Mina Rowe

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection via antioxidants : Results of a phase I clinical trial

Background: The pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with a defective host antiviral immune response and intrahepatic oxidative stress. Oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation play major roles in the fatty liver accumulation (steatosis) that leads to necro-inflammation and necrosis of hepatic cells. Previous trials suggested that antioxidative therapy may have a beneficial effect on patients with chronic HCV infection. Aims: To determine the safety and efficacy of treatment of chronic HCV patients via a combination of antioxidants. Methods: Fifty chronic HCV patients were treated orally on a daily basis for 20 weeks with seven antioxidative oral preparations (glycyrrhizin, schisandra, silymarin, ascorbic acid, lipoic acid, L-glutathione, and alpha-tocopherol), along with four different intravenous preparations (glycyrrhizin, ascorbic acid, L-glutathione, B-complex) twice weekly for the first 10 weeks, and followed up for an additional 20 weeks. Patients were monitored for HCV-RNA levels, liver enzymes, and liver histology. Assessment of quality of life was performed using the SF-36 questionnaire. Results: In one of the tested parameters (eg, liver enzymes, HCV RNA levels, or liver biopsy score), a combination of antioxidants induced a favorable response in 48% of the patients (24). Normalization of liver enzymes occurred in 44% of patients who had elevated pretreatment ALT levels (15 of 34). ALT levels remained normal throughout follow-up period in 72.7% (8 of 11). A decrease in viral load (one log or more) was observed in 25% of the patients (12). Histologic improvement (2-point reduction in the HAI score) was noted in 36.1% of the patients. The SF-36 score improved in 26 of 45 patients throughout the course of the trial (58% of the patients). Treatment was well tolerated by all patients. No major adverse reactions were noted. Conclusions: These data suggest that multi antioxidative treatment in chronic HCV patients is well tolerated and may have a beneficial effect on necro-inflammatory variables. A combination of antiviral and antioxidative therapies may enhance the overall response rate of these patients.

Comparison of immunogenicity of two hepatitis A vaccines — VAQTA® and HAVRIX® — in young adults

Two new hepatitis A vaccines have been developed, and their immunogenicity tested using different immunoassays. The present study was designed to compare the immunogenicity of these two hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines--VAQTA and HAVRIX--as determined by seroconversion rates and anti-HAV titers, and using the same immunoassay. Healthy volunteers (15-30 y), seronegative for anti-HAV, were randomized in an open single center study to four groups of 20-21 vaccinees each, to receive either a 25 U or a 50 U dose of VAQTA, or HAVRIX at 720 EU or 1440 EU/dose, administered at 0, 1 and 6 m or at 0 and 6 m, respectively. Four weeks after primary immunization, seroconversion rates were 100% for VAQTA and 95% for HAVRIX, following injection of 50 U or 1440 EU, respectively (p = NS) and anti-HAV GMTs were 40 and 37 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively. At 6 months, prior to the booster dose, seroconversion rates were 100% for both vaccines, with anti-HAV GMTs of 111 and 70 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively (P < 0.05). At month 7, four weeks after the only booster injection, using the two dose regimen, anti-HAV titers were 2212 and 1511 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively (P < NS). Using three doses of 25 U/dose of VAQTA or 720 EU/dose of HAVRIX at 0, 1 and 6 m did not produce any clinically evaluable advantage over the two dose regimen for either vaccine. No significant adverse events were observed using either vaccine. In summary, both vaccines have similar immunogenicity demonstrated using identical immunoassays for evaluation. These results also confirm the outstanding immunogenicity of a single dose of either of the HAV vaccines and support their use in pre- and possibly postexposure prophylaxis against hepatitis A virus infection.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection via oral immune regulation toward hepatitis B virus proteins.

