Miles Sparrow
Monash University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Miles Sparrow.
The Lancet | 2015
Peter De Cruz; Michael A. Kamm; Amy L. Hamilton; Kathryn J. Ritchie; Efrosinia O. Krejany; Alexandra Gorelik; Danny Liew; Lani Prideaux; Ian C. Lawrance; Jane M. Andrews; Peter A. Bampton; Peter R. Gibson; Miles Sparrow; Rupert W. Leong; Timothy H. Florin; Richard B. Gearry; Graham L. Radford-Smith; Finlay Macrae; Henry Debinski; Warwick Selby; Ian Kronborg; Michael J. Johnston; Rodney Woods; P. Ross Elliott; Sally Bell; Steven J. Brown; William Connell; Paul V. Desmond
BACKGROUND Most patients with Crohns disease need an intestinal resection, but a majority will subsequently experience disease recurrence and require further surgery. This study aimed to identify the optimal strategy to prevent postoperative disease recurrence. METHODS In this randomised trial, consecutive patients from 17 centres in Australia and New Zealand undergoing intestinal resection of all macroscopic Crohns disease, with an endoscopically accessible anastomosis, received 3 months of metronidazole therapy. Patients at high risk of recurrence also received a thiopurine, or adalimumab if they were intolerant to thiopurines. Patients were randomly assigned to parallel groups: colonoscopy at 6 months (active care) or no colonoscopy (standard care). We used computer-generated block randomisation to allocate patients in each centre to active or standard care in a 2:1 ratio. For endoscopic recurrence (Rutgeerts score ≥i2) at 6 months, patients stepped-up to thiopurine, fortnightly adalimumab with thiopurine, or weekly adalimumab. The primary endpoint was endoscopic recurrence at 18 months. Patients and treating physicians were aware of the patients study group and treatment, but central reading of the endoscopic findings was undertaken blind to the study group and treatment. Analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00989560. FINDINGS Between Oct 13, 2009, and Sept 28, 2011, 174 (83% high risk across both active and standard care groups) patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of study drug. Of 122 patients in the active care group, 47 (39%) stepped-up treatment. At 18 months, endoscopic recurrence occurred in 60 (49%) patients in the active care group and 35 (67%) patients in the standard care group (p=0.03). Complete mucosal normality was maintained in 27 (22%) of 122 patients in the active care group versus four (8%) in the standard care group (p=0.03). In the active care arm, of those with 6 months recurrence who stepped up treatment, 18 (38%) of 47 patients were in remission 12 months later; conversely, of those in remission at 6 months who did not change therapy recurrence occurred in 31 (41%) of 75 patients 12 months later. Smoking (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.8, p=0.02) and the presence of two or more clinical risk factors including smoking (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.01-7.7, p=0.05) increased the risk of endoscopic recurrence. The incidence and type of adverse and severe adverse events did not differ significantly between patients in the active care and standard care groups (100 [82%] of 122 vs 45 [87%] of 52; p=0.51) and (33 [27%] of 122 vs 18 [35%] of 52; p=0.36), respectively. INTERPRETATION Treatment according to clinical risk of recurrence, with early colonoscopy and treatment step-up for recurrence, is better than conventional drug therapy alone for prevention of postoperative Crohns disease recurrence. Selective immune suppression, adjusted for early recurrence, rather than routine use, leads to disease control in most patients. Clinical risk factors predict recurrence, but patients at low risk also need monitoring. Early remission does not preclude the need for ongoing monitoring. FUNDING AbbVie, Gutsy Group, Gandel Philanthropy, Angior Foundation, Crohns Colitis Australia, and the National Health and Medical Research Council.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2014
Geoffrey M. Forbes; Marian J. Sturm; Rupert W. Leong; Miles Sparrow; Dev S. Segarajasingam; Adrian G. Cummins; Michael Phillips; Richard Herrmann
BACKGROUND & AIMS Transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells has been successful therapy for small numbers of patients with Crohns disease (CD), but requires prior myeloconditioning. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) escape immune recognition, so myeloconditioning is not required before their administration. We investigated the efficacy of allogeneic MSCs in patients with luminal CD. METHODS Our phase 2, open-label, multicenter study included 16 patients (21-55 y old; 6 men) with infliximab- or adalimumab-refractory, endoscopically confirmed, active luminal CD (CD activity index [CDAI], >250). Subjects were given intravenous infusions of allogeneic MSCs (2 × 10(6) cells/kg body weight) weekly for 4 weeks. The primary end point was clinical response (decrease in CDAI >100 points) 42 days after the first MSC administration; secondary end points were clinical remission (CDAI, <150), endoscopic improvement (a CD endoscopic index of severity [CDEIS] value, <3 or a decrease by >5), quality of life, level of C-reactive protein, and safety. RESULTS Among the 15 patients who completed the study, the mean CDAI score was reduced from 370 (median, 327; range, 256-603) to 203 (median, 129) at day 42 (P < .0001). The mean CDAI scores decreased after each MSC infusion (370 before administration, 269 on day 7, 240 on day 14, 209 on day 21, 182 on day 28, and 203 on day 42). Twelve patients had a clinical response (80%; 95% confidence interval, 72%-88%; mean reduction in CDAI, 211; range 102-367), 8 had clinical remission (53%; range, 43%-64%; mean CDAI at day 42, 94; range, 44-130). Seven patients had endoscopic improvement (47%), for whom the mean CDEIS scores decreased from 21.5 (range, 3.3-33) to 11.0 (range, 0.3-18.5). One patient had a serious adverse event (2 dysplasia-associated lesions), but this probably was not caused by MSCs. CONCLUSIONS In a phase 2 study, administration of allogeneic MSCs reduced CDAI and CDEIS scores in patients with luminal CD refractory to biologic therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01090817.
