Mikhail Enikeev

RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES AFTER MONOPOLAR VERSUS LASER ENDOSCOPIC ENUCLEATION OF THE PROSTATE: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

INTRODUCTION Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) has been recognized as a viable treatment modality for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and functional outcomes of three different techniques of EEP, including monopolar enucleation (MEP), holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), and thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP). METHODS The study consisted of a retrospective comparison of pre- and postoperative parameters in men undergoing three types of EEP: MEP, HoLEP, and ThuLEP. Functional parameters were evaluated before and 6 months after surgery, which included the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum flow rate, postvoid residual volume, prostate volume, and sodium levels of all patients. RESULTS A total of 551 men with the mean age of 67.1 years were included in the study. Of these, MEP was performed on 95 patients, HoLEP was performed on 254 patients, and ThuLEP on 202 patients. The mean mass of morcellated tissue obtained during the three techniques did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Mean procedure times of ThuLEP and HoLEP were shorter than MEP demonstrating 72, 76, and 86 minutes, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean catheterization time following laser EEPs was shorter than MEP as shown by 1.3, 1.3, and 3.8 days, respectively (p < 0.01). Hospital stay times of HoLEP and ThuLEP were shorter than MEP demonstrated by 3.3, 3.4, and 6.9 days, respectively (p < 0.01). Patients after MEP had significant decrease in postoperative hemoglobin and sodium levels. All the groups showed statistically significant improvement in the aforementioned parameters following treatment. CONCLUSIONS Both techniques of laser enucleation proved to be efficacious in the management of BPH. MEP of the prostate seems to be a highly promising addition to the list of enucleation techniques and was determined to be an effective and acceptable procedure, despite a higher complication rate.

A randomized trial comparing the learning curve of three endoscopic enucleation techniques (HoLEP, ThuFLEP and MEP) for BPH using mentoring approach – initial results

OBJECTIVE To assess the differences in the learning curve associated with different techniques of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety patients were randomly assigned into 3 groups (30 patients in each): HoLEP, ThuFLEP or MEP. Inclusion criteria for the study included prostate volume <80 cc, IPSS > 20, or Qmax < 10. The EEPs were performed by 3 surgeons experienced in transurethral resection of the prostate. Assignment of surgeons to surgical technique was also randomized. None of the surgeons had prior experience in EEP. RESULTS ThuFLEP was slightly superior (with no significant difference [P > .05]) to HoLEP and MEP in terms of overall enucleation rate-1.0 g/min vs 0.8 g/min and 0.7 g/min, respectively. We observed similar enucleation rates at the initial stages of training (first 20 surgeries) with insignificant increase in ThuFLEP efficiency. At next 10 surgeries ThuFLEP and HoLEP efficiency were higher than of MEP (P < .001) without significant difference between techniques of laser EEP (P = .07). CONCLUSION Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate can be adopted safely and effectively within 30 surgeries if the technique is learned with a mentoring approach. EEP is shown to be safe and effective even in the initial stages of learning. Laser EEP (HoLEP, ThuFLEP) appears to lend itself to quicker adaptation compared MEP.

PD23-07 EFFECT OF HOLMIUM LASER ENUCLEATION OF THE PROSTATE (HOLEP) ON THE SEXUAL FUNCTION

IPSS, Qmax, residual volume) were recorded preoperatively and at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: Median initial prostate volume was not significantly different between the groups (LV: 44.1ml, TURP: 44.8ml; p1⁄40.47). After catheter removal, the relative prostate volume reduction (RVR) was significantly lower following LV (table). Six weeks and six months after LV RVR increased significantly (both p<0.001). However, RVR remained significantly lower after LV throughout the entire 3-year observation period (table). All clinical outcome parameters improved significantly and remained so for 3 years without relevant differences between the groups. No significant differences in overall re-treatment rates were observed (LV: 5 (5.1%), TURP: 5 (6.5%), p1⁄40.75) CONCLUSIONS: After 3 years, prostate volume reduction remained inferior after 120W greenlight LV compared to TURP. However, as yet the lower volume reduction did not translate into inferior functional outcome or higher retreatment rates. Further follow-up of our cohort will reveal if the extent of tissue ablation impacts the long-term outcome of the procedures.

