Minghuang Wang
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Minghuang Wang.
Volume 2: Plant Systems, Construction, Structures and Components; Next Generation Reactors and Advanced Reactors | 2013
Chong Chen; Jun Zou; Dezheng Xu; Qin Zeng; Minghuang Wang
A point-wise cross-section data library HENDL-ADS/MC (Hybrid Evaluated Nuclear Data Library) has been produced by FDS team to do the nuclear analysis for the ADS system. The HENDL-ADS/MC library contained 408 nuclide cross-section files including actinides, fission products and structural materials for neutron energy up to 150 MeV. The nuclear library also contained several sub-libraries with different temperatures. A series of neutron integral experiments and critical safety benchmarks have been performed to test the availability and reliability of the HENDL-ADS/MC data library. To validate and qualify the reliability of the high neutron energy cross section for HENDL-ADS/MC library further, a series of high neutron shielding experiments have been performed using MCNP. The testing results indicated the accuracy and reliability of HENDL-ADS/MC library.Copyright
Volume 5: Fuel Cycle, Radioactive Waste Management and Decommissioning; Reactor Physics and Transport Theory; Nuclear Education, Public Acceptance and Related Issues; Instrumentation and Controls; Fusion Engineering | 2013
Lisheng Mao; Minghuang Wang; Xuewei Fu; Jieqiong Jiang; Yican Wu
The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) has been performed to compare two fuel cycle scenarios: a once-through cycle (LWR OT) and a fusion Cdriven reactor, namely FDS-SFB, recycling employing PUREX (Purex-SFB). In order to estimate the LCOEs, the mass flows based on an equilibrium mode were analysed. The sensitivity of the results to variations in key parameters was also performed. A simple dynamic model was also constructed to consider other important factors that characterize a fuel cycle, e.g. resource utilization, environmental effects.The results of economics are as flows: LWR OT 29mills/KWh, Purex-SFB 48.19mills/KWh. It was found that the capital cost accounts for the largest proportion of the LCOEs. The fuel cycle cost analysis indicates that the FDS-SFB fuel cycle cost will be competitive with the once-through fuel cycle. Also, sensitivity analysis indicates that fuel cycle cost of LWR would be higher than that of the LWR-SFB fuel cycle with the uranium Price rising. Dynamic model analysis indicates that Purex-SFB could reduce the amounts of MA and the amounts of natural uranium considerably compared with LWR OT.Copyright
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2010
Jieqiong Jiang; Minghuang Wang; Zhong Chen; Yuefeng Qiu; Jinchao Liu; Yunqing Bai; Hongli Chen; Yanglin Hu
Fusion Engineering and Design | 2010
Jun Zou; Zhaozhong He; Qin Zeng; Yuefeng Qiu; Minghuang Wang
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | 2015
Minghuang Wang; Chao Lian; Yuanye Li; Dong Wang; Jieqiong Jiang; Yican Wu
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy | 2015
Minghuang Wang; Hua Huang; Chao Lian; Xiang Ji; Jieqiong Jiang; Yican Wu
Journal of Fusion Energy | 2015
Minghuang Wang; Qiusun Zeng; Jieqiong Jiang; Yican Wu
Archive | 2012
Yunqing Bai; Ming Jin; Minghuang Wang; Yican Wu
Journal of Fusion Energy | 2015
Guangyao Sun; Chao Lian; Muyi Ni; Jing Song; Minghuang Wang; Jieqiong Jiang; Liqin Hu
international conference on supercomputing | 2014
Jing Song; Guangyao Sun; Huaqing Zheng; Lijuan Hao; Zhenping Chen; Mingchang Wu; Gui Li; Cheng Chen; Kuan Zhang; Yongfeng Wang; Yawen Yan; Tao He; Shengpeng Yu; Chong Chen; Jun Zou; Minghuang Wang; Qin Zeng; Pengcheng Long; Liqin Hu; Yican Wu