Mitsuhiro Tsukino

Body mass index in male patients with COPD: correlation with low attenuation areas on CT

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by the presence of airflow limitation caused by loss of lung elasticity and/or airway narrowing. The pathological hallmark of loss of lung elasticity is emphysema, and airway wall remodelling contributes to the airway narrowing. Using CT, these lesions can be assessed by measuring low attenuation areas (LAA) and airway wall thickness/luminal area, respectively. As previously reported, COPD can be divided into airway dominant, emphysema dominant and mixed phenotypes using CT. In this study, it is postulated that a patient’s physique may be associated with the relative contribution of these lesions to airflow obstruction. Methods: CT was used to evaluate emphysema and airway dimensions in 201 patients with COPD. Emphysema was evaluated using percentage of LAA voxels (LAA%) and airway lesion was estimated by percentage wall area (WA%). Patients were divided into four phenotypes using LAA% and WA%. Results: Body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in the higher LAA% phenotype (ie, emphysema dominant and mixed phenotypes). BMI correlated with LAA% (ρ = −0.557, p<0.0001) but not with WA%. BMI was significantly lower in the emphysema dominant phenotype than in the airway dominant phenotype, while there was no difference in forced expiratory volume in 1 s %predicted between the two. Conclusion: A low BMI is associated with the presence of emphysema, but not with airway wall thickening, in male smokers who have COPD. These results support the concept of different COPD phenotypes and suggest that there may be different systemic manifestations of these phenotypes.

Comparison of different computed tomography scanning methods for quantifying emphysema.

Computed tomography (CT) is used to detect emphysematous changes in the lungs of living patients. It is therefore important to develop a standard method for the radiographic quantification of emphysematous lesions using CT. The authors determine the best CT scanning methods for assessing the degree of pulmonary emphysema. Computed tomography scanning was performed in 85 consecutive patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Scans were obtained using 2-mm or 5-mm collimation, at full inspiration or full expiration, and with standard or high spatial-resolution reconstruction images (eight images each). Emphysema was then assessed by visual scoring using a five-point scale for each lung. Emphysema was scored as significantly less severe using standard reconstruction images. There were no significant differences in CT-scored emphysema on scans obtained with 2-mm and 5-mm collimation. Emphysema was scored as significantly less severe on expiratory scans. The postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second value correlated better with emphysema scored on expiratory scans. Computed tomography-scored emphysema obtained by all methods correlated well with the diffusion capacity and total lung capacity, regardless of the method used. Using a visual scoring system with a five-point scale, narrow collimation is probably not necessary for the quantification of emphysema, although a high spatial-resolution reconstruction appears to be of value. Scans obtained in exhalation appear to underemphasize the severity of emphysema.

Effects of theophylline and ipratropium bromide on exercise performance in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND The effects of theophylline or anticholinergic agents on exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remain controversial. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of an oral theophylline with an inhaled anticholinergic agent and to examine the effects of combined therapy on exercise performance using progressive cycle ergometry. METHODS Twenty one men with stable COPD and a mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of 1.00 (0.40) l were studied. Theophylline (600 or 800 mg daily), ipratropium bromide (160 μg), a combination of both drugs, and placebo were given in a randomised, double blind, four period crossover design study. Spirometric data, pulse rate, and blood pressure were assessed before and at 90 and 120 minutes after inhalation. Symptom limited progressive cycle ergometer exercise tests (20 watts/min) were performed 90 minutes after each inhalation, and dyspnoea was measured during exercise using the Borg scale. RESULTS The mean (SD) serum theophylline concentration was 18.3 (6.3) μg/ml, and seven patients had side effects during treatment with theophylline. Theophylline and ipratropium bromide produced greater increases in FEV1, maximal oxygen consumption, maximal minute ventilation, and several dyspnoea ratios than placebo. There were no differences between theophylline and ipratropium bromide except in maximal heart rate. A combination of both drugs produced greater improvements in pulmonary function and exercise capacity than either drug alone. CONCLUSIONS Both high dose theophylline and high dose ipratropium bromide improved exercise capacity in patients with stable COPD. Although data based on short term effects cannot be directly applied to long term therapy, theophylline added to an inhaled anticholinergic agent may have beneficial effects on exercise capacity in patients with COPD.

