Milan Vošmik

Liposomal doxorubicin combined with regional hyperthermia: Reducing systemic toxicity and improving locoregional efficacy in the treatment of solid tumors

Summary Incorporation of doxorubicin into polyethylene glycol-coated (pegylated) liposomes increases the therapeutic index, prolongs circulation time and enhances tumor localization. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is an established therapeutic agent in epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC), breast carcinoma or Kaposi’s sarcoma, and PLD administration results in reduction of toxicity. Addition of regional hyperthermia increases liposome extravasation, induces the doxorubicin release from the liposomes, and the combination of hyperthermia and doxorubicin itself may be supra-additive, resulting in enhanced antitumor efficacy in the heated region. Encouraging results have been reported for the combination of PLD and hyperthermia in EOC, breast carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma.

High-dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of penile carcinoma--first experience.

PURPOSE Interstitial low-dose rate brachytherapy (BRT) allows a conservative treatment of T1-T2 penile carcinoma. High-dose rate (HDR) BRT is often considered as a dangerous method for interstitial implants because of higher risk of complications. However, numerous reports suggest that results of HDR-BRT may be comparable to low-dose rate BRT. There are no data available in the literature regarding HDR interstitial BRT for carcinoma of the penis. METHODS AND MATERIALS Ten patients with early penile carcinoma were treated by interstitial hyperfractionated HDR-BRT at the dose of 18 times 3Gy twice daily between years 2002 and 2009. Breast interstitial BRT template was used for fixation and precise geometry reconstruction of stainless hollow needles. RESULTS Median followup was 20 months. Our BRT technique and fractionation schedule was well tolerated by all patients. Acute reaction consisted predominantly of penis edema and Grade 2 radiation mucositis that dissolved during 8 weeks after the treatment. We neither observed any postradiation necrosis nor urethral stenosis. The worst late side effects recorded were mild telanagiectasias in the treatment region. At the last followup, all patients were alive without evidence of the tumor and with fully functional organ. CONCLUSIONS Hyperfractionated interstitial HDR-BRT with 18 times 3 Gy per fraction twice daily is a promising method in selected patients of penile carcinoma and deserves further evaluation in a larger prospective study.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor as a Predictor of Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Gastric Carcinoma

Purpose:The purpose of our study was a retrospective evaluation whether the intensity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression predicts tumor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric carcinoma.Patients and Methods:Thirty-six patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (cT2–4 or N+) were studied. Preoperative treatment consisted of 30–45 Gy of gastric irradiation with continuous 5-fluorouracil and weekly cisplatin. Surgical resection was performed 4–6 weeks later. EGFR expression in pretreatment tumor biopsies was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Level of EGFR expression was determined from the intensity and extent of staining. Tumor response was defined as a reduction of at least one T-stage level and/or finding of intense tumor regression in histopathologic examination.Results:Seventeen patients responded to preoperative chemoradiation – 8 patients (22%) had pathologic complete response, 9 patients (25%) were downstaged. Positive EGFR expression was found in 8 tumors (22%), and represented a significant predictive marker of poor tumor response in multivariate logistic regression analysis (p = 0.015). Response to chemoradiotherapy was found in 60% (16/28) of EGFR negative patients and in 13% (1/8) of EGFR positive patients (p = 0.044). None of the eight EGFR positive patients achieved pathologic complete response in comparison with 8/28 (29%) of patients with EGFR negative staining (p = 0.16).Conclusion:EGFR may represent a molecular marker predictive for poor response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma.Ziel:Ziel dieser Studie war eine retrospektive Evaluierung, ob die Expressionsintensität des epidermalen Wachstumsfaktor-Rezeptors (EGFR) die Tumorantwort auf präoperative Chemoradiotherapie vorhersagt bei Patienten mit lokal fortgeschrittenem Magenkrebs.Patienten und Methodik:36 Patienten mit Adenokarzinom des Magens (cT2–4 oder N+) wurden untersucht. Die präoperative Behandlung bestand aus einer Bestrahlung des Magens mit 30–45 Gy mit fortlaufendem 5-Fluorouracil und wöchentlichem Cisplatin. Die operative Resektion wurde 4–6 Wochen später durchgeführt. Die Expression des EGFR in den vorbehandelten Biopsiepräparaten des Tumors wurde mittels Immunhistochemie gemessen. Die Höhe der EGFR-Expression wurde festgelegt nach der Intensität und dem Ausmaß der Färbung. Das Downstaging wurde definiert als eine Reduktion von mindestens einem T-Stadium und/oder einem Befund von Tumorregression in der histopathologischen Untersuchung.Ergebnisse:17 Patienten haben auf die präoperative Chemoradiotherapie angesprochen – 8 Patienten (22%) hatten eine pathologisch komplette Reaktion, 9 Patienten (25%) wurden „downgestaged“. Eine positive EGFR-Expression wurde in 8 Tumoren gefunden (22%), und stellte einen signifikanten Vorhersagefaktor dar für eine geringe Tumorantwort in multivariater logistischer Regressionsanalyse (p = 0,015). Eine Reaktion auf die Chemoradiotherapie wurde bei 60% (16/28) der EGFR-negativen Patienten festgestellt und bei 13% (1/8) der EGFR-positiven Patienten (p = 0,044). Keiner der 8 EGFR-positiven Patienten erreichte eine pathologisch komplette Reaktion im Vergleich zu 8/28 (29%) der Patienten mit EGFR-negativer Färbung (p = 0,16).Schlussfolgerung:Der EGFR stellt einen Vorhersagefaktor für eine geringe Reaktion auf die präoperative Chemoradiotherapie beim lokal fortgeschrittenen Magenkarzinom dar.

