Mohamed Khereba

Thoracoscopic localization of intraparenchymal pulmonary nodules using direct intracavitary thoracoscopic ultrasonography prevents conversion of VATS procedures to thoracotomy in selected patients

OBJECTIVES To investigate the feasibility, accuracy, and effect on conversion rates of intracavitary video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery ultrasonography (VATS-US) for localization of difficult to visualize pulmonary nodules. METHODS The study consisted of a prospective cohort of VATS-US for localization of intraparenchymal peripheral pulmonary nodules. Patients with pulmonary nodules not touching the visceral pleura on the computed tomography scan, who were scheduled for VATS wedge resection, were prospectively enrolled. The lobe of interest was examined: visually, using finger palpation when possible, and using the instrument sliding method. The nodule was then sought using a sterile ultrasound transducer. The primary outcome measure was the prevention of conversion to thoracotomy or lobectomy secondary to positive VATS-US findings in patients with nodules that were not identifiable using standard VATS techniques. RESULTS Four different surgeons performed 45 individual VATS-US procedures during a 13-month period. Intracavitary VATS-US was able to detect 43 of 46 nodules. The sensitivity of VATS-US was 93%, and the positive predictive value was 100%. The lung nodules were visualized by thoracoscopic lung examination in 12 cases (27%), palpable by finger in 18 cases (40%), and palpable using the instrument sliding technique in 17 cases (38%). In 20 cases, lung nodules were not identifiable using any of the traditional techniques and were identified only with VATS-US. VATS-US, therefore, prevented conversion to thoracotomy or lobectomy without tissue diagnosis in 43% (20/46) of cases. CONCLUSIONS Intracavitary VATS-US is a real-time, feasible, reliable, and effective method of localization of intraparenchymal pulmonary nodules during selected VATS wedge resection procedures and can decrease the conversion rates to thoracotomy or lobectomy.

Pilot study of pulmonary arterial branch sealing using energy devices in an ex vivo model

OBJECTIVE Vascular endostaplers are bulky and can be dangerous when dividing small pulmonary arterial (PA) branch vessels during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. We aimed to evaluate and compare the immediate efficacy of modern energy sealing devices in an ex vivo PA sealing model. METHODS Patients undergoing anatomical lung resection or lung transplantation were recruited for a prospective cohort pilot study. Four devices were evaluated: Harmonic Ace (Ethicon, Cincinnati, Ohio), Thunderbeat (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), LigaSure (Covidien, Boulder, Colo), and Enseal (Ethicon; Cincinnati, Ohio). After anatomical lung resection, the PA branches were dissected in vitro. Sealing was then performed with 1 of the sealing devices, the vessel was slowly pressurized, and the bursting pressure was recorded. RESULTS Forty-nine PA branches were sealed in 14 patients. The mean PA branch diameter was 7.4 mm (1.8-14.5 mm). Ten patients had normal PA pressure and 3 had PA hypertension. The mean bursting pressure in each was as follows: Harmonic Ace group, 415.5 mm Hg (137.1-1388.4 mm Hg), Thunderbeat group, 875 mm Hg (237.1-2871.3 mm Hg); LigaSure group, 214.7 mm Hg (0-579.6 mm Hg); Enseal group, 133.7 mm Hg (0-315.38 mm Hg). There were 2 complete sealing failures: LigaSure (diameter 6.78 mm) and Enseal (diameter 8.3 mm). CONCLUSIONS In this pilot study to examine energy sealing of PA branches in a simulated ex vivo model, vascular sealing using energy was effective and was able to sustain high intraluminal bursting pressures. Further research is needed to determine the in vivo and long-term safety of PA branch energy sealing.

Prospective trial evaluating sonography after thoracic surgery in postoperative care and decision making

OBJECTIVE Following thoracic surgery, daily chest X-rays (CXRs) are performed to assess patient evolution and to make decisions regarding chest tube removal and patient discharge. Sonography after thoracic surgery (SATS) has the potential to be an effective, convenient, inexpensive and easy to learn tool in the post-operative management of thoracic surgery patients. We hypothesized that SATS could alleviate the need for repetitive CXRs, thus reducing the related risks, costs and inconvenience. METHODS This study consisted of a prospective cohort trial. All patients scheduled to undergo thoracic surgery at a single academic medical centre were eligible. Post-operative bedside pleural ultrasound was performed whenever a CXR was ordered by the treating team. Investigators specifically assessed patients with the goals of identifying pleural effusions and pneumothoraces. Study investigators were blinded to CXR results. SATS findings were compared with CXRs, which were considered the gold standard in routine post-operative pleural space evaluation. RESULTS One hundred and twenty patients were prospectively enrolled over a 5.5-month period. Three hundred and fifty-two ultrasound examinations were performed (mean = 3.0 ± 2.4 exams per patient). The time interval between the ultrasound and the comparative CXR was 166 ± 149 min. The mean time required to perform SATS was 11 ± 6 min per exam. In the detection of pleural effusion, SATS yielded a sensitivity of 83.1% and a specificity of 59.3%. In the detection of pneumothoraces, a sensitivity of 21.2% and a specificity of 94.7% were obtained. CONCLUSIONS Post-operative ultrasound may alleviate the need to perform routine CXR in patients with a previously ruled out pneumothorax. SATS used selectively may be able to reduce the number of routine CXRs performed; however, it does not have high enough accuracy to replace CXRs.

