Mirko Moroni

Additional Acetylcholine (ACh) Binding Site at α4/α4 Interface of (α4β2)2α4 Nicotinic Receptor Influences Agonist Sensitivity

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) α4 and β2 subunits assemble in two alternate stoichiometries to produce (α4β2)2α4 and (α4β2)2β2, which display different agonist sensitivities. Functionally relevant agonist binding sites are thought to be located at α4(+)/β2(−) subunit interfaces, but because these interfaces are present in both receptor isoforms, it is unlikely that they account for differences in agonist sensitivities. In contrast, incorporation of either α4 or β2 as auxiliary subunits produces isoform-specific α4(+)/α4(−) or β2(+)/β2(−) interfaces. Using fully concatenated (α4β2)2α4 nAChRs in conjunction with structural modeling, chimeric receptors, and functional mutagenesis, we have identified an additional site at the α4(+)/α4(−) interface that accounts for isoform-specific agonist sensitivity of the (α4β2)2α4 nAChR. The additional site resides in a region that also contains a potentiating Zn2+ site but is engaged by agonists to contribute to receptor activation. By engineering α4 subunits to provide a free cysteine in loop C at the α4(+)α4(−) interface, we demonstrated that the acetylcholine responses of the mutated receptors are attenuated or enhanced, respectively, following treatment with the sulfhydryl reagent [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate or aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate. The findings suggest that agonist occupation of the site at the α4(+)/(α4(−) interface leads to channel gating through a coupling mechanism involving loop C. Overall, we propose that the additional agonist site at the α4(+)/α4(−) interface, when occupied by agonist, contributes to receptor activation and that this additional contribution underlies the agonist sensitivity signature of (α4β2)2α4 nAChRs.

Sazetidine-A Is a Potent and Selective Agonist at Native and Recombinant α4β2 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors

Sazetidine-A has been recently proposed to be a “silent desensitizer” of α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), implying that it desensitizes α4β2 nAChRs without first activating them. This unusual pharmacological property of sazetidine-A makes it, potentially, an excellent research tool to distinguish between the role of activation and desensitization of α4β2 nAChRs in mediating the central nervous system effects of nicotine itself, as well as those of new nicotinic drugs. We were surprised to find that sazetidine-A potently and efficaciously stimulated nAChR-mediated dopamine release from rat striatal slices, which is mediated by α4β2* and α6β2* subtypes of nAChR. The agonist effects on native striatal nAChRs prompted us to re-examine the effects of sazetidine-A on recombinant α4β2 nAChRs in more detail. We expressed the two alternative stoichiometries of α4β2 nAChR in Xenopus laevis oocytes and investigated the agonist properties of sazetidine-A on both α4(2)β2(3) and α4(3)β2(2) nAChRs. We found that sazetidine-A potently activated both stoichiometries of α4β2 nAChR: it was a full agonist on α4(2)β2(3) nAChRs, whereas it had an efficacy of only 6% on α4(3)β2(2) nAChRs. In contrast to what has been published before, we therefore conclude that sazetidine-A is an agonist of native and recombinant α4β2 nAChRs but shows differential efficacy on α4β2 nAChRs subtypes.

An additional ACh binding site at the α4/α4 interface of the (α4β2)2α4 nicotinic receptor influences agonist sensitivity

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) α4 and β2 subunits assemble in two alternate stoichiometries to produce (α4β2)2α4 and (α4β2)2β2, which display different agonist sensitivities. Functionally relevant agonist binding sites are thought to be located at α4(+)/β2(−) subunit interfaces, but because these interfaces are present in both receptor isoforms, it is unlikely that they account for differences in agonist sensitivities. In contrast, incorporation of either α4 or β2 as auxiliary subunits produces isoform-specific α4(+)/α4(−) or β2(+)/β2(−) interfaces. Using fully concatenated (α4β2)2α4 nAChRs in conjunction with structural modeling, chimeric receptors, and functional mutagenesis, we have identified an additional site at the α4(+)/α4(−) interface that accounts for isoform-specific agonist sensitivity of the (α4β2)2α4 nAChR. The additional site resides in a region that also contains a potentiating Zn2+ site but is engaged by agonists to contribute to receptor activation. By engineering α4 subunits to provide a free cysteine in loop C at the α4(+)α4(−) interface, we demonstrated that the acetylcholine responses of the mutated receptors are attenuated or enhanced, respectively, following treatment with the sulfhydryl reagent [2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate or aminoethyl methanethiosulfonate. The findings suggest that agonist occupation of the site at the α4(+)/(α4(−) interface leads to channel gating through a coupling mechanism involving loop C. Overall, we propose that the additional agonist site at the α4(+)/α4(−) interface, when occupied by agonist, contributes to receptor activation and that this additional contribution underlies the agonist sensitivity signature of (α4β2)2α4 nAChRs.

Non-agonist-binding subunit interfaces confer distinct functional signatures to the alternate stoichiometries of the alpha4beta2 nicotinic receptor: an alpha4-alpha4 interface is required for Zn2+ potentiation.

The α4β2 subtype is the most abundant nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) in the brain and possesses the high-affinity binding site for nicotine. The α4 and β2 nAChR subunits assemble into two alternate stoichiometries, (α4)2(β2)3 and (α4)3(β2)2, which differ in their functional properties and sensitivity to chronic exposure to nicotine. Here, we investigated the sensitivity of both receptor stoichiometries to modulation by Zn2+. We show that Zn2+ exerts an inhibitory modulatory effect on (α4)2(β2)3 receptors, whereas it potentiates or inhibits, depending on its concentration, the function of (α4)3(β2)2 receptors. Furthermore, Zn2+ inhibition on (α4)2(β2)3 nAChRs is voltage-dependent, whereas it is not on (α4)3(β2)2 receptors. We used molecular modeling in conjunction with alanine substitution and functional studies to identify two distinct sets of residues that determine these effects and may coordinate Zn2+. Zn2+ inhibition is mediated by a site located on the β2(+)/α4(−) subunit interfaces on both receptor stoichiometries. α4H195 and β2D218 are key determinants of this site. Zn2+ potentiation on (α4)3(β2)2 nAChRs is exerted by a site that resides on the α4(+)/α4(−) of this receptor stoichiometry. α4H195 on the (−) side of the ACh-binding α4 subunit and α4E224 on the (+) side of the non-ACh-binding α4 subunit critically contribute to this site. We also identified residues within the β2 subunit that confer voltage dependency to Zn2+ inhibition on (α4)2(β2)3, but not on (α4)3(β2)2 nAChRs.

Human α3β4 Neuronal Nicotinic Receptors Show Different Stoichiometry if They Are Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes or Mammalian HEK293 Cells

Background The neuronal nicotinic receptors that mediate excitatory transmission in autonomic ganglia are thought to be formed mainly by the α3 and β4 subunits. Expressing this composition in oocytes fails to reproduce the properties of ganglionic receptors, which may also incorporate the α5 and/or β2 subunits. We compared the properties of human α3β4 neuronal nicotinic receptors expressed in Human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293) and in Xenopus oocytes, to examine the effect of the expression system and α∶β subunit ratio. Methodology/Principal Findings Two distinct channel forms were observed: these are likely to correspond to different stoichiometries of the receptor, with two or three copies of the α subunit, as reported for α4β2 channels. This interpretation is supported by the pattern of change in acetylcholine (ACh) sensitivity observed when a hydrophilic Leu to Thr mutation was inserted in position 9′ of the second transmembrane domain, as the effect of mutating the more abundant subunit is greater. Unlike α4β2 channels, for α3β4 receptors the putative two-α form is the predominant one in oocytes (at 1∶1 α∶β cRNA ratio). This two-α form has a slightly higher ACh sensitivity (about 3-fold in oocytes), and displays potentiation by zinc. The putative three-α form is the predominant one in HEK cells transfected with a 1∶1 α∶β DNA ratio or in oocytes at 9∶1 α∶β RNA ratio, and is more sensitive to dimethylphenylpiperazinium (DMPP) than to ACh. In outside-out single-channel recordings, the putative two-α form opened to distinctive long bursts (100 ms or more) with low conductance (26 pS), whereas the three-α form gave rise to short bursts (14 ms) of high conductance (39 pS). Conclusions/Significance Like other neuronal nicotinic receptors, the α3β4 receptor can exist in two different stoichiometries, depending on whether it is expressed in oocytes or in mammalian cell lines and on the ratio of subunits transfected.

The α1K276E Startle Disease Mutation Reveals Multiple Intermediate States in the Gating of Glycine Receptors

Loss-of-function mutations in human glycine receptors cause hyperekplexia, a rare inherited disease associated with an exaggerated startle response. We have studied a human disease mutation in the M2–M3 loop of the glycine receptor α1 subunit (K276E) using direct fitting of mechanisms to single-channel recordings with the program HJCFIT. Whole-cell recordings from HEK293 cells showed the mutation reduced the receptor glycine sensitivity. In single-channel recordings, rat homomeric α1 K276E receptors were barely active, even at 200 mm glycine. Coexpression of the β subunit partially rescued channel function. Heteromeric mutant channels opened in brief bursts at 300 μm glycine (a concentration that is near-maximal for wild type) and reached a maximum one-channel open probability of about 45% at 100 mm glycine (compared to 96% for wild type). Distributions of apparent open times contained more than one component in high glycine and, therefore, could not be described by mechanisms with only one fully liganded open state. Fits to the data were much better with mechanisms in which opening can also occur from more than one fully liganded intermediate (e.g., “primed” models). Brief pulses of glycine (∼3 ms, 30 mm) applied to mutant channels in outside-out patches activated currents with a slower rise time (1.5 ms) than those of wild-type channels (0.2 ms) and a much faster decay. These features were predicted reasonably well by the mechanisms obtained from fitting single-channel data. Our results show that, by slowing and impairing channel gating, the K276E mutation facilitates the detection of closed reaction intermediates in the activation pathway of glycine channels.

