Minna Thullberg

Cell attachment to the extracellular matrix induces proteasomal degradation of p21(CIP1) via Cdc42/Rac1 signaling.

ABSTRACT The cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (Cdk2) inhibitors p21CIP1 and p27KIP1 are negatively regulated by anchorage during cell proliferation, but it is unclear how integrin signaling may affect these Cdk2 inhibitors. Here, we demonstrate that integrin ligation led to rapid reduction of p21CIP1 and p27KIP1 protein levels in three distinct cell types upon attachment to various extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins, including fibronectin (FN), or to immobilized agonistic anti-integrin monoclonal antibodies. Cell attachment to FN did not rapidly influence p21CIP1 mRNA levels, while the protein stability of p21CIP1 was decreased. Importantly, the down-regulation of p21CIP1 and p27KIP1 was completely blocked by three distinct proteasome inhibitors, demonstrating that integrin ligation induced proteasomal degradation of these Cdk2 inhibitors. Interestingly, ECM-induced proteasomal proteolysis of a ubiquitination-deficient p21CIP1 mutant (p21K6R) also occurred, showing that the proteasomal degradation of p21CIP1 was ubiquitin independent. Concomitant with our finding that the small GTPases Cdc42 and Rac1 were activated by attachment to FN, constitutively active (ca) Cdc42 and ca Rac1 promoted down-regulation of p21CIP1. However, dominant negative (dn) Cdc42 and dn Rac1 mutants blocked the anchorage-induced degradation of p21CIP1, suggesting that an integrin-induced Cdc42/Rac1 signaling pathway activates proteasomal degradation of p21CIP1. Our results indicate that integrin-regulated proteasomal proteolysis might contribute to anchorage-dependent cell cycle control.

Distinct versus redundant properties among members of the INK4 family of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors

p16INK4a, p15INK4b, p18INK4c and p19INK4d comprise a family of cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitors and tumor suppressors. We report that the INK4 proteins share the ability to arrest cells in G1, and interact with CDK4 or CDK6 with similar avidity. In contrast, only p18 and particularly p19 are phosphorylated in vivo, and each of the human INK4 proteins shows unique expression patterns dependent on cell and tissue type, and differentiation stage. Thus, the INK4 proteins harbor redundant as well as non‐overlapping properties, suggesting distinct regulatory modes, and diverse roles for the individual INK4 family members in cell cycle control, cellular differentiation, and multistep oncogenesis.

Cell cycle regulators in testicular cancer: loss of p18INK4C marks progression from carcinoma in situ to invasive germ cell tumours.

Cell cycle regulators govern cellular proliferation, modulate differentiation and, when defective, contribute to oncogenesis. Here, we examined expression of cyclins A, B1 and E, and cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors p18INK4C (p18), p21WAF1/Cip1 (p21) and p27Kip1 (p27), in normal human adult testis (n = 5), and 53 testicular tumours, including 23 carcinomas in situ (CIS) and 30 germ cell tumours (GCTs). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a correlation between proliferation and abundance of the cyclin proteins, and abundant p18 and the lack of p21 and p27 in normal spermatogenesis. Expression of p21 and/or p27 was induced in some differentiated structures seen in teratomas, and was recapitulated in cell culture, using human NTera2/D1 teratocarcinoma cells induced to differentiate into neurons. CIS lesions showed abundant p18, low cyclin E, and moderate p27, in contrast with most invasive seminomas and embryonal carcinomas with very low‐to‐negative p18, often elevated cyclin E, and, unexpectedly, sustained or increased p27. Our results suggest increased abundance of cyclin E, and particularly down‐modulation or loss of p18 INK4C as the features that correlate with progression from CIS to invasive germ cell tumours of the human testis. Int. J. Cancer 85:370–375, 2000. ©2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Ubiquitin/proteasome-mediated degradation of p19INK4d determines its periodic expression during the cell cycle.

