Mir Hussain

Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.

Study Design. Human cadaveric ilio-lumbosacral spines were tested in an in vitro biomechanical flexibility experiment to investigate the biomechanical stability provided by four different types of spinal reconstruction techniques after spondylectomy of the L5 vertebral body. Objective. To compare the biomechanical stability provided by four reconstruction methods after L5 spondylectomy. Summary of Background Data. Clinical studies have shown that total spondylectomy of the L5 vertebral body presents a challenging scenario for spinal reconstruction. Biomechanical studies on spinal reconstruction after total spondylectomy have been performed at the thoracolumbar junction. However, there have been no biomechanical studies after L5 spondylectomy. Methods. Seven cadaveric lumbosacral spines (L2-S1) with intact ilium were used. After intact testing, spondylectomy of the L5 vertebra was performed and the spine was reconstructed using an expandable cage for anterior column support. Supplementary fixation was performed as a sequential order of: (1) bilateral pedicle screws at L4-S1 (SP), (2) anterior plate and bilateral pedicle screws at L4-S1 (ASP), (3) bilateral pedicle screws at L3-S1 and iliac screws (MP), and (4) anterior plate at L4-S1, bilateral pedicle screws at L3-S1 and iliac screws (AMP). Range of motion (ROM) for each construct was obtained by applying pure moments in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Results. In flexion, extension and lateral bending all the instrumented constructs significantly decreased (P < 0.05) the range of motion (ROM) compared to intact. In axial rotation, only the circumferential support constructs (ASP, AMP) provided significantly decreased (P < 0.05) ROM, whereas posterior instrumentations alone (SP, MP) were comparable to intact spines. Conclusion. After L5 spondylectomy, the L4-S1 cage with posterior short segment instrumentation provides stability in lateral bending that is not further increased by adding L3 pedicle-iliac screws and L4-S1 anterior plate. However, an anterior L4-S1 plate provides additional stability in flexion, extension, and axial rotation.

The biomechanical effect of transverse connectors use in a pre- and postlaminectomy model of the posterior cervical spine: an in vitro cadaveric study.

Study Design. An in vitro biomechanical study investigating the effect of transverse connectors on posterior cervical stabilization system in a laminectomy model. Objective. To evaluate the optimal design, number, and location of the transverse connectors in stabilizing long segment posterior instrumentation in the cervical spine. Summary of Background Data. In the cervical spine, lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation is used for providing stability after decompression. Transverse connectors have been used to augment segmental posterior instrumentation. However, in the cervical region the optimal design, number, and the location of transverse connectors is not known. Methods. Seven fresh human cervicothoracic cadaveric spines (C2–T1) were tested by applying ±1.5 Nm moments in flexion (F), extension (E), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). After testing the intact condition, LMS/rods were placed and then were tested with two different transverse connectors (top-loading connector [TL] and the head-to-head [HH] connector) in multiple levels, pre- and postlaminectomy (PL). Results. LMS significantly reduced segmental motion by 77.2% in F, 75.6% in E, 86.6% in LB, and 86.1% in AR prelaminectomy and by 75.4% in F, 76% in E, 80.6% in LB, and 76.4% in AR postlaminectomy compared to intact (P < 0.05). Only in AR, PL constructs with HH connectors at C3 & C7, TL connectors at C4–C5 & C5–C6, and at C3–C4 & C6–C7 significantly reduced the range of motion by 12.9%, 11.9%, and 11.9%, respectively, compared to PL LMS (P < 0.05). No statistical significance was observed between TL connector and HH connector in all loading directions. Conclusion. The biomechanical advantage of transverse connectors is significant in AR, when using two connectors at the proximal and distal ends, compared to one connector. In a clinical setting, this data may guide surgeons on transverse connector configurations to consider during posterior cervical instrumentation.

Kinematics of a selectively constrained radiolucent anterior lumbar disc: Comparisons to hybrid and circumferential fusion

BACKGROUND Despite encouraging clinical outcomes of one-level total disc replacements reported in literature, there is no compelling evidence regarding the stability following two-level disc replacement and hybrid constructs. The current study is aimed at evaluating the multidirectional kinematics of a two-level disc arthroplasty and hybrid construct with disc replacement adjacent to rigid circumferential fusion, compared to two-level fusion using a novel selectively constrained radiolucent anterior lumbar disc. METHODS Nine osteoligamentous lumbosacral spines (L1-S1) were tested in the following sequence: 1) Intact; 2) One-level disc replacement; 3) Hybrid; 4) Two-level disc replacement; and 5) Two-level fusion. Range of motion (at both implanted and adjacent level), and center of rotation in sagittal plane were recorded and calculated. FINDINGS At the level of implantation, motion was restored when one-level disc replacement was used but tended to decrease with two-level disc arthroplasty. The findings also revealed that both one-level and two-level disc replacement and hybrid constructs did not significantly change adjacent level kinematics compared to the intact condition, whereas the two-level fusion construct demonstrated a significant increase in flexibility at the adjacent level. The location of center of rotation in the sagittal plane at L4-L5 for the one-level disc replacement construct was similar to that of the intact condition. INTERPRETATION The one-level disc arthroplasty tended to mimic a motion profile similar to the intact spine. However, the two-level disc replacement construct tended to reduce motion and clinical stability of a two-level disc arthroplasty requires additional investigation. Hybrid constructs may be used as a surgical alternative for treating two-level lumbar degenerative disc disease.

Axial spondylectomy and circumferential reconstruction via a posterior approach.

BACKGROUND Spinal metastases of the second cervical vertebra are a subset of tumors that are particularly difficult to address surgically. Previously described techniques require highly morbid circumferential dissection posterior to the pharynx for resection and reconstruction. OBJECTIVE To perform a biomechanical analysis of instrumented reconstruction configurations used after axial spondylectomy and to demonstrate safe use of a novel construct in a patient case report. METHODS Several different published and novel reconstruction configurations were inserted into 7 occipitocervical spines that underwent axial spondylectomy. A biomechanical analysis of the stiffness of the constructs in flexion and extension, lateral bending, and rotation was performed. A patient then underwent a posterior-only approach for axial spondylectomy and circumferential reconstruction. RESULTS Biomechanical analysis of different constructs demonstrated that anterior column reconstruction with bilateral cages spanning the C1 lateral mass to the C3 facet in combination with occipitocervical instrumentation was superior in flexion-extension and equivalent in lateral bending and rotation to currently used constructs. The patient in whom this construct was placed via a posterior-only approach for axial spondylectomy and instrumentation remained at neurological baseline and demonstrated no recurrence of local disease or failure of instrumentation to date. CONCLUSION When C1 lateral mass to C3 facet bilateral cage plus occipitocervical instrumentation is compared with existing anterior and posterior constructs, this novel reconstruction is biomechanically equivalent if not superior in performance. In a patient, the posterior-only approach for C2 spondylectomy with the novel reconstruction was safe and durable and avoided the morbidity of the anterior approach.

Pedicle Screw Configuration for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Treatment: Short versus Long Posterior Fixation Constructs with and without Anterior Column Augmentation

Study Design An in-vitro study. Purpose The current study is aimed at investigating the differences in stability between short posterior fixation (SPF), hybrid posterior fixation (HPF), and long posterior fixation (LPF) with and without anterior column augmentation using calcium phosphate bone cement (CaP) for treating burst fractures (BFs). Overview of Literature The ideal treatment for thoracolumbar BF is controversial regarding the use of short or LPF constructs. Methods Seven human thoracolumbar spines (T9-L4) were tested on a six degree of freedom spine simulator in three physiologic planes, flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). Tested surgical constructs included the following: intact, injury (BF), SPF (T12-L2), HPF (T11-L2), LPF (T11-L3), SPF+CaP, HPF+CaP, LPF+CaP, and CaP alone (CaP). Range of motion (ROM) was recorded at T12-L2 in FE, LB, and AR. Results The reduction in mean ROM trended as follows: LPF>HPF>SPF. Only LPF constructs and HPF with anterior column augmentation significantly reduced mean ROM in FE and LB compared to the intact state. All instrumented constructs (SPF, HPF, and LPF) significantly reduced ROM in FE and LB compared to the injured condition. Furthermore, the instrumented constructs did not provide significant rotational stability. Injecting CaP provided minimal additional stability. Conclusions For the injury created, LPF and HPF provided better stability than SPF with and without anterior column augmentation. Therefore, highly unstable fractures may require extended, long or hybrid fusion constructs for optimum stability.

A comparative biomechanical study of traditional and in-line plating systems following immediate stabilization of single and bi-level cervical segments

BACKGROUND Anterior cervical plate fixation has gained widespread acceptance for treatment of cervical spine pathologies by stabilizing the segment and enhancing fusion rates. While it is generally accepted that multiple fusion levels benefit from plating, few studies have compared plate designs. Wider plates can increase surgical complications and cost and are, therefore, not indicated unless biomechanical benefits exist. In this study, a cervical cadaver model is subjected to physiological loads and stabilized with in-line one-screw, and traditional two-screw per vertebral body plates. METHODS Three groups of eight fresh frozen human cadaver cervical spines (C2-C7) were tested by applying pure moments of 1.5 Nm. Motion was obtained at C5-C6, and C4-C5/C5-C6 for single-level and bi-level experiments, respectively, in flexion-extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Specimens were tested, 1) intact, 2) injured (anterior discectomy), 3) with interbody fusion spacer, 4) in-line one-screw plate+spacer, and 5) two-screw plate+spacer, using four available plate brands. FINDINGS Single-level plating with interbody spacer restricted range-of-motion with respect to the spacer-alone construct in flexion-extension, regardless of one-screw or two-screw plate design, or brand. Similar behavior was seen in axial rotation, but not in lateral bending, where significance reductions in motion were achieved only with respect to the intact spine, not the interbody spacer group. In bi-level experiments all plate types restricted range-of-motion below spacer-alone levels in all loading modes. INTERPRETATION Anterior plating should be selected based on surgical requirements, as a wide (two-screw) over a narrow (one-screw) plating profile does not appear to provide a tangible biomechanical benefit.

Stabilization of the craniocervical junction after an internal dislocation injury: an in vitro study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Reconstructive surgeries at the occipitocervical (OC) junction have been studied in treating degenerative conditions. There is a paucity of data for optimal fixation for a traumatically unstable OC joint. In clinical OC dislocations, segmental fixation may be impossible because of vertebral artery injury or fracture. Segmental fixation of the occiput, C1, and C2 demonstrated maximum biomechanical stability in fixation of an unstable craniocervical dislocation. A biomechanical study comparing various points of cervical posterior screw fixation after recreating traumatic injury would illuminate relative advantages between the various techniques. PURPOSE To determine the rigidity lost, if any, of segmental C0-C2 posterior screw fixation versus fixation skipping C1 at the OC junction, with or without a cross-connector. STUDY DESIGN This study is a cadaveric biomechanical investigation. METHODS Intervertebral motions and translations were recorded in seven specimens under conditions in the following order: intact, OC dislocation model with complete disruption of the cruciate ligaments, alar ligaments, and occipitoatlantal/atlantoaxial capsules (injury), segmental posterior fixation (SPF) with posterior instrumentation (ELLIPSE; Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA) at occiput, C1, and C2 levels, endpoint fixation (EPF) with posterior instrumentation at occiput and C1 level skipping C1, and endpoint fixation with a cross-connector (EPFC). Motion was applied through a custom spine simulator with a pure moment load of 2.5 Nm and measured with motion capture markers attached to occiput (C0), anterior C1 ring, and C2. Flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), axial rotation (AR), and cranial-caudal (CC) motions were recorded in terms of C0-C2. Results were reported as a percentage of injured motion (injury=100%), unless otherwise stated. RESULTS The injury significantly increased the motion to 165%, 263%, and 130%, during FE, LB, and AR, respectively, of intact. The CC translations increased to 164%, 254%, and 121% during FE, LB, AR, respectively, of intact. Segmental posterior fixation significantly reduced motion to 7%, 8%, and 1%, during FE, LB, and AR, respectively, of injury. Endpoint fixation significantly increased motion in FE, resulting in 12%, 6%, and 4% during FE, LB, and AR, respectively, of injury when compared with SPF. The EPFC construct decreased the motion compared with its counterpart to 8.6%, 5.7%, and 3.2% during FE, LB, and AR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS All fixation constructs significantly reduced motion in all loading modes and CC translations, compared with intact and injury. The construct with the greatest stability against craniocervical dislocation included SPF with instrumentation at the occiput, C1, and C2. By skipping C1 using the EPF, FE and cephalad-caudal translations significantly increased compared with posterior fixation at every level. The addition of a cross-connector increased the stability but was not statistically significant.

Additional sagittal correction can be obtained when using an expandable titanium interbody device in lumbar Smith-Peterson osteotomies: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Insertion of intervertebral fusion devices between consecutive Smith-Peterson osteotomies (SPOs) provides an anterior fulcrum during compression, which has been documented to improve achievable Cobb angle correction. Extension of these principles to an expandable device would theoretically provide greater surgical adjustment for flatback and scoliotic cases than a static cage. PURPOSE To investigate whether an expandable titanium interbody device would produce greater sagittal correction than a static spacer when used during SPO procedures. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Cadaveric research was performed. PATIENT SAMPLE Seven T10-S1 human specimens were used. OUTCOME MEASURES Cobb angle changes and range of motion are the physiological measures. No self-report/functional measures were applicable. METHODS Bilateral pedicle screws were placed (T11-L5) before Smith-Petersen osteotomy creation from L2 to L4. A transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion titanium expandable implant was placed in each disc space from L2-L3 to L4-L5, which is currently an off-label use of this implant. Initial placement simulated a static spacer, and then incremental device expansion was performed to obtain an intermediate and final height. Lateral fluoroscopic images were taken for Cobb angle evaluation between L2 and L5, and range of motion as observed during application of pure bending moments was captured using a six degree-of-freedom spine simulator. A one-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc analysis was performed to determine significant differences (p<.05) between surgical constructs (intact, SPO only, contracted, semiexpanded, and expanded). Study costs were allocated within the research budget of a medical device company, where some authors are salaried employees; another author has been a paid consultant elsewhere. These financial associations were not believed to bias the results. RESULTS Change in Cobb angle from L2 to L5 was significantly greater with the interbody spacer compared with SPO alone. Despite an obvious increase in lordosis with expansion height, there were no significant differences between implant expansion states for the L2-L5 Cobb angle. All instrumented constructs were statistically equivalent in every mode of motion once rigid instrumentation was implemented, regardless of expansion state. CONCLUSIONS The expandable interbody did have a slight effect on lordotic correction; each additional millimeter in height expansion yielded approximately 1° in correction across the three SPO levels. Even without significant differences between the states, an expandable device may allow the surgeon more control of lordotic correction within the operating room than a static spacer alone.

Does Lumbopelvic Fixation Add Stability? A Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis of an Unstable Pelvic Fracture Model

Objective: We sought to determine the role of lumbopelvic fixation (LPF) in the treatment of zone II sacral fractures with varying levels of sacral comminution combined with anterior pelvic ring (PR) instability. We also sought to determine the proximal extent of LPF necessary for adequate stabilization and the role of LPF in complex sacral fractures when only 1 transiliac–transsacral (TI–TS) screw is feasible. Materials and Methods: Fifteen L4 to pelvis fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were tested intact in flexion-extension (FE) and axial rotation (AR) in a bilateral stance gliding hip model. Two comminution severities were simulated through the sacral foramen using an oscillating saw, with either a single vertical fracture (small gap, 1 mm) or 2 vertical fractures 10 mm apart with the intermediary bone removed (large gap). We assessed sacral fracture zone (SZ), PR, and total lumbopelvic (TL) stability during FE and AR. The following variables were tested: (1) presence of transverse cross-connector, (2) presence of anterior plate, (3) extent of LPF (L4 vs. L5), (4) fracture gap size (small vs. large), (5) number of TI–TS screws (1 vs. 2). Results: The transverse cross-connector and anterior plate significantly increased PR stability during AR (P = 0.02 and P = 0.01, respectively). Increased sacral comminution significantly affected SZ stability during FE (P = 0.01). Two versus 1 TI–TS screw in a large-gap model significantly affected TL stability (P = 0.04) and trended toward increased SZ stabilization during FE (P = 0.08). Addition of LPF (L4 and L5) significantly improved SZ and TL stability during AR and FE (P < 0.05). LPF in combination with TI–TS screws resulted in the least amount of motion across all 3 zones (SZ, PR, and TL) compared with all other constructs in both small-gap and large-gap models. Conclusions: The role of LPF in the treatment of complex sacral fractures is supported, especially in the setting of sacral comminution. LPF with proximal fixation at L4 in a hybrid approach might be needed in highly comminuted cases and when only 1 TI–TS screw is feasible to obtain maximum biomechanical support across the fracture zone.

Biomechanical Investigation of a Novel Revision Device in an Osteoporotic Model: Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Anchor Versus Larger Screw Diameter.

Study Design: In vitro cadaveric biomechanical study. Objective: To assess revision pullout strength of novel anchored screws (AS) versus conventional larger diameter traditional pedicle screws (TPS) in an osteoporotic model. Summary of Background Data: Pedicle screws are the most ubiquitous method of treating spinal pathologies requiring lumbar fusion. Although these screws are effective in providing 3-column stabilization of the spine, revision surgeries are occasionally necessary, particularly for geriatric and osteoporotic populations. Innovative technologies should be tested to ensure continued improvement in revision techniques. Methods: For 4 specimens at L2–L5 (T-score=−3.6±0.54), 6.5-mm-diameter TPS were inserted into left and right pedicles and were pulled out; revision screws were then inserted. Polyether-ether-ketone anchors, designed to expand around a 6.5-mm screw, were inserted into all left pedicles. On the contralateral side, 7.5-mm-diameter TPS were inserted at L2–L3, and 8.5-mm-diameter TPS at L4–L5. Pullout testing was performed at 10 mm/min. The maximum pullout strength and insertion forces were recorded. Results: The initial average pullout force (6.5-mm screw) was 837 N (±329 N) and 642 N (±318 N) in L2–L3 and L4–L5 left pedicles, and 705 N (±451 N) and 779 N (±378 N) in L2–L3 and L4–L5 right pedicles, respectively. Comparison of revision pullout forces versus initial pullout forces revealed the following: 87% and 63% for AS in L2–L3 and L4–L5 left pedicles, respectively; 56% for 7.5-mm and 93% for 8.5-mm TPS in L2–L3 and L4–L5 right pedicles, respectively. Conclusions: Anchor sleeves with 6.5-mm-diameter pedicle screws provided markedly higher resistance to screw pullout than 7.5-mm-diameter revision screws and fixation statistically equivalent to 8.5-mm-diameter screws, possibly because of medial-lateral expansion within the vertebral space and/or convex filling of the pedicle. AS results had the lowest SD, indicating minimal variability in bone-screw purchase.