Biologic importance and prognostic significance of selected clinicopathological parameters in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, with emphasis on smoking, protein p16 INK4a expression, and HPV status

The aim of this study is to evaluate the biologic importance and prognostic significance of selected clinicopathological parameters in patients with oral (OSCC) and oropharyngeal (OPSCC) squamous cell carcinoma, with emphasis on smoking, protein p16(INK4a) (p16) expression, and human papillomavirus (HPV) status.The study sample consisted of 48 patients with OSCC and 44 patients with OPSCC. Half of the patients were nonsmokers and the other half were gender-, age- and tumor localization-matched smokers. p16 expression was detected in 17/48 (35 %) OSCCs and in 36/44 (82 %) OPSCCs and HPV DNA was present in 7/48 (15 %) OSCCs and in 35/44 (80 %) OPSCCs. The sensitivity and specificity of p16 expression for HPV DNA presence were 0.74 and 0.88, respectively. The OPSCCs were more frequently basaloid (p < 0.001) while the OSCCs were more frequently conventional (p < 0.000001). The OSCCs were more likely to recur locally and to be the cause of death (p = 0.009 in both parameters).The HPV-positive tumors were more frequently localized in oropharynx, were basaloid SCCs and were p16- and HPV-positive (p < 0.000001 in all 4 parameters). The HPV-negative tumors were more frequently localized in oral cavity (p < 0.000001), more frequently asociated with local, regional and locoregional recurence (p = 0.011, p = 0.019 and p = 0.030, respectively) and with tumor-related death (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference with regard to smoking history (p > 0.05). The survival of patients with HPV-positive tumors was significantly longer (median 112 months; 95% CI 54 - 112 months) than that of patients with HPV-negative tumors (median 17 months; 95% CI 12 - 39 months) (p < 0.001). The HPV status of OSCC/OPSCC is an important biological and prognostic parameter and should be examined in all cases, using PCR or immunohistochemical detection of surrogate marker p16. Smoking itself does not seem to be an important prognostic factor.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Postprostatectomy Radiotherapy Planning

