development.ResultsResponse rate at follow-up was 54% (nxa0=xa0454). Overall, HRQoL worsened in eight out of the ten KIDSCREEN dimensions, with ES ranging from −0.10 (Moods and Emotions) to −0.34 (Psychological Well-being). The decrease was most marked in the intermediate age group (13–17xa0years of age at follow-up) and in girls. In the GEE models, pubertal development more strongly impacted changes in girls than in boys.ConclusionsIn this representative, population-based sample of children and adolescents, moderate decrements in HRQoL were observed after 3 years. Changes were particularly important among girls and in relation to pubertal development. These results could provide useful reference data for other longitudinal studies in population sub-groups.


Contact Dermatitis | 2009

Principles and methodology for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ-2002) to Spanish and Catalan

Nohemi Sala‐Sastre; Mike Herdman; Lidia Navarro; Miriam De LaPRADA; Ramon M. Pujol; Consol Serra; Jordi Alonso; Mari-Ann Flyvholm; Ana Giménez-Arnau

Background: Occupational skin diseases are among the most frequent work‐related diseases in industrialized countries. The Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire (NOSQ‐2002), developed in English, is a useful tool for screening of occupational skin diseases.


Journal of Adolescence | 2010

Brief report: The KIDSCREEN follow-up study on Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Spanish children and adolescents. Pilot test and representativeness

Jorge A Palacio-Vieira; Ester Villalonga-Olives; J. Alonso; Jose M. Valderas; Mike Herdman; Mireia Espallargues; Silvina Berra; Luis Rajmil

The Spanish KIDSCREEN follow-up study reassessed the Spanish baseline sample (n=840) of the European KIDSCREEN study 3 years later (2006). The aims of this paper were to describe the KIDSCREEN follow-up study and the pilot test, and to analyze participation rates and representativeness. Instruments included the KIDSCREEN-52 HRQoL measure and a set of scales including the possible explanatory variables. Focus groups and individual interviews were carried out in a pilot test. Participants were compared with non-participants at baseline, and also with Eurostat census data. Twenty-two out of 24 subjects were interviewed in the pilot test. Fifteen items needed to be modified after the pilot test. Participation rate reached 54% (n=454). Participants (mean age=12.71 years old) were on average 6 months younger than non-participants (p=0.03), and from more educated families. KIDSCREEN follow-up instrumentation seems adequate for collecting factors with potential influence on HRQoL. Follow-up respondents representativeness seems to be acceptable.


Quality of Life Research | 2008

The adaptation into Spanish of the Coddington Life Events Scales (CLES)

Ester Villalonga-Olives; Jose M. Valderas; Jorge A Palacio-Vieira; Mike Herdman; Luis Rajmil; J. Alonso

AimsTo obtain a conceptually and psychometrically equivalent Spanish version of the Coddington Life Events Scales (CLES) for children and adolescents and to test their psychometric properties.MethodsForward and backward translations were performed. Comprehension, acceptability, and alternative translations were tested in focus groups and semi-structured interviews. An expert panel and the copyright holders of the original version were actively involved. Test–retest reliability [Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)] was assessed by administering the questionnaire on two occasions 3xa0months apart to children aged 12–14xa0years (nxa0=xa030). Construct validity was assessed by comparing children’s responses with those of their parents (nxa0=xa019). The methods replicated those of the validation of the original version.ResultsOf the 53 CLES items translated, ten were found to be difficult to understand. Following back-translation, seven items were modified and a final version was obtained. Test–retest ICC reliability for total scores was 0.63. The ICC between children and parents was 0.42. Both results were very similar to those reported for the original version.ConclusionsThese preliminary findings suggest that the Spanish version of the CLES is understandable and acceptable and that it is similar to the original in terms of validity and reliability. Although further validation is needed, it is recommended for use in research settings in Spain.


Quality of Life Research | 2017

An exploration of differences between Japan and two European countries in the self-reporting and valuation of pain and discomfort on the EQ-5D

Yan Feng; Mike Herdman; Floortje van Nooten; Charles S. Cleeland; David Parkin; Shunya Ikeda; Ataru Igarashi; Nancy Devlin

