Milena Di Leo

Guidewire biliary cannulation does not reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with the contrast injection technique in low-risk and high-risk patients

BACKGROUND Guidewire (GW) cannulation can reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) by avoiding the opacification of the main pancreatic duct. OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of conventional contrast ERCP and GW cannulation of the common bile duct on the rate of PEP in low- and high-risk patients. DESIGN Prospective, comparative-intervention single-center study. SETTING Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Patients with biliary disease with an intact papilla were prospectively examined by ERCP. INTERVENTIONS Biliary cannulation using a sphincterotome with contrast injection (ConI) or a hydrophilic GW without contrast injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Pancreatitis rate in the GW group and the contrast injection (ConI) group. RESULTS PEP occurred in 60 of 1249 patients (4.8%), 35 of 678 (5.2%) in the GW group and 25 of 571 (4.4%) in the ConI group (not significant). The overall rate of PEP was significantly higher in high-risk patients (12.2%) than in low-risk patients (3.5%) (P < .001), but was similar for the 2 techniques within each of these 2 groups. In patients with unintended main pancreatic duct (MPD) cannulation or opacification, the rate of PEP was not significantly different with the GW (15.2%) and ConI (8.4%) techniques but was associated with a significantly higher rate of pancreatitis (11.9%) than in patients in whom the contrast medium or GW did not enter the MPD (3.5%) (P < .001). Multivariate analysis indicated that more than 10 papillary cannulation attempts, MPD cannulation or opacification, suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, and precut methods were significant risk factors independently associated with PEP. LIMITATIONS Lack of randomization. CONCLUSIONS For selective cannulation of the CBD, the risk of inducing PEP is similar with the ConI and GW techniques in high-risk and low-risk patients. Any manipulation of the MPD must be considered a high-risk factor for PEP, such as multiple attempts on the papilla or use of the precut method.

A single-centre prospective, cohort study of the natural history of acute pancreatitis

BACKGROUND The natural history of acute pancreatitis is based on clinical studies that aim to elucidate the course of disease on the basis of predicted risk factors. AIMS To evaluate the long-term occurrence of recurrent acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis in a cohort of patients following an initial episode of acute pancreatitis. METHODS 196 patients were enrolled consecutively and studied prospectively. Clinical characteristics, exogenously/endogenously-associated factors, and evolution to recurrent acute pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis were analyzed. RESULTS 40 patients developed recurrent acute pancreatitis 13 of whom developed chronic pancreatitis. In a univariate analysis, recurrent acute pancreatitis was associated with an idiopathic aetiology (p<0.001), pancreas divisum (p=0.001), and higher usage of cigarettes and alcohol (p<0.001; p=0.023). Chronic pancreatitis was associated with a severe first episode of acute pancreatitis (p=0.048), PD (p=0.03), and cigarette smoking (p=0.038). By multivariate analysis, pancreas divisum was an independent risk factor for recurrent acute pancreatitis (OR 11.5, 95% CI 1.6-83.3). A severe first-episode of acute pancreatitis increased the risk of progressing to chronic pancreatitis by nine-fold. CONCLUSIONS Special attention should be given to patients who experience a severe first attack of acute pancreatitis as there appears to be an increased risk of developing chronic pancreatitis over the long term.

Early precut sphincterotomy for difficult biliary access to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM Precut sphincterotomy is a technique usually employed for difficult biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for the treatment of bile duct disease. It is a validated risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), but it is not clear whether the risk is related to the technique itself or to the repeated biliary cannulation attempts preceding it. The primary aim of the study was to assess the incidence of PEP in early precut compared with the standard technique in patients with difficult biliary cannulation. Secondary aims were to compare complications and cannulation success. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, clinical trial, patients who were referred for therapeutic biliary ERCP and difficult biliary cannulation were randomized to early precut (Group A) or repeated papillary cannulation attempts followed, in cases of failure, by late precut (Group B). PEP was defined as the onset of upper abdominal pain associated with an elevation in serum pancreatic enzymes of at least three times the normal level at more than 24 hours after the procedure. No rectal indomethacin or diclofenac was used for prevention of PEP. RESULTS A total of 375 patients were enrolled. PEP developed in 10 of the 185 patients (5.4 %) in Group A and 23 of the 190 (12.1 %) in Group B (odds ratio [OR] 0.35; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.16 - 0.78). The incidence of PEP was significantly lower in the early precut group (10/185, 5.4 %) than in the delayed precut subgroup (19/135 [14.1 %]; OR 0.42, 95 %CI 0.17 - 1.07). There were no differences in biliary cannulation success rates, bleeding, perforation, and cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS In patients with difficult biliary cannulation, early precut is an effective technique and can significantly reduce the incidence of PEP. Repeated biliary cannulation attempts are a real risk factor for this complication.

