Miroslav Peterka

Epigenetic Signals during Odontoblast Differentiation

Odontoblast terminal differentiation occurs according to a tooth-specific pattern and implies both temporo-spatially regulated epigenetic signaling and the expression of specific competence. Differentiation of odontoblasts (withdrawal from the cell cycle, cytological polarization, and secretion of predentin/dentin) is controlled by the inner dental epithelium, and the basement membrane (BM) plays a major role both as a substrate and as a reservoir of paracrine molecules. Cytological differentiation implies changes in the organization of the cytoskeleton and is controlled by cytoskeleton-plasma membrane-extracellular matrix interactions. Fibronectin is re-distributed during odontoblast polarization and interacts with cell-surface molecules. A nonintegrin 165-kDa fibronectin-binding protein, transiently expressed by odontoblasts, is involved in microfilament reorganization. Growth factors (TGFβ1,2,3/BMP2,4, and 6), expressed in tooth germs, signal differentiation. Systemically derived molecules (IGF1) may also intervene. IGF1 stimulates cytological but not functional differentiation of odontoblasts: The two events can thus be separated. Immobilized TGFβ1 (combined with heparin) induced odontoblast differentiation. Only immobilized TGFβ1 and 3 or a combination of FGF1 and TGFβ1 stimulated the differentiation of functional odontoblasts over extended areas and allowed for maintenance of gradients of differentiation. Presentation of active molecules in vitro appeared to be of major importance; the BM should fulfill this role in vivo by immobilizing and spatially presenting TGF(3s. Attempts are being made to investigate the mechanisms which spatially control the initiation of odontoblast differentiation and those which regulate its propagation. Analysis of molar development suggested that odontoblast differentiation and crown morphogenesis are interdependent, although the possibility of co-regulation requires further investigation.

Development of the vestigial tooth primordia as part of mouse odontogenesis.

The mouse functional dentition comprises one incisor separated from three molars by a toothless diastema in each dental quadrant. Between the incisor and molars, the embryonic tooth pattern also includes vestigial dental primordia, which undergo regression involving apoptosis in their epithelium. Apoptosis appears to play an important role in achieving the specific tooth pattern in the mouse. We documented similarities in the folding mechanism allowing the formation of the dental lamina in mice as well as in reptiles. While further budding on this dental lamina gives rise to many individual simple tooth primordia in crocodiles and lizards, budding morphogenesis of several simple tooth primordia appears to be integrated in the mouse, giving rise to enamel organs of a complex nature. The differentiation of a mammalian tooth germ during both ontogeny and phylogeny might thus include the concrescence (connation) of more primordia, putatively corresponding to simple teeth in mammalian ancestors.

Patterning by heritage in mouse molar row development

It is known from paleontology studies that two premolars have been lost during mouse evolution. During mouse mandible development, two bud-like structures transiently form that may represent rudimentary precursors of the lost premolars. However, the interpretation of these structures and their significance for mouse molar development are highly controversial because of a lack of molecular data. Here, we searched for typical tooth signaling centers in these two bud-like structures, and followed their fate using molecular markers, 3D reconstructions, and lineage tracing in vitro. Transient signaling centers were indeed found to be located at the tips of both the anterior and posterior rudimentary buds. These centers expressed a similar set of molecular markers as the “primary enamel knot” (pEK), the signaling center of the first molar (M1). These two transient signaling centers were sequentially patterned before and anterior to the M1 pEK. We also determined the dynamics of the M1 pEK, which, slightly later during development, spread up to the field formerly occupied by the posterior transient signaling center. It can be concluded that two rudimentary tooth buds initiate the sequential development of the mouse molars and these have previously been mistaken for early stages of M1 development. Although neither rudiment progresses to form an adult tooth, the posterior one merges with the adjacent M1, which may explain the anterior enlargement of the M1 during mouse family evolution. This study highlights how rudiments of lost structures can stay integrated and participate in morphogenesis of functional organs and help in understanding their evolution, as Darwin suspected long ago.

Tooth Morphogenesis and Pattern of Odontoblast Differentiation

The terminal differentiation of odontoblasts is controlled by the inner dental epithelium (IDE) and occurs according to a tooth-specific pattern. It requires temporospatially regulated epigenetic signaling and the expression of specific competence. The patterning of cusp formation was compared with that of odontoblast differentiation in the first lower molar in mice. Histology, immunostaining, and three dimensional reconstructions were completed by experimental approaches in vitro. The mesenchyme controls the pattern of cusp formation. During the cap-bell transition in the molar, a subpopulation of nondividing IDE cells from the enamel knot (EK) undergo a tooth-specific segregation in as many subpopulations as cusps will form. Epithelial cell-basement membrane interactions seem to be involved in the segregation of EK cells. The timing and spatial pattern of the segregation of EK cells correlate with cusps formation. However, the temporal pattern of odontoblast terminal differentiation is different. This discrepancy might result from cusp-specific differences either in the timing of the initiation of odontoblast terminal differentiation and/or in cell proliferation kinetics.

Developmental disorders of the dentition: An update

Dental anomalies are common congenital malformations that can occur either as isolated findings or as part of a syndrome. This review focuses on genetic causes of abnormal tooth development and the implications of these abnormalities for clinical care. As an introduction, we describe general insights into the genetics of tooth development obtained from mouse and zebrafish models. This is followed by a discussion of isolated as well as syndromic tooth agenesis, including Van der Woude syndrome (VWS), ectodermal dysplasias (EDs), oral‐facial‐digital (OFD) syndrome type I, Rieger syndrome, holoprosencephaly, and tooth anomalies associated with cleft lip and palate. Next, we review delayed formation and eruption of teeth, as well as abnormalities in tooth size, shape, and form. Finally, isolated and syndromic causes of supernumerary teeth are considered, including cleidocranial dysplasia and Gardner syndrome.

