Mohamed Azab

Comparison of the 5-Hydroxytryptamine3 (Serotonin) Antagonist Ondansetron (Gr 38032F) with High-Dose Metoclopramide in the Control of Cisplatin-Induced Emesis

To compare ondansetron (GR 38032F), a 5-hydroxytryptamine3-receptor antagonist, with metoclopramide in the prophylaxis of acute cisplatin-induced emesis, we conducted a double-blind crossover study in 97 patients scheduled to receive cisplatin (80 to 100 mg per square meter of body-surface area) for treatment of cancer. None had received chemotherapy before this trial. Among the 76 patients who satisfactorily completed both parts of the study, complete or nearly complete control of emesis (i.e., no episodes of emesis occurred, or only one or two) was achieved in 57 of 76 treatments (75 percent) with ondansetron and in 32 of 76 treatments (42 percent) with metoclopramide (P less than 0.001). Ondansetron was also more effective in controlling acute nausea, as assessed with a visual-analogue scale (P = 0.019) or a graded scale (P = 0.024). There was a significant preference among patients for ondansetron (55 vs. 26 percent; P = 0.006). Dystonic reactions were observed during three treatments with metoclopramide; both agents were otherwise well tolerated. We conclude that ondansetron is more effective than metoclopramide in the control of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting, and that this suggests that serotonin is an important mediator of this side effect.

Prognostic factors in primary gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. A multivariate analysis, report of 106 cases, and review of the literature.

The authors have reviewed 106 cases of primary gastrointestinal non‐Hodgkins lymphoma (GI‐NHL) treated at the Institut Gustave‐Roussy (IGR), France, between 1975 and 1986. The occurrence was 55 in the stomach, 26 in the small intestine, ten ileocecal, seven in the large intestine, and eight patients had multiple involvement. Patients were clinically staged according to the Ann Arbor staging system using the modification of Musshoff for Stage IIE. All histologic material of the 106 patients were reviewed and graded according to the Working Formulation (WF) and the Kiel classifications. Most patients received combination chemotherapy as part or all of their primary treatment program (95 patients, 90%). Seventy five patients (71%) had a multimodality treatment. The overall 5‐year survival rate was 60%. Sixteen variables were tested by univariate analyses for prognostic influence on survival. Of these, only clinical stage (P < 0.001), the achievement of initial complete remission (CR) (P < 0.001), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (P = 0.01), mesenteric involvement (P = 0.03), and serosal infiltration (P = 0.05) were significant prognostic factors. Important variables were tested by a multivariate analysis using the Cox model taking into account different treatment modalities. Only three variables entered the regression analysis at a significant level: clinical stage (P = 0.02), surgical resection (P = 0.03), and histologic grade (Kiel) (P = 0.04). When the achievement of initial CR was introduced into the model, it was the most significant variable (P < 0.001) whereas all other variables became nonsignificant except for the histologic grade (Kiel) (P = 0.004). Based on results of the multivariate analyses we propose two prognostic classifications of patients: one at the initial evaluation depending on clinical stage, surgical resectability, and histologic grade (Kiel); the other at the end of primary treatment depending on the achievement or not of CR and the histologic grade.

Cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin combination in the treatment of resistant high-risk. Gestational trophoblastic tumors

Eight patients with high‐risk gestational trophoblastic tumors (GTT) resistant to multiagent chemotherapy were treated with the combination of cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin (PVB). All patients had a metastatic disease including three patients with two metastatic sites and two patients with brain metastases. Four patients achieved complete remission (CR) with the PVB regimen (50%). Three additional patients had partial remission (PR) of whom two were converted into CR by surgery of resistant residual lesions. One patient relapsed and the remaining five patients in CR were cured (62%). A multimodal approach was necessary in most patients as five of them had hysterectomy and two patients had a whole‐brain irradiation. Toxicity was mild with no treatment related deaths.

Treatment of high-risk gestational trophoblastic disease with chemotherapy combinations containing cisplatin and etoposide

The authors have treated 22 patients with high‐risk gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) by cisplatin‐etoposide‐containing combinations. Sixteen patients were treated with dactinomycin, platinum, and etoposide combination (APE regimen) and six patients had platinum and etoposide combination (PE regimen). Fourteen patients were treated for resistant or relapsing GTD after first‐line therapy, and eight patients initially. All 22 patients were high risk according to the World Health Organization prognostic score values. Sustained complete remission was achieved in 19 patients (86%). All eight patients who received treatment as initial therapy were cured (100%) whereas only 11 patients were cured among the 14 patients who failed prior chemotherapy (78%). Hematologic and renal toxicities were limited and no treatment‐related deaths occurred in this group of patients. Cisplatin and etoposide could be more widely used in chemotherapeutic combinations for high‐risk gestational trophoblastic disease.