OBJECTIVES:Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a noncytopathic virus, and hepatocellular injury is mediated by a defective host antiviral immune response. We have previously shown that antiviral immunity can be modulated through oral feeding of viral proteins. The aims of this study were to determine the safety and efficacy of treatment of patients with chronic HBV by means of p.o. administration of HBV envelope proteins.METHODS:A total of 42 chronic HBV patients were treated p.o. with HBV envelope proteins (HBsAg+preS1+preS2), three times/wk for 20–30 wk, and followed for an additional 20 wk. Patients were monitored for HBV-DNA levels, liver enzymes, and liver histology. HBV-directed T cell immune modulation was assessed in vitro by HBV specific T cell-proliferation, cytotoxicity, IFNγ, and IL10 ELISPOT assays, and reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction cytokines assay.RESULTS:Favorable response in one of the primary endpoints was achieved in 28/42 patients (66.6%) by means of p.o. immune regulation. A significant decrease in viral load was observed in 15 patients (35.7%). HBsAg/HBcAg biopsy scores improved in 41% and 57.1% of patients, respectively. Histological improvement in liver necroinflammatory score was noted in 12/40 patients (30%). In all, 80% showed biochemical response. Five of 19 HBeAg positive patients (26.3%) became negative for HBeAg. A favorable augmentation in anti-HBV specific T cell response, with increased HbsAg specific T cell proliferation (78%), cytotoxicity (75%), and IFNγ positive T cell clones (62.9%) was noted. In addition, a decrease in the IL10 γ positive T cell clones was achieved (48.1%). Natural killer T (NKT) lymphocytes increased significantly in all treated patients.CONCLUSIONS:Immune regulation of the anti-HBV immune response via p.o. administration of HBV envelope proteins alleviated the immune-mediated liver injury while augmenting the effective antiviral immunity.

Interference of Antibody Production to Hepatitis B Surface Antigen in a Combination Hepatitis A/Hepatitis B Vaccine

A randomized trial comparing 3 manufacturing consistency lots of a combination hepatitis A/hepatitis B vaccine to each other and to hepatitis A vaccine and hepatitis B vaccine given separately and concurrently was done to evaluate safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. Healthy volunteers >/=11 years of age were divided into 4 groups. Each of 3 groups received a separate consistency lot of the combination vaccine, and 1 group received separate but concurrent injections of hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccines. Injections were given at weeks 0 and 24. The combination vaccine was generally well tolerated. The hepatitis A portion of the combination vaccine produced clinically acceptable high seropositivity rates 4 and 52 weeks after the first injection. The hepatitis B portion of the vaccine did not produce clinically acceptable seropositivity rates 4 weeks after the second injection. Lack of antibody production may be attributed, at least in part, to immunologic interference.

Air Transportation of Patients With End-Stage Liver Disease to Distant Liver Transplantation Centers

The Israeli population does not meet its transplantation organ needs. Therefore, liver transplantation (LTX) candidates are sometimes transported to centers abroad. We aimed to assess the demographic and clinical issues concerning this policy. Records of all candidates transported (2000–2004) were retrospectively reviewed. Data included etiology, disease severity, outcome, distances traveled and destinations, and medical complication arising en route. Forty‐three candidates were transported overseas: 12 patients with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) and 31 with cirrhosis. Average MELD score was 19.94, and the APACHE II score for patients with FHF was 20.5. Destinations included the United States, Colombia, Belgium, Germany, China, and Italy. Average distance traveled was 4,660 miles. Two patients were intubated and sedated during flight. All patients safely reached their destinations: 8 died prior to transplantation, 5 died after transplantation, 3 are awaiting transplantation, 3 recovered spontaneously, and the rest successfully underwent transplantation and returned home. In conclusion, our results suggest that long‐distance transportation of patients awaiting liver transplantation is safe and technically feasible provided precaution measures are taken. Therefore, allocation regions may be broadened to include larger and more distant populations. (Liver Transpl 2005;11:650–655.)

Pre-liver transplant psychosocial evaluation predicts post-transplantation outcomes

Abstract Psychosocial factors greatly impact the course of patients throughout the liver transplantation process. A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent liver transplantation at Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center between 2002 and 2012. A composite psychosocial score was computed based on the patient’s pre-transplant evaluation. Patients were divided into two groups based on compliance, support and insight: Optimal psychosocial score and Non-optimal psychosocial score. Post-liver transplantation survival and complication rates were evaluated. Out of 100 patients who underwent liver transplantation at the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center between 2002 and 2012, 93% had a complete pre-liver transplant psychosocial evaluation in the medical record performed by professional psychologists and social workers. Post-liver transplantation survival was significantly higher in the Optimal group (85%) as compared to the Non-optimal group (56%, p = .002). Post-liver transplantation rate of renal failure was significantly lower in the Optimal group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in other post-transplant complications. A patient’s psychosocial status may impact outcomes following transplantation as inferior psychosocial grades were associated with lower overall survival and increased rates of complications. Pre-liver transplant psychosocial evaluations are an important tool to help predict survival following transplantation.

Original contributionTreatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection via oral immune regulation toward hepatitis B virus proteins

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection via oral immune regulation toward hepatitis B virus proteins