Minoru Hoshiyama

The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields.

Averaged magnetoencephalography (MEG) following somatosensory stimulation, somatosensory evoked magnetic field(s) (SEF), in humans are reviewed. The equivalent current dipole(s) (ECD) of the primary and the following middle-latency components of SEF following electrical stimulation within 80-100 ms are estimated in area 3b of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI), the posterior bank of the central sulcus, in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated site. Their sites are generally compatible with the homunculus which was reported by Penfield using direct cortical stimulation during surgery. SEF to passive finger movement is generated in area 3a or 2 of SI, unlike with electrical stimulation. Long-latency components with peaks of approximately 80-120 ms are recorded in the bilateral hemispheres and their ECD are estimated in the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) in the bilateral hemispheres. We also summarized (1) the gating effects on SEF by interference tactile stimulation or movement applied to the stimulus site, (2) clinical applications of SEF in the fields of neurosurgery and neurology and (3) cortical plasticity (reorganization) of the SI. SEF specific to painful stimulation is also recorded following painful stimulation by CO(2) laser beam. Pain-specific components are recorded over 150 ms after the stimulus and their ECD are estimated in the bilateral SII and the limbic system. We introduced a newly-developed multi (12)-channel gradiometer system with the smallest and highest quality superconducting quantum interference device (micro-SQUID) available to non-invasively detect the magnetic fields of a human peripheral nerve. Clear nerve action fields (NAFs) were consistently recorded from all subjects.

Preferential stimulation of Aδ fibers by intra-epidermal needle electrode in humans

&NA; We recorded evoked potentials (EPs) induced by conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TS), laser stimulation (LS) and epidermal electrical stimulation (ES) using a specially made needle electrode. We evaluated the activated fibers by epidermal stimulation by assessing the conduction velocity (CV) of the peripheral nerves. The EPs were recorded from Cz electrode (vertex) of the International 10–20 system in 12 healthy subjects. For the ES, the tip of a stainless steel needle electrode was inserted in the epidermis of the skin (0.2 mm in depth). Distal and proximal sites of the upper limb were stimulated by the LS and ES with an intensity which induced a definite pain sensation. Similar sites were stimulated by TS with an intensity of two times the sensory threshold. A major EP positive response (P1) was obtained by stimulation by all three types of stimuli. The P1 latency for the TS (245±22 ms) was significantly shorter than that for the ES (302±17 ms, P<0.0001) and LS (341±21 ms, P<0.0001) and the peak latency P1 by the LS was also significantly longer, approximately 40 ms, than that by the ES (P<0.0001). The CVs were 15.1, 15.3 and 44.1 m/s obtained by ES, LS and TS, respectively. The CV indicated that the fibers activated by the ES were mainly A&dgr; fibers, which corresponded to the fibers stimulated by the LS. We considered that the ES with our newly developed needle electrode was a very convenient method for the selective stimulation of the A&dgr; fibers, since it was very simple, not requiring any special apparatus, did not cause bleeding or burns and caused minimum uncomfortable feeling.

Pain-related magnetic fields following painful CO2 laser stimulation in man

The initial somatosensory evoked magnetic fields following painful heat stimulation by CO2 laser beam applied to the upper and lower limb were investigated in normal subjects. The main deflections, ‘Pain MA’ and ‘Pain ML’ following the arm and leg stimulation, respectively, were identified in the bilateral second sensory cortices (SII). The onset latencies of Pain MA and Pain ML were approximately 150 and 200 ms, respectively. No consistent equivalent current dipole was found in other areas including the primary sensory cortex in each hemisphere. Therefore, we consider that neurons in the bilateral SII are initially activated following painful heat stimulation.

A comparative magnetoencephalographic study of cortical activations evoked by noxious and innocuous somatosensory stimulations

We recorded somatosensory-evoked magnetic fields and potentials produced by painful intra-epidermal stimulation (ES) and non-painful transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TS) applied to the left hand in 12 healthy volunteers to compare cortical responses to noxious and innocuous somatosensory stimulations. Our results revealed that cortical processing following noxious and innocuous stimulations was strikingly similar except that the former was delayed approximately 60 ms relative to the latter, which was well explained by a difference in peripheral conduction velocity mediating noxious (Adelta fiber) and innocuous (Abeta fiber) inputs. The first cortical activity evoked by both ES and TS was in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated side. The following activities were in the bilateral secondary somatosensory cortex (SII), insular cortex, cingulate cortex, anterior medial temporal area and ipsilateral SI. The source locations did not differ between the two stimulus modalities except that the dipole for insular activity following ES was located more anterior to that following TS. Both ES and TS evoked vertex potentials consisting of a negativity followed by a positivity at a latency of 202 and 304 ms, and 134 and 243 ms, respectively. The time course of the vertex potential corresponded to that of the activity of the medial temporal area. Our results suggested that cortical processing was similar between noxious and innocuous stimulation in SI and SII, but different in insular cortex. Our data also implied that activities in the amygdala/hippocampal formation represented common effects of noxious and tactile stimulations.

Pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields

Abstract Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) following painful electrical stimulation of the finger were investigated in 5 normal subjects. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of deflections shorter than 100 msec in latency were located in the primary sensory cortex (SI) in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated finger following either non-painful or painful stimulation. Two main deflections, N100m-P100m and N250m-P250m, were independently identified following painful stimulation, although they were not found in SEFs following non-painful weak: stimulation. ECDs of the N100m-P100m were considered to be located in the bilateral second sensory cortices (SII). ECDs of the N250m-P250m were identified in the bilateral cingulate cortices and SII, but the intersubject difference was large. Therefore, we considered that contralateral SI and bilateral SII were initially activated by painful noxious stimulation, and then multiple areas including bilateral SII and cingulate cortices were activated. In EEG recordings (evoked potentials), no potential corresponding to N100m-Pl.00m was found, probably because it was difficult to record activation in SII by EEG recordings. The P250 potential which corresponded to the N250m-P250m was clearly identified, probably because activation of multiple areas generated large long-duration EEG potentials which were maximal around the vertex, unlike MEG recordings.

Temporal changes of pyramidal tract activities after decision of movement : a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in humans

To elucidate the effects of the decision to move on the pyramidal tract in humans, we examined the changes in the motor evoked potentials (MEP) of the forearm muscles following transcranial magnetic cortical stimulation (TMS) of the hand area during a go/no-go hand-movement task in 10 normal subjects. The subjects performed an extension of the right wrist according to the go, no-go and control signals, one of which was randomly presented on a TV. A single TMS was applied to the primary hand motor area in the left hemisphere 0-300 ms after each signal. The MEPs recorded from the wrist extensor and flexor muscles changed in amplitude after both go and no-go signals. In comparison with the control, the MEPs were significantly facilitated in the agonistic muscles (wrist extensor muscles) and attenuated in the antagonistic muscles (wrist flexor muscles), at the latencies of 100-200 ms after the go signal (P < 0.02). In contrast, the MEPs of both the extensor and flexor muscles were significantly attenuated during the period of 100-200 ms after the no-go signal (P < 0.001). We speculate that there is strong inhibition on the pyramidal tract after the no-go signal and that the inhibitory effect is non-specific to the target muscles. This inhibition differs from the reciprocal inhibition of the MEP observed in antagonistic muscles after the go signal, and it is probably related to the movement decision originating in the prefrontal cortex.

Effects of distraction on pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and potentials following painful electrical stimulation

We aimed to compare the effects of distraction on pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (pain SEF) following painful electrical stimulation with simultaneous recordings of evoked potentials (pain SEP). Painful electrical stimuli were applied to the right index finger of eleven healthy subjects. A table with 25 random two-digit numbers was shown to the subjects, who were asked to add 5 numbers of each line in their mind (calculation task) or to memorize the numbers (memorization task) during the recording. In the SEF recording, 3 short-latency components within 50 ms of the stimulation were generated in the primary sensory cortex (SI) of the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated finger. Middle-latency components between 100 and 250 ms after the stimuli were recorded from the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) in the bilateral hemispheres or the cingulate cortex. No SEF components were significantly affected by either task. In the SEP recording, the middle-latency components (N140 and P230) were identified as being maximal around the vertex. Amplitudes of the N140 and P230 were not affected by each task, but the peak-to-peak amplitude (N140-P230) was significantly decreased by both the calculation and memorization tasks, particularly by the former. Subjective pain rating was decreased in both the calculation and memorization tasks, particularly in the former. We concluded that distraction tasks reduced activities in the limbic system, in which the middle-latency EEG component probably generated, while neither the short-latency SEF components generated in SI nor the primary pain-related SEF components generated in SII-insula are affected.

Pain processing traced by magnetoencephalography in the human brain

The temporal and spatial processing of pain perception in human was traced by magnetoencephalography (MEG). We applied a painful CO2 laser beam to the forearm of 11 normal subjects, and estimated the activated areas using a single equivalent current dipole (ECD) at each time point, and a brain electric source analysis (BESA) as a spatio-temporal multiple source analysis method. The four-source model was found to be the most appropriate; sources 1 and 2 at the secondary sensory cortex (SII) contralateral and ipsilateral to the stimulation, and sources 3 and 4 at the anterior medial temporal area (probably the amygdalar nuclei or hippocampal formation) contralateral and ipsilateral to the stimulation, respectively. Activities in all 4 areas were temporally overlapped. Activity in the primary sensory cortex (SI) contralateral to the stimulated site was not identified. Activity in the cingulate cortex was also not clearly identified. These results are probably due to one or more of the following factors; (1) the cingulate cortex is too deep, (2) the ECDs generated in the cingulate cortex are mainly oriented radially, and (3) the ECDs generated in bilateral hemispheres interfere with each other. No significant or consistent magnetic fields were recorded after 500 msec following the stimulation, probably due to the complicated spatial and temporal overlapping of activities in multiple areas.

A new method for measuring the conduction velocities of Aβ-, Aδ- and C-fibers following electric and CO2 laser stimulation in humans

Abstract The conduction velocities of Aβ-, Aδ- and C-fibers of a peripheral nerve of the upper limb in normal subjects were measured by a combination of conventional electric stimulation, painful CO 2 laser stimulation and non-painful CO 2 laser stimulation of a tiny skin surface area, respectively. The values obtained were 69.1±7.4 m/s, 10.6±2.1 and 1.2±0.2 m/s, respectively. These findings demonstrated that the combined methods are useful for experimental and clinical exploration of the physiological function and pathophysiological role of Aβ-, Aδ- and C-fibers of a given peripheral nerve.

Identification of motor and sensory brain activities during unilateral finger movement: spatiotemporal source analysis of movement-associated magnetic fields

Abstract We investigated the movement-related cortical fields (MRCFs) recorded by magnetoencephalography (MEG) to identify the motor and sensory brain activities at the instant of the unilateral finger movement using six normal subjects. We focused our investigation on the source analysis of the events tightly linked to movement onset, and we used brain electric source analysis (BESA) to model the sources generating MRCFs during the interval from 200 ms before to 150 ms after the movement onset. Four sources provided satisfactory solutions for MRCF activities in this interval. Sources 1 and 2, which were located in the pre-central regions in the hemisphere contralateral and ipsilateral to the moved finger, respectively, generated the readiness fields (RF), but source 1 was predominant just before movement onset. The motor field (MF), the peak of which was just after movement onset, was mainly generated by source 1. Sources 3 and 4 were located in the post-central regions in the hemisphere contralateral and ipsilateral to the moved finger, respectively. The first motor evoked field (MEF-I), the peak of which was about 80 ms after the movement, was mainly generated by source 3, but with the participation of sources 1, 2 and 4. The results indicated that the activities of both pre -and post-central regions in bilateral hemispheres were related to voluntary movements, although the predominant areas varied over time. This is the first noninvasive study to clarify the complex spatiotemporal activities relating movements in humans using a multi-channel MEG system.