Dose response study of ipratropium bromide aerosol on maximum exercise performance in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Although the bronchodilating effect of inhaled anticholinergics has been established in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), their effects on exercise capacity are still controversial. Previous studies have suggested that the standard dosage hardly affects exercise tolerance, whereas higher doses might elicit an improvement. The aim of the present study was to determine the dose of ipratropium bromide aerosol that improves exercise performance using progressive cycle ergometry in patients with stable COPD. METHODS: Twenty men with stable COPD of mean (SD) age 69.2 (4.6) years and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.00 (0.37) 1 were studied in a randomised double blind manner. Each patient received ipratropium bromide in doses of 240 micrograms, 160 micrograms, 80 micrograms, 40 micrograms, and placebo from a metered dose inhaler (MDI) with an InspirEase spacer on five separate days. Spirometric parameters were assessed before and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after each inhalation, and pulse rate and blood pressure were also measured immediately before each spirometric measurement. Symptom limited progressive (20 watts/min) cycle ergometer exercise tests were performed 90 minutes after each inhalation. RESULTS: Ipratropium bromide in doses of 160 micrograms and 240 micrograms produced a greater increase in FEV1 than 40 micrograms or 80 micrograms ipratropium bromide at all time points. Doses of 160 micrograms and 240 micrograms ipratropium bromide also produced greater increases in maximal work load and maximal oxygen consumption than placebo, whereas 40 micrograms and 80 micrograms ipratropium bromide did not. There was a weak correlation between the change in FEV1 and the change in maximal work load (r = 0.45). No differences were found in pulse rate or blood pressure between the treatment and placebo groups, and no side effects were noted throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: A dose of at least four times the standard dose of ipratropium bromide from an MDI with a spacer device was necessary to improve maximal cycle exercise capacity in patients with stable COPD. Although the data from cycle ergometry cannot be directly applied to exercise performed during day to day activities, it is conceivable that the recommended doses of ipratropium bromide do not elicit the optimal clinical benefits.

Predictive properties of different multidimensional staging systems in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Background Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered to be a respiratory disease with systemic manifestations. Some multidimensional staging systems, not based solely on the level of airflow limitation, have been developed; however, these systems have rarely been compared. Methods We previously recruited 150 male outpatients with COPD for an analysis of factors related to mortality. For this report, we examined the discriminative and prognostic predictive properties of three COPD multidimensional measurements. These indices were the modified BODE (mBODE), which includes body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity; the ADO, composed of age, dyspnea, and airflow obstruction; and the modified DOSE (mDOSE), comprising dyspnea, airflow obstruction, smoking status, and exacerbation frequency. Results Among these indices, the frequency distribution of the mBODE index was the most widely and normally distributed. Univariate Cox proportional hazards analyses revealed that the scores on three indices were significantly predictive of 5-year mortality of COPD (P < 0.001). The scores on the mBODE and ADO indices were more significantly predictive of mortality than forced expiratory volume in 1 second, the Medical Research Council dyspnea score, and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire total score. However, peak oxygen uptake on progressive cycle ergometry was more significantly related to mortality than the scores on the three indices (P < 0.0001). Conclusion The multidimensional staging systems using the mBODE, ADO, and mDOSE indices were significant predictors of mortality in COPD patients, although exercise capacity had a more significant relationship with mortality than those indices. The mBODE index was superior to the others for its discriminative property. Further discussion of the definition of disease severity is necessary to promote concrete multidimensional staging systems as a new disease severity index in guidelines for the management of COPD.

A comparison of the responsiveness of different generic health status measures in patients with asthma

Generic health status has been recommended to be measured separately from disease-specific health status, because they can yield complementary information. In particular, generic health status can provide comprehensive health ratings across various disorders. However, the weakness with generic measures is that they may be less responsive to clinical changes than disease-specific ones. Therefore, when using generic health status as an endpoint in clinical trials, the instrument to be used is a problem with respect to responsiveness. In the present study, we investigated and compared the responsiveness of health status measures during asthma treatment using three different generic instruments: the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-items Health Survey (SF-36), the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the EQ5D (EuroQoL), as well as one disease-specific instrument, the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). Fifty-four new patients with asthma who consulted our clinic were recruited. The health status measurements were performed on the initial visit, and at 3 and 6 months. All subscales of the SF-36 showed a significant improvement during the first 6 months. Each dimension of the EQ5D showed stronger ceiling effects than the SF-36. With respect to the responsiveness indices, the SF-36 was regarded as more responsive than the NHP or EQ5D utility. The changes in the SF-36 had a weak to moderate correlation with the changes in the AQLQ. In conclusion, the SF-36 had a higher responsiveness for asthma as a generic measure than the NHP or EQ5D, and evaluated different aspects from the AQLQ. The SF-36 can be used effectively in asthma clinical trials.

