Minori Koshiji

Pembrolizumab for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-012): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial

BACKGROUND Expression of PD-L1 has been shown to be upregulated in some patients with gastric cancer. As part of the phase 1b KEYNOTE-012 study, we aimed to assess the safety and activity of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction. METHODS This study was a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial done at 13 cancer research centres in the USA, Israel, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. We enrolled patients with PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastro-oesophageal junction. Patients received intravenous pembrolizumab at 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for 24 months or until progression or unacceptable toxic effects occurred. Response was assessed every 8 weeks in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The primary objectives were safety in patients who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab and the proportion of patients achieving overall responses in patients who received at least one pembrolizumab dose and who either had a post-baseline scan or who discontinued therapy because of clinical disease progression or a treatment-related adverse event before the first post-baseline scan. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01848834, and is ongoing but no longer enrolling patients. FINDINGS From Oct 23, 2013, to May 5, 2014, 39 patients were enrolled. 36 were evaluable for response by central assessment. Eight (22%, 95% CI 10-39) patients were judged to have had an overall response at central review; all responses were partial. All 39 patients were included in the safety analyses. Five (13%) patients had a total of six grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events, consisting of two cases of grade 3 fatigue, one case each of grade 3 pemphigoid, grade 3 hypothyroidism, and grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy, and one case of grade 4 pneumonitis. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION In this population of patients with recurrent or metastatic PD-L1-positive gastric cancer, pembrolizumab had a manageable toxicity profile and promising antitumour activity, warranting further study in phase 2 and 3 trials. FUNDING Merck & Co.

Lessons from the comparison of two randomized clinical trials using gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer

There had been no standard chemotherapy established for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) until 2009, when the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine (GC) was adopted as a first line standard chemotherapy option based on the results from two randomized studies: ABC-02, a UK investigator-initiated trial and the largest randomized phase III study in this tumor type with 410 patients; and BT22, a Japanese, industry-sponsored, randomized phase II study with 83 patients. In this review, investigators from both studies collaborated to compare protocols, patient characteristics, and outcomes of both studies including sub-analyses of study results. Although both studies showed GC combination therapy to be more effective than monotherapy, a detailed comparison revealed disparities between efficacy and safety end-points between the studies, which did not necessarily arise from different populations but from differences in protocol design. This review provides clinicians with insights for advanced BTC clinical study design and interpretation of historical studies.

Phase I study of LY2469298, an Fc-engineered humanized anti-CD20 antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma

Patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), where position 158 of FcγR‐IIIa is heterozygous valine/phenylalanine or homozygous phenylalanine (F‐carriers), have natural killer cells with lower binding affinity to IgG than valine homozygote patients. In addition, F‐carriers show less efficacy with rituximab treatment than patients homozygous for valine. LY2469298 is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, with human germline framework regions, and specific amino acid substitutions engineered into the Fc region to increase effector function in antibody‐dependent cell‐mediated cytotoxicity. This dose‐escalation, phase I study was conducted to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of LY2469298 in Japanese patients with previously treated, CD20‐positive FL who had not relapsed or progressed within 120 days of prior rituximab. LY2469298 was administered by intravenous infusion at 100 or 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks. Ten patients were enrolled (median age, 60 years); all had previously been treated with rituximab. Nine patients were F‐carriers while one was homozygous for valine at position 158 of FcγRIIIa. No patients developed dose‐limiting toxicities, and the most frequent adverse events were lymphopenia, pyrexia, leukopenia, chills and neutropenia. Five (50%) of the ten patients responded to LY2469298 treatment (three complete responses, one unconfirmed complete response and one partial response). Serum LY2469298 was eliminated in a biphasic manner and the pharmacokinetic profiles were not different from those in a preceding study in the United States. In conclusion, LY2469298 was well tolerated and clinical activity was observed in FL patients pretreated with rituximab, mostly consisting of F‐carriers. Further investigation of FL is warranted. (Cancer Sci 2011; 102: 432–438)

Safety and antitumor activity of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent carcinoma of the anal canal

