Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mikhail Lomarev is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mikhail Lomarev.


Neurology | 2005

Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals

Meenakshi B. Iyer; U. Mattu; Jordan Grafman; Mikhail Lomarev; Susumu Sato; Eric M. Wassermann

Background: Data from the human motor cortex suggest that, depending on polarity, direct current (DC) brain polarization can depress or activate cortical neurons. Activating effects on the frontal lobe might be beneficial for patients with frontal lobe disorders. This phase 1 study tested the safety of frontal DC, including its effects on frontal and other brain functions. Methods: The authors applied 20 minutes of anodal, cathodal, or sham DC to the left prefrontal cortex in three groups of right-handed subjects and looked for effects on global measures of processing and psychomotor speed, emotion, and verbal fluency, a measure of local cortical function. In one experiment (n = 30), the authors tested before and after 1 mA DC and monitored EEG in 9 subjects. In two other experiments using 1 mA (n = 43) and 2 mA (n = 30), the authors tested before and then starting 5 minutes after the onset of DC. Results: All subjects tolerated DC well. There were no significant effects on performance with 1 mA DC. At 2 mA, verbal fluency improved significantly with anodal and decreased mildly with cathodal DC. There were no clinically significant effects on the other measures. Conclusions: Limited exposure to direct current polarization of the prefrontal cortex is safe and can enhance verbal fluency selectively in healthy subjects. As such, it deserves consideration as a procedure to improve frontal lobe function in patients.


Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry | 2010

Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease

David H. Benninger; Mikhail Lomarev; Grisel Lopez; Eric M. Wassermann; Xiaobai Li; Elaine Considine; Mark Hallett

Background Progression of Parkinsons disease (PD) is characterised by motor deficits which eventually respond less to dopaminergic therapy and thus pose a therapeutic challenge. Deep brain stimulation has proven efficacy but carries risks and is not possible in all patients. Non-invasive brain stimulation has shown promising results and may provide a therapeutic alternative. Objective To investigate the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of PD. Design Randomised, double blind, sham controlled study. Setting Research institution. Methods The efficacy of anodal tDCS applied to the motor and prefrontal cortices was investigated in eight sessions over 2.5 weeks. Assessment over a 3 month period included timed tests of gait (primary outcome measure) and bradykinesia in the upper extremities, Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Serial Reaction Time Task, Beck Depression Inventory, Health Survey and self-assessment of mobility. Results Twenty-five PD patients were investigated, 13 receiving tDCS and 12 sham stimulation. tDCS improved gait by some measures for a short time and improved bradykinesia in both the on and off states for longer than 3 months. Changes in UPDRS, reaction time, physical and mental well being, and self-assessed mobility did not differ between the tDCS and sham interventions. Conclusion tDCS of the motor and prefrontal cortices may have therapeutic potential in PD but better stimulation parameters need to be established to make the technique clinically viable. This study was publicly registered (clinicaltrials.org: NCT00082342).


Movement Disorders | 2006

Placebo-controlled study of rTMS for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Mikhail Lomarev; Sulada Kanchana; William Bara-Jimenez; Meenakshi B. Iyer; Eric M. Wassermann; Mark Hallett

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for gait and bradykinesia in patients with Parkinsons disease (PD). In a double‐blind placebo‐controlled study, we evaluated the effects of 25 Hz rTMS in 18 PD patients. Eight rTMS sessions were performed over a 4‐week period. Four cortical targets (left and right motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex) were stimulated in each session, with 300 pulses each, 100% of motor threshold intensity. Left motor cortex (MC) excitability was assessed using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from the abductor pollicis brevis. During the 4 weeks, times for executing walking and complex hand movements tests gradually decreased. The therapeutic rTMS effect lasted for at least 1 month after treatment ended. Right‐hand bradykinesia improvement correlated with increased MEP amplitude evoked by left MC rTMS after individual sessions, but improvement overall did not correlate with MC excitability. rTMS sessions appear to have a cumulative benefit for improving gait, as well as reducing upper limb bradykinesia in PD patients. Although short‐term benefit may be due to MC excitability enhancement, the mechanism of cumulative benefit must have another explanation.


