Miriam C. C. Melo

Hypotensive effect of the nitrosyl ruthenium complex nitric oxide donor in renal hypertensive rats.

We have described a new compound (trans-[RuCl([15]aneN(4))NO](2+)), which in vitro releases NO by the action of a reducing agent such as catecholamines. We investigated the effect of this NO donor in lowering the mean arterial pressure (MAP) in severe and moderate renal hypertensive 2K-1C rats. MAP was measured before and after intravenous in bolus injection of the compound in conscious 2K-1C and normotensive (2K) rats. In the hypertensive rats (basal 196.70+/-8.70mmHg, n=5), the MAP was reduced in -34.25+/-13.50mmHg (P<0.05) 6h after administration of 10mmol/L/Kg of the compound in bolus. In normotensive rats the compound had no effect. We have also studied the effect of the injection of 0.1mmol/L/Kg in normotensive (basal 118.20+/-11.25mmHg, n=4), moderate (basal 160.90+/-2.30mmHg, n=6), and severe hypertensive rats (basal 202.46+/-16.74 mmHg, n=6). The compound at the dose of 0.1mmol/L/Kg did not have effect (P>0.05) on MAP of normotensive and moderate hypertensive rats. However, in the severe hypertensive rats (basal 202.46+/-16.70mmHg, n=6) there was a significant reduction on the MAP of -28.64+/-12.45mmHg. The NO donor reduced the MAP of all hypertensive rats in the dose of 10mmol/L/Kg and in the severe hypertensive rats at the dose of 0.1mmol/L/Kg. The compound was not cytotoxic to the rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells in the concentration of 0.1mmol/L/Kg that produced the maximum relaxation.

Cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant (CINC)-1 induces fever by a prostaglandin-dependent mechanism in rats

Cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-1 (CINC-1), a member of the ELR+CXC subfamily [ELR motif (glutamic acid-leucine-arginine) adjacent to the cysteine-X-cysteine (CXC) motif located at the N-terminus of the protein], is an acute-phase protein and its synthesis is induced by endogenous and exogenous pyrogens. However, there are no studies on the pyrogenic property of CINC-1. Therefore, the present study evaluates whether centrally administered CINC-1 promotes an integrated febrile response along with an increase in the prostaglandin (PG)E2 content of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of rats. The effects of antipyretic drugs on fever and on the PGE2 content of the CSF as well as the effectiveness of a neutralizing anti-CINC-1 antibody on the fever induced by CINC-1 have also been investigated. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of CINC-1 induced a dose-dependent bell-shaped rise on body temperature and increased PGE2 concentration in the CSF of conscious rats. Injected into the preoptic area of the anterior hypothalamus (AH/POA) (i.h.), CINC-1 also induced a dose-dependent bell-shaped increase in body temperature along with a decrease on tail skin temperature. Indomethacin (INDO, 2 mg kg(-1), i.p.) and ibuprofen (IBU, 10 mg kg(-1), i.p.) markedly reduced the fever evoked by i.c.v. injection of CINC-1 (25 ng/site). Orally given celecoxib (5 mg kg(-1), 30 min. before) abolished the fever induced by CINC-1 i.c.v. or i.h. (50 pg) injection. The antipyretic drugs also blocked the PGE(2) increase after CINC-1 i.c.v. injection. Co-injected anti-CINC antibody (10 ng/site) strongly reduced the febrile response induced by CINC-1 (50 pg/site) injected intrahypothalamically. This is the first time that centrally injected CINC-1 has been reported to act directly on the pyrogen-sensitive neurons of AH/POA, promoting a thermoregulatory response that seems to depend on other endogenous pyrogens synthesis and, as seen here, on PGE2.

Dipyrone metabolite 4-MAA induces hypothermia and inhibits PGE2-dependent and -independent fever while 4-AA only blocks PGE2-dependent fever

The antipyretic and hypothermic prodrug dipyrone prevents PGE2‐dependent and ‐independent fever induced by LPS from Escherichia coli and Tityus serrulatus venom (Tsv) respectively. We aimed to identify the dipyrone metabolites responsible for the antipyretic and hypothermic effects.

Chemokine ligand (CCL)-3 promotes an integrated febrile response when injected within pre-optic area (POA) of rats and induces calcium signaling in cells of POA microcultures but not TNF-α or IL-6 synthesis.

