Mirela V. Simon

Are cortical tubers epileptogenic? Evidence from electrocorticography

The purpose of this study was to characterize the epileptogenicity of tubers and surrounding cortex in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Three pediatric patients with TSC and intractable epilepsy underwent surgical resection of tubers associated with epileptogenic foci. In all patients, presurgical imaging revealed a prominent tuber that correlated on electroencephalography (EEG) with frequent interictal epileptiform discharges and electrographic seizures. Intracranial electrocorticography (ECoG) was performed using subdural grids placed over the tuber and surrounding cortex and depth electrodes positioned directly within the tuber. In all three patients, the depth electrode within the tuber was electrographically silent, whereas the surrounding cortical tissue showed significant epileptiform activity. The tuber and the electrically active adjacent cortex were resected. The patients experienced a drastic reduction in seizure frequency postsurgery. Epileptogenicity of cortical tubers may derive not from the lesion itself, but rather from the perturbation or abnormal development of the surrounding cortex.

Diffusion‐weighted Imaging Abnormalities in the Splenium after Seizures

Summary:  Purpose: Transient increased T2 signal in the splenium of the corpus callosum after seizures has been reported and sometimes attributed to a postulated toxicity of anticonvulsant medications (AEDs).

Evolution of operative strategies in open thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE During a 24-year interval, we managed >90% of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAA) repairs with a clamp-and-sew (clamp/sew) approach supplemented with protective adjuncts, including renal hypothermia and epidural cooling with aggressive intercostal reconstruction for spinal cord protection. A finite paraplegia rate led to operative modifications using distal aortic perfusion (DAP) through atriofemoral bypass to support cord collateral circulation and selective intercostal reconstruction based on motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. This study evaluated the effect of DAP/MEP on perioperative outcomes. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing repair of nonruptured Crawford extent I-III TAA using DAP/MEP were compared with propensity-matched patients treated with the clamp/sew technique. Outcomes included 30-day mortality and paraplegia. RESULTS There were 52 patients in the DAP cohort vs 127 undergoing clamp/sew. The DAP and clamp/sew cohorts differed in age (62.6 vs 69.5 years, P = .0003), presence of Marfan disease (10% vs 2%, P = .01), and chronic dissection (37% vs 8%, P = .001). Operative mortality was low (DAP, 2%; clamp/sew, 5%; P = .38). Postoperative renal insufficiency, although doubled in clamp/sew (17%) vs DAP (8%; P = .10), was not significant. DAP patients had a significantly lower incidence of intercostal reconstruction than the clamp/sew group (10% vs 34%, P < .0001), yet there was no paraplegia in the DAP cohort vs 5% in clamp/sew (P = .11). The composite death/paraplegia rate was decreased with DAP at 1 of 52 (2%) vs clamp/sew at 11 of 127 (9%; P = .01). Paraparesis with complete recovery occurred in 5 of 52 (10%) of the DAP group. CONCLUSIONS Elective TAA repair was accomplished with a low mortality in the DAP and clamp/sew cohorts. The use of MEP in the DAP cohort (despite a higher spinal cord ischemic risk due to the number of chronic dissection patients) decreased the need for intercostal reconstruction, with no paraplegia to date. DAP with MEP is the preferred operative strategy for extent I to III TAA repair.

Neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring of the vestibulocochlear nerve.

Summary Neurosurgical procedures involving the skull base and structures within can pose a significant risk of damage to the brain stem and cranial nerves. This can have life-threatening consequences and/or result in devastating neurologic deficits. Over the past decade, intraoperative neurophysiology has significantly evolved and currently offers a great tool for live monitoring of the integrity of nervous structures. Thus, dysfunction can be identified early and prompt modification of the surgical management or operating conditions, leads to avoidance of permanent structural damage. Along these lines, the vestibulocochlear nerve (CN VIII) and, to a greater extent, the auditory pathways as they pass through the brain stem are especially at risk during cerebelopontine angle (CPA), posterior/middle fossa, or brain stem surgery. CN VIII can be damaged by several mechanisms, from vascular compromise to mechanical injury by stretch, compression, dissection, and heat injury. Additionally, cochlea itself can be significantly damaged during temporal bone drilling, by noise, mechanical destruction, or infarction, and because of rupture, occlusion, or vasospasm of the internal auditory artery. CN VIII monitoring can be successfully achieved by live recording of the function of one of its parts, the cochlear or auditory nerve (AN), using the brain stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), electrocochleography (ECochG), and compound nerve action potentials (CNAPs) of the cochlear nerve. This is a review of these techniques, their principle, applications, methodology, interpretation of the evoked responses, and their change from baseline, within the context of surgical and anesthesia environments, and finally the appropriate management of these changes.

Dorsal column mapping via phase reversal method: the refined technique and clinical applications.

BACKGROUND Safe resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors can be challenging, because they often alter the cord anatomy. Identification of neurophysiologically viable dorsal columns (DCs) and of neurophysiologically inert tissue, eg, median raphe (MR), as a safe incision site is crucial for avoiding postoperative neurological deficits. We present our experience with and improvements made to our previously described technique of DC mapping, successfully applied in a series of 12 cases. OBJECTIVE To describe a new, safe, and reliable technique for intraoperative DC mapping. METHODS The right and left DCs were stimulated by using a bipolar electric stimulator and the triggered somatosensory evoked potentials recorded from the scalp. Phase reversal and amplitude changes of somatosensory evoked potentials were used to neurophysiologically identify the laterality of DCs, the inert MR, as well as other safe incision sites. RESULTS The MR location was neurophysiologically confirmed in all patients in whom this structure was first visually identified as well as in those in whom it was not, with 1 exception. DCs were identified in all patients, regardless of whether they could be visually identified. In 3 cases, negative mapping with the use of this method enabled the surgeon to reliably identify additional inert tissue for incision. None of the patients had postoperative worsening of the DC function. CONCLUSION Our revised technique is safe and reliable, and it can be easily incorporated into routine intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection. It provides crucial information to the neurosurgeon to prevent postoperative neurological deficits.

An intraoperative multimodal neurophysiologic approach to successful resection of precentral gyrus epileptogenic lesions

Cortical dysplasias (CDs) are highly epileptogenic lesions with a good prognosis of seizure freedom, if totally resected. However, their accurate delineation and resection can be difficult, and depend on the extent of pathology and lesion location. Intraoperative neurophysiologic assessments are valuable in these situations. We present an illustrative case of intractable epilepsy where judicious use of intraoperative neurophysiologic–techniques guided resection of precentral CD, under general anesthesia and in the absence of preoperative electrophysiologic mapping data. Ictal onset was accurately delineated using electrocorticography (ECoG). Phase reversal of the median somatosensory‐evoked potentials (MSSEPs) localized the central sulcus (CS). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) triggered by high‐frequency monopolar anodal electrical cortical stimulation at the primary motor cortex (PMC) threshold delineated the PMC. Using this technique, PMC and the corticospinal tract (CST) were continuously monitored during resection. No changes in MEPs from the preresection baseline were seen; no residual abnormal activity was present in the postresection ECoG. The patient emerged from surgery without deficits and has been seizure free during a 10‐month follow‐up. Staged multimodal intraoperative neurophysiology can be used successfully under general anesthesia to guide resection of epileptogenic lesions within the precentral gyrus, as an add‐on or, in certain situations, as a viable alternative to preoperative electrophysiologic mapping.

Phase reversal of somatosensory evoked potentials triggered by gracilis tract stimulation: case report of a new technique for neurophysiologic dorsal column mapping.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE : Reliable visual identification of the median raphae, essential for the preservation of function of the posterior dorsal columns during intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection, is not possible in many cases, because of distorted local anatomy. In such cases, intraoperative neurophysiologic mapping of the dorsal columns offers invaluable information to the surgeon, and guides the myelotomy. We hereby describe such a new technique. CLINICAL PRESENTATION : A 41-year-old man with a C3-C4 intramedullary spinal cord tumor underwent successful myelotomy and tumor resection. Dorsal column mapping was performed by use of an 8-contact minielectrode strip placed on the dorsal spinal cord. Direct electrical stimulation was applied via 2 adjacent contacts of the strip at a time, in an attempt to stimulate in succession the left and right dorsal columns. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) were recorded after each stimulation, via scalp electrodes. A sharp change in polarity of the recorded scalp SSEPs (phase reversal) indicated when the stimulation of the opposite dorsal column occurred. Myelotomy was performed in between the minielectrode contacts identified as being situated closest to the raphe. The posterior tibial SSEPs were continuously monitored during and after myelotomy and until the dura closure. No changes from premyelotomy SSEPs were present. Postoperatively, the patient had preservation of the posterior column function. CONCLUSION : SSEP phase-reversal technique is a promising new method to identify the neurophysiologic midline in intramedullary tumor resection. Fast and easy to perform, its final role in neurophysiologic dorsal column mapping awaits confirmation in future applications.

Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring decreases EEG burst suppression ratio during deep general anesthesia.

Purpose: The burst suppression (BS) EEG patterns induced by general anesthesia can react to somatosensory stimuli. We investigated this reactivity by studying the effect of peripheral nerve stimulation used for routine intraoperative spinal cord monitoring by somatosensory evoked potentials on BS patterns. Methods: The relative time spent in suppression expressed as BS ratio (BSR) and mean burst duration were measured before (BSRPre), during (BSRStim), and after (BSRPost) a 60-second repetitive electrical ulnar nerve stimulation in nine patients under total intravenous general anesthesia with propofol. The BS reactivity was measured as BSRPre-BSRStim. Results: Overall, 27 trials were included with BSRPre up to 77%, indistinguishable from BSRPost. During stimulation, the mean BSR transiently decreased from 42% to 35%. For each 1% increase in BSRPre, the BS reactivity increased with 0.6%, whereas the burst duration remained approximately 3 seconds. For BSRPre below 30%, the BS reactivity was negligible. Conclusions: Data from this study show that somatosensory input can evoke bursts, altering the “spontaneous” deep BS patterns (BSRPre >30%). Further studies are necessary to objectively assess the clinical relevance of stimulus-induced BS reactivity during deep general anesthesia.

Predictors of clamp-induced electroencephalographic changes during carotid endarterectomies.

Objective: Electroencephalograms (EEGs) detect clamp-induced cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and thus impact management and minimize the risk of perioperative stroke. We hypothesized that age, preoperative neurologic symptoms, ≥70% contralateral carotid and bilateral vertebral stenosis increase the probability of clamp-induced EEG changes, whereas ≥70% unilateral carotid stenosis does not. Methods: This is an observational cohort study of 299 patients who underwent CEA with EEG monitoring at a single large urban academic medical center in 2009. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used. Results: Seventy percent or greater ipsilateral carotid stenosis decreases the odds of clamp-induced neurophysiologic dysfunction (odds ratio [OR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.18, 0.99], P = 0.04) after adjustment for symptomatic status, degree contralateral carotid or vertebral stenosis, and age. Preoperative neurologic symptoms, ≥70% contralateral carotid stenosis, and bilateral extracranial vertebral stenosis independently increase these odds (OR 2.62, 95% CI [1.32, 5.18], P = 0.005; OR 2.84, 95% CI [1.27, 6.34], P = 0.01; and OR 3.58, 95% CI [1.02, 12.53], P = 0.04, respectively), after adjustment for the other factors. Age ≥70 years has no significant impact. Conclusions: Preoperative neurologic symptoms, ≥70% contralateral carotid, and bilateral vertebral stenosis increase the probability of clamp-induced ischemia as detected by intraoperative EEG, while ≥70% ipsilateral carotid stenosis decreases it.

Factors affecting successful localization of the central sulcus using the somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal technique.

BACKGROUND Perirolandic surgery is associated with an increased risk of postoperative neurological deficit that can be reduced by accurate recognition of the location of sensorimotor cortex. The median somatosensory evoked potential (MSSEP) phase reversal technique (PRT) reliably identifies the central sulcus (CS) intraoperatively, but does require additional surgical time. Awareness of factors that lengthen the time required for MSSEP PRT has important implications for surgical planning. OBJECTIVE To identify factors that affect the time required for CS localization via MSSEP PRT. METHODS Multivariate Cox regression analysis, applied in 100 consecutive cases of perirolandic surgery at a single institution from 2005 to 2010, during which CS localization was attempted via a standardized MSSEP PRT. RESULTS The CS was reliably identified in 77 cases. The mean time to identification was 5 minutes (SD = 5; range, 1-20 minutes). Lesion location either very close to the CS (within the postcentral gyrus) or at an intermediate distance (with edema extending very close to the CS) independently decreased the rate at which the CS was identified by 73% (hazard ratio: 0.27, P < .001) and 55% (hazard ratio: 0.45, P = .007), respectively. Highly destructive pathology reduced this rate by 42% (hazard ratio: 0.58, P = .03), after adjusting for other important factors. Epidural recording, age, and the presence of a burst suppression pattern on the electroencephalogram had no effect. CONCLUSION MSSEP PRT is an effective method for CS identification and only marginally lengthens the operative time. However, difficulty in CS localization can be expected in the presence of postcentral gyrus lesions, edema distorting perirolandic anatomy, and with highly destructive pathology.