Mitsugu Kochi

Evaluation of serum CEA and CA19-9 levels as prognostic factors in patients with gastric cancer

Background. This clinicopathological study evaluated the utility of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 as predictors of locoregional recurrence and long-term disease-free survival in patients with gastric cancer. Methods. During the period January 1989 to December 1994, 485 patients with primary gastric cancer were evaluated. Gastrectomies were performed in 434 patients. Prognostic factors were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis, using Cox regression. Results. Elevated serum CEA and CA19-9 levels were observed in 92 of the 485 patients (19.0%), and in 95 of the 435 patients (21.8%), respectively, and both markers were elevated in 29 of these 435 patients (6.7%). Elevated serum CEA and CA19-9 levels correlated well with lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion, vessel invasion, stage grouping, depth of invasion, and curability. Patients with elevated serum CEA levels were at significantly higher risk of having all recurrence factors than were those with normal serum CEA levels. Patients with elevated serum CA19-9 levels were at significantly higher risk of having peritoneal metastases and distant metastases than were those with normal serum CA19-9 levels. A significant difference in the cumulative survival curves of patients was demonstrated between those with elevated and those with normal serum CEA or CA19-9 levels, even for patients at the same disease stage (stage III). Patients with elevated levels of both markers had a significantly worse prognosis than patients in whom the levels of both markers were normal. In patients who underwent gastrectomy, elevated serum CEA levels either preoperatively or within 3 weeks after gastrectomy were associated with significantly worse prognosis than were normal levels. When the cutoff level of serum CEA was increased to 10 ng/ml, serum CEA, age, lymph node metastasis, and surgical stage grouping were selected as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis of 14 prognostic factors, using Cox regression. Conclusion. Serum CEA and CA19-9 levels provide additional prognostic information in patients with primary gastric cancer. In particular, an elevated serum CEA level provides additional prognostic information and is a useful indicator of curability in patients who undergo gastrectomy. Serum CEA level is an independent prognostic factor in patients with primary gastric cancer.

Is there a benefit of pancreaticosplenectomy with gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND In Japan, wide resection with extended lymph node dissection has been performed for advanced cancer with good prognosis. Pancreaticosplenectomy with gastrectomy is performed to facilitate dissection of the lymph nodes around the splenic artery. We attempted to evaluate the effects of pancreaticosplenectomy and splenectomy with gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. METHODS Gastric cancer patients underwent splenectomy with gastrectomy (78 cases), pancreaticosplenectomy with gastrectomy (105 cases), or gastrectomy alone (1,755 cases). Survival rates were compared among the three groups for each factor of the depth of invasion, stage, and curability. RESULTS There were no significant differences among the three groups. Pancreaticosplenectomy or splenectomy with gastrectomy to dissect lymph nodes does not improve survival but is associated with severe complications. CONCLUSIONS The spleen should be resected when a patient has clearly positive node metastasis around the splenic hilus and artery, and pancreaticosplenectomy be performed when the cancer lesion invades the pancreas.

Bioresorbable membrane to reduce postoperative small bowel obstruction in patients with gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial.

Objective:This randomized controlled trial was designed to assess whether the use of a sodium hyluronate-based bioresorbable membrane reduces small bowel obstruction after gastrectomy for gastic cancer. Summary Background Data:Clinical studies have reported that a bioresorbable membrane significantly reduces the incidence and severity of adhesion after abdominopelvic surgery. Methods:Between 2003 and 2006, a total of 150 patients with gastric cancer who were scheduled to undergo gastrectomy were randomly assigned to a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) group or to a control group. Before closing the abdominal incision, 2 sheets of Seprafilm membrane were applied to the surface of the small intestine under the middle abdominal wound in the Seprafilm group. The primary end point was the incidence of bowel obstruction. Secondary end points were intraoperative and postoperative morbidity and mortality. We registered with Clinical Trials.gov using the Protocol Registration System (ID-NCT00529412). Results:We evaluated a total of 144 patients: 70 in the Seprafilm group and 74 in the control group. The overall incidence (Seprafilm group, 5.7% vs. control group, 9.5%; P = 0.534) and the cumulative incidence of small bowel obstruction (6.2% vs. 12.2% at 36 months; P = 0.3789) were slightly but not significantly lower in the Seprafilm group. The incidence of postoperative complications was similar in the groups (32.9% vs. 29.7%; P = 0.722). Seprafilm did not adversely affect bowel, liver, or renal functions. Conclusions:The use of Seprafilm does not significantly reduce the incidence of small bowel obstruction in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Recent advances in chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in Japan

In the early 1990s, a combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin was widely adopted to treat advanced gastric cancer; however, no survival advantage over single-agent 5-FU was confirmed by the results of randomized trials conducted over a long period. Recently developed agents such as irinotecan, taxanes (docetaxel), and new oral fluorouracil (S-1) have yielded more promising results, with a response rate of over 50% and a median survival time of over 10 months in combination studies. These newer combination regimens were investigated in various randomized phase III studies to clarify if the newer-generation regimens provided a survival advantage over the oldergeneration regimens. Based on the findings of a large randomized study, S-1 has become standard in the adjuvant setting after D2 dissection curatively resected stage II and III gastric cancer. This article reviews the recent advances in gastric cancer chemotherapy, especially in Japan.