PURPOSE To investigate whether the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate bed treatment planning could influence definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 21 consecutive patients referred for prostate bed radiotherapy were included in the present retrospective study. The CTV was delineated according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations on computed tomography (CT) and T(1)-weighted (T(1)w) and T(2)-weighted (T(2)w) MRI. The CTV magnitude, agreement, and spatial differences were evaluated on the planning CT scan after registration with the MRI scans. RESULTS The CTV was significantly reduced on the T(1)w and T(2)w MRI scans (13% and 9%, respectively) compared with the CT scans. The urinary bladder was drawn smaller on the CT scans and the rectum was smaller on the MRI scans. On T(1)w MRI, the rectum and urinary bladder were delineated larger than on T(2)w MRI. Minimal agreement was observed between the CT and T(2)w images. The main spatial differences were measured in the superior and superolateral directions in which the CTV on the MRI scans was 1.8-2.9 mm smaller. In the posterior and inferior border, no difference was seen between the CT and T(1)w MRI scans. On the T(2)w MRI scans, the CTV was larger in these directions (by 1.3 and 1.7 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The use of MRI in postprostatectomy radiotherapy planning resulted in a reduction of the CTV. The main differences were found in the superior part of the prostate bed. We believe T(2)w MRI enables more precise definition of prostate bed CTV than conventional planning CT.

Late toxicity after conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: Impact of previous surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Objectives:  To retrospectively compare late toxicity of conventional‐dose three‐dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D‐CRT) and high‐dose intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer.

Comparison of rectal dose-volume constraints for IMRT prostate treatment planning

The purpose of this paper is to compare different sets of rectal dose-volume constraints and to develop input criteria for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of prostate cancer. The IMRI treatment plans were created using Varian planning system (CadPlan with Helios module) for ten patients with localized prostate cancer (isocenter dose 78 Gy). The posterior portion of rectum was contoured as an extra volume (help volume). Three sets of input parameters for rectum with gradually increasing priorities (25-50-75-90) were designed for the inverse treatment planning: 1. dose-volume constraints allowing no more than 50, 40, 20 and 10% of the rectum volume be irradiated to 50, 60, 70, and 75 Gy, respectively-volume-based plans, priorities 25-90 (V25-90 plans); 2. maximum dose constraint of 74.1 Gy for rectum-plans with limited maximum reactal dose, priorities 25-90 (M25-90 plans); 3. maximum dose constraint of 50 Gy for the help volume-plans with limited maximum dose for the help volume, priorities 25-90 (H25-90 plans). Dose homogeneity in the planning target volume (PTV) and the rectal volumes (RV) irradiated to 50, 60, 70, and 75 Gy (RV 50-75 Gy) were recorded. Rectum sparing improved for all the plans with increasing priority. While the M plans had the lowest RV 75 Gy values, the H plans gave the minimum RV 50-70 Gy values. Plans were considered acceptable if at least 98% of the PTV was treated to 95% of the prescribed dose. In particular plan groups, the V75, M75, and H50 plans, together with the V50+M75 and H50+M75 combined plans, satisfied this condition and yielded the lowest rectal doses. The H50+M75 combined plan allowed optimal sparing of rectum (RV 50 Gy 51.6%, RV 60 Gy 38.5%, RV 70 Gy 26.0%, and RV 75 Gy 9.1%, respectively). An optima set of dose-based rectal constraints (maximum rectal dose 74.1 Gy, maximum help volume dose 50 Gy) has been developed for Varian planning software. These parameters will constitute a starting point for the prostate IMRT plan optimization.

Utilization of cone‐beam CT for reconstruction of dose distribution delivered in image‐guided radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma — bony landmark setup compared to fiducial markers setup

The purpose of this study was to compare two different styles of prostate IGRT: bony landmark (BL) setup vs. fiducial markers (FM) setup. Twenty‐nine prostate patients were treated with daily BL setup and 30 patients with daily FM setup. Delivered dose distribution was reconstructed on cone‐beam CT (CBCT) acquired once a week immediately after the alignment. Target dose coverage was evaluated by the proportion of the CTV encompassed by the 95% isodose. Original plans employed 1 cm safety margin. Alternative plans assuming smaller 7 mm margin between CTV and PTV were evaluated in the same way. Rectal and bladder volumes were compared with initial ones. While the margin reduction in case of BL setup makes the prostate coverage significantly worse (p=0.0003, McNemars test), in case of FM setup with the reduced 7 mm margin, the prostate coverage is even better compared to BL setup with 10 mm margin (p=0.049, Fishers exact test). Moreover, partial volumes of organs at risk irradiated with a specific dose can be significantly lowered (p<0.0001, unpaired t‐test). Reducing of safety margin is not acceptable in case of BL setup, while the margin can be lowered from 10 mm to 7 mm in case of FM setup. PACS numbers: 87.55.dk, 87.55.km, 87.55.tm

Carrier Molecules and Extraction of Circulating Tumor DNA for Next Generation Sequencing in Colorectal Cancer

The aims of the study were: i) to compare circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) yields obtained by different manual extraction procedures, ii) to evaluate the addition of various carrier molecules into the plasma to improve ctDNA extraction recovery, and iii) to use next generation sequencing (NGS) technology to analyze KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS somatic mutations in ctDNA from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Venous blood was obtained from patients who suffered from metastatic colorectal carcinoma. For plasma ctDNA extraction, the following carriers were tested: carrier RNA, polyadenylic acid, glycogen, linear acrylamide, yeast tRNA, salmon sperm DNA, and herring sperm DNA. Each extract was characterized by quantitative real-time PCR and next generation sequencing. The addition of polyadenylic acid had a significant positive effect on the amount of ctDNA eluted. The sequencing data revealed five cases of ctDNA mutated in KRAS and one patient with a BRAF mutation. An agreement of 86% was found between tumor tissues and ctDNA. Testing somatic mutations in ctDNA seems to be a promising tool to monitor dynamically changing genotypes of tumor cells circulating in the body. The optimized process of ctDNA extraction should help to obtain more reliable sequencing data in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

IMRT using simultaneous integrated boost (66 Gy in 6 weeks) with and without concurrent chemotherapy in head and neck cancer – toxicity evaluation

Summary Aim To evaluate the toxicity of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMRT) in head and neck cancer patients treated using a protocol comprising 66 Gy to the PTV1 (planning target volume; region of macroscopic tumour) and 60 Gy and 54 Gy to the regions with high risk (PTV2) and low risk (PTV3) of subclinical disease in 30 fractions in six weeks. Material and Methods Between December 2003 and February 2006, 48 patients (median age 55; range 25–83, performance status 0–1) with evaluable non-metastatic head and neck cancer of various localizations and stages (stages: I–1; II–8; III–12; IV–27 patients, resp.) were irradiated according to the protocol and followed (median follow-up 20 months; range 4–42). Ten patients underwent concurrent chemotherapy (CT) and in 15 patients the regimen was indicated postoperatively because of close or positive margins. In all cases the regimen was used as an alternative to conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks). The acute and late toxicities were evaluated according to RTOG and RTOG/EORTC toxicity scales, respectively. Results All patients finished the treatment without the need for interruption due to acute toxicity. No patient experienced grade 4 toxicity. More severe acute toxicity was observed in patients with CT, but the most severe toxicity was grade 3. Grade 3 toxicity was observed in the skin, mucous membrane, salivary glands, pharynx/oesophagus and larynx in 8.4%, 35.4%, 39.6% and 2.1%, in the CT subgroup in 10%, 100%, 90%, 10%, respectively. The trend of impairment of acute toxicity by concurrent chemotherapy was statistically confirmed by Fishers exact test (for mucous membranes p=0.000002 and pharyngeal/oesophageal toxicity p=0.0004). The most severe late toxicity was grade 2 subcutaneous tissue (34.2%), mucous membrane (36.8%) and larynx (11.1%), grade 3 in salivary gland (2.6%) and grade 1 in skin (84.2%) and spinal cord (5.4%). The late toxicity was not increased by chemotherapy. Conclusion In light of the toxicity profile we consider the presented regimen to be an alternative to conventional radiotherapy 70 Gy in 7 weeks. The addition of CT requires more intensive supportive care.