Mohamed Estai

Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review.

In this report we review the range of teaching resources and strategies used in anatomy education with the aim of coming up with suggestions about the best teaching practices in this area. There is much debate about suitable methods of delivering anatomical knowledge. Competent clinicians, particularly surgeons, need a deep understanding of anatomy for safe clinical procedures. However, because students have had very limited exposure to anatomy during clinical training, there is a concern that medical students are ill-prepared in anatomy when entering clerkships and residency programs. Therefore, developing effective modalities for teaching anatomy is essential to safe medical practice. Cadaver-based instruction has survived as the main instructional tool for hundreds of years, however, there are differing views on whether full cadaver dissection is still appropriate for a modern undergraduate training. The limitations on curricular time, trained anatomy faculty and resources for gross anatomy courses in integrated or/and system-based curricula, have led many medical schools to abandon costly and time-consuming dissection-based instruction in favour of alternative methods of instruction including prosection, medical imaging, living anatomy and multimedia resources. To date, no single teaching tool has been found to meet curriculum requirements. The best way to teach modern anatomy is by combining multiple pedagogical resources to complement one another, students appear to learn more effectively when multimodal and system-based approaches are integrated. Our review suggests that certain professions would have more benefit from certain educational methods or strategies than others. Full body dissection would be best reserved for medical students, especially those with surgical career intentions, while teaching based on prosections and plastination is more suitable for dental, pharmacy and allied health science students. There is a need to direct future research towards evaluation of the suitability of the new teaching methodologies in new curricula and student perceptions of integrated and multimodal teaching paradigms, and the ability of these to satisfy learning outcomes.

A proof-of-concept evaluation of a cloud-based store-and-forward telemedicine app for screening for oral diseases

Objective It is widely considered that telemedicine can make positive contributions to dental practice. This study aimed to evaluate a cloud-based telemedicine application for screening for oral diseases. Methods A telemedicine system, based on a store-and-forward method, was developed to work as a platform for data storage. An Android application was developed to facilitate entering demographic details and capturing oral photos. As a proof-of-concept, six volunteers were enrolled in a trial to obtain oral images using smartphone cameras. Following an onsite oral examination, images of participants’ teeth were obtained by a trained dental assistant. Oral images were directly uploaded from the smartphone to a cloud-based server via broadband network. The assessments of oral images by offsite dentists were compared with those carried out via face-to-face oral examinations. Results A complete set of 30 oral images was obtained from all six participants. Out of 192 teeth reviewed, the proportion of ungradable teeth was 8%. Sensitivity and specificity of teledental screening were 57% and 100% respectively. The inter-grader agreement estimated for two examination modalities and between two teledental graders was 70% and 62% respectively. Findings indicate that the proposed system for screening of oral diseases can be implemented to provide a valid and reliable alternative to traditional oral screening. Conclusion This study provided evidence that a robust system for store-and-forward screening for dental problems can be developed, and leads to the need for further testing of its robustness to confirm the accuracy and reliability of the teledentistry system.

Diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry in the detection of dental caries: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE This study sought to systematically review the literature for research evidence for the diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry in the detection of dental caries. METHODS Two reviewers searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases through January 2016 for comparative studies that examined the diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry for detecting caries compared with nontelemedicine alternatives. Retrieved studies were screened for inclusion criteria and were evaluated for methodological quality using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) checklist. RESULTS Of 287 citations identified, 10 met the preset inclusion criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were the most common measures of diagnostic accuracy used in 10 studies. Despite very limited published evidence on the diagnostic accuracy of teledentistry, the reviewed teledentistry studies showed comparable diagnostic performance compared with nontelemedicine alternatives. The average methodological quality of the selected articles is low, since none of the selected studies satisfied all 4 QUADAS-2 domains. Only 6 articles were scored as having a low risk of bias in 3 of 4 of QUADAS-2 domains. All the selected studies had low concerns regarding applicability. The main shortcoming was that in most of the selected studies, the methodology, in particular patient selection and index tests, was insufficiently described. CONCLUSIONS Teledentistry has an acceptable diagnostic performance in the detection of dental caries. However, due to the heterogeneity of the reviewed studies, the generalization of results may be difficult. Further well-designed research to investigate the effectiveness of the teledentistry approach to caries detection is needed to determine the capability of this technology in epidemiologic oral surveys.