Differing deregulation of HER2 in primary gastric cancer and synchronous related metastatic lymph nodes

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate how differences in expression of HER2 between primary gastric cancers (PGCs) and their corresponding metastatic lymph nodes (LMNs) might affect its potential as a prognostic indicator in treatments including anti-HER2 agents.MethodsThe analysis was conducted in 102 patients who underwent surgical resection for primary gastric cancers (PGCs; adenocarcinoma, intestinal type) with synchronous LNMs. HER2 gene status and protein expression were investigated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in all patients; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed in 22 patients. The correlation between HER2 gene status in PGCs and their LNMs was evaluated.ResultsPositive HER2 expression as detected by IHC + FISH was observed in 27/102 PGC samples (26.5%) and 29/102 LNM samples (28.4%). HER2 amplification status in 102 paired PGC and LNM samples as evaluated by FISH + IHC was concordant in 92 patients (90.2%), 69 (67.6%) were unamplified and 23/102 (22.5%) were amplified at both sites, and discordant in 10 patients (9.8%), 4 (3.9%) were positive for PGC and negative for LNM, while 6 (5.9%) were positive for LNM and negative for PGC. The results of FISH + IHC showed very strong concordance in HER2 status between the PGC and LNM groups (k = 0.754).ConclusionThe high concordance between HER2 results for PGCs and their LNMs indicates that assessment of HER2 status in the primary cancer alone is a reliable basis for deciding treatment with anti-HER2 agents in patients with LNMs from gastric adenocarcinoma.Virtual slidesThe virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/9365749431029643.

FLEP Chemotherapy for α-Fetoprotein-Producing Gastric Cancer

Objective: This study aimed at comparing the efficacy of FLEP chemotherapy in the treatment of stage IV AFP-producing gastric cancer and stage IV non-AFP-producing gastric cancer. Methods: Between 1989 and 2002, 57 patients with stage IV inoperable gastric cancer were given a combination of chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV), etoposide (VP-16) and cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) (designated as FLEP). In the two groups classified histologically according to AFP positivity, the rate of response and conversion to surgery, disease-free and overall survival were compared. The disease-free and overall survival in the two groups was compared by a log-rank test. Results: Patients of the AFP-producing group had a significantly better response rate (70 vs. 31.9%, p = 0.03) and a better conversion rate (40 vs. 12.8%, p = 0.04) than those of the non-AFP-producing group. Patients of the AFP-producing group also had a significantly better disease-free and overall survival (p = 0.02) than those of the non-AFP-producing group. AFP-producing gastric cancer was identified as an independent prognostic factor. Conclusion: FLEP chemotherapy was more effective for stage IV AFP-producing gastric cancer than in stage IV non-AFP-producing gastric cancer. Preoperative FLEP chemotherapy improved the prognosis of AFP-producing gastric cancer because of downstaging.

Phase II/III study of second-line chemotherapy comparing irinotecan-alone with S-1 plus irinotecan in advanced gastric cancer refractory to first-line treatment with S-1 (JACCRO GC-05)

BACKGROUND In Japan, S-1 plus cisplatin has been used as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Patients with no response to first-line treatment with S-1 often receive a taxane-alone or irinotecan-alone as second-line treatment. However, second-line treatment with S-1 plus irinotecan is widely used in patients with AGC resistant to first-line S-1-based chemotherapy. The goal of this trial was to determine whether the consecutive use of S-1 plus irinotecan improves survival when compared with irinotecan-alone as second-line treatment for AGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients who had disease progression during first-line S-1-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive S-1 plus irinotecan or irinotecan-alone. The S-1 plus irinotecan group received oral S-1 (40-60 mg/m(2)) on days 1-14 and intravenous irinotecan (150 mg/m(2)) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The irinotecan-alone group received the same dose of irinotecan intravenously on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS From February 2008 to May 2011, a total of 304 patients were enrolled. The median OS was 8.8 months in the S-1 plus irinotecan group and 9.5 months in the irinotecan-alone group. This difference was not significant (hazard ratio for death, 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.78-1.25; P = 0.92). Grade 3 or higher toxicities were more common in the S-1 plus irinotecan group than in the irinotecan-alone group. CONCLUSION The consecutive use of S-1 plus irinotecan is not recommended as second-line treatment in patients who are refractory to S-1-based first-line chemotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00639327.