Clinical Neurophysiology | 2007

Safety study of high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with chronic stroke ☆ ☆☆

Mikhail Lomarev; Deog Young Kim; S. Pirio Richardson; Bernhard Voller; Mark Hallett

OBJECTIVE Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a potential therapeutic tool to rehabilitate chronic stroke patients. In this study, the safety of high-frequency rTMS in stroke was investigated (Phase I). METHODS The safety of 20 and 25 Hz rTMS over the motor cortex (MC) of the affected hemisphere, with intensities of 110-130% of the motor threshold (MT), was evaluated using surface electromyography (EMG) of hand and arm muscles. RESULTS Brief EMG bursts, possibly representing peripheral manifestations of after discharges, and spread of excitation to proximal muscles are considered to be associated with a high risk of seizure occurrence. These events were recorded after the rTMS trains. Neither increased MC excitability nor improved pinch force dynamometry was found after rTMS. CONCLUSIONS Stimulation parameters for rTMS, which are safe for healthy volunteers, may lead to a higher risk for seizure occurrence in chronic stroke patients. SIGNIFICANCE rTMS at rates of 20 and 25 Hz using above threshold stimulation potentially increases the risk of seizures in patients with chronic stroke.


Movement Disorders | 2011

Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of focal hand dystonia

David H. Benninger; Mikhail Lomarev; Grisel Lopez; Natassja Pal; David A. Luckenbaugh; Mark Hallett

The treatment of writers cramp, a task‐specific focal hand dystonia, needs new approaches. A deficiency of inhibition in the motor cortex might cause writers cramp. Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates cortical excitability and may provide a therapeutic alternative. In this randomized, double‐blind, sham‐controlled study, we investigated the efficacy of cathodal stimulation of the contralateral motor cortex in 3 sessions in 1 week. Assessment over a 2‐week period included clinical scales, subjective ratings, kinematic handwriting analysis, and neurophysiological evaluation. Twelve patients with unilateral dystonic writers cramp were investigated; 6 received transcranial direct current and 6 sham stimulation. Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation had no favorable effects on clinical scales and failed to restore normal handwriting kinematics and cortical inhibition. Subjective worsening remained unexplained, leading to premature study termination. Repeated sessions of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex yielded no favorable results supporting a therapeutic potential in writers cramp.


Clinical Neurophysiology | 2009

Safety study of 50 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with Parkinson's disease.

David H. Benninger; Mikhail Lomarev; Eric M. Wassermann; Grisel Lopez; Elise Houdayer; Rebecca E. Fasano; Nguyet Dang; Mark Hallett

OBJECTIVE Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has shown promising results in treating Parkinsons disease (PD), but the best values for rTMS parameters are not established. Fifty Hertz rTMS may be superior to 25 Hz rTMS investigated so far. The objective of this study was to determine if 50 Hz rTMS could be delivered safely in PD patients since current safety limits are exceeded. METHODS Fifty Hertz rTMS was applied with a circular coil on the primary motor cortex (M1). Stimulation intensity was first tested at 60% rest motor threshold [RMT] and 0.5 s train duration and then increased in 0.5 s steps to 2 s, and by 10% steps to 90% RMT. Multi-channel electromyography (EMG) was recorded to control for signs of increasing time-locked EMG activity including correlates of the spread of excitation and after-discharges, or an increase of M1 excitability. Pre- and post-50 Hz rTMS assessments included EEG, Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Grooved Pegboard Test, Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT), Folstein Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and Verbal Fluency to control for motor and cognitive side effects. RESULTS Ten PD patients were investigated. Multi-channel EMG showed no signs of increased time-locked EMG activity including correlates of the spread of excitation and after-discharges, or increased M1 excitability in 9 patients. A PD patient with bi-temporal spikes in the pre-testing EEG had clinical and EMG correlates of spread of excitation at 90% RMT, but no seizure activity. Pre- and post-50 Hz assessment showed no changes. No adverse events were observed. Fifty Hertz rTMS was well tolerated except by 1 patient who wished to terminate the study due to facial muscle stimulation. CONCLUSION Fifty Hertz rTMS at an intensity of 90% RMT for 2 s appears safe in patients with PD, but caution should be taken for patients with paroxysmal EEG activity. For this reason, comprehensive screening should include EEG before higher-frequency rTMS is applied. SIGNIFICANCE This is the first study to investigate safety of 50 Hz rTMS in humans.


Muscle & Nerve | 2008

Changes in short afferent inhibition during phasic movement in focal dystonia

Sarah Pirio Richardson; Barbara Bliem; Mikhail Lomarev; Ejaz A. Shamim; Nguyet Dang; Mark Hallett

Impaired surround inhibition could account for the abnormal motor control seen in patients with focal hand dystonia, but the neural mechanisms underlying surround inhibition in the motor system are not known. We sought to determine whether an abnormality of the influence of sensory input at short latency could contribute to the deficit of surround inhibition in patients with focal hand dystonia (FHD). To measure digital short afferent inhibition (dSAI), subjects received electrical stimulation at the digit followed after 23 ms by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded over abductor digiti minimi (ADM) during rest and during voluntary phasic flexion of the second digit. F‐waves were also recorded. We studied 13 FHD patients and 17 healthy volunteers. FHD patients had increased homotopic dSAI in ADM during flexion of the second digit, suggesting that this process acts to diminish overflow during movement; this might be a compensatory mechanism. No group differences were observed in first dorsal interosseous. Further, no differences were seen in the F‐waves between groups, suggesting that the changes in dSAI are mediated at the cortical level rather than at the spinal cord. Understanding the role of these inhibitory circuits in dystonia may lead to development of therapeutic agents aimed at restoring inhibition. Muscle Nerve, 2007


Clinical Neurophysiology | 2008

2. Changes in short afferent inhibition during phasic movement in focal dystonia

S. Pirio Richardson; Barbara Bliem; Mikhail Lomarev; Ejaz A. Shamim; Nguyet Dang; Mark Hallett

Impaired surround inhibition could account for the abnormal motor control seen in patients with focal hand dystonia, but the neural mechanisms underlying surround inhibition in the motor system are not known. We sought to determine whether an abnormality of the influence of sensory input at short latency could contribute to the deficit of surround inhibition in patients with focal hand dystonia (FHD). To measure digital short afferent inhibition (dSAI), subjects received electrical stimulation at the digit followed after 23 ms by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded over abductor digiti minimi (ADM) during rest and during voluntary phasic flexion of the second digit. F-waves were also recorded. We studied 13 FHD patients and 17 healthy volunteers. FHD patients had increased homotopic dSAI in ADM during flexion of the second digit, suggesting that this process acts to diminish overflow during movement; this might be a compensatory mechanism. No group differences were observed in first dorsal interosseous. Further, no differences were seen in the F-waves between groups, suggesting that the changes in dSAI are mediated at the cortical level rather than at the spinal cord. Understanding the role of these inhibitory circuits in dystonia may lead to development of therapeutic agents aimed at restoring inhibition.


Experimental Brain Research | 2006

Short-latency afferent inhibition during selective finger movement

Bernhard Voller; Alan St Clair Gibson; James M. Dambrosia; Sarah Pirio Richardson; Mikhail Lomarev; Nguyet Dang; Mark Hallett


Journal of Neurophysiology | 2005

Long-Latency Afferent Inhibition During Selective Finger Movement

Bernhard Voller; Alan St Clair Gibson; Mikhail Lomarev; Sulada Kanchana; James M. Dambrosia; Nguyet Dang; Mark Hallett

Collaboration


Dive into the Mikhail Lomarev's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Hallett

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eric M. Wassermann

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nguyet Dang

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Grisel Lopez

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David H. Benninger

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Bernhard Voller

Medical University of Vienna

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ejaz A. Shamim

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

James M. Dambrosia

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Meenakshi B. Iyer

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge