Mitchell Conn

A validation study of 3 grading systems to evaluate small-bowel cleansing for wireless capsule endoscopy : a quantitative index, a qualitative evaluation, and an overall adequacy assessment

BACKGROUND Capsule endoscopy (CE) is a powerful tool for evaluating the small bowel. Assessment of small-bowel cleansing for CE is an essential quality measure. OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to validate 3 new scales that grade small-bowel cleansing for CE. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, single-center study. SETTING Tertiary university hospital. INTERVENTION Five experienced capsule endoscopists read 40 CEs twice, separated by 1 month, to grade small-bowel cleansing on 3 scales-quantitative index (QI; 0-10), qualitative evaluation (QE; poor, fair, good, excellent), and overall adequacy assessment (OAA; inadequate, adequate). The QI and QE evaluated both the entire and distal small bowel. Investigators received no prior training in these scales. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Intraclass correlation coefficients to assess intraobserver (test-retest) and interobserver reliability. PATIENTS Forty patients who underwent 1 CE between June 2005 and May 2006 and who satisfied entry criteria. RESULTS Intraobserver reliability was moderate to substantial for the QI (0.60-0.66), moderate for the OAA (0.56), and fair to moderate for the QE (0.37-0.47). Interobserver scores were lower: QI and OAA moderate (0.47-0.52, 0.41, respectively) and slight to fair for the QE (0.20-0.24). QI scores for the entire and distal small bowel were highly correlated for each reader (0.57-0.87), and distal small-bowel scores were lower by 1.3 points, indicating poorer cleansing (P = .001). A dichotomized QE of excellent/good versus fair/poor had moderate to substantial intraobserver and interobserver reliability (0.58-0.66, 0.41-0.49, respectively). There was a strong and highly significant association among all 3 scales (P < .001 between QI and both QE and OAA). CONCLUSION We have described and validated 3 scales for grading small-bowel cleansing for CE. An evaluation of small-bowel cleansing should be routinely incorporated into the CE report.

An old problem with a new therapy: gastrointestinal bleeding in ventricular assist device patients and deep overtube-assisted enteroscopy.

Conventional algorithms for diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with nonpulsatile ventricular assist devices (VADs) may take days to perform while patients require transfusions. We developed a new algorithm based on deep overtube-assisted enteroscopy (DOAE) to facilitate a rapid diagnosis and treatment. From 2004 to 2012, 84 patients who underwent VAD placement in our institution, were evaluated for episodes of GIB. Our new algorithm for the management of GIB using DOAE was evaluated by dividing the episodes into three groups: group A (traditional management without enteroscopy), group B (traditional management with enteroscopy performed >24 hours after presentation), and group C (new management algorithm with enteroscopy performed <24 hours after presentation). Gastrointestinal bleeding was observed in 14 (17%) of our study patients for a total of 45 individual episodes of which 28 met our criteria for subanalysis. Forty-one (84%) lesions were confined to the upper gastrointestinal tract with more than 91% of these lesions being arteriovenous malformations. Average number of transfusions in groups A, B, and C were 4.1, 6.3, and 1.3, respectively (p = 0.001). The number of days to treatment was significantly shorter in group C than group B (0.4 vs. 5.3 days, p = 0.0002). Our new algorithm for the management of GIB using DOAE targets the most common locations of bleeding found in this patient population. When performed early, DOAE has the potential to decrease the need for transfusions and allow for an early diagnosis of GIB in VAD recipients.

Spiral Enteroscopy Utilizing Capsule Location Index for Achieving High Diagnostic and Therapeutic Yield

Background and Aim. Spiral enteroscopy (SE) is a new small bowel endoscopic technique. Our aim is to review the diagnostic and therapeutic yield, safety of SE, and the predictive role of prior capsule endoscopy (CE) at an academic center. Methods. A retrospective review of patients undergoing SE after prior CE between 2008 and 2013 was performed. Capsule location index (CLI) was defined as the fraction of total small bowel transit time when the lesion was seen on CE. Results. A total of 174 SEs were performed: antegrade (147) and retrograde (27). Abnormalities on SE were detected in 65% patients. The procedure was safe in patients with surgically altered bowel anatomy (n = 12). The diagnostic yield of antegrade SE decreased with increasing CLI range. The diagnostic yield of retrograde SE decreased on decreasing CLI range. A CLI cutoff of 0.6 was derived that determined the initial route of SE. Vascular ectasias seen on CE were detected in 83% cases on SE; p < 0.01. Conclusions. SE is safe with a high diagnostic and therapeutic yield. CLI is predictive of the success of SE and determines the best route of SE. The type of small bowel pathology targeted by SE may affect its utility and yield.

The diagnostic yield of wireless capsule endoscopy in patients with unexplained abdominal pain

ment. Background rate of detectable small bowel lesions in healthy volunteers was 13.8%. Mean number of small bowel mucosal breaks and incidence of subjects with 1 mucosal break was significantly higher with naproxen omeprazole compared to celecoxib or placebo (Table). Relative risk for small bowel mucosal breaks was 2.23 (95% CI 1.02, 4.88; p 0.04) for celecoxib vs placebo; 7.46 (3.81, 14.62; p 0.001) for naproxen omeprazole vs placebo; and 3.51 (2.22, 5.53; p 0.001) for celecoxib vs naproxen omeprazole.

Update Treatment for HBV Infection and Persistent Risk for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prospect for an HBV Cure

Since the discovery of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) by Blumberg et al. in 1965, its genome, sequence, epidemiology, and hepatocarcinogenesis have been elucidated. Globally, hepatitis B virus (HBV) is still responsible for the majority of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCC is the sixth-most common cancer in the world and the second-most common cancer death. The ultimate goal of treating HBV infection is the prevention of HCC. Fortunately, anti-HBV treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs), which began with lamivudine in 1998, has resulted in remarkable improvements in the survival of patients with chronic hepatitis B and a reduced incidence of HCC. These results were documented with lamivudine, entecavir, and tenofovir. Nonetheless, as the duration of antiviral treatment increases, the risk for HCC still remains despite undetectable HBV DNA in serum, as reported by different investigators with observation up to 4–5 years. In our own experience, we are witnessing the development of HCC in patients who have received antiviral treatment. Some have enjoyed negative serum HBV DNA for over 12 years before developing HCC. Current treatment with NAs can effectively suppress the replication of the virus but cannot eradicate the covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) that is within the nucleus of hepatocytes. There still remains a great need for a cure for HBV. Fortunately, several compounds have been identified that have the potential to eradicate HBV, and there are ongoing clinical trials in progress in their early stages.

Diagnostic 3Yield of M2A capsule endoscopy compared with sonde and push enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding

Diagnostic 3Yield of M2A capsule endoscopy compared with sonde and push enteroscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding