Mitsuru Yokota

Laparoscopic approach to suspected T1 and T2 gallbladder carcinoma

AIM To evaluate a laparoscopic approach to gallbladder lesions including polyps, wall-thickening lesions, and suspected T1 and T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC). METHODS We performed 50 cases of laparoscopic whole-layer cholecystectomy (LCWL) and 13 cases of laparoscopic gallbladder bed resection (LCGB) for those gallbladder lesions from April 2010 to November 2016. We analyzed the short-term and long-term results of our laparoscopic approach. RESULTS The median operation time was 108 min for LCWL and 211 min for LCGB. The median blood loss was minimal for LCWL and 28 ml for LCGB. No severe morbidity occurred in either procedure. Nine patients who underwent LCWL and 7 who underwent LCGB were postoperatively diagnosed with GBC. One of these patients had undergone LCGB for pathologically diagnosed T2 GBC after LCWL. All of the final surgical margins were negative. Three of these 15 patients underwent additional open surgery. The mean follow-up period was 26 mo, and only one patient developed recurrence. CONCLUSION LCWL and LCGB are safe and useful procedures that allow complete resection of highly suspected or early-stage cancer and achieve good short-term and long-term results.

Laparoscopic vs Open Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer Using the Ligament of Treitz Approach

Background Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (Lap-DP) for benign lesions or those with low malignant potential has been proven safe and effective, and its performance is now widespread [1, 2, 3]. Lap-DP for left-sided pancreatic cancer (PC) is also being increasingly performed. According to some reports, Lap-DP has superior short-term outcomes (blood loss, postoperative hospital stay) and comparable oncological outcomes and overall survival with those of open distal pancreatectomy (Op-DP) [4, 5, 6]. PC has highly malignant potential; thus, complete resection and sufficient regional lymphadenectomy with tumor-free margins are very important. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is an accepted standard Op-DP technique for PC and is reportedly useful for achieving R0 resection and radical lymphadenectomy [7, 8, 9, 10]. However, laparoscopic RAMPS (Lap-RAMPS) is not yet popular because of its technical difficulty and lack of adequate evidence. Few reports have described the detailed surgical technique of Lap-RAMPS [11, 12, 13]. We employ Lap-RAMPS using the ligament of Treitz approach with the benefit of a laparoscopic view and herein describe the usability of this laparoscopic procedure with a video.

The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy in obese patients

BACKGROUND Obesity is generally reported to increase the risk of surgical complications. There have been few reports of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) in obese patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of (1) LH versus open hepatectomy (OH) in obese patients and (2) LH in obese patients versus LH in non-obese patients. METHODS We introduced LH at our institution in April 2014. LH was performed in 63 obese patients and 108 non-obese patients from April 2014 to May 2017. OH was performed in 79 obese patients from January 2010 to May 2017. This study retrospectively compared the short-term outcomes of the LH obese group with those of the OH obese group and the LH non-obese group. RESULTS In patient characteristics, the LH obese group included a significantly higher percentage of patients with liver cirrhosis than the OH obese group. The LH obese group had fewer patients with a history of abdominal surgery but more with liver cirrhosis than the LH non-obese group. For short-term outcomes, the LH obese group had significantly less blood loss, fewer intraoperative transfusions, fewer positive surgical margins, and shorter postoperative hospital stays than the OH obese group. In contrast, only operation time was significantly different (longer) in the LH obese group than in the LH non-obese group. There were no significant differences in morbidity or mortality between the LH obese group and either the OH obese or the LH non-obese groups. CONCLUSION LH in obese patients is safe and effective.