Prognostic Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Clinical Outcomes of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Cetuximab Plus Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy: A Subgroup Analysis of the JACCRO CC-05/06 Trials

Introduction: Primary tumor location is a critical prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, it remains unclear whether tumor location is a predictor of the response to cetuximab treatment. It is also uncertain if BRAF mutation contributes to the impact of tumor location on survival. We assessed the prognostic impact of tumor location on clinical outcomes in mCRC patients treated with first‐line cetuximab chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: The associations of tumor location with overall survival and progression‐free survival were evaluated in mCRC patients with KRAS exon 2 wild‐type tumors who were enrolled onto 2 clinical trials: JACCRO CC‐05 of cetuximab plus FOLFOX (n = 57, UMIN000004197) and CC‐06 of cetuximab plus SOX (n = 61, UMIN000007022). Tumors proximal or from splenic flexure to rectum were defined as right‐sided or left‐sided, respectively. In addition, exploratory RAS and BRAF mutation analyses were performed. Results: A total of 110 patients were assessable for tumor location; 90 had left‐sided tumors. Left‐sided tumors were significantly associated with longer overall survival (36.2 vs. 12.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.28, P < .0001) and progression‐free survival (11.1 vs. 5.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.47, P = .0041) than right‐sided tumors; similar results were obtained in multivariate analysis. A subanalysis showed that the association was evident in the FOLFOX group and that tumor location was an independent prognostic factor irrespective of BRAF status in RAS wild‐type patients. Conclusion: Primary tumor location might be a predictor of survival independent of BRAF status in mCRC patients who receive first‐line cetuximab combined with oxaliplatin‐based chemotherapy. &NA; Primary tumor location is a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We assessed the prognostic impact of tumor location on survival and the association between BRAF mutation and tumor sidedness in mCRC patients treated with cetuximab. Tumor location is a prognostic marker for first‐line cetuximab plus oxaliplatin‐based chemotherapy, irrespective of BRAF status.

D2 gastrectomy with versus without bursectomy for gastric cancer.

Objectives:The purpose of this study was to determine the survival benefit of bursectomy by retrospectively comparing the prognosis in patients undergoing D2 lymphadenectomy and gastrectomy (D2 gastrectomy) with bursectomy for gastric cancer with that in patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy alone. Methods:A total of 254 consecutive stage IA to IIIC gastric cancer patients undergoing curative intent surgery between 2004 and 2009 were enrolled. The patients were divided into 2 groups: a bursectomy group, which included patients undergoing curative D2 gastrectomy with bursectomy by one surgeon, and a nonbursectomy group, which included those undergoing curative D2 gastrectomy alone by other surgeons. Results:No statistically significant difference was observed in the number of metastatic nodes or penetration of the serosa between the 2 groups. The overall incidence of surgery-related complications was 24.0% in the bursectomy group (29 of 121 patients) and 25.6% in the nonbursectomy group (34 of 133 patients). The 5-year overall survival rate was 85.8% in the bursectomy group and 80.8% in the nonbursectomy group (hazard ratio 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.74; P=0.60). Conclusions:The results of this retrospective study indicate no survival benefit for bursectomy plus D2 gastrectomy over D2 gastrectomy alone.

Combined assessment of EGFR-related molecules to predict outcome of 1st-line cetuximab-containing chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

ABSTRACT Several studies have reported that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related molecules may serve as predictors of cetuximab treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), such as EGFR gene copy number (GCN), expression of 2 ligands of EGFR, amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG), and EGFR CA simple sequence repeat 1 (CA-SSR1) polymorphism; however, these biomarkers still remain not useful in clinical practice since they have been evaluated using cohorts with patients treated in various settings of chemotherapy. We therefore analyzed associations of mRNA expression of AREG and EREG, EGFR GCN, and CA-SSR1 polymorphism [short (S;≤ 19) / long (L; ≥ 20)] with clinical outcomes in 77 Japanese patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC enrolled in phase II trials of FOLFOX (n = 28/57, UMIN000004197) or SOX (n = 49/67, UMIN000007022) plus cetuximab as first-line therapy. High AREG expression correlated with significantly better progression-free survival (median 11.6 vs. 66 months, HR 0.52, P = 0.037); moreover, it remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis (HR: 0.48, P = 0.027). S/S genotype of CA-SSR1 predicted severe skin toxicity (P = 0.040). Patients with both AREG-low and EGFR low-GCN had significantly shorter overall survival than the others (median 22.2 vs. 42.8 months, HR 2.34, P = 0.042). The multivariate analysis showed that molecular status with both AREG-low and EGFR low-GCN was a predictor of worse survival (P = 0.006). In conclusion, AREG mRNA expression and EGFR CA-SSR1 polymorphism predict survival and skin toxicity, respectively, of initial chemotherapy with cetuximab. Our results also suggest potential prognostic value of the combined assessment of AREG and EGFR GCN for first-line cetuximab treatment.