Mike Krebs
California State University, Los Angeles
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mike Krebs.
Electronic Journal of Linear Algebra | 2008
Mike Krebs; Anthony Shaheen
The spectrum of a Johnson graph is known to be given by the Eberlein polynomial. In this paper, a straightforward representation-theoretic derivation of this fact is presented. Also discussed are some consequences of this formula, such as the fact that infinitely many of them are Ramanujan.
American Mathematical Monthly | 2014
Richard Katz; Mike Krebs; Anthony Shaheen
Abstract We prove that if a real-valued function of the plane sums to zero on the four vertices of every unit square, then it must be the zero function. This fact implies a lower bound in a “coloring of the plane” problem similar to the famous Hadwiger–Nelson problem, which asks for the smallest number of colors needed to assign every point in the plane a color so that no two points of unit distance apart have the same color.
College Mathematics Journal | 2013
Mike Krebs; Natalie C. Martinez
Summary On any finite graph, the number of closed walks of length k is equal to the sum of the kth powers of the eigenvalues of any adjacency matrix. This simple observation is the basis for the combinatorial trace method, wherein we attempt to count (or bound) the number of closed walks of a given length so as to obtain information about the graphs eigenvalues, and vice versa. We give a brief overview and present some simple but interesting examples. The method is also the source of interesting, accessible undergraduate projects.
College Mathematics Journal | 2018
Mike Krebs
Let Q denote the set of rational numbers and R the set of reals. Consider the function k : Q → Q defined by k(x) = 0 if x < √2 and k(x) = 1 if x > √2. A standard exercise in an introductory point-set topology class is to show that k is continuous but does not extend continuously to a function from R to R. Here, we topologize Q in the standard way, i.e., as a subspace of R where R has the Euclidean topology. One way to think of this is that the standard topology on Q does not “detect” continuous extensions to R. Can any topology on Q do so? More precisely:
Archive | 2011
Mike Krebs; Anthony Shaheen
Mathematics Magazine | 2010
Carlos Arcos; Gary Brookfield; Mike Krebs
American Mathematical Monthly | 2010
Mike Krebs; Thomas Wright
Applied general topology | 2017
Mike Krebs
Involve, A Journal of Mathematics | 2016
Kevin Cramer; Mike Krebs; Nicole Shabazi; Anthony Shaheen; Edward Voskanian
The Mathematical Intelligencer | 2009
Mike Krebs