Mircea Trofin
Microsoft
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mircea Trofin.
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering | 2008
Trevor Parsons; Adrian Mos; Mircea Trofin; Thomas Gschwind; John Murphy
Monitoring, analysing and understanding component based enterprise software systems are challenging tasks. These tasks are essential in solving and preventing performance and quality problems. Obtaining component level interactions which show the relationships between different software entities is a necessary prerequisite for such efforts. This paper focuses on component based Java applications, currently widely used by industry. They pose specific challenges while raising interesting opportunities for component level interaction extraction tools. We present a range of representative approaches for dynamically obtaining and using component interactions. For each approach we detail the needs it addresses, and the technical requirements for building an implementation of the approach. We also take a critical look at the different available implementations of the various techniques presented. We give performance and functional considerations and contrast them against each other by outlining their relative advantages and disadvantages. Based on this data, developers and system integrators can better understand the current state-of-the-art and the implications of choosing or implementing different dynamic interaction extraction techniques.
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer | 2008
Mircea Trofin; John Murphy
Contextual component frameworks, such as Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB), allow for components to specify boundary conditions for the runtime context. These conditions are satisfied at runtime by services of the underlying platform, thus ensuring that the context in which components run exhibits properties that allow them to operate correctly. Depending on how components call each other, it is possible that satisfying such conditions lead to problems such as reduced performance due to redundant service execution, or permanent errors (composition mismatches), due to incompatible boundary conditions. Currently, the semantics of these boundary conditions are expressed in natural language only, making it impossible to incorporate them into an automatic analysis tool. Furthermore, early understanding of how components call each other would be necessary, but it is currently difficult to achieve by means of a tool, as the method dispatch rules in a component system differ from the dispatch rules of the programming language(s) in which they were developed. We have developed a metamodel,
The Journal of Object Technology | 2006
Mircea Trofin; John Murphy
conference on object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications | 2003
Mircea Trofin
{\mathbb{M}}
conference on object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applications | 2004
Mircea Trofin
Archive | 2003
Mircea Trofin; John Murphy
, for describing boundary conditions, an analysis method,
Archive | 2013
Mircea Trofin; Krzysztof J. Cwalina; Patrick H. Dussud
Archive | 2010
Mircea Trofin; David Kean
{\mathbb{A}}
Archive | 2008
Mircea Trofin; Oleg Lvovitch; Blake W. Stone; Krzysztof J. Cwalina; Clemens A. Szyperski; Alex Bulankou
Archive | 2011
Mircea Trofin; Wes Haggard; Krzysztof J. Cwalina; David Kean; Jobst-Immo Landwerth
, and a static component-level call graph extraction method for EJB applications, CHAEJB.