Although studies have shown that chemokines are pyrogenic when injected into the brain, there are no data indicating which cell types and receptors in the CNS are employed by chemokines such as CCL3 (synonym: MIP-1α) to induce fever in rats. We aimed to study, whether CCL3 induces fever when injected directly into the thermoregulatory center within the pre-optic area (POA). Moreover, we investigated whether CCL3 activates cells from POA microcultures resulting in intracellular Ca++ mobilization and synthesis/release of TNF-α and IL-6. Microinjections of CCL3 into the POA induced a dose-dependent fever, which was accompanied by a decrease in tail skin temperature. The primary microcultures of the POA (from topographically excised rat pup brain tissue) were stimulated by bolus administrations of 100 μl CCL3 (0.1 or 0.01 μg) or sterile PBS as control. We evaluated the responses of 261 (30.89%) neurons, 346 (40.94%) astrocytes and 238 microglia cells (29.17%). Stimulation of rat POA microcultures with CCL3 was capable of inducing Ca++ signaling in 15.31% of all astrocytes and 5.75% of all neurons investigated. No cellular Ca++-signals were observed after overnight incubation of the cultures with antiCCR1 or antiCCR5 antibodies. CCL3 did not alter the release of the pyrogenic cytokines IL-6 or TNF-α into the supernatant of the cultures. In conclusion the present study shows for the first time that CCL-3 injected directly into the rat POA, evoked an integrated febrile response. In parallel this chemokine induces Ca++ signaling in astrocytes and neurons via both CCR1 and CCR5 receptors when administered to POA microcultures without stimulating the synthesis of TNF-α and IL-6. It is a possibility that CCL3-induced fever may occur via CCR1 and CCR5 receptors stimulation of astrocytes and neurons from POA.

Cyclooxygenase-independent mechanism of ibuprofen-induced antipyresis: the role of central vasopressin V-1 receptors

This study compared the antipyretic effects of ibuprofen and indomethacin regarding the efficacy in blocking fevers induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS from E. coli) or pyrogenic mediators that act on prostaglandin (PG)‐dependent and PG‐independent pathways. The content of PGE2 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the dependence on central arginine vasopressin (AVP) release by both antipyretics were also compared during the reduction of LPS‐induced fever. Finally, we investigated the effect of ibuprofen on hypothalamic cytokine content during LPS‐induced fever. Ibuprofen (intraperitoneally, i.p.) dose‐dependently inhibited the fever induced by LPS (intravenously, i.v.). Indomethacin (2 mg/kg) and ibuprofen (10 mg/kg) reduced the fever induced by i.c.v. injection of interleukin (IL)‐1β, IL‐6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α, or arachidonic acid (AA). Ibuprofen, but not indomethacin, inhibited i.c.v. endothelin‐1‐ and pre‐formed pyrogenic factor (PFPF)‐induced fever. Neither ibuprofen nor indomethacin affected fever by PGE2, PGF2α, or corticotrophin‐releasing factor (CRF); however, both reduced the CSF PGE2 content after LPS. Bilateral injection of the AVP V1 receptor antagonist d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP into the ventral septal area blocked both ibuprofen‐ and indomethacin‐induced antipyresis. Ibuprofen did not modify the hypothalamic increase in either IL‐1β or IL‐6 induced by LPS. In conclusion, although the antipyretic effect of ibuprofen involves the blockage of central production of PGE2 and the endogenous release of AVP, differently from low dose of indomethacin, ibuprofen not only reduced the fever induced by PGE2‐dependent, but also, that induced by PGE2‐independent endogenous pyrogens. Moreover, ibuprofen does not affect the hypothalamic synthesis/release of IL‐1β and IL‐6.

