Mitchell Loeb
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mitchell Loeb.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | 2015
Jennifer H. Madans; Daniel Mont; Mitchell Loeb
In the article, Measuring Disability: Comparing the Impact of Two Data Collection Approaches on Disability Rates, in Volume 12 of the Journal International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Carla Sabariego et al. [1] raise several issues regarding the use of the short set of questions developed by the Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG) as compared with the approach to disability measurement proposed through the Model Disability Survey (MDS). We address these below. [...].
Disability and Health Journal | 2011
Mitchell Loeb; Li-Hui Chen
BACKGROUND The conceptualization of disability has shifted from a medical to a social model with a consequent focus away from impairments and toward activities and participation. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a common point of reference and a common language in a developing disability discourse. OBJECTIVES We sought to apply a model for the measurement of disability based on the activity and participation constructs of the ICF to persons with movement difficulty as a result of injury-related causes. METHODS Data from sample adults aged 18 years and over in the 2001-2006 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were used for analysis. Disability among adults with injury-related movement difficulty was assessed through measures of difficulty performing basic actions (movement, sensory, emotional, and/or cognitive functioning); and limitations of complex activities (defined through measures of self-care, social participation, and work participation). SUDAAN 9.0 was used in all analyses to account for the complex sampling design and weighting of the NHIS data. RESULTS Approximately 16% of noninstitutionalized adults who reported movement difficulty mentioned injury as a cause. On average, between 2001 and 2006, about 7.6 million adults had injury-related movement difficulty in the United States. Overall, 50% of adults who experienced injury-related movement difficulty also experienced some complex activity limitation. CONCLUSIONS Using NHIS data, we have demonstrated the applicability of an approach using basic actions difficulty and complex activity limitations to measure functioning and participation in individuals with a specific type and cause of difficulty: injury-related movement difficulty. The operationalization of these constructs provides a possible tool to monitor progress toward the attainment of the equalization of opportunities among people with injury-related movement difficulty.
Disability and Health Journal | 2015
Mitchell Loeb; Bruce S. Jonas
BACKGROUND There is limited research that assesses psychological functioning categorically as a predictor of complex activity limitations either alone or in conjunction with physical functioning. OBJECTIVES This paper assesses the impact of psychological and/or physical functioning difficulties as predictors of complex activity limitations among U.S. adults, using data from a national survey. METHODS Data come from the 2006-2010 National Health Interview Survey among U.S. adults 18 or older (n = 124,337). We developed a combined physical/psychological exposure variable with six categories: 1) no/low psychological distress (LPD) and absence of physical functioning difficulties, 2) moderate psychological distress (MPD) only, 3) serious psychological distress (SPD) only, 4) physical functioning difficulty only, 5) MPD and physical functioning difficulties, and 6) SPD and physical functioning difficulties. Selected complex activity limitations include daily living, social and work limitations. RESULTS Compared to adults with LPD and absence of physical functioning difficulties, the results demonstrated a clear and significant gradient of increasing risk of complex activity limitations beginning with MPD only, SPD only, physical functioning difficulty only, both MPD and physical functioning difficulties, and SPD and physical functioning difficulties. CONCLUSIONS The data suggest a stronger risk of complex activity limitations when increasing psychological functioning difficulties coexist with physical functioning difficulties, leading to potential interference with a persons ability to accomplish major life activities measured in this study. The sizeable contribution of psychological distress to the prevalence of basic actions difficulty implies that the mental health component of functional limitations is important in the overall assessment of health and well-being.
Disability and Health Journal | 2018
Mitchell Loeb; Daniel Mont; Claudia Cappa; Elena De Palma; Jennifer Madans; Roberta Crialesi
This is the first of three papers that will document the development of a survey module on child functioning developed by UNICEF in collaboration with the Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG), and demonstrate - both conceptually and through test results - the strengths of that module compared with alternative tools for identifying children with disabilities in household surveys. This first paper in the series sets the background and reviews the literature leading to the development of the UNICEF/WG Child Functioning Module (CFM) and presents the WG Short Set of questions (WG-SS) and the Ten Question Screening Instrument (TQSI) as precursors, outlining some of their shortcomings and how the UNICEF/WG CFM was designed to meet those challenges. Subsequent articles will summarize results from the cognitive and field testing of the CFM including comparisons with results derived from the TQSI and the WG-SS.
Disability and Health Journal | 2018
Claudia Cappa; Daniel Mont; Mitchell Loeb; Christina Misunas; Jennifer Madans; Tijana Comic; Filipa de Castro
BACKGROUND A module on child functioning developed by UNICEF and the Washington Group on Disability Statistics (WG) for use in censuses and surveys reflects current thinking around disability measurement and is intended to produce internationally comparable data. The Child Functioning Module (CFM) was developed in response to limitations of the Ten Question Screening Instrument (TQSI) for use in surveys and builds on the WG Short Set (WG-SS) of questions that was designed to capture disability in censuses, particularly among the adult population. OBJECTIVE This paper documents the testing of the module and summarizes its results, including a description of prevalence levels across countries using different cut-offs, and comparisons with prevalence levels obtained using the TQSI and the WG-SS. METHODS Field tests were conducted in Samoa as part of the 2014 Demographic and Health Survey and in Mexico as part of the 2015 National Survey of Boys, Girls and Women. The module was also implemented in Serbia as part of a dedicated survey conducted in the province of Vojvodina, in February 2016. RESULTS Using the recommended cut-offcut-off, the percentage of children reported as having functional difficulty ranges from 1.1% in Serbia to 2% in Mexico among children aged 2-4 years, and from 3.2% in Samoa to 11.2% in Mexico among children aged 5-17 years. Across all three countries, the prevalence of functional difficulty was highest in the socio-emotional domains. A comparison of the prevalence levels obtained using the WG-SS and the CFM shows that, except for the question on cognition/learning, the WG-SS and the CFM are relatively close for children aged 5-17 years for the domains that are included in both question sets, but the WG-SS excludes many children identified by the CFM in other domains. The comparison between the TQSI and the CFM shows that, while the prevalence estimates are similar for seeing and hearing, significant differences affect other domains, particularly cognition/learning and communication. CONCLUSIONS The CFM addresses a full range of functional domains that are important for child development. The module represents an improvement on the TQSI in that it allows for scaled responses to determine the degree of difficulty, and so can separate out many potential false positives. The module is also preferred over the WG-SS for collecting data on children, first, because most of the questions in the WG-SS are not suitable for children under the age of 5 years, and second, because the WG-SS leaves out important functional domains for children aged 5-17 years, namely those related to developmental disabilities and behavioural issues.
Archive | 2008
Daniel Mont; Mitchell Loeb
ALTER - European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap | 2010
Daniel Mont; Mitchell Loeb
Disability and Health Journal | 2010
Bruce S. Jonas; Mitchell Loeb
ALTER - European Journal of Disability Research / Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap | 2016
Islay Mactaggart; Claudia Cappa; Hannah Kuper; Mitchell Loeb; Sarah Polack
Social Protection and Labor Policy and Technical Notes | 2008
Daniel Mont; Mitchell Loeb