Ming- Li

Outcome of frozen elephant trunk technique for acute type A aortic dissection: as systematic review and meta-analysis.

AbstractAcute aortic dissections of Stanford type A require emergency surgery repair and present challenges to surgeons. The frozen elephant technique is one of several approaches used to treat aortic arch dissection. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to investigate the clinical effectiveness of the frozen elephant technique for treating acute type A aortic dissection.Medline, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched up to March 31, 2014, for studies that assessed the use of frozen elephant trunk technique for treating acute type A aortic dissection. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included rate of stroke, spinal cord injury, renal failure, and reoperations for bleeding.Eleven studies were included in the analysis that encompassed 881 patients. The mean age ranged from 45.4 to 66.8 years, and the proportion of the population that was male ranged from 45 to 85%. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 8%. The rate of stroke, spinal cord injury, renal failure, and frequency of reoperations for bleeding were 3, 4, 5, and 5, respectively. Sensitivity analysis indicates that the findings are robust and there was no publication bias.These findings indicate that the frozen elephant techniques does not bring unacceptable mortality or morbidity risk for treating acute type A aortic dissection.

Hepatic artery reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation using surgical loupes: Achieving low rate of hepatic arterial thrombosis in 741 consecutive recipients—tips and tricks to overcome the poor hepatic arterial flow

The reconstruction of the hepatic artery (HA) is the most complex step in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) because of the smaller diameter of the artery and the increased risk of HA‐related complications. Because of the smaller diameter of the HA, many centers use a microsurgical technique with interrupted sutures for arterial anastomosis. The aim of our study was to retrospectively investigate the outcomes after HA reconstruction performed under magnifying loupes using the “parachute technique.” From August 1, 2002 to August 31, 2016, LDLT was performed in 766 recipients. HA reconstruction for the initial 25 LDLT surgeries was performed using a microsurgery technique (era 1). From May 2007 until the end date, HA reconstruction was performed in 741 recipients by a “parachute technique” under surgical loupes (era 2). HA reconstruction was performed using surgical loupes in 737 adults (male:female, 526:211) and 4 pediatric patients (male:female, 3:1). The average diameter of the donor graft HA was 2.8 mm (range, 1‐6.5 mm). The most notable factor in this era was the quick HA anastomosis procedure with a mean time of 10 ± 5 minutes (range, 5‐30 minutes). In era 2, 9 (1.21%) patients developed hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), whereas 2 patients developed nonthrombotic HA‐related complications. Extra‐anatomic HA reconstruction was performed in 14 patients due to either primary HA anastomosis failure or a poor caliber recipient HA. The use of magnifying surgical loupes to perform HA reconstruction is safe, feasible, and yields a low incidence of HA‐related complications. The “parachute technique” for HA reconstruction can achieve a speedy reconstruction without increasing the risk of HAT. Liver Transplantation 23 887–898 2017 AASLD.

Outflow reconstruction for right liver allograft with multiple hepatic veins: “V‐plasty” of hepatic veins to form a common outflow channel versus 2 or more hepatic vein–to–inferior vena cava anastomoses in limited retrohepatic space

Outflow reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is certainly difficult in limited retrohepatic space with using right liver grafts with venous anomalies. Venoplasty of the inferior right hepatic veins (IRHVs) and middle hepatic vein (MHV) reconstruction using synthetic grafts to form a common outflow channel or a second venocaval anastomosis are available options. We aim to compare outcomes of LDLT recipients who underwent outflow reconstruction with a “V‐Plasty” technique and outcomes of patients who underwent a second venocaval anastomosis. Out of 325 recipients who underwent LDLT from March 2011 to September 2014, 45 received right liver allografts that were devoid of MHV with multiple draining IRHVs (2 or more). Group A (n = 16) comprised the recipients with outflow reconstruction with a V‐Plasty, and group B (n = 29) included the recipients with a second venocaval anastomosis. Group A recipients (male:female, 10:6; median age, 50.5 years) had a mean Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score of 14.7, whereas for group B recipients (male:female, 20:9; median age, 52.0 years) it was 17.2. The mean IRHV diameter for group A and B grafts was 8.3 mm each. Mean warm ischemia time for group A was significantly lower (25.2 minutes) as compared to group B recipients (34.6 minutes) with P < 0.001. The 2‐month patency rates of vascular grafts were 100% for group A recipients with no evidence of thrombosis. In conclusion, the V‐Plasty technique of MHV and IRHV reconstruction to form a common outflow is a new concept that proves to be a safe and feasible alternative for second venocaval anastomosis. Liver Transpl 22:192‐200, 2016.

Selective cerebral perfusion with 4-branch graft total aortic arch replacement: Outcomes in 12 patients

BackgroundAortic arch reconstruction is associated with high neurological morbidity. Our purpose is to describe our experience using a 4-branched graft and selective antegrade brain perfusion (SABP) for total aortic arch replacement (TAR).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 12 patients who received TAR, with or without ascending aorta replacement, with a 4-branched graft for Stanford type A dissection (n = 9) or aortic arch aneurysm (n = 3). In all patients surgery was performed with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) with or without retrograde brain perfusion, and selective antegrade brain perfusion (SABP) via the subclavian artery or axillary artery.ResultsThere were 8 males and 4 females with an average age of 63.14 years. Emergent operations were performed in 9 patients with acute type A aortic dissections. Of all 12 patients, 2 deaths occurred and 1 patient experienced lower extremity paraplegia resulting in an in-hospital mortality rate of 16.6% and a permanent neurological deficit rate of 8.3%.ConclusionsThe use of a 4-branched graft, hypothermic circulatory arrest, and SABP is a useful operative method for aortic arch replacement with acceptable morbidity and mortality.

Reconstruction of Isolated Inferior Right Hepatic Vein(s) in Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Polytetrafluoroethylene Grafts: A New Feasible Concept, Technique of ‘Bridging Conduit Venoplasty’ and Outcomes

BACKGROUND Right lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains the most common form of liver transplantation in Asia. However, reconstruction of the venous outflow in a right liver allograft may pose technical difficulties if hepatic venous variations are present. Recently, much emphasis has been given to the reconstruction of large and multiple inferior right hepatic veins (IRHVs). The method of reconstructive technique, type of vascular grafts, and the outcome after the procedure have been a point of debate. In this report we discuss the IRHV reconstruction techniques using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) vascular grafts and the outcomes after such reconstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS Out of 262 right liver allografts that underwent venous reconstruction using ePTFE vascular grafts, IRHVs required either venoplasty or second inferior vena cava (IVC) anastomosis in 99 recipients. Depending upon type of IRHV reconstruction, the recipients were divided in 2 groups: Group A (n=52): IRHV venoplasty using ePTFE graft, and group B (n=47): Direct IRHV-to-IVC anastomosis. The outcome after LDLT was compared for these 2 groups. RESULTS The ePTFE venoplasty group had significantly shorter warm ischemia time as compared to the direct to IVC anastomosis group (p<0.01, 95% confidence interval -10.96 to -2.92). There were no thrombotic complications in either group of recipients; 4.2% of the recipients from group B developed hepatic venous stenosis but with no clinical deterioration; and 1 patient from group A developed ePTFE graft migration in the second portion of the duodenum that required surgical exploration. CONCLUSIONS The IRHVs drain a considerable portion of the posterior sector of right liver allografts and thus must be reconstructed. Use of ePTFE vascular grafts for IRHV venoplasty is a safe and feasible concept that facilitates the outflow reconstruction of liver allografts.