End-user acceptance of a cloud-based teledentistry system and Android phone app for remote screening for oral diseases.

Objective This study aimed to evaluate users’ acceptance of a teledentistry model utilizing a smartphone camera used for dental caries screening and to identify a number of areas for improvement of the system. Methods A store-and-forward telemedicine platform “Remote-I” was developed to assist in the screening of oral diseases using an image acquisition Android app operated by 17 teledental assistants. A total of 485 images (five images per case) were directly transmitted from the Android app to the server. A panel of five dental practitioners (graders) assessed the images and reported their diagnosis. A user acceptance survey was sent to the graders and smartphone users following completion of the screening program. Results Of the 22 surveys sent out, 20 (91%) were completed. Generally, users showed optimism towards the use of the teledentistry system, and strongly positively assessed items on content and service quality. The majority of graders took less than 15 min to read the images while phone users took 5–10 min to complete the dental photography using the Android app. This study identified a number of factors that are essential for improving the current system, such as optimization of smartphone camera features, the format of the server, and the orientation of images and using oral retractors during photography. Conclusions Users appear to be generally satisfied with the proposed teledentistry model. However, they have specific concerns to address, many of which could be resolved through more effective training, coordination between sites and upgrading the current system.

Role of telemedicine and mid-level dental providers in expanding dental-care access: potential application in rural Australia

Despite great progress in oral health over the past three decades, the rates of caries remain high in Australia, particularly among underserved populations. The reasons for poor oral health amongst underserved populations are multiple, but rests with socio-economic determinants of health. The present review considers international workforce models that have been created to enhance the recruitment and retention of dental providers in rural areas. Several strategies have been developed to address care access problems in rural areas, including the use of telemedicine and mid-level dental providers (MLDPs). Despite ongoing opposition from dentistry organisations, the Alaska and Minnesota workforce models have proven that developing and deploying dental therapists from rural communities has the potential to address the unmet needs of underserved populations. It is more efficient and cost-effective for MLDPs to perform triage and treat simple cases and for dentists to treat complicated cases. The use of MLDPs is intended to increase the capacity of the dental workforce in areas that are too isolated to entice dentists. Telemedicine has emerged as one solution to address limited access to health care, particularly in locations where there is a lack of providers. Telemedicine not only provides access to care, but also offers support, consultations and access to continuing education for practicing dental providers in rural areas. This strategy has the potential to free up resources to increase care access and reduce oral health disparities, thereby contributing to closing the rural-urban oral health gap.

A systematic review of the research evidence for the benefits of teledentistry.

Objective This review is designed to inform future decisions about the benefits of integrating teledentistry into routine health services, by presenting an overview of the evidence for the effectiveness and economic impact of teledentistry. Methods Two reviewers searched PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases through November 2016 to identify published peer-reviewed studies in English. Teledentistry studies were included if they were; (a) controlled (randomised or non-randomised) assessment studies; and (b) compared outcomes of a teledentistry intervention in terms of clinical or economic evaluation with the outcomes of traditional clinical alternatives. The quality of the studies was evaluated using a quality appraisal tool that considered study performance and design. Results This review identified 385 publications, of which 217 full-text articles were retrieved for further inspection. Of these, only 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. Nine of the included articles showed some clinical outcomes; the other two were primarily economic analyses. The balance of these studies assesed the efficacy of teledentistry interventions rather than their effectiveness. Four studies (36%) achieved higher quality scores and have greater potential to influence health-care decision-making. To date, the most convincing published evidence regarding the efficacy of teledentistry was provided by studies on paediatric dentistry, orthodontics and oral medicine. The economic analysis referred only to cost-minimisation, suggesting that the use of teleconsultation in dentistry can be cost-saving when compared to a conventional consultation. However, high-quality economic studies on teledentistry are rare. Conclusion There is emerging evidence supporting the efficacy of teledentistry. However, there is not yet enough conclusive evidence, particularly for its effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and long-term use, to make evidence-based policy decisions on teledentistry.