Background Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab, a humanized programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody, was assessed in KEYNOTE-028, a multicohort, phase Ib trial for patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced solid tumors. We report results for the cohort of patients with advanced anal carcinoma. Patients and methods Patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (≥1%) received intravenous pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for up to 2 years or until confirmed progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed every 8 weeks for the first 6 months and every 12 weeks thereafter per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Primary endpoints were safety and overall response rate per investigator review. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and response duration. Data cutoff date was 1 July 2015. Results Of the 43 patients with advanced anal carcinoma evaluable for PD-L1 expression, 32 (74%) had PD-L1-positive tumors as assessed with the 22C3 prototype assay, of whom 25 were enrolled between April and September 2014. Sixteen patients (64%) experienced treatment-related adverse events; the most common ones were diarrhea and fatigue in four patients (16%) each and nausea in three patients (12%). There were no treatment-related deaths or discontinuations as of the data cutoff date. Among the 24 patients with squamous cell carcinoma histology, four had confirmed partial response, for an overall response rate of 17% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5%–37%) and 10 (42%) had confirmed stable disease, for a disease control rate of 58%. One additional patient with non-squamous histology had confirmed stable disease. Conclusion In this population of patients with PD-L1-positive advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma, pembrolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity. These data support further study of pembrolizumab for this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02054806.Background Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab, a humanized programmed death 1 monoclonal antibody, was assessed in KEYNOTE-028, a multicohort, phase Ib trial for patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced solid tumors. We report results for the cohort of patients with advanced anal carcinoma. Patients and methods Patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (≥1%) received intravenous pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for up to 2 years or until confirmed progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was assessed every 8 weeks for the first 6 months and every 12 weeks thereafter per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Primary endpoints were safety and overall response rate per investigator review. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and response duration. Data cutoff date was 1 July 2015. Results Of the 43 patients with advanced anal carcinoma evaluable for PD-L1 expression, 32 (74%) had PD-L1-positive tumors as assessed with the 22C3 prototype assay, of whom 25 were enrolled between April and September 2014. Sixteen patients (64%) experienced treatment-related adverse events; the most common ones were diarrhea and fatigue in four patients (16%) each and nausea in three patients (12%). There were no treatment-related deaths or discontinuations as of the data cutoff date. Among the 24 patients with squamous cell carcinoma histology, four had confirmed partial response, for an overall response rate of 17% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5%–37%) and 10 (42%) had confirmed stable disease, for a disease control rate of 58%. One additional patient with non-squamous histology had confirmed stable disease. Conclusion In this population of patients with PD-L1-positive advanced squamous cell anal carcinoma, pembrolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity. These data support further study of pembrolizumab for this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02054806.

Phase I dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of oral enzastaurin (LY317615) in advanced solid tumors

Enzastaurin is an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor that targets the protein kinase C (PKC) and phosphoinositide 3‐kinase/AKT pathways to induce apoptosis and suppress proliferation of various cancer cell lines. This phase I study evaluated the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of enzastaurin in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors and determined the recommended dose for phase II. Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2. Patients received enzastaurin orally once daily until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Enzastaurin was started at 250 mg/day followed by stepwise dose increases based on the incidence of dose‐limiting toxicities (DLT). Twenty‐three patients (seven patients: 250 mg; six patients: 375 mg; six patients: 500 mg; four patients: 750 mg) were enrolled and received enzastaurin. The major tumor types were non‐small‐cell lung cancer (n = 5) and breast cancer (n = 3). No DLT was reported at doses of 500 mg or less. Because two DLT (grade 2 QTc prolongation lasting for a week) were observed at 750 mg enzastaurin, this was determined as the maximum tolerated dose. Multiple daily doses at 500 mg achieved the target plasma concentration to inhibit PKC activity (1400 nmol/L). Enzastaurin was well tolerated up to 500 mg in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. The recommended dose for phase II was determined to be 500 mg daily for a 28‐day cycle on the basis of safety and plasma exposures. (Cancer Sci 2010);

Safety and Antitumor Activity of the Anti–Programmed Death-1 Antibody Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma

Purpose The anti-programmed death-1 antibody pembrolizumab was evaluated in KEYNOTE-028, a multicohort, phase IB study of patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced solid tumors. Results from the esophageal carcinoma cohort are reported herein. Patients and Methods Eligible patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction in whom standard therapy failed and who had PD-L1-positive tumors received pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for up to 2 years or until confirmed disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Response was assessed every 8 weeks up to 6 months and every 12 weeks thereafter. Primary end points were safety and overall response rate, determined by investigator review per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Results Among 83 patients with esophageal carcinoma and samples evaluable for PD-L1 expression, 37 (45%) had PD-L1-positive tumors, and 23 were enrolled. Median age was 65 years; 78% had squamous histology; and 87% received ≥ two prior therapies for advanced/metastatic disease. As of the data cutoff (February 20, 2017), median follow-up was 7 months (range, 1 to 33 months). Nine patients (39%) experienced treatment-related adverse events, most commonly decreased appetite, decreased lymphocyte count, generalized rash, and rash (two patients [9%] each). No grade 4 adverse events or deaths were attributed to pembrolizumab. Overall response rate was 30% (95% CI, 13% to 53%); median duration of response was 15 months (range, 6 to 26 months). A six-gene interferon-γ gene expression signature analysis suggested that delayed progression and increased response occur among pembrolizumab-treated patients with higher interferon-γ composite scores. Conclusion Pembrolizumab demonstrated manageable toxicity and durable antitumor activity in patients with heavily pretreated, PD-L1-positive advanced esophageal carcinoma.

A Landmark Point Analysis with Cytotoxic Agents for Advanced NSCLC

Introduction: As a result of recent publications, we hypothesized that period of 8 weeks after initiation of treatment is a useful landmark point for cytotoxic agents for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To test this hypothesis, we conducted landmark analyses with clinical trials employing cytotoxic agents. Our goal was to assess the proper design of clinical trials with cytotoxic agents for NSCLC for maximizing patients’ benefit. Methods: We conducted landmark analyses of a phase II study of pemetrexed in locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and a phase III study of Four-Arm Cooperative Study for advanced NSCLC. A total of 806 patients who received chemotherapy (pemetrexed, cisplatin and irinotecan, paclitaxel and carboplatin, cisplatin and gemcitabine, cisplatin and vinorelbine) were included in this assessment. Results: Tumor-shrinkage rate at 8 weeks was significantly associated with longer survival in the study with pemetrexed (p = 0.043), whereas tumor-shrinkage rate at 4 weeks did not correlated with survival (p = 0.139). Similarly, using the Four-Arm Cooperative Study data, the optimal landmark point was 8 weeks (p = 0.002), not 4 weeks (p = 0.190). Conclusion: The landmark point for NSCLC was 8 weeks with all cytotoxic agents in our analysis when the therapy was given as a frontline or subsequent therapy. Our result suggests the concept of a disease-specific landmark point, which may lead to a change of phase II/III clinical study design to evaluate cytotoxic agents and clinical investigators, and their sponsors may consider an early look to assess the efficacy of cytotoxic agents for NSCLC.

A Phase I Study of Enzastaurin Combined with Pemetrexed in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: Enzastaurin is an oral serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, which suppress signaling through protein kinase C-&bgr; and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT pathway. Preclinical studies suggested synergic antitumor activity of enzastaurin and pemetrexed. We conducted this phase I study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical activity of this combination in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: An oral daily dose of 500 mg enzastaurin was administered once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) in combination with 500 mg/m2 pemetrexed on day 1 in repeated 21-day cycles. Cycle 1 started with a 7-day enzastaurin lead-in treatment that preceded pemetrexed administration: a loading dose of 1125 mg enzastaurin on day 1 followed by a 500 mg total daily dose on days 2–7. Results: Twelve patients were treated QD (n = 6) or BID (n = 6). One dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 QTc prolongation) was reported in the QD cohort. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were slightly increased in the BID cohort compared with the QD cohort. After beginning the combination therapy, enzastaurin exposures decreased slightly but remained above the target plasma concentration of 1400 nmol/L. Compared with QD, there was a higher exposure with BID. The enzastaurin dosing regimen (QD or BID) had no effect on pemetrexed pharmacokinetics. Two patients had partial responses as defined by RECIST. Five patients received more than 10 cycles of treatment without disease progression. Conclusions: Both schedules of enzastaurin in combination with pemetrexed were well tolerated and clinically active in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Effect of biliary drainage on chemotherapy in patients with biliary tract cancer: an exploratory analysis of the BT22 study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Complications from biliary drainage in biliary tract cancer (BTC) may influence the relative dose intensity of chemotherapy or increase adverse events during chemotherapy. BT22 was a randomized phase II trial, the results of which were consistent with those of a phase III trial in non-Japanese that demonstrated the effectiveness of gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination therapy (GC) in BTC. The purpose of this exploratory analysis of the BT22 study was to identify the possible effects of biliary drainage on the efficacy and safety of GC or gemcitabine monotherapy (G). PATIENTS AND METHODS The 83 BTC patients who received GC or G in BT22 were retrospectively analysed in two subgroups dependent upon whether biliary drainage was performed before study entry. Efficacy and safety of treatment (GC vs. G) were compared in these two groups. RESULTS The GC arm had a higher 1-year survival rate and longer median survival time (MST) than the G arm independent of prior biliary drainage. Patients in the drainage subgroup developed cholangitis more frequently, however, the frequency of grade 3/4 adverse events did not differ between the treatment regimens with/without drainage. CONCLUSIONS Biliary drainage before chemotherapy did not affect the therapeutic efficacy or tolerability of chemotherapy using G or GC.