PurposeTo investigate the systematic differences in the self-reporting and valuation of overall health and, in particular, pain/discomfort between three countries (England/UK, Japan, and Spain) on the EQ-5D.MethodsExisting datasets were used to explore differences in responses on the EQ-5D descriptive system between Japan (3L and 5L), the UK (3L), England (5L), and Spain (5L), particularly on the dimension of pain/discomfort. The role of different EQ dimensions in determining self-reported overall health scores for the EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) was investigated using ordinary least squares regression. Time trade-off (TTO) results from Japanese and UK respondents for the EQ-5D-3L as well as Japanese and English respondents for the EQ-5D-5L were compared using t tests.ResultsFor the EQ-5D-3L, a higher percentage of respondents in Japan than in the UK reported ‘no pain/discomfort’ (81.6 vs 67.0%, respectively); for the EQ-5D-5L, the proportions were 79.2% in Spain, 73.2% in Japan, and 63–64% in England, after adjusting for age differences in samples. The ‘pain/discomfort’ dimension had the largest impact on respondents’ self-reported EQ-VAS only for EQ-5D-3L in Japan. Using the EQ-5D-3L, Japanese respondents were considerably less willing to trade off time to avoid pain/discomfort than the UK respondents; for example, moving from health state, 11121 (some problems with pain/discomfort) to 11131 (extreme pain/discomfort) represented a decrement of 0.65 on the observed TTO value in the UK compared with 0.15 in Japan. Using the EQ-5D-5L, Japanese respondents were also less willing to trade off time to avoid pain/discomfort than respondents in England; however, the difference in values was much smaller than that observed using EQ-5D-3L data.ConclusionsThis study provides evidence of between-country differences in the self-reporting and valuation of health, including pain/discomfort, when using EQ-5D in general population samples. The results suggest a need for caution when comparing or aggregating EQ-5D self-reported data in multi-country studies.


Quality of Life Research | 2017

Using EQ-5D-3L and OAB-5D to assess changes in the health-related quality of life of men with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Zalmai Hakimi; Mike Herdman; Marco Pavesi; Nancy Devlin; Jameel Nazir; Christopher K. Hoyle; Isaac Odeyemi

ObjectivesTo assess changes in the health status of men with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH) using the EQ-5D-3L and OAB-5D instruments and to evaluate the sensitivity of the instruments.MethodsData were available from a large randomised phase III trial of men with moderate-to-severe storage and voiding LUTS/BPH (NEPTUNE). Men received a fixed-dose combination of solifenacin 6xa0mg plus oral controlled absorption system (OCAS™) formulation of tamsulosin (TOCAS, 0.4xa0mg), TOCAS monotherapy or placebo and completed the EQ-5D-3L and OAB-5D at baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12. Analysis of covariance was used to estimate changes in EQ-5D-3L Index, EQ-VAS and OAB-5D. Changes in dimension level were summarised using the Paretian Classification of Health Change (PCHC).ResultsImproved health-related quality of life from baseline was seen in all treatment arms on EQ-5D-3L and OAB-5D at week 12, although only OAB-5D showed statistically significant differences between active treatment and placebo, both on the index score and using the PCHC approach. Effect sizes in the active treatment groups were large (>0.8) on OAB-5D but small (≈0.2) on EQ-5D-3L. EQ-5D-3L showed a very high ceiling effect (45% of men reported full health at baseline) and a substantial proportion of these men reported improvements at week 12 in several dimensions of OAB-5D.ConclusionsA large ceiling effect on EQ-5D-3L substantially limited its sensitivity in this population. OAB-5D proved more sensitive to changes in health status and could be considered a complement to ED-5D-3L as a source of utilities for health economic modelling.


European Journal of Dermatology | 2015

Valid screening questions useful to diagnose hand and forearm eczema are available in the Spanish language, a new tool for global research

Anna Martí-Margarit; Josep Maria Manresa; Mike Herdman; Ramon M. Pujol; Consol Serra; Mary-Ann Flyvholm; Ana Giménez-Arnau

Hand eczema is an impacting cutaneous disease. Globally valid tools that help to diagnose hand and forearm eczema are required.ObjectiveTo validate the questions to detect hand and/or forearm eczema included in the “Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire” (NOSQ-2002) in the Spanish language.Materials and methodsAprospective pilot studywas conducted with 80 employees of a cleaning company and a retrospective one involving 2,546 individuals. The responses were analysed for sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. The final diagnosis according to the patients’ hospital records, the specialty care records and the physical examination was taken as gold standard. The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) was also evaluated.ResultsSensitivity and specificity, in a worst case scenario (WC) combining both questions, were 96.5% and 66.7%, respectively, and in a per protocol (PP) analysis, were 96.5% and 75.2%.ConclusionThe questions validated detected eczema effectively, making this tool suitable for use e.g. in multicentre epidemiological studies or clinical trials.

Collaboration


Dive into the Mike Herdman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nancy Devlin

University of Sheffield

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Silvina Berra

National University of Cordoba

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jordi Alonso

Pompeu Fabra University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Montse Ferrer

Autonomous University of Barcelona

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge