Ming-Hui Hung

Nonintubated thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and safety of thoracoscopic lobectomy without endotracheal intubation. Summary Background Data:General anesthesia with single-lung ventilation is considered mandatory for thoracoscopic lobectomy for non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonintubated thoracoscopic lobectomy has not been reported previously. Methods:From August 2009 through June 2010, some 30 consecutive patients with clinical stage I or II NSCLC were treated by nonintubated thoracoscopic lobectomy using epidural anesthesia, intrathoracic vagal blockade, and sedation. To evaluate the feasibility and safety of this novel technique, they were compared with a control group consisting of 30 consecutive patients with clinical stage I or II NSCLC who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy using intubated general anesthesia from August 2008 through July 2009. Results:Collapse of the operative lung and inhibition of coughing were satisfactory in the nonintubated patients, induced by spontaneous breathing, and vagal blockade. Three patients in the nonintubated group required conversion to intubated-single lung ventilation because of persistent hypoxemia, poor epidural anesthesia pain control, and bleeding. One patient in each group was converted to thoracotomy because of bleeding. The 2 groups had comparable anesthesia durations, surgical durations, blood loss, and numbers of dissected lymph nodes. Patients who underwent nonintubated surgery had lower rates of sore throat (6.7% vs 40.0%, P = 0.002) and earlier resumption of oral intake (mean, 4.7 hours vs 18.8 hours, P < 0.001). Patients undergoing nonintubated surgery also had a trend toward better noncomplication rates (90% vs 66.7%, P = 0.057) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (mean, 5.9 days vs 7.1 days, P = 0.078). Conclusions:Nonintubated thoracoscopic lobectomy is technically feasible and is as safe as lobectomy performed with intubation in highly selected patients. It can be a valid alternative of single-lung-ventilated thoracoscopic surgery in managing early-stage NSCLC.

Nonintubated thoracoscopic lung resection: a 3-year experience with 285 cases in a single institution.

OBJECTIVE Tracheal intubation with one-lung ventilation is considered mandatory for thoracoscopic surgery. This study reported the experience of thoracoscopic lung resection without endotracheal intubation in a single institution. METHODS From August 2009 through July 2012, 285 consecutive patients were treated by nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery using epidural anesthesia, intrathoracic vagal blockade, and sedation for lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection in a tertiary medical center. The feasibility and safety of this technique were evaluated. RESULTS The final diagnosis for surgery were primary lung cancer in 159 patients (55.8%), metastatic lung cancer in 17 (6.0%), benign lung tumor in 104 (36.5%), and pneumothorax in 5 (1.8%). The operative methods consisted of conventional (83.2%) and needlescopic (16.8%) thoracoscopic surgery. The operative procedures included lobectomy in 137 patients (48.1%), wedge resection in 132 (46.3%), and segmentectomy in 16 (5.6%). Collapse of the operative lung and inhibition of coughing were satisfactory in most of the patients. Fourteen (4.9%) patients required conversion to tracheal intubation because of significant mediastinal movement [5], persistent hypoxemia [2], dense pleural adhesions [2], ineffective epidural anesthesia [2], bleeding [2], and tachypnea [1]. One patient (0.4%) was converted to thoracotomy because of bleeding. No mortality was noted in our patients. CONCLUSIONS Nonintubated thoracoscopic lung resection is technically feasible and safe in selected patients. It can be a valid alternative in managing patients with pulmonary lesions.

Feasibility and Safety of Nonintubated Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Geriatric Lung Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND The feasibility and safety of thoracoscopic lobectomy using anesthesia without tracheal intubation for treatment of geriatric non-small cell lung cancer patients is unclear, although it has been used with success in younger populations. METHODS From 2009 through 2011, 84 consecutive patients aged 65 years or older with stage I or II non-small cell lung cancer underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy. Among them, 36 patients were treated without tracheal intubation using epidural anesthesia, intrathoracic vagal blockade, and sedation (nonintubated group). The other 48 patients were treated with single-lung ventilation under general anesthesia intubated with a double-lumen tube (intubated group). The perioperative profiles and short-term outcomes of the two groups were compared. RESULTS The 84 patients were a mean age of 73.0 years (range, 65-87 years). Both groups had comparable preoperative demographic and cancer staging profiles. The anesthetic duration of the nonintubated group was shorter. Both groups had comparable operation duration and blood loss. One patient in the nonintubated group was converted to tracheal intubation due to persistent hypoxemia. Postoperatively, the two groups had comparable hospital stays, complication rates, and dissected lymph nodes. Stridor was noted in 3 patients and delirium in 4 in the intubated group, but none occurred in the nonintubated group. CONCLUSIONS Nonintubated thoracoscopic lobectomy is technically feasible and was as safe as thoracoscopic lobectomy performed with tracheal intubation in the geriatric lung cancer patients. Thoracoscopic lobectomy without tracheal intubation during anesthesia is a valid alternative for managing selected geriatric patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Nonintubated Needlescopic Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Management of Peripheral Lung Nodules

BACKGROUND Video-assisted thoracic operations are usually performed with 5-mm or 10-mm instruments under general anesthesia with single-lung ventilation. Management of peripheral lung nodules by a needlescopic video-assisted thoracoscopic operation, without endotracheal intubation, has rarely been attempted. We evaluated the feasibility and safety of this minimally invasive technique in managing peripheral lung nodules. METHODS From August 2009 through March 2011, 46 patients with peripheral lung nodules were treated using 3-mm needlescopic video-assisted thoracoscopic operations for wedge resection with epidural anesthesia and sedation, without endotracheal intubation. RESULTS A definitive diagnosis was obtained in all 46. Extension of the 3-mm incisions was required in 8 patients because of primary lung cancer requiring a lobectomy in 3, pleural adhesions in 3, and difficulty in identifying or resecting the nodule in 2. Two patients required conversion to intubated single-lung ventilation because of dense adhesions between the lungs and the diaphragm. Operations lasted a mean of 69.2 ± 46.8 minutes. Postoperative side effects occurred in 4 patients, including sore throat, headache, and vomiting requiring medication. Operative complications developed in 1 patient who had air leaks for more than 3 days postoperatively. The mean postoperative chest tube drainage and hospital stay were 1.1 days and 2.7 days, respectively. Postoperative neuralgia was noted in 12 patients (26%). Most patients (74%) were very satisfied or satisfied with the resulting scars. CONCLUSIONS Nonintubated needlescopic video-assisted thoracoscopic operations are technically feasible and safe and may be a less invasive alternative in the management of selected patients with peripheral pulmonary nodules.

Fatal Massive Hemorrhage Caused by Nasogastric Tube Misplacement in a Patient with Mediastinitis

Nasogastric tube insertion is a routine procedure in medical care. However, misplacement of the tube can cause a variety of complications, which can be life threatening in some instances. We report a case of fatal hemorrhagic shock immediately after nasogastric tube insertion in a patient undergoing debridement by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinitis. Emergency endoscopy showed that the bleeding came from the nasogastric tube which had perforated the esophagus and possibly tore an intrathoracic large vessel. The nasogastric tube insertion was considered to have directly produced the perforation because no esophageal perforation had been found on preoperative endoscopy. Factors contributing to the risk of esophageal perforation in this case included coexisting mediastinitis, surgical manipulation, endotracheal intubation, inability to cooperate during general anesthesia, and repetitive advancement of the nasogastric tube. Prompt clamping of the nasogastric tube or delayed insertion after failed attempts might have improved the outcome. This report illustrates the complication of massive bleeding that can occur immediately after misplaced insertion of a nasogastric tube. Extraordinary care should be taken to avoid misplacement of the nasogastric tube during insertion.

Nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery using regional anesthesia and vagal block and targeted sedation

OBJECTIVE Thoracoscopic surgery without endotracheal intubation is a novel technique for diagnosis and treatment of thoracic diseases. This study reported the experience of nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery in a tertiary medical center in Taiwan. METHODS From August 2009 through August 2013, 446 consecutive patients with lung or pleural diseases were treated by nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery. Regional anesthesia was achieved by thoracic epidural anesthesia or internal intercostal blockade. Targeted sedation was performed with propofol infusion to achieve a bispectral index value between 40 and 60. The demographic data and clinical outcomes were evaluated by retrospective chart review. RESULTS Thoracic epidural anesthesia was used in 290 patients (65.0%) while internal intercostal blockade was used in 156 patients (35.0%). The final diagnosis were primary lung cancer in 263 patients (59.0%), metastatic lung cancer in 38 (8.5%), benign lung tumor in 140 (31.4%), and pneumothorax in 5 (1.1%). The median anesthetic induction time was 30 minutes by thoracic epidural anesthesia and was 10 minutes by internal intercostal blockade. The operative procedures included lobectomy in 189 patients (42.4%), wedge resection in 229 (51.3%), and segmentectomy in 28 (6.3%). Sixteen patients (3.6%) required conversion to tracheal intubation because of significant mediastinal movement (seven patients), persistent hypoxemia (two patients), dense pleural adhesions (two patients), ineffective epidural anesthesia (two patients), bleeding (two patients), and tachypnea (one patient). One patient (0.4%) was converted to thoracotomy because of bleeding. No mortality was noted in our patients. CONCLUSIONS Nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery is technically feasible and safe and can be a less invasive alternative for diagnosis and treatment of thoracic diseases.

Nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery: state of the art and future directions

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become a common and globally accepted surgical approach for a variety of thoracic diseases. Conventionally, it is performed under tracheal intubation with double lumen tube or bronchial blocker to achieve single lung ventilation. Recently, VATS without tracheal intubation were reported to be feasible and safe in a series of VATS procedures, including management of pneumothorax, wedge resection of pulmonary tumors, excision of mediastinal tumors, lung volume reduction surgery, segmentectomy, and lobectomy. Patients undergoing nonintubated VATS are anesthetized using regional anesthesia in a spontaneously single lung breathing status after iatrogenic open pneumothorax. Conscious sedation is usually necessary for longer and intensively manipulating procedures and intraoperative cough reflex can be effectively inhibited with intrathoracic vagal blockade on the surgical side. The early outcomes of nonintubated VATS include a faster postoperative recovery and less complication rate comparing with its counterpart of intubated general anesthesia, by which may translate into a fast track VATS program. The future directions of nonintubated VATS should focus on its long-term outcomes, especially on oncological perspectives of survival in lung cancer patients. For now, it is still early to conclude the benefits of this technique, however, an educating and training program may be needed to enable both thoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists providing an alternative surgical option in their caring patients.

Non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery using internal intercostal nerve block, vagal block and targeted sedation

OBJECTIVES Thoracoscopic surgery using internal intercostal nerve block, vagal block and targeted sedation without endotracheal intubation is a promising technique for selected patients, but little is known about its feasibility and safety. METHODS We evaluated 109 patients with lung (105), mediastinal (3) or pleural (1) tumours treated using non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery. Internal, intercostal nerve block was performed at the T3-T8 intercostal level and vagal block was performed adjacent to the vagus nerve at the level of the lower trachea for right-sided operations and at the level of the aortopulmonary window for left-sided operations. Sedation was performed with propofol infusion to achieve a bispectral index value between 40 and 60. RESULTS Thoracoscopic lobectomy was performed in 43 patients, wedge resection in 50, segmentectomy in 12 and mediastinal or pleural tumour excision in 4. Three patients (2.8%) required conversion to intubated one-lung ventilation because of vigorous mediastinal movement and dense diaphragmatic adhesions. Anaesthetic induction and operation had a median duration of 10.0 and 127.0 min, respectively. Operative complications developed in 13 patients with air leaks for more than 3 days and 1 patient required transfusion of blood products. The median postoperative chest drainage and hospital stay were 2.0 and 4.0 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery using internal intercostal nerve block, vagal block and targeted sedation is technically feasible and safe in surgical treatment of lung, mediastinal and pleural tumours in selected patients.

Anesthetic consideration for nonintubated VATS

In the recent decade, nonintubated-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been extensively performed and evaluated. The indicated surgical procedures and suitable patient groups are steadily increasing. Perioperative anesthetic management presents itself as a fresh issue for the iatrogenic open pneumothorax, which is intended for unilateral lung collapse to create a steady surgical field, and the ensuing physiologic derangement involving ventilatory and hemodynamic perspectives. With appropriate monitoring, meticulous employment of regional anesthesia, sedation, vagal block, and ventilatory support, nonintubated VATS is proved to be a safe alternative to the conventional intubated general anesthesia.

Emergency airway management with fiberoptic intubation in the prone position with a fixed flexed neck.

We describe emergency airway management with fiberoptic intubation in a patient in the prone position with her neck flexed by a head pin holder during a neurosurgical procedure. Laryngeal mask airway is suggested in emergency difficult airway algorithms; however, this was not feasible in this patient because of her edematous upper airway and limited mouth opening resulting from extreme neck flexion by a head pin holder. The case illustrates the role of fiberoptic intubation in emergency airway management in this critical situation. Maneuvers to facilitate fiberoptic technique are also described.