Mohamed El-Hemaly

Caudate lobe resection with major hepatectomy for central cholangiocarcinoma: is it of value?

BACKGROUND/AIMS The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of concomitant caudate lobe resection in the course of major hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODOLOGY During the period between January 1995 and December 2010, 159 patients were subjected to major hepatectomy with or without total caudate lobe resection at the Gastroenterology Centre, Mansoura University. These patients were divided in two groups: 1) a caudate lobe preservation (CLP) group (79 patients) and 2) a caudate lobe resection (CLR) group (80 patients). All patient data were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS This study included 94 men and 65 women with a mean age of 53.5±0 years without operative mortality. No differences were observed between groups regarding operative time, blood loss or the development of any individual postoperative complication. There were 23 (28.8%) margin-positive resections in the CLR group and 49 (62%) margin-positive resections in the CLP group (p≤0.001). Recurrence was confirmed in 53 (67.1%) and in 41(51.3%) patients in the CLP and CLR groups, respectively (p=0.031). The median survival of the CLR group was 36 months with a 5-year survival rate of 28%, while the median survival of the CLP group was 22 months with a 5-year survival rate of 5% (p≤0.001). CONCLUSIONS Caudate lobe resection in combination with major hepatectomy did not affect operative or postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, it led to higher rates of margin-negative resections and significantly improved survival.

The effect of residual gastric antrum size on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is gaining popularity worldwide as a definitive bariatric procedure. However, there are still some controversial issues associated with the technique, one of which is the size of the residual antrum. OBJECTIVES The aim of this prospective randomized trial is to study the effect of the size of the residual gastric antrum on the outcome of LSG. SETTINGS University-affiliated hospital. METHODS Between November 2009 and August 2013, 113 morbidly obese patients submitted for LSG were randomized into 2 groups, namely antral preserving-LSG (AP-LSG) and antral resecting-LSG (AR-LSG), depending on the distance from the pylorus at which gastric division begins. In the AP-LSG group, the distance was 6 cm from the pylorus and included 58 patients, whereas the distance was 2 cm in the AR-LSG group and included 55 patients. The follow-up period was at least 12 months. Baseline and 6 and 12 month outcomes were analyzed including assessments of the percent excess weight lost (%EWL), reduction in BMI, morbidity, mortality, reoperations, quality of life, and co-morbidities. RESULTS Both groups were comparable regarding age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and co-morbidities. There was one 30-day mortality, and there was no significant difference in the complication rate or early reoperations between the 2 groups. Weight loss was significant in both groups at 6 and 12 months. At 12 months, weight loss was greater in the AR-LSG than in the AP-LSG group, but with was no significant difference between the 2 groups at 12 months (%EWL was 64.2% in the AP-LSG group and 67.6% in the AR-LSG group; p>.05). The resolution/improvement of co-morbidities, quality of life outcome and the overall prevalence of co-morbidities were similar. CONCLUSIONS LSG with or without antral preservation produces significant weight loss after surgery. The 2 procedures are equally effective regarding %EWL, morbidity, quality of life, and amelioration of co-morbidities.

Pelvic floor dyssynergia: efficacy of biofeedback training.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Paradoxical contraction of the pelvic floor during attempts to defaecate is described as pelvic floor dyssynergia (anismus). It is a behavioural disorder (no associated morphological or neurological abnormalities); consequently, biofeedback training has been recommended as a behavioural therapy for such a disorder. The aim of the present study was to evaluate long-term satisfaction of patients diagnosed with pelvic floor dyssynergia after biofeedback. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty patients (35 females and 25 males) with a mean age of 30±12years and a 4year duration of constipation were included. Forty-five patients had normal colonic transit and 15 patients had slow colonic transit. History, physical examination and barium enema were done to exclude constipation secondary to organic causes. Colonic and pelvic floor functions (colon-transit time, anorectal manometry, EMG and defaecography) were performed before and after biofeedback treatments. Patients were treated on a weekly basis with an average of (6±2) sessions. RESULTS At the end of sessions, 55 out of 60 patients (91.6%) reported a subjectively overall improvement. Symptoms of dyschezia were reported less frequently after biofeedback. Age and gender were not predictive factors of outcome. No symptoms at initial assessment were predictive for patients satisfaction but the only factor of predictive value was the diagnosis of anismus and the motivated patient who wanted to continue the sessions. CONCLUSION Biofeedback remains a morbidity free, low-cost and effective outpatient therapy for well-motivated patients complaining of functional constipation and diagnosed as pelvic floor dyssynergia.

Pancreatic body hydatid cyst: A case report

Highlights • Pancreatic hydatid cyst is rarely reported.• Due to its rarity and similarity with more common pancreatic cystic conditions, diagnosis of pancreatic may be a challenging.• Past history of travelling to endemic ares should raise suspiscion to the possibility of hydatid disease.