Outcome of endotherapy for pancreas divisum in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis

AIM To assess the rate of relapses of acute pancreatitis (AP), recurrent AP (RAP) and the evolution of endosonographic signs of chronic pancreatitis (CP) in patients with pancreas divisum (PDiv) and RAP. METHODS Over a five-year period, patients with PDiv and RAP prospectively enrolled were divided into two groups: (1) those with relapses of AP in the year before enrollment were assigned to have endoscopic therapy (recent RAP group); and (2) those free of recurrences were conservatively managed, unless they relapsed during follow-up (previous RAP group). All patients in both groups entered a follow-up protocol that included clinical and biochemical evaluation, pancreatic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) every year and after every recurrence of AP, at the same time as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). RESULTS Twenty-two were treated by ERCP and 14 were conservatively managed during a mean follow-up of 4.5 ± 1.2 years. In the recent RAP group in whom dorsal duct drainage was achieved, AP still recurred in 11 (57.9%) after the first ERCP, in 6 after the second ERCP (31.6%) and in 5 after the third ERCP (26.3%). Overall, endotherapy was successful 73.7%. There were no cases of recurrences in the previous RAP group. EUS signs of CP developed in 57.9% of treated and 64.3% of untreated patients. EUS signs of CP occurred in 42.8% of patients whose ERCPs were successful and in all those in whom it was unsuccessful (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences in the rate of AP recurrences after endotherapy and in the prevalence of EUS signs suggesting CP when comparing patients with dilated and non-dilated dorsal pancreatic ducts within each group. CONCLUSION Patients with PDiv and recent episodes of AP can benefit from endoscopic therapy. Effective endotherapy may reduce the risk of developing EUS signs of CP at a rate similar to that seen in patients of previous RAP group, managed conservatively. However, in a subset of patients, endotherapy, although successful, did not prevent the evolution of endosonographic signs of CP.

Intra-channel stent release technique for fluoroless endoscopic ultrasound-guided lumen-apposing metal stent placement: changing the paradigm

Background Recently, a novel lumen-apposing fully covered self-expanding metal stent (LA-FCSEMS) mounted on an electrocautery-enhanced delivery system has been developed to perform endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage. From early experience, however, release of the proximal flange of the stent has mostly been done using endoscopic view guidance to ensure proper positioning. Aim We describe a new technique that we have named the Intra-Channel Stent Release Technique (ICSRT) to perform stent placement under complete EUS control, without the use of either fluoroscopic or endoscopic views. Material and methods Data on all consecutive patients who underwent EUS-guided drainage using the new ICSRT between June 2014 and April 2016 were retrospectively retrieved from two institution databases. All EUS procedures were performed by experienced endoscopists with the patient under conscious or deep sedation. The total procedure and stent deployment time, and adverse events related to stent positioning with the ICSRT were evaluated. Results One hundred consecutive patients (51 women; mean age ± SD, 66 ± 15.2 years, range 34 – 95) underwent EUS-guided transluminal drainage with the Hot AXIOS™ device using the new ICSRT. The procedure was technically successful in all but one patient (1 %). The mean total procedural time was 21.9 minutes (range 7 – 50), while the mean time for stent placement was 3.2 minutes (range 1 – 15). No major adverse events occurred. Discussion The ICSRT has been used to deploy the newly developed lumen-apposing FCSEMS under complete EUS guidance without fluoroscopic and/or endoscopic assistance. The technique appears to be safe and highly effective and should be learned by all interventional endosonographers in order to be able to perform drainage in all clinical scenarios.

Pancreatic morpho-functional imaging as a diagnostic approach for chronic asymptomatic pancreatic hyperenzymemia

BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) findings in people with chronic asymptomatic pancreatic hyperenzymemia (CAPH) have shifted the hypothesis that CAPH is always non-pathological. However, there have been no studies including both secretin-MRCP (S-MRCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) to examine the pancreatic morphology in these subjects. AIM To prospectively assess the diagnostic approach for CAPH using both pancreatic EUS and S-MRCP. METHODS In a case-control prospective study from January 2010 to December 2014, 68 consecutive subjects with CAPH were scheduled to undergo S-MRCP and EUS (CAPH group) in a tertiary care setting. In the same period, the EUS findings of this group were compared with 68 patients examined by EUS alone for submucosal lesions of the gastric fundus, matched for sex and age (control group). RESULTS EUS detected pancreatic alterations in 60.3% of the CAPH group and 13.2% of controls (p<0.001). S-MRCP showed pancreatic alterations in 51.5% in the CAPH group. With the combined procedures, pancreatic abnormalities were detected in 63.3%. The diagnoses established by the two techniques were concordant in 51 (75%) of the 68 CAPH subjects; in the remaining 17 (25%) the two methods gave additional information. CONCLUSIONS In people with CAPH S-MRCP and EUS are both recommended in order to detect pancreatic abnormalities before this biochemical alteration is confirmed as benign CAPH, or Gullos syndrome.