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases | 2011
Melissa L. Haines; Yousef Ajlouni; Peter M Irving; Miles Sparrow; Rosemary Rose; Richard B. Gearry; Peter R. Gibson
Background: Circulating concentrations of 6‐thioguanine nucleotide (6‐TGN) and 6‐methyl mercaptopurine (6‐MMP) are associated with thiopurine efficacy and may predict toxicity. This study aimed to examine retrospectively the utility of measuring metabolite concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who had continuing symptoms despite stable thiopurine treatment. Methods: Concentrations of 6‐TGN and 6‐MMP were measured in lysates of washed red cells by high‐performance liquid chromatography in peripheral blood drawn from 63 symptomatic patients with IBD (63% men, mean age 37, range 14‐74 years, 67% Crohns disease, 33% ulcerative colitis) treated with azathioprine or 6‐mercaptopurine. Short‐term clinical outcomes were examined. Results: 6‐TGN concentrations weakly correlated with the thiopurine dose (r = 0.28, P = 0.08). On weight‐based criteria, 50% of patients were underdosed. However, metabolite patterns suggested 7 (11%) patients were noncompliant, 18 (29%) were being underdosed, 33 (52%) were refractory to treatment with either appropriate (41%) or elevated (11%) metabolite concentrations, and 6 (10%) had a raised 6‐MMP:6‐TGN ratio consistent with aberrant thiopurine metabolism. The clinical outcome improved in 40 of 46 (87%) of patients in whom the course of action taken was as recommended by a metabolite‐directed algorithm, while 3 of 17 patients (18%) improved where discordant actions were taken (P = 0.0001; Fishers exact test). Fifteen patients (24%) avoided inappropriate escalation of therapy. Conclusions: Dose‐optimization or toxicity‐avoidance strategies frequently result from metabolite testing in patients with inadequate efficacy from thiopurines, with evidence of better outcomes. Thiopurine metabolite testing is a potentially powerful tool for optimizing thiopurine usage in IBD. (Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011;)
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2012
Mayur Garg; John S Lubel; Miles Sparrow; Stephen G. Holt; Peter R. Gibson
Understanding of the role of vitamin D in health and disease has increased markedly in the past decade, with its involvement extending well beyond traditional roles in calcium and phosphate homeostasis and musculoskeletal health. This conceptual expansion has been underpinned by identification and exploration of components of this axis including vitamin D‐binding protein, key enzymes and receptors in multiple cell types, and a greater recognition of nonclassical autocrine and paracrine effects. Its influence in IBD remains uncertain.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2007
Peter M Irving; Richard B. Gearry; Miles Sparrow; Peter R. Gibson
Background Corticosteroids are a well‐established treatment for active Crohn’s disease and have been widely used for decades. It has become apparent, however, that a proportion of patients either fails to respond to corticosteroids or is unable to withdraw from them without relapsing. Furthermore, their use is associated with a range of side effects, such that long‐term treatment carries unacceptable risk.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2015
Jennifer Jones; Gilaad G. Kaplan; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet; Leonard Baidoo; Shane M. Devlin; Gil Y. Melmed; Divine Tanyingoh; Laura H. Raffals; Peter M. Irving; Patricia L. Kozuch; Miles Sparrow; Fernando S. Velayos; Brian Bressler; Adam S. Cheifetz; Jean-Frederic Colombel; Corey A. Siegel
BACKGROUND & AIMS There is debate over whether patients with Crohns disease who start anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy after failed immunomodulator therapy should continue to receive concomitant immunomodulators. We conducted a meta-analysis of subgroups from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-TNF agents to compare the efficacy and safety of concomitant immunomodulator therapy vs anti-TNF monotherapy. METHODS We performed a systematic review of literature published from 1980 through 2008 and identified 11 RCTs of anti-TNF agents in patients with luminal or fistulizing Crohns disease. We excluded RCTs of patients who were naive to anti-TNF and immunomodulator therapy. The primary end points were clinical response at weeks 4-14 and 24-30 and remission at weeks 24-30. Secondary end points included infusion site or injection site reactions and selected adverse events. A priori subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate fistula closure and the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with different anti-TNF agents. RESULTS Overall, combination therapy was no more effective than monotherapy in inducing 6-month remission (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-1.31), inducing a response (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.79-1.48), maintaining a response (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.67-3.49), or inducing partial (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.84-1.88) or complete fistula closure (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.68-1.78). In subgroup analyses of individual anti-TNF agents, combination therapy was not more effective than monotherapy in inducing 6-month remission in those treated with infliximab (OR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.97-3.07), adalimumab (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.58-1.35), or certolizumab (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.65-1.34). Overall, combination therapy was not associated with an increase in adverse events, but inclusion of infliximab was associated with fewer injection site reactions (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.79.) CONCLUSIONS On the basis of a meta-analysis, continued use of immunomodulator therapy after starting anti-TNF therapy is no more effective than anti-TNF monotherapy in inducing or maintaining response or remission. RCTs are needed to adequately assess the efficacy of continued immunomodulator therapy after anti-TNF therapy is initiated.
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 2010
Gil Y. Melmed; Brennan M. Spiegel; Brian Bressler; Adam S. Cheifetz; Shane M. Devlin; Laura E. Harrell; Peter M. Irving; Jennifer Jones; Gilaad G. Kaplan; Patricia L. Kozuch; Fernando S. Velayos; Leonard Baidoo; Miles Sparrow; Corey A. Siegel
BACKGROUND & AIMS There is no consensus on the appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy for Crohns disease. Some patients benefit from concomitant immunomodulators, but concerns related to infections and lymphoma risk have dampened enthusiasm for this approach. We applied the RAND/University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method toward establishing appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators and anti-TNF therapies for Crohns disease. METHODS A literature review was conducted regarding efficacy and safety of concomitant immunomodulators in the setting of anti-TNF therapy for Crohns disease and presented to the Building Research in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Globally group, a globally diverse panel of 13 gastroenterologists clinically experienced in inflammatory bowel disease. A total of 134 scenarios were constructed using several clinical variables. Panelists used a modified Delphi method to rate the appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators, and met to discuss and re-rate appropriateness. Disagreement was assessed using a validated index. RESULTS Concomitant immunomodulators were generally rated appropriate for 63 scenarios, uncertain for 60 scenarios, and inappropriate for 11 scenarios. In general, concomitant immunomodulators were appropriate for those with extensive disease, shorter duration of disease, perianal involvement, prior surgery, females, and older patients (>26 y). Concomitant immunomodulators were generally rated inappropriate for young males, and in some scenarios involving uncomplicated disease. Smoking and the particular anti-TNF medication did not influence ratings. Disagreement was observed in 6 of 134 scenarios. CONCLUSIONS The appropriateness of concomitant immunomodulators with anti-TNF therapy for Crohns disease was determined through a modified Delphi panel approach based on expert interpretation of the available literature. Clinicians should consider multiple factors when considering concomitant immunomodulators with anti-TNF treatment.
Journal of Crohns & Colitis | 2014
Peter R. Gibson; C. J. Vaizey; Christopher M. Black; Rebecca Jayne Nicholls; Adèle R Weston; Peter A. Bampton; Miles Sparrow; Ian C. Lawrance; Warwick Selby; Jane M. Andrews; Alissa Walsh; David Hetzel; Finlay Macrae; Gregory Thomas Charles Moore; Martin Weltman; Rupert W. Leong; T. Fan
BACKGROUND & AIMS The burden of ulcerative colitis (UC) in relation to disease severity is not well documented. This study quantitatively evaluated the relationship between disease activity and quality of life (QoL), as well as health care utilization, cost, and work-related impairment associated with UC in an Australian population. METHODS A cross-sectional, noninterventional, observational study was performed in patients with a wide range of disease severity recruited during routine specialist consultations. Evaluations included the Assessment of Quality of Life-8-dimension (AQoL-8D), EuroQol 5-dimension, 5-level (EQ-5D-5L), the disease-specific Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) instrument. The 3-item Partial Mayo Score was used to assess disease severity. Health care resource utilization was assessed by chart review and patient questionnaires. RESULTS In 175 patients, mean (SD) AQoL-8D and EQ-5D-5L scores were greater for patients in remission (0.80 [0.19] and 0.81 [0.18], respectively) than for patients with active disease (0.70 [0.20] and 0.72 [0.19], respectively, both Ps<0.001). IBDQ correlated with both AQoL-8D (r=0.73; P<0.0001) and EQ-5D-5L (0.69; P<0.0001). Mean 3-month UC-related health care cost per patient was AUD
The Lancet | 2017
Severine Vermeire; William J. Sandborn; S. Danese; Xavier Hébuterne; Bruce Salzberg; Maria Kłopocka; Dino Tarabar; Tomas Vanasek; Miloš Greguš; Paul Hellstern; Joo Sung Kim; Miles Sparrow; Kenneth J. Gorelick; Michelle Hinz; Alaa Ahmad; Vivek Pradhan; Mina Hassan-Zahraee; Robert Clare; Fabio Cataldi; W. Reinisch
2914 (SD=
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2011
Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet; Abderrahim Oussalah; Xavier Roblin; Miles Sparrow
3447 [mean for patients in remission=