Imaging technologies in the diagnosis and treatment of acute pyelonephritis

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the possibilities of ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing acute pyelonephritis (AP) and renal abscess. Patients and Methods Two hundred and seven patients with AP were followed up from 2010 throughout 2015. All the patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 included 113 (54.6%) patients with acute nonobstructive pyelonephritis; group 2 included 33 (15.9%) patients with acute obstructive pyelonephritis; and group 3 included 61 (29.5%) pregnant female patients with AP. All 207 patients with AP underwent ultrasound examination of the kidneys. Computed tomography (CT) was performed in 87 patients (42.0%). MRI was performed in 14 patients (6.7%). Results We identified the ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance (MR), and CT-signs of acute renal inflammation at different stages of the process. The main us-signs were decreased mobility of the kidney, its enlargement, thickened parenchyma, hydrophilic parenchyma and an impairment of corticomedullary differentiation. The typical CT-signs of AP were enlargement of the kidney with its thickened parenchyma and an impairment of corticomedullary differentiation. The main MR-signs of AP were enlargement of the kidney (>12 cm lengthwise), thickened parenchyma (<2 cm in the median segment of the kidney) and an impairment of corticomedullary differentiation. Conclusions Assessment of the structural and functional state of renal parenchyma and the upper urinary tract using techniques such as ultrasonography, CT, MRI contributes to more efficacious treatment of patients at different stages of AP and timely drainage with properly adjusted pathogenetic therapy at the infiltrative stage is instrumental in preventing purulent destructive forms of AP.

Percutaneous US-guided renal cryoablation using 3D modeling

Introduction The article describes the first experience of performing percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided cryoablation of renal tumor and assesses the safety and short-term results of treatment. Materials and Methods Twelve patients were subjected to US-guided cryoablation of renal tumor in 2015. The tumor size in 11 patients was up to 3.0 cm (T1а); in one female patient, 4.5 cm (T1b). Tumors were assessed according to the PADUA score. In eight patients, it was 6-7 (low); in three patients, 8-9 (average); in one, 10 (high). All the patients underwent US examination using a FlexFocus 800 apparatus with convex abdominal transducers. Before surgery and 6 months later, all the patients underwent renal Doppler US and contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Results The average cryoablation time was 60 min. Seven operations were performed under spinal anesthesia and five operations under local anesthesia. The follow-up period lasted 8 months on average. According to the ultrasonography and Doppler findings, after 6 months, the tumor (T1a) in 11 patients reduced in size by an average of 7-8 mm and had no blood supply. T1b patients mass size reduces from 4.5 to 3.7 cm; however, a 1.5 cm area with a high attenuation gradient of the contrast medium was visualized. Later, the patient was subjected to laparoscopic renal resection. Histological finding revealed clear-cell carcinoma. Conclusions We consider percutaneous US-guided cryoablation as a method of choice for patients with stage T1a renal tumor localized on the posterior or lateral surface in the inferior or middle segment without sinus involvement and PADUA <9.

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for small, large and giant prostatic hyperplasia: tips and tricks

Introduction Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) allows to treat extremely large prostates (>200 cm3). The aim of the study was to compare the efficiency of HoLEP for prostates of different sizes. Methods Four hundred and fifty-nine patients were divided into three groups: group 1 included 278 patients (<100 cm3); group 2 included 169 patients (100-200 cm3); group 3 included 12 patients (>200 cm3). Results The duration of enucleation in group 1 was 56.5 ± 10.7 min; in group 2 was 96.4 ± 24.9 min; in group 3 was 120.9 ± 35 min. The duration of morcellation in group 1 was 37.5 ± 7.3 min; in group 2 was 63.3 ± 11.2 min; in group 3 was 84.0 ± 25.6 min. The enucleation efficiency in group 3 (1.70 g/min) was higher (p<0.05) than in group 1 (1.05 g/min) and group 2 (1.23 g/min). Morcelation efficiency was lower in groups 1 and 2 (1.58 and 1.87 g/min, respectively) than in group 3 (2.45 g/min) (p<0.05). Follow-up period lasted 18 months. There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in International Prostate Symptom Score, Qmax, quality of life and postvoid residual volume for 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after surgery. Conclusions HoLEP is a safe, highly efficacious and a size-independent procedure.