Endoscopic ultrasound-through-the-needle biopsy in pancreatic cystic lesions: A multicenter study

Tissue acquisition in pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) is the ideal method for diagnosis and risk stratification for malignancy of these lesions. Direct sampling from the walls of PCL with different devices has shown better results than cytology from cystic fluid. We carried out a retrospective, multicenter study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of a micro‐forceps, specifically designed to be used through a 19‐gauge needle after endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)‐guided puncture of PCL.

Management of high grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus with underlying oesophageal varices: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND Endoscopic treatment of Barretts oesophagus leading to high grade dysplasia with oesophageal varices may lead to bleeding complications. AIMS Estimate effectiveness of endoscopic band-ligation in oesophageal varices patients treated for high grade dysplasia, and compare to endoscopically treated non-oesophageal varices high grade dysplasia patients. METHODS Retrospective comparative study. All 8 high grade dysplasia patients with varices who were treated initially with band-ligation at Mayo Clinic between 8/1/1999 and 2/28/2014 were compared with reference group of 52 high grade dysplasia patients treated endoscopically. RESULTS One high grade dysplasia patients patient with oesophageal varices (12.5%) achieved complete remission of intestinal metaplasia defined by at least one followup endoscopy with normal biopsies, and 3 (37.5%) achieved complete remission of dysplasia defined by at least one followup endoscopy with non-dysplastic biopsies. 39 (75.0%) endomucosal resection/radiofrequency ablation patients experienced at least one followup endoscopy with normal biopsies, and 49 (94.2%) experienced non-dysplastic biopsies. Both of these endpoints occurred significantly more often in the endomucosal resection/radiofrequency ablation group compared to the high grade dysplasia with oesophageal varices group (p=0.016 and p=0.025, respectively). CONCLUSIONS High grade dysplastic Barretts can be safely managed with band-ligation. However, resolution of Barretts epithelium is rarely achieved with banding alone.

Fetal radiation exposure: Is monitoring really needed?

The effect of fetal radiation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on pregnant women is a very interesting topic. Smith et al recently estimated the fetal radiation exposure in pregnant women undergoing ERCPs using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). The authors concluded that TLDs are unnecessary during ERCP with modified techniques. We believe that an extreme caution is needed in clinical practice before drawing such conclusions when they are not strongly supported by enough experimental evidence. Therefore, we recommend that fetal radiation exposure be monitored in clinical practice by using dosimeters, bearing in mind that all relevant techniques to control and minimize the exposure must be applied.

Cost analysis and outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions in an outpatient setting

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), a minimally invasive treatment for early gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, is considered challenging and risky in the colorectum. As such, most patients undergoing ESD are hospitalized due to the perceived increased risk of adverse events. The aim of this study was to compare the costs, safety and efficacy of colorectal-ESD in an outpatient vs inpatient setting in a tertiary level center. METHODS This is a retrospective study on consecutive patients admitted for colorectal-ESD. Patients were divided into outpatients (Group-A, same-day discharge), and inpatients (Group-B, admitted for at least one night). Data on overall costs, outcomes and adverse events were assessed for each group. RESULTS A total of 136 patients were considered. Fourteen were excluded because ESD was not performed due to intraprocedural suspicion of invasive cancer. Eighty-three patients were treated as outpatients (Group-A, 68%) and 39 (Group-B, 32%) were hospitalized. R0-rate was 90.4% in Group-A and 89.7% in Group-B(P = 0.98). One perforation occurred in Group-A (1.2%) and 2 in Group-B(5.1%, P = 0.2). Mean Length of stay (LOS) was 1 day for outpatients and 3.3 days for inpatients. Management of Group-A as outpatients produced a cost savings of 941€ on average per patient. CONCLUSIONS Outpatient colorectal-ESD is a feasible, cost-effective strategy to manage superficial colorectal tumors with outcomes comparable to inpatient colorectal-ESD. By using proper selection criteria, outpatient ESD could be considered the first-line approach for most patients.