Optimizing patient referrals to dental consultants: Implication of teledentistry in rural settings

The uneven distribution of dental practitioners (particularly consultants – in Australia commonly called specialists) in Australia creates a barrier to accessing consultant level dental care. This maldistribution often results in the isolation of general dental practitioners (GDPs) practising in rural/remote settings, and the consequent lack of easy access to a second expert opinion from dental consultants. It then becomes challenging for GDP’s to weigh up cases that need consultant advice. This, at times, can contribute to under-referral or unselective referral of patients that require consultant advice, furthering the burdens on rural residents through additional travel and increased waiting times.

Comments on ‘Comparison of dental hygienists and dentists: clinical and teledentistry identification of dental caries in children’

Dear Editor, We read with great interest the article reported by Daniel and Kumar (1). To our knowledge, this study is among the first in teledentistry research that used photographs taken by smartphone camera in the assessment of dental caries. The study emphasizes the importance of role substitution in dentistry, such as dental hygienists to provide dental care. Although such studies would contribute to the literature on the mobile teledentistry, we observed some limitations in the methodology. The flow and timing of methodology are unclear; for example, did the four examiners carry out the caries assessment independently? If not, this may have introduced a risk of bias. It is well acknowledged that the photographic approach of caries assessment has a limitation in that a photograph only provides a single-dimensional view, which makes it difficult to observe all tooth surfaces, particularly in the posterior teeth (2). The single-dimensional view only allows detection of carious lesions on mostly the occlusal surfaces and does not allow to detect caries at interproximal surfaces, which are the most vulnerable sites for caries. DFS or DMFS index is useful in the visual oral examination as this approach allows viewing of teeth in three dimensions and identifying all teeth surfaces. Therefore, it was not clear why the authors used the DFS index, rather than other indexes such as DFT or DMFT, which might be more suitable to assess caries when individual tooth surfaces are difficult to identify. The paper was intended to evaluate a new screening approach, ‘teledentistry’, in comparison with the traditional visual oral examination, as well as caries assessment by a dentist versus dental hygienist. The appropriate statistical test to evaluate the validity of a new diagnostic or screening tool is the diagnostic accuracy measures. Diagnostic accuracy studies compare a diagnostic test of interest to an existing diagnostic test to determine the presence or absence of the disease of interest. Diagnostic accuracy is commonly represented by two measures, sensitivity and specificity; however, sometimes other measures, including predictive values, likelihood ratios and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, are used. We expected the authors to present some diagnostic accuracy measures to address the research question and support their conclusions. However, the authors only used mean DFS scores to detect differences among the examiners. Correlation of mean DFS scores between the four examiners does not imply accuracy of diagnosis. Although mean DFS scores between examiners might be identical (for the same patients), it does not mean that the distribution of the individual components (d and f) is the same or that the distribution of caries in the dentition is the same. Comparisons to detect accuracy in diagnosis need to be on a tooth-by-tooth basis (or in this study, on a surface-by-surface basis). Estimating caries prevalence or severity (DFS score) does not provide rigid evidence on the accuracy of teledentistry approach in detecting dental caries. Overall, we congratulate the authors and thank the editor for publishing such an interesting topic.

Cost savings from a teledentistry model for school dental screening: an Australian health system perspective

Objective The aim of the present study was to compare the costs of teledentistry and traditional dental screening approaches in Australian school children. Methods A cost-minimisation analysis was performed from the perspective of the oral health system, comparing the cost of dental screening in school children using a traditional visual examination approach with the cost of mid-level dental practitioners (MLDPs), such as dental therapists, screening the same cohort of children remotely using teledentistry. A model was developed to simulate the costs (over a 12-month period) of the two models of dental screening for all school children (2.7million children) aged 5-14 years across all Australian states and territories. The fixed costs and the variable costs, including staff salary, travel and accommodation costs, and cost of supply were calculated. All costs are given in Australian dollars. Results The total estimated cost of the teledentistry model was

Development and Practice of Store-and-Forward Telehealth Systems in Ophthalmology Dental and Emergency.

50million. The fixed cost of teledentistry was