Origin of the Deciduous Upper Lateral Incisor and its Clinical Aspects

The upper lateral incisor in humans is often affected by dental anomalies that might be explained developmentally. To address this question, we investigated the origin of the deciduous upper lateral incisor (i2) in normal human embryos at prenatal weeks 6–8. We used serial frontal histological sections and computer-aided 3D reconstructions. At embryonic days 40-42, two thickenings of the dental epithelia in an “end-to-end” orientation were separated by a groove at the former fusion site of the medial nasal and maxillary processes. Later, these dental epithelia fused, forming a continuous dental lamina. At the fusion site, i2 started to develop. The fusion line was detectable on the i2 germ until the 8th prenatal week. The composite origin of the i2 may be associated with its developmental vulnerability. From a clinical aspect, a supernumerary i2 might be a form of cleft caused by a non-fusion of the dental epithelia.

Cell-Cell and Cell-Matrix Interactions During Initial Enamel Organ Histomorphogenesis in the Mouse

Relationships between cell-cell/cell-matrix interactions and enamel organ histomorphogenesis were examined by immunostaining and electron microscopy. During the cap-bell transition in the mouse molar, laminin-5 (LN5) disappeared from the basement membrane (BM) associated with the inner dental epithelium (IDE), and nondividing IDE cells from the enamel knot (EK) underwent a tooth-specific segregation in as many subpopulations as cusps develop. In the incisor, the basement membrane (BM) in contact with EK cells showed strong staining for LN5 and integrin f 6 g 4. LN5 seems to provide stable adhesion, while its proteolytic processing might facilitate cell segregation. In both teeth, immunostaining for antigens associated with desmosomes or adherens junctions was similar for EK cells and neighboring IDE cells. Outside the EK, IDE cell-BM interactions changed locally during the initial molar cusp delimitation and on the labial part of the incisor cervical loop. Conversely, cell-cell junctions stabilized the anterior part of the incisor during completion of morphogenesis. Time and space regulation of cell-matrix and cell-cell interactions might thus play complementary roles in allowing plasticity during tooth morphogenesis and stabilization at later stages of epithelial histogenesis.

Evolutionary Implications of the Occurrence of Two Vestigial Tooth Germs During Early Odontogenesis in the Mouse Lower Jaw

The study of closely-spaced developmental stages reveals the occurrence of three distinct dental segments during early odontogenesis in the ICR mouse lower jaw: the mesial (MS), the second rudimentary (R2), and the molar segments. At embryonic day (ED) 12.5, the MS displays an accessory bud, which regresses rapidly and disappears at ED 13.5. The R2 segment reaches a wide bud stage at ED 13.5 and then merges with the mesial end of the emerging first lower molar (M 1 ) cap before ED 15.0. The MS and R2 segments never develop into functional teeth and are classified as vestigial tooth germs. Depending on their developmental chronology and on the position they occupy along the prospective mandibular tooth row, MS and R2 segments are putatively assigned to primordia of a third (dP 3 ) and fourth (dP 4 ) lower deciduous premolar, respectively. Evolutionary implications of these developmental data are discussed.

Body weight in mouse embryos specifies staging of tooth development.

Great intra- and interlitter variation in morphological stages is known to exist among mouse embryos of the same strain at a similar chronological stage. With the aim of searching for an easily measurable parameter that correlates well with tooth development, the morpho- and histodifferentiation of teeth were compared in embryos classified according to the embryonic day (ED) specified by wet body weight. The embryos and fetuses were harvested at 12-h intervals from ED12.5 until birth, weighed, fixed, and processed histologically. The tooth age was determined according to the developmental progress of the first molar, evaluated based on morpho- and histodifferentiation criteria. The data documented a better correlation between tooth morpho-histodifferentiation with the age/weight staging than with only the embryonic day. The cytodifferentiation of odontoblasts exhibited a high interlitter variability and was similar within specimens of the same litter, regardless of their body weight differences.

Three-dimensional analysis of the early development of the dentition.

Tooth development has attracted the attention of researchers since the 19th century. It became obvious even then that morphogenesis could not fully be appreciated from two-dimensional histological sections. Therefore, methods of three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions were employed to visualize the surface morphology of developing structures and to help appreciate the complexity of early tooth morphogenesis. The present review surveys the data provided by computer-aided 3D analyses to update classical knowledge of early odontogenesis in the laboratory mouse and in humans. 3D reconstructions have demonstrated that odontogenesis in the early stages is a complex process which also includes the development of rudimentary odontogenic structures with different fates. Their developmental, evolutionary, and pathological aspects are discussed. The combination of in situ hybridization and 3D reconstruction have demonstrated the temporo-spatial dynamics of the signalling centres that reflect transient existence of rudimentary tooth primordia at loci where teeth were present in ancestors. The rudiments can rescue their suppressed development and revitalize, and then their subsequent autonomous development can give rise to oral pathologies. This shows that tooth-forming potential in mammals can be greater than that observed from their functional dentitions. From this perspective, the mouse rudimentary tooth primordia represent a natural model to test possibilities of tooth regeneration.