Functional outcome after Swenson's operation for Hirshsprung's disease

Background/Aim: Hirschsprungs disease (HD) is one of the most common causes resulting in lower intestinal obstruction in children with atypical clinical symptoms and inconspicuous morphological findings by barium enema X-ray. Recently, this situation has been largely ameliorated by improvement of instrument for measurement of anorectal pressure. By now, anorectal manometry has been regarded as a routine means for functional assessment and diagnosis of HD. It is accurate in nearly all cases of HD with characteristic absence of rectoanal inhibitory reflex. Different surgical modalities of treatment are available and Swensons operation is one of the surgical procedures done for HD. Anorectal manometric findings may change after Swensons operation with improvement of rectoanal inhibitory reflex in some cases. We aimed to evaluate functional results after Swensons operation for HD using anorectal manometry. Patients and Methods: Between 1996 and 2005, 52 patients were diagnosed with HD and operated upon by Swensons operation in Gastroenterology Center, Mansoura University. There were 33 males (63.46%) and 19 females (36.54%) with a mean age of 3.29 ± 1.6, (range 2-17 years). Anorectal manometry and rectal muscle biopsy were done preoperatively for diagnosis but after operation anorectal manometry was done after every six months and then yearly. Results: All of the 52 patients showed absent rectoanal inhibitory reflex on manometric study with relatively higher resting anal canal pressure and within normal squeeze pressure. Postoperatively, there were 35 continent patients (67.31%) with 11 patients (21.15%) showing minor incontinence and six (11.54%) with major incontinence. On the other side, there were five patients (9.62%) with persistent constipation after operation (three due to anal stricture and two due to residual aganglionosis). Postoperative manometric study showed some improvement in anal sensation with the rectoanal inhibitory reflex becoming intact in six patients (11.54%) four years after operation. Conclusion: Anorectal manometry is a more reliable method for diagnosis of HD than barium enema X-ray but for final diagnosis, it is reasonable to combine anorectal manometry with tissue biopsy. Functional outcome after Swensons operation for HD may improve in some patients complaining of incontinence or constipation. Anorectal manometry may show improvement of the parameters after Swensons operation.

Surgical management of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a single center experience.

Background/Aim: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgery remains the mainstay of curative treatment. Our objective is to evaluate the outcome of surgical treatment of primary gastric GIST. Materials and Methods: Between January 1997 and April 2008, thirty seven consecutive patients underwent resection for GISTs (35 patients with primary gastric GISTs and two patients with intestinal GISTs who were excluded from the study). These patients underwent upper endoscopy ± biopsy, barium meal and abdominal CT scan. Patients’ demographics and clinical presentations were analyzed. Perioperative parameters measured included operative times, estimated blood loss, intraoperative finding, surgical techniques, morbidity and length of hospitalization. Recurrence and survival were also analyzed. Results: Of the 35 patients with gastric GISTs included in the study, 63% were female. The median age was 59 ± 14 years (range, 23 to 75 years). The primary presenting symptoms were bleeding and dyspepsia; 43% of these tumors were located mainly in the body of the stomach. Tumor size was < 10 cm in 80% of the patients. The average tumor size was 6.3 ±3.2 cm (range from 3 to 13 cm). Regarding the surgical management, 20 patients (57%) underwent gastric wedge resection, eight patients (23%) underwent partial gastrectomy and the remaining seven patients (20%) underwent total gastrectomy. Radical resections were found in 32 patients (91.5%) while palliative resections were found in three patients (8.5%). The resected lymph nodes were negative in 32 patients (91.5%). Recurrence was noted in three patients, with a median time to recurrence of 14.3 months (range, 7 to 28 months). The three- and five-years survival in patients who underwent wedge resection was 92% and 81%, respectively, where it was 95% and 87%, respectively, in patients who underwent gastrectomy (either partial or total). There were no major intraoperative complications or mortalities. Conclusion: Complete surgical resection either through wedge resection or gastrectomy with negative margins remains the gold standard treatment in the management of patients with primary resectable gastric GISTs.

Bile reflux measurement and its contribution to the severity of reflux esophagitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may occur with acid, bile or in a mixed form. Endoscopic injury and mucosal metaplasia are a known sequelae to pathological GERD. The aim of the study was to determine the contribution of acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux to endoscopic severity in patients with GERD and Barretts esophagus (BE). MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety-one patients complaining of reflux symptoms were studied with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and graded to nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), erosive reflux disease (ERD) and BE. Esophageal manometry and simultaneous ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring (Bilitec 2000) were performed in all patients. RESULTS Seventy-one patients (78.0%) had ERD (Savary-Miller (grade I-III), 11 patients (12.1%) had NERD and 9 patients (9.9%) had BE, which were suspected endoscopically and diagnosed by histological esophageal biopsy. Combined 24-h esophageal bilirubin and pH monitoring revealed the following: 39 patients (42.9%) had mixed acid and bile reflux, 16 (17.6%) had pathological acid reflux alone, 18 (19.8%) had bile reflux alone and 18 patients (19.8%) showed no evidences of abnormal reflux. The percentage of the total time of the bilirubin absorbance > 0.14 in 71 patients with ERD was (8.18+/-11.28%) and in 9 patients with BE was (15.48+/-30.48%), which was significantly greater than that in 11 patients with NERD (4.48+/-8.99%), P<0.05 and P=0.01 respectively. All the BE patients had abnormal esophageal bile reflux (bile alone (3 patients)); and mixed bile and acid (6 patients)); 44 of 71 patients (61.97%) with ERD had abnormal esophageal bile reflux (alone (13 patients) and mixed bile and acid (31 patients)); meanwhile, 15 of them (21.2%) had abnormal acid exposure alone. Despite 11 patients having NERD, four patients (36.4%) had abnormal esophageal bile reflux and two of them had mixed reflux of bile with acid. CONCLUSION We believe that the Bilitec method reliably identifies the presence of bilirubin and quantitatively detects the duodenogastroesophageal reflux of bile. Mixed reflux (acid and bile) is the chief pattern of reflux in our GERD patients. Bile reflux either alone or along with acid reflux contributes to the severity of erosive and nonerosive reflux diseases as well as in BE.