Assembly and activity of the proto-oncogenic cyclin D/CDK4(6) complexes, the major driving force of G1 phase progression, is negatively regulated by a family of INK4 CDK inhibitors p16INK4a, p15INK4b, p18INK4c, and p19INK4d. Expression of the INK4 family members is controlled at the transcriptional level, through differential response to environmental and intracellular signals such as cytokines, oncogenic overload, or cellular senescence. Here we show that the periodic oscillation of the p19INK4d protein during the cell cycle is determined by the ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent mechanism, allowing the protein abundance to follow the changes in its mRNA expression. Within the INK4 family, this regulatory mode appears restricted to p19INK4d whose ubiquitination was dependent on the integrity of lysine 62, and binding to CDK4. These results highlight unexpected differences among the INK4 inhibitors, and suggest how p19INK4d may help regulate the rate of cyclin D/CDK4(6) complex formation, and thereby timely progression through the mammalian cell division cycle.

PRIMA-1Met/APR-246 induces wild-type p53-dependent suppression of malignant melanoma tumor growth in 3D culture and in vivo

Disseminating malignant melanoma is a lethal disease highly resistant to radio- and chemotherapy. Therefore, the development of new treatment strategies is strongly needed. Tumor suppressor p53-mediated apoptosis is essential for the response to radio- and chemotherapy. Although p53 is not frequently mutated in melanoma, it is inactivated by integrin αv-mediated signaling, as we previously demonstrated 1, which may account, at least partially, for increased apoptosis resistance of malignant melanoma. In this study we addressed the question whether functional restoration of p53 by APR-246 (PRIMA-1Met), which can reactivate mutant p53 and induce massive apoptosis in cancer cells, is able to restore the function of inactive p53 in melanoma. Using a three-dimensional collagen gel (3D-collagen) to culture melanoma cells carrying wild-type p53, we found that APR-246 treatment resulted in activation of p53, leading to increased expression of p53 pro-apoptotic targets Apaf1 and PUMA and activation of caspase- 9 and -3. Moreover, APR-246 triggered melanoma cell apoptosis that was mediated by p53 and caspase 9. Importantly, APR-246 treatment also suppressed human melanoma xenograft tumors in vivo in a p53-dependent manner. Thus, wild-type p53 reactivation may provide a novel approach for malignant melanoma treatment, with APR-246 as a candidate drug for such a development.

The kinase-inhibitory domain of p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) inhibits cell cycle progression independent of PAK1 kinase activity

p21-activated kinase 1 (PAK1) is a mediator of downstream signaling from the small GTPases Rac and Cdc42. In its inactive state, PAK1 forms a homodimer where two kinases inhibit each other in trans. The kinase inhibitory domain (KID) of one molecule of PAK1 binds to the kinase domain of its counterpart and keeps it inactive. Therefore, the isolated KID of PAK1 has been widely used to specifically inhibit and study PAK function. Here, we show that the isolated KID induced a cell cycle arrest with accumulation of cells in the G1u2009phase of the cell cycle with an inhibition of cyclin D1 and D2 expression. This cell cycle arrest required the intact KID and was also induced by a mutated KID unable to block PAK1 kinase activity. Furthermore, the KID-induced cell cycle arrest could not be rescued by the expression of a constitutively active PAK1-T423E mutant, concluding that this arrest occurs independently of PAK1 kinase activity. Our results suggest that PAK1 through its KID inhibits cyclin D expression and thereby enforces a cell cycle arrest. Our results also call for serious precaution in the use of KID to study PAK function.

