Minja Milovanovic
University of the Witwatersrand
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Minja Milovanovic.
PLOS ONE | 2015
Limakatso Lebina; Noah Taruberekera; Minja Milovanovic; Karin Hatzold; Miriam Mhazo; Cynthia Nhlapo; Nkeko Tshabangu; Mmatsie Manentsa; Victoria Kazangarare; Millicent Makola; Scott Billy; Neil Martinson
Background The World Health Organisation and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS have recommended the scale-up of Medical Male Circumcision (MMC) in countries with high HIV and low MMC prevalence. PrePex device circumcision is proposed as an alternate method for scaling up MMC. Objective Evaluate safety and feasibility of PrePex in South Africa. Design A multisite prospective cohort PrePex study in adults and adolescents at three MMC clinics. Participants were followed-up 8 times, up to 56 days after PrePex placement. Results In total, 398 PrePex circumcisions were performed (315 adults and 83 adolescents) their median ages were 26 (IQR: 22–30) and 16 years (IQR: 15–17), respectively. The median time for device placement across both groups was 6 minutes (IQR: 5–9) with the leading PrePex sizes being B (30%) and C (35%) for adults (18–45 years), and A (31%) and B (38%) for adolescents (14–17 years). Additional sizes (size 12–20) were rarely used, even in the younger age group. Pain of device application was minimal but that of removal was severe. However, described pain abated rapidly and almost no pain was reported 1 hour after removal. The Adverse Events rate were experienced by 2.7% (11/398) of all participants, three of which were serious (2 displacements and 1 self-removal requiring prompt surgery). None of the Adverse Events required hospitalization. The majority of participants returned to work within a day of device placement. Conclusion Our study shows that PrePex is a safe MMC method, for males 14 years and above. PrePex circumcision had a similar adverse event rate to that reported for surgical MMC, but device removal caused high levels of pain, which subsided rapidly.
Global Health Action | 2015
Hae Young Kim; Limakatso Lebina; Minja Milovanovic; Noah Taruberekera; David W. Dowdy; Neil Martinson
Background Several circumcision devices have been evaluated for a safe and simplified male circumcision among adults. The PrePex device was prequalified for voluntary male medical circumcision (VMMC) in May 2013 by the World Health Organization and is expected to simplify the procedure safely while reducing cost. South Africa is scaling up VMMC. Objective To evaluate the overall unit cost of VMMC at a mixed site vs. a hypothetical PrePex-only site in South Africa. Design We evaluated the overall unit cost of VMMC at a mixed site where PrePex VMMC procedure was added to routine forceps-guided scalpel-based VMMC in Soweto, South Africa. We abstracted costs and then modeled these costs for a hypothetical PrePex-only site, at which 9,600 PrePex circumcisions per year could be done. We examined cost drivers and modeled costs, varying the price of the PrePex device. The healthcare system perspective was used. Results In both sites, the main contributors of cost were personnel and consumables. If 10% of all VMMC were by PrePex at the mixed site, the overall costs of the surgical method and PrePex were similar – US
Theory & Psychology | 2015
Brendon Barnes; Minja Milovanovic
59.62 and
International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease | 2014
Neil Martinson; Katherine E. McLeod; Minja Milovanovic; Reginah Msandiwa; Limakatso Lebina
59.53, respectively. At the hypothetical PrePex-only site, the unit cost was US
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes | 2016
Minja Milovanovic; Noah Taruberekera; Neil Martinson; Limakatso Lebina
51.10 with PrePex circumcisions having markedly lower personnel and biohazardous waste management costs. In sensitivity analysis with the cost of PrePex kit reduced to US
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes | 2016
Paul J. Feldblum; Neil Martinson; Bruce Bvulani; Noah Taruberekera; Mehebub Mahomed; Namwinga Chintu; Minja Milovanovic; Catherine E. Hart; Scott Billy; Edgar Necochea; Alick Samona; Miriam Mhazo; Debora Bossemeyer; Jaim Jou Lai; Limakatso Lebinai; Tigistu A. Ashengo; Lucinda Macaringue; Valentine Veena; Karin Hatzold
10 and
International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease | 2015
Limakatso Lebina; Pattamukkil Abraham; Minja Milovanovic; Katlego Motlhaoleng; Richard E. Chaisson; Modiehi Rakgokong; Jonathan E. Golub; Ebrahim Variava; Neil Martinson
2, the cost of VMMC was further reduced. Conclusions Adding PrePex to an existing site did not necessarily reduce the overall costs of VMMC. However, starting a new PrePex-only site is feasible and may significantly reduce the overall cost by lowering both personnel and capital costs, thus being cost-effective in the long term. Achieving a lower cost for PrePex will be an important contributor to the scale-up of VMMC.Background Several circumcision devices have been evaluated for a safe and simplified male circumcision among adults. The PrePex device was prequalified for voluntary male medical circumcision (VMMC) in May 2013 by the World Health Organization and is expected to simplify the procedure safely while reducing cost. South Africa is scaling up VMMC. Objective To evaluate the overall unit cost of VMMC at a mixed site vs. a hypothetical PrePex-only site in South Africa. Design We evaluated the overall unit cost of VMMC at a mixed site where PrePex VMMC procedure was added to routine forceps-guided scalpel-based VMMC in Soweto, South Africa. We abstracted costs and then modeled these costs for a hypothetical PrePex-only site, at which 9,600 PrePex circumcisions per year could be done. We examined cost drivers and modeled costs, varying the price of the PrePex device. The healthcare system perspective was used. Results In both sites, the main contributors of cost were personnel and consumables. If 10% of all VMMC were by PrePex at the mixed site, the overall costs of the surgical method and PrePex were similar – US
PLOS ONE | 2018
Christopher J. Hoffmann; Minja Milovanovic; Anthony Kinghorn; Hae Young Kim; Katlego Motlhaoleng; Neil Martinson; Ebrahim Variava
59.62 and
PLOS ONE | 2018
Limakatso Lebina; Minja Milovanovic; Kennedy Otwombe; Pattamukkil Abraham; Mmatsie Manentsa; Susan A. Nzenze; Neil Martinson
59.53, respectively. At the hypothetical PrePex-only site, the unit cost was US
PLOS ONE | 2018
Jenny Coetzee; Janice Buckley; Kennedy Otwombe; Minja Milovanovic; Glenda Gray; Rachel Jewkes
51.10 with PrePex circumcisions having markedly lower personnel and biohazardous waste management costs. In sensitivity analysis with the cost of PrePex kit reduced to US