Abstract LB-67: REGARD: A phase III, randomized, double-blind trial of ramucirumab and best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo and BSC in the treatment of metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma following disease progression on first-line p

Proceedings: AACR 104th Annual Meeting 2013; Apr 6-10, 2013; Washington, DC Background: VEGF and VEGF receptor-2 mediated signaling and angiogenesis may contribute to gastric cancer pathogenesis. Ramucirumab (RAM; IMC-1121B) is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting VEGFR-2. We conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III international trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RAM in pts with metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma progressing on 1st-line platinum- and/or fluoropyrimidine containing combination therapy. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to receive RAM (8 mg/kg IV) or placebo (PL) every 2 weeks (wks) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Pts had disease progression within 4 months (m) after 1st-line therapy for metastatic disease or within 6 m after adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 12-wk PFS rate, overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: From 10/09 to 01/12, 355 pts were randomized (RAM: 238; PL: 117). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms. RAM significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 22% when compared to PL (Hazard Ratio [HR] for OS = 0.776; 95% CI, 0.603-0.998; p = 0.0473). Median OS was 5.2 m for RAM and 3.8 m for PL. The OS benefit for RAM appeared consistent across subgroups and after adjustment for other prognostic factors (multivariate HR = 0.774; 95% CI, 0.605-0.991). The HR for PFS was 0.483 (95% CI, 0.376-0.620; p < 0.0001). Median PFS was 2.1 m for RAM and 1.3 m for PL. 12-wk PFS was 40% for RAM and 16% for PL. ORR was 3.4% for RAM and 2.6% for PL. Disease control rate was 49% for RAM and 23% for PL (p < 0.0001). Use of anti-cancer therapy post-study: 32% RAM; 39% PL. The most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were: hypertension (7.6% RAM; 2.6% PL), fatigue (6.4% RAM; 9.6% PL), anemia (6.4% RAM; 7.8% PL), abdominal pain (5.9% RAM; 2.6% PL), ascites (4.2% RAM; 4.3% PL), decreased appetite (3.4% RAM; 3.5% PL), bleeding (3.4% RAM; 2.6% PL), and hyponatremia (3.4% RAM; 0.9% PL). Conclusions: Ramucirumab significantly prolonged survival in pts with advanced gastric or GE junction adenocarcinoma following progression on first-line therapy with an acceptable safety profile. These results validate VEGFR-2 signaling as a therapeutic target in gastric cancer. Clinical trial: [NCT00917384][1] Citation Format: Charles S. Fuchs, Jiri Tomasek, Jae Yong Cho, Dumitru Filip, Rodolfo Passalacqua, Chancal Goswami, Howard Safran, Lucas Vieira Dos Santos, Giuseppe Aprile, David Ferry, Bohuslav Melichar, Moustapha Tehfe, Eldar Topuzov, Josep Tabernero, John Raymond Zalcberg, Ian Chau, Minori Koshiji, Yanzhi Hsu, Jonathan Schwartz, Jaffer Ajani. REGARD: A phase III, randomized, double-blind trial of ramucirumab and best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo and BSC in the treatment of metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma following disease progression on first-line p [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-67. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-LB-67 [1]: /lookup/external-ref?link_type=CLINTRIALGOV&access_num=NCT00917384&atom=%2Fcanres%2F73%2F8_Supplement%2FLB-67.atom