Mikki Campbell

Surgical resection of epidural disease improves local control following postoperative spine stereotactic body radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly being applied to the postoperative spine metastases patient. Our aim was to identify clinical and dosimetric predictors of local control (LC) and survival. METHODS Eighty patients treated between October 2008 and February 2012 with postoperative SBRT were identified from our prospective database and retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS The median follow-up was 8.3 months. Thirty-five patients (44%) were treated with 18-26 Gy in 1 or 2 fractions, and 45 patients (56%) with 18-40 Gy in 3-5 fractions. Twenty-one local failures (26%) were observed, and the 1-year LC and overall survival (OS) rates were 84% and 64%, respectively. The most common site of failure was within the epidural space (15/21, 71%). Multivariate proportional hazards analysis identified systemic therapy post-SBRT as the only significant predictor of OS (P = .02) and treatment with 18-26 Gy/1 or 2 fractions (P = .02) and a postoperative epidural disease grade of 0 or 1 (0, no epidural disease; 1, epidural disease that compresses dura only, P = .003) as significant predictors of LC. Subset analysis for only those patients (n = 48/80) with high-grade preoperative epidural disease (cord deformed) indicated significantly greater LC rates when surgically downgraded to 0/1 vs 2 (P = .0009). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative SBRT with high total doses ranging from 18 to 26 Gy delivered in 1-2 fractions predicted superior LC, as did postoperative epidural grade.

Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Following In-Field Failure of Initial SBRT for Spinal Metastases

PURPOSE We report our experience in salvaging spinal metastases initially irradiated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), who subsequently progressed with imaging-confirmed local tumor progression, and were re-irradiated with a salvage second SBRT course to the same level. METHODS AND MATERIALS From a prospective database, 56 metastatic spinal segments in 40 patients were identified as having been irradiated with a salvage second SBRT course to the same level. In addition, 24 of 56 (42.9%) segments had initially been irradiated with conventional external beam radiation therapy before the first course of SBRT. Local control (LC) was defined as no progression on magnetic resonance imaging at the treated segment, and calculated according to the competing risk model. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated for each patient treated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The median salvage second SBRT total dose and number of fractions was 30 Gy in 4 fractions (range, 20-35 Gy in 2-5 fractions), and for the first course of SBRT was 24 Gy in 2 fractions (range, 20-35 Gy in 1-5 fractions). The median follow-up time after salvage second SBRT was 6.8 months (range, 0.9-39 months), the median OS was 10.0 months, and the 1-year OS rate was 48%. A longer time interval between the first and second SBRT courses predicted for better OS (P=.02). The crude LC was 77% (43/56), the 1-year LC rate was 81%, and the median time to local failure was 3.0 months (range, 2.7-16.7 months). Of the 13 local failures, 85% (11/13) and 46% (6/13) showed progression within the epidural space and paraspinal soft tissues, respectively. Absence of baseline paraspinal disease predicted for better LC (P<.01). No radiation-induced vertebral compression fractures or cases of myelopathy were observed. CONCLUSION A second course of spine SBRT, most often with 30 Gy in 4 fractions, for spinal metastases that failed initial SBRT is a feasible and efficacious salvage treatment option.

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Indications, Outcomes, and Points of Caution:

Study Design: A broad narrative review. Objectives: The objective of this article is to provide a technical review of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) planning and delivery, indications for treatment, outcomes, complications, and the challenges of response assessment. The surgical approach to spinal metastases is discussed with an overview of emerging minimally invasive techniques. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted on the techniques, outcomes, and developments in SBRT and surgery for spinal metastases. Results: The optimal management of patients with spinal metastases is complex and requires multidisciplinary assessment from an oncologic team that is familiar with the shifting paradigm as a consequence of evolving techniques in surgery and stereotactic radiation, as well as new developments in systemic agents. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score and the epidural spinal cord compression (Bilsky) grading system are useful tools that facilitate communication among oncologic team members and can direct management by providing a baseline assessment of risks prior to therapy. The combined multimodality approach with “separation surgery” followed by postoperative spine SBRT achieves thecal sac decompression, improves tumor control, and avoids complications that may be associated with more extensive surgery. Conclusion: Spine SBRT is a highly effective treatment that is capable of delivering ablative doses to the target while sparing the critical organs-at-risk, chiefly the critical neural tissues, within a short and manageable schedule. At the same time, surgery occupies an important role in select patients, particularly with the expanding availability and expertise in minimally invasive techniques. With rapid adoption of spine SBRT in centers outside of the academic setting, it is imperative for the practicing oncologist to understand the relevance and application of these evolving concepts.

SU-G-JeP2-01: A New Approach for MR-Only Treatment Planning: Tissue Segmentation-Based Pseudo-CT Generation Using T1-Weighted MRI.

PURPOSE To evaluate MR-only treatment planning for brain Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) based on pseudo-CT (pCT) generation using one set of T1-weighted MRI. METHODS T1-weighted MR and CT images from 12 patients who were eligible for brain SABR were retrospectively acquired for this study. MR-based pCT was generated by using a newly in-house developed algorithm based on MR tissue segmentation and voxel-based electron density (ED) assignment (pCTv). pCTs using bulk density assignment (pCTb where bone and soft tissue were assigned 800HU and 0HU,respectively), and water density assignment (pCTw where all tissues were assigned 0HU) were generated for comparison of ED assignment techniques. The pCTs were registered with CTs and contours of radiation targets and Organs-at-Risk (OARs) from clinical CT-based plans were copied to co-registered pCTs. Volumetric-Modulated-Arc-Therapy(VMAT) plans were independently created for pCTv and CT using the same optimization settings and a prescription (50Gy/10 fractions) to planning-target-volume (PTV) mean dose. pCTv-based plans and CT-based plans were compared with dosimetry parameters and monitor units (MUs). Beam fluence maps of CT-based plans were transferred to co-registered pCTs, and dose was recalculated on pCTs. Dose distribution agreement between pCTs and CT plans were quantified using Gamma analysis (2%/2mm, 1%/1mm with a 10% cut-off threshold) in axial, coronal and sagittal planes across PTV. RESULTS The average differences of PTV mean and maximum doses, and monitor units between independently created pCTv-based and CT-based plans were 0.5%, 1.5% and 1.1%, respectively. Gamma analysis of dose distributions of the pCTs and the CT calculated using the same fluence map resulted in average agreements of 92.6%/79.1%/52.6% with 1%/1mm criterion, and 98.7%/97.4%/71.5% with 2%/2mm criterion, for pCTv/CT, pCTb/CT and pCTw/CT, respectively. CONCLUSION Plans produced on Voxel-based pCT is dosimetrically more similar to CT plans than bulk assignment-based pCTs. MR-only treatment planning using voxel-based pCT generated from T1-wieghted MRI may be feasible.