Prognostic factors in gestational trophoblastic tumors. A multivariate analysis

One hundred sixty‐two gestational trophoblastic tumors (GTT) were treated at the Institute Gustave‐Roussy, Villejuif, France, from 1975 to 1985. Sustained complete remission (CR) was obtained in 146 patients (90%). All 97 patients with no histologic diagnosis of choriocarcinoma were cured, including 19 patients considered at high risk initially. Among 65 histologic chariocarcinoma patients, 16 died (CR, 75.5%) including seven initially nonmetastatic patients. Using a univariate analysis, all factors tested in the whole group of patients were more or less significant except for age and parity. However, when the same variables were tested in patients considered at high risk initially, only three factors were statistically significant. Those three factors were the only ones associated with a statistically significant higher relative death risk (RR) on multivariate analysis and are as follows: an antecedent nonmolar pregnancy (RR = 4.3; P < 0.01); initial presentation with more than one metastatic organ (RR = 7.4; P < 0.01); and primary resistance to single agent (RR = 18.8; P < 0.0001) or multi‐agent chemotherapy (RR = 26.1; P < 0.0001). It seems that those three factors, together with a histologic diagnosis of choriocarcinoma, are the prognostic factors that discriminate patients with unfavorable outcomes among the high‐risk group.

Phase I Study of Retelliptine Dihydrochloride (SR 95325 B) Using a Single Two-Hour Intravenous Infusion Schedule

Retelliptine dihydrochloride (SR 95325 B, NSC D-626717-W) is an ellipticine derivative having a very high level of antitumor activity in resistant murine solid tumor models. We studied in a Phase I trial escalating doses of retelliptine using a single 2-hour IV infusion schedule. Data from other Phase I studies allowed a starting dose of 80 mg/m2 and a rapid dose escalation. Included were 15 patients (M/F = 13/2) with a median age of 55 (range: 17–72). There were 22 courses delivered at the following dose levels: 80, 180, 700, 900, 1,200, and 1,500 mg/m2. Primary tumor types were kidney (6 patients), colon (3 patients), pancreas (2 patients), and others (4 patients).Mild dose-related visual troubles (blurring, accommodation troubles, oculomotor paresis) occurred in 9/11 patients starting from 700 mg/m2. Asymptomatic EKG anomalies, including significant prolongation of PR and QRS intervals occurred at 1500 mg/m2 (in 3/3 patients) marking the maximum tolerated dose. Both visual and EKG anomalies were spontaneously reversible few minutes to few hours after the end of infusion. Other possible drug-related toxicity occurred sporadically such as somnolence, bronchospasm, dry mouth, and vomiting (2 patients each). There were no significant laboratory anomalies. Neither drug-related deaths nor objective complete or partial responses were observed. The recommended dose for Phase II trial using the 2-hour intravenous infusion schedule is 1,200 mg/m2.

Phase II Trial of Ifosfamide in the Treatment of Metastatic Hormone-Refractory Patients with Prostatic Cancer

Cyclophosphamide has been considered one of the reference drugs of chemotherapy in randomized trials in hormone-refractory prostate cancer by the National Prostatic Cancer Project (NPCP). Ifosfamide, another oxazaphosphorine agent, and an analog of cyclophosphamide, appears to be more active and less toxic in a broad spectrum of tumors. Fifteen patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer were treated with continuous infusion of ifosfamide 2 g/m2 per day for 2 days, together with the uroepithelial protective agent Mesna 2.4 g/m2 per day for 2 days, both to be repeated every 3 weeks. All patients have failed on previous hormonal therapy and 7 patients had received previous chemotherapy. The median age was 66 years. Fourteen patients were evaluable; none of whom achieved an objective response. Four patients were stabilized and 10 had disease progression while on chemotherapy. Major toxicity included 2 reversible encephalopathy, 3 grade I reversible renal toxicity, and 1 hemorrhagic cystitis. We concluded that ifosfamide given in this schedule in this group of patients is not an active agent in prostate cancer.

Non-nephrotoxic empiric antimicrobial therapy in febrile neutropenic cancer patients

We evaluated the efficacy of piperacillin-pefloxacin as a non-nephrotoxic antibiotic combination in febrile neutropenic cancer patients treated with nephrotoxic chemotherapy. 40 patients: 34 with solid tumours and 6 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, were treated during 55 episodes with: piperacillin 4 g intravenously every 8 h and pefloxacin 400 mg intravenously every 12 h. If the patient remained febrile after 72 h, 1 g vancomycin intravenously was added every 12 h. The mean duration of neutropenia was 7 days (range 3-13). Infection was microbiologically documented in 13 episodes (8 gram-positive cocci and 7 gram-negative bacilli). Temperature became normal in 38 patients with piperacillin-pefloxacin and 12 further episodes were resolved by the addition of vancomycin. 2 patients had an early change of antibiotics because of clinical deterioration, there were 2 protocol violations and 1 patients temperature became normal after the addition of amphotericin. Neither septic death nor toxicity were observed. We conclude that this empirical treatment is active and safe and warrants further comparative trials.

Phase II trial of methyl-gag and melphalan in metastatic adult renal cell carcinoma.

A trial of melphalan and methyl-gag was undertaken in 16 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Among 14 evaluable patients, 6 had stabilization of disease. No significant responses were observed. While both drugs have produced occasional responses in renal cancer, their combination shows no therapeutic advantage.