Lack of p19INK4d in human testicular germ-cell tumours contrasts with high expression during normal spermatogenesis

p19INK4d, a member of the INK4 family of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, negatively regulates the proto-oncogenic cyclin D/CDK4(6) complexes whose ability to phosphorylate the retinoblastoma tumour suppressor (RB) promotes G1/S transition. In contrast to the related p16INK4a tumour suppressor, expression patterns of 19INK4d in human tissues and tumours remain unknown. As the RB pathway is commonly targeted in cancer, and mouse models suggest a role for p19INK4d in spermatogenesis, we examined the abundance and localization of p19INK4d in the human testis, both during normal development and at various stages of germ-cell tumour pathogenesis. Our data show that the p19INK4d protein is abundant in spermatocytes of normal human adult testes, whereas virtually no p19INK4d is detectable in testicular cancer, including the preinvasive carcinoma in situ stage. Together with the lack of p19INK4d in human foetal germ cells, these results support the concept of foetal origin of the testicular germ-cell tumours, and help better understand the emerging role of the RB pathway in spermatogenesis and tumorigenesis in the human testis.

p21-activated Kinase 4 Phosphorylation of Integrin β5 Ser-759 and Ser-762 Regulates Cell Migration

Modulation of integrin αvβ5 regulates vascular permeability, angiogenesis, and tumor dissemination. In addition, we previously found a role for p21-activated kinase 4 (PAK4) in selective regulation of integrin αvβ5-mediated cell motility (Zhang, H., Li, Z., Viklund, E. K., and Strömblad, S. (2002) J. Cell Biol. 158, 1287–1297). This report focuses on the molecular mechanisms of this regulation. We here identified a unique PAK4-binding membrane-proximal integrin β5-SERS-motif involved in controlling cell attachment and migration. We also mapped the integrin β5-binding site within PAK4. We found that PAK4 binding to integrin β5 was not sufficient to promote cell migration, but that PAK4 kinase activity was required for PAK4 promotion of cell motility. Importantly, PAK4 specifically phosphorylated the integrin β5 subunit at Ser-759 and Ser-762 within the β5-SERS-motif. Point mutation of these two serine residues abolished the PAK4-induced cell migration, indicating a functional role for these phosphorylations in migration. Our results may give important leads to the functional regulation of integrin αvβ5, with implications for vascular permeability, angiogenesis, and cancer dissemination.

Oncogenic H-Ras V12 promotes anchorage-independent cytokinesis in human fibroblasts.

Cell anchorage is required for cell proliferation of untransformed cells, whereas anchorage-independent growth can be induced by oncogenes and is a hallmark of transformation. Whereas anchorage-dependent control of the progression of the G1 phase of the cell cycle has been extensively studied, it is less clear whether and how anchorage may control other cell cycle phases and whether oncogenes may affect such controls. Here, we found that lack of cell anchorage did not influence progression through the cell cycle S phase, G2 phase, or most of mitosis of primary human fibroblasts. However, unanchored fibroblasts could not complete cytokinesis. The cleavage furrow and central spindle were still formed in the absence of anchorage, but cells were unable to complete ingression, causing binucleation. Importantly, V12 H-Ras-transformed fibroblasts and two cancer cell lines progressed through the entire cell cycle without anchorage, including through cytokinesis. This indicates that oncogenic signaling may contribute to anchorage-independent growth and tumorigenesis by promoting the final cleavage furrow ingression during cytokinesis.

Anchorage-independent cytokinesis as part of oncogenic transformation?

Cell anchorage to the extracellular matrix (ECM) controls proliferation of mammalian cells and the abrogation of this control is an indicator of cellular transformation. In fact, two distinct periods of the cell cycle are subject to anchorage-dependent regulation. Firstly, anchorage exerts an extensive control of the G1-phase, a control that we found to be more rigorous than for example the control by growth factors. Secondly, anchorage regulates the progression through cytokinesis. In order to achieve anchorage-independent growth a cell must circumvent these controls. To this end, we recently found that oncogenic H-RasV12 can provide sufficient signals to overcome the anchorage-dependence for cytokinesis. Together with earlier findings on G1-phase control, this demonstrates that oncogenic signaling contributes to de-regulation of anchorage-dependence during both the G1-phase and the cytokinesis. This also suggests that de-regulated cytokinesis may be part of oncogenic transformation.