Involvement of PGE2 and RANTES in Staphylococcus aureus-induced fever in rats

This study investigated the involvement of prostaglandins and regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), in fever induced by live Staphylococcus aureus (no. 25923, American Type Culture Collection) injection in rats. S. aureus was injected intraperitoneally at 10(9), 10(10), and 2 × 10(10) colony-forming units (CFU)/cavity, and body temperature (T(b)) was measured by radiotelemetry. The lowest dose of S. aureus induced a modest transient increase in T(b), whereas the two higher doses promoted similar long-lasting and sustained T(b) increases. Thus, the 10(10) CFU/cavity dose was chosen for the remaining experiments. The T(b) increase induced by S. aureus was accompanied by significant decreases in tail skin temperature and increases in PGE(2) levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and hypothalamus but not in the venous plasma. Celecoxib (selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, 2.5 mg/kg po) inhibited the fever and the increases in PGE(2) concentration in the CSF and hypothalamus induced by S. aureus. Dipyrone (120 mg/kg ip) reduced the fever from 2.5 to 4 h and the PGE(2) increase in the CSF but not in the hypothalamus. S. aureus increased RANTES in the peritoneal exudate but not in the CSF or hypothalamus. Met-RANTES (100 μg/kg iv), a chemokine (C-C motif) receptor (CCR)1/CCR5 antagonist, reduced the first 6 h of fever induced by S. aureus. This study suggests that peripheral (local) RANTES and central PGE(2) production are key events in the febrile response to live S. aureus injection. As dipyrone does not reduce PGE(2) synthesis in the hypothalamus, it is plausible that S. aureus induces fever, in part, via a dipyrone-sensitive PGE(2)-independent pathway.

The relevance of kalikrein-kinin system via activation of B-2 receptor in LPS-induced fever in rats

Purpose: This study evaluated the involvement of endogenous kallikrein‐kinin system and the bradykinin (BK) B1 and B2 receptors on LPS‐ induced fever and the POA cells involved in this response. Material and methods: Male Wistar rats received either i.v. (1 mg/kg), i.c.v. (20 nmol) or i.h. (2 nmol) injections of icatibant (B2 receptor antagonist) 30 or 60 min, respectively, before the stimuli. DALBK (B1 receptor antagonist) was given either 15min before BK (i.c.v.) or 30 min before LPS (i.v.). Captopril (5 mg/kg, sc.,) was given 1 h prior LPS or BK. Concentrations of BK and total kininogenon CSF, plasma and tissue kallikrein were evaluated. Rectal temperatures (rT) were assessed by telethermometry. Ca++ signaling in POA cells was performed in rat pup brain tissue microcultures. Results: Icatibant reduced LPS fever while, captopril exacerbated that response, an effect abolished by icatibant. Icatibant (i.h.) reduced fever to BK (i.h.) but not that induced by LPS (i.v.). BK increased intracellular calcium concentration in neurons and astrocytes. LPS increased levels of bradykinin, tissue kallikrein and total kininogen. BK (i.c.v.) increased rT and decreased tail skin temperature. Captopril potentiated BK‐induced fever an effect abolished by icatibant. DALBK reduced the fever induced by BK. BK (i.c.v.) increased the CSF PGE2concentration. Effect abolished by indomethacin (i.p.). Conclusions: LPS activates endogenous kalikrein‐kinin system leading to production of BK, which by acting on B2‐receptors of POA cells causes prostaglandin synthesis that in turn produces fever. Thus, a kinin B2‐receptor antagonist that enters into the brain could constitute a new and interesting strategy to treat fever. HighlightsRole of kininergic system in LPS‐induced fever in rats.LPS‐induced kalikrein‐kinin system activation results in B2‐receptors in POA cells.Both POA cells activation and rats fever occurs after BK B2‐receptors stimulation.

Virtual screening and biological evaluation of novel antipyretic compounds

Due to the absence of safety of the antipyretics to patients with cardiovascular dysfunction, new targets to treat inflammation have been pursued. mPGES‐1 is a promising target because its inhibition would not cause the side‐effects related to COX inhibition. To identify novel inhibitors of mPGES‐1, we developed a ligand‐based pharmacophore model that differentiates true inhibitors from decoys and enlightens the structure‐activity relationships for known mPGES‐1 inhibitors. The model (four hydrophobic centers, two hydrogen bond acceptor and two hydrogen bond donor points) was employed to select lead‐like compounds from ZINC database for in vivo evaluation. Among the 18 compounds selected, five inhibited the fever induced by LPS. The most potent compound (5‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐3‐({6‐methylimidazo[1,2‐a]pyridin‐2‐yl}methyl)‐2,3dihydro‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐one) is active peripherally (i.v.) or centrally (i.c.v.) (82.18% and 112% reduction, respectively) and reduces (69.13%) hypothalamic PGE2 production, without significant COX‐1/2 inhibition. In conclusion, our in silico approach leads to the selection of a compound that presents the chemical features to inhibit mPGES‐1 and reduces fever induced by LPS. Furthermore, the in vivo and in vitro results support the hypothesis that its mechanism of action does not depend on COX inhibition. Hence, it can be considered a promising lead compound for antipyretic development, once it would not have the side‐effects of COX‐1/2 inhibitors.