Clinical course and prognosis of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a basically benign disease, but the prognosis is so poor that the mortality rate is similar to some malignant diseases. Depending on the disease severity, the 5-year mortality rate of patients with COPD varies from 40 to 70%. The three major causes of death have been identified as COPD itself, lung cancer, and cardiovascular disease. The following factors have been reported to be related to survival: FEV1 (especially the maximal attainable lung function), age, gender, PaO2, PaCO2, body weight, and comorbidity. There have been several large-scale randomized clinical trials to examine the prophylactic effects of inhaled anti-cholinergics and inhaled corticosteroids on the annual decline in FEV1. However, unfortunately, in all of the published studies, these drugs had no effect on the annual decline in FEV1.

Health‐Related Quality of Life in Stable Asthma: What Are Remaining Quality of Life Problems in Patients with Well‐Controlled Asthma?

We purposed to examine the distribution of the disturbances in the health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and to determine the relationship between HRQoL and various clinical parameters in patients with well‐controlled asthma according to the guidelines. We enrolled 162 patients with stable asthma, and 113 were defined as well‐controlled. HRQoL was measured by the Living with Asthma Questionnaire (LWAQ), the St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and the short‐form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF‐36), dyspnea by the Medical Research Council (MRC), and psychological status by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). In both stable and well‐controlled patients, the frequency distributions showed that the scores on the Avoidance, Distress, and Preoccupation constructs on the LWAQ were widely distributed, whereas the scores on the Vitality and General Health scales on the SF‐36 were normally distributed. In patients with well‐controlled asthma, the HADS had mild to moderate correlations with all questionnaires. Multiple regression analysis showed that the Anxiety, the MRC scale and the treatment steps accounted for 44% of the variance in the Avoidance on the LWAQ. These results suggest that domains of psychological well‐being may continue to be affected even though the asthma patients are well‐controlled by guideline criteria.

Comparison of the Bronchodilator Effects of Salbutamol Delivered via a Metered-Dose Inhaler with Spacer, a Dry-Powder Inhaler, and a Jet Nebulizer in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

The aim of this study was to compare the bronchodilator effects of salbutamol delivered via three different devices: a dry-powder inhaler (DPI), a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a large-volume spacer and a jet nebulizer (NEB) in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Ten male patients with stable COPD [age: 67.2 ± 3.8 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1): 1.56 ± 0.32 liters] were studied in a randomized, double-blind and crossover manner. Each patient received 200 or 1,000 µg salbutamol via an MDI with an InspirEaseTM spacer, a RotahalerTM, or a DeVilbiss 646TM nebulizer (NEB), or matching placebo on 7 separate days. Spirometry was performed before and 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 240 min after inhalation. With the 200-µg dose, only DPI produced a small but greater response in maximum FEV1 and in area under the time-response curve (AUC-FEV1) compared with placebo. With the 1,000-µg dose, DPI and MDI produced equally greater improvements in both maximum FEV1 and AUC–FEV1 than NEB. An equal bronchodilating effect can be obtained using either DPI or MDI with a spacer device, whereas the NEB was less effective when the same dose was administered.

Longitudinal changes in health status using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire and pulmonary function in patients with stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Long-term changes in health status have been less evaluated in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in comparison to the changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Accordingly, we examined the clinical course of health status as well as pulmonary function in COPD patients, and investigated the relationship between the change in health status and the change in pulmonary function in a 3-year longitudinal study involving 224 patients with COPD. Health status using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) and pulmonary function were measured at baseline and every six months over three years. We used the random effects model for the slopes to estimate the longitudinal changes. A total of 147 patients completed the 3-year study. The dyspnoea, fatigue, and emotional function domains of the CRQ declined slowly but significantly over 3 years (p= 0.001, 0.003, and 0.004, respectively) with a mean decline rate of 0.08/year. This means that it would take about 6 years to reach the minimal important change of 0.5 on the CRQ. The mean decline in post-bronchodilator FEV1 was 60 ml/year. None of the changes in any of the domains of the CRQ were significantly correlated with the changes in pulmonary function. We have found that, in comparison to the decline in pulmonary function, health status evaluated by the CRQ declined significantly but very slowly in three of four domains over three years in patients with COPD. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that there was no significant relationship between the change in health status and the change in pulmonary function.