Chloride ions in the pore of glycine and GABA channels shape the time course and voltage dependence of agonist currents

In the vertebrate CNS, fast synaptic inhibition is mediated by GABA and glycine receptors. We recently reported that the time course of these synaptic currents is slower when intracellular chloride is high. Here we extend these findings to measure the effects of both extracellular and intracellular chloride on the deactivation of glycine and GABA currents at both negative and positive holding potentials. Currents were elicited by fast agonist application to outside-out patches from HEK-293 cells expressing rat glycine or GABA receptors. The slowing effect of high extracellular chloride on current decay was detectable only in low intracellular chloride (4 mm). Our main finding is that glycine and GABA receptors “sense” chloride concentrations because of interactions between the M2 pore-lining domain and the permeating ions. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that the sensitivity of channel gating to intracellular chloride is abolished if the channel is engineered to become cation selective or if positive charges in the external pore vestibule are eliminated by mutagenesis. The appropriate interaction between permeating ions and channel pore is also necessary to maintain the channel voltage sensitivity of gating, which prolongs current decay at depolarized potentials. Voltage dependence is abolished by the same mutations that suppress the effect of intracellular chloride and also by replacing chloride with another permeant ion, thiocyanate. These observations suggest that permeant chloride affects gating by a foot-in-the-door effect, binding to a channel site with asymmetrical access from the intracellular and extracellular sides of the membrane.

In Glycine and GABAA Channels, Different Subunits Contribute Asymmetrically to Channel Conductance via Residues in the Extracellular Domain

Single-channel conductance in Cys-loop channels is controlled by the nature of the amino acids in the narrowest parts of the ion conduction pathway, namely the second transmembrane domain (M2) and the intracellular helix. In cationic channels, such as Torpedo ACh nicotinic receptors, conductance is increased by negatively charged residues exposed to the extracellular vestibule. We now show that positively charged residues at the same loop 5 position boost also the conductance of anionic Cys-loop channels, such as glycine (α1 and α1β) and GABAA (α1β2γ2) receptors. Charge reversal mutations here produce a greater decrease on outward conductance, but their effect strongly depends on which subunit carries the mutation. In the glycine α1β receptor, replacing Lys with Glu in α1 reduces single-channel conductance by 41%, but has no effect in the β subunit. By expressing concatameric receptors with constrained stoichiometry, we show that this asymmetry is not explained by the subunit copy number. A similar pattern is observed in the α1β2γ2 GABAA receptor, where only mutations in α1 or β2 decreased conductance (to different extents). In both glycine and GABA receptors, the effect of mutations in different subunits does not sum linearly: mutations that had no detectable effect in isolation did enhance the effect of mutations carried by other subunits. As in the nicotinic receptor, charged residues in the extracellular vestibule of anionic Cys-loop channels influence elementary conductance. The size of this effect strongly depends on the direction of the ion flow and, unexpectedly, on the nature of the subunit that carries the residue.

Co-Release of GABA Does Not Occur at Glycinergic Synapses onto Lumbar Motoneurons in Juvenile Mice

The fast inhibitory neurotransmitters glycine and GABA are co-localized in synaptic terminals of inhibitory interneurons in the spinal cord and co-released onto lumbar motoneurons in neonatal rats. We performed whole-cell voltage-clamp experiments on spinal cord preparations obtained from juvenile (P8–14) mice to determine whether inhibitory currents exhibited GABAergic components in motoneurons of animals of weight-bearing age. Subsequently we established whether or not GABA is co-released at glycinergic synapses onto motoneurons by determining if it conferred modulatory effects on the kinetics of glycinergic currents. Exponential fitting analysis showed that evoked and miniature inhibitory post-synaptic currents (IPSCs) were best-fitted with a single decay time constant. Responses recorded from connected interneuron-motoneuron pairs showed no effect of a benzodiazepine or a GABAA receptor antagonist. Similarly IPSCs evoked by extracellular stimulation and miniature IPSCs were not affected by either agent, indicating the absence of co-detection. Experimental manipulation of the relative content of pre-synaptic GABA and glycine conferred no effect on post-synaptic responses. It is thus unlikely that GABA is co-released in biologically relevant amounts at glycinergic synapses onto lumbar motoneurons in mice of this age.

The kinetic properties of the α3 rat glycine receptor make it suitable for mediating fast synaptic inhibition

•  In the adult, most inhibitory transmission mediated by glycine uses channels containing α1 subunits, but both α1 and the related α3 subunit are present in spinal areas that process pain. •  We recorded the effect of a range of fixed glycine concentrations on the activity of individual glycine channels expressed in vitro to contain only α3 subunits. •  Glycine is very effective in opening α3 channels. At full activation, both α1 and α3 channels are open nearly 100% of the time, but α3 channels need all, or almost all, of the five glycine binding sites to be occupied, whereas α1 channels need only three. •  When channels were activated in synaptic‐like conditions (fast, 1 ms, 10 mm glycine pulses), α3 responses decayed more slowly than α1 responses. •  This difference is likely to be too small to allow α1‐ and α3‐mediated synaptic responses to be distinguishable on the basis of time course alone.