Preoperative Assessment of Chest Wall Invasion in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Surgeon-Performed Ultrasound

BACKGROUND Chest wall invasion in operable lung cancer upgrades the stage and can affect operative planning. Diagnosing chest wall invasion preoperatively is important in patient consent, in the choice of operative incision placement, and can be helpful in choosing an operative approach (open vs thoracoscopic). The objectives of this study were to determine the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative, surgeon-performed ultrasound (US) in assessing tumoral chest wall invasion (T3) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and to compare its accuracy vs preoperative computed tomography (CT). METHODS This study was a prospective clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01206894) that prospectively enrolled patients between September 2010 and January 2013. Eligible patients included those with NSCLC abutting the parietal pleura or invading the chest wall on preoperative CT scan of the chest and who were planned for surgical resection. Criteria for chest wall invasion on US included (1) disruption of the parietal pleura, (2) invasion of the ribs, or (3) impairment of pleural movement with respiration. The US chest wall examination was performed by the thoracic surgical team immediately before the surgical intervention. Sensitivity and specificity for CT scan and US in assessing chest wall invasion were calculated using definitive chest wall invasion on final pathologic analysis as the gold standard for chest wall invasion. RESULTS During a 28-month period, 28 patients (15 men and 13 women) patients were prospectively enrolled. Mean age was 62 ± 11 years, and mean body mass index was 25.3 ± 4.5 kg/m(2). The average time for surgeon-performed US assessment looking for chest wall invasion was 5.3 ± 5 minutes. The sensitivity of US in evaluating chest wall invasion was 90.9% and the specificity was 85.7%. CT scan was associated with a sensitivity of 61.5% and a specificity of 84.6%. The positive and negative predictive values of surgeon-performed US for tumoral chest wall invasion were 83.3% and 92.3%, respectively, compared with 80% and 68.8% for CT scan. CONCLUSIONS Surgeon-performed preoperative chest wall US can reliably diagnose tumoral chest wall invasion in patients with NSCLC. CT scan has poor sensitivity in predicting chest wall invasion preoperatively. Surgeon-performed US can be considered as a complementary adjunct to preoperative imaging in patients with pulmonary lesions abutting the chest wall to improve preoperative diagnosis, staging, and operative planning.

Cervical Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Using a Flexible Endoscope for Bilateral Thoracoscopy

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become the standard of care for pleural evaluation, drainage, and pleurodesis. The major limitations to standard VATS techniques include intercostal pain and the unilateral nature of the procedure. We report on a cervical VATS approach for bilateral thoracoscopy, pleural biopsy, and talc pleurodesis using a flexible video endoscope without any intercostal incision. A 64-year old male with peritoneal carcinomatosis was noted to have significant bilateral pleural effusions. A cervical video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (C-VATS) procedure was performed through a 2-cm cervical incision using a sterile flexible gastroscope. Bilateral thoracoscopy, pleural drainage, pleural biopsies, lung biopsy, and talc pleurodesis were performed. No thoracic intercostal incisions were performed. Total operative time was 48 minutes. The procedure was successful and the recovery was uneventful. The patient was discharged 4 days after the procedure. C-VATS is an extremely minimally invasive procedure. It avoids intercostal incisions and allows for bilateral pleural procedures through a single small cervical incision.

Modified technique for tracheobronchial Y-stent insertion using flexible bronchoscope for stent guidance

From the Thoracic Surgery Department, Centre Hospitalier de L’Universit e de Montr eal, Montreal, Canada. Disclosures: Authors have nothing to disclose with regard to commercial support. Received for publication March 20, 2015; revisions receivedMay 24, 2015; accepted for publication July 3, 2015; available ahead of print Aug 12, 2015. Address for reprints: Jordan Kazakov, MD, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 (E-mail: JordanKazakov@ gmail.com). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015;150:1005-9 0022-5223/

Pleural ultrasound as an adjunct to physical examination in the preoperative evaluation of lung cancer patients

0.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.016

Initial experience with a new technique of endoscopic and ultrasonographic access for biopsy of para-aortic (station 6) mediastinal lymph nodes without traversing the aorta.

OBJECTIVES Preoperative evaluation of patients with suspected or confirmed lung cancer consists of clinical and radiological staging. Malignant pleural effusion is a poor prognosticator in non-small-cell lung cancer. Pleural ultrasound (PU) allows for the assessment of pleural effusion, providing real-time guidance for its aspiration and cytological analysis. Pleural Ultrasonography in Lung Cancer (PULC) as an adjunct to physical examination has the potential to improve preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer during first surgical encounter by allowing the evaluation of previously unassessed pleural effusion. METHODS This study consisted of a prospective trial of surgeon-performed PU in the preoperative evaluation of lung cancer patients. All patients evaluated in the thoracic surgery clinic with the new or presumed diagnosis of lung cancer were eligible. A portable ultrasound machine was used to evaluate pleural fluid in the bilateral costophrenic sulci with pleural fluid aspiration for cytological analysis. RESULTS Forty-five patients were prospectively enrolled over a 3-month period. Thirteen patients had ultrasound evidence of a pleural effusion, of which 3 were significant enough for aspiration. Cytological analysis of these effusions yielded malignant cells in 1 patient. Positive PULC evaluation led to a change in clinical staging (M0 to M1a) in 10 patients and a change in pathological staging (pleural fluid cytology positive) in 1 patient. The time required for PULC examination was 15 ± 7 min. There were no complications related to the procedures. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative pleural ultrasonography is a rapid and effective way to improve precision of staging in patients with lung cancer. More precise staging may allow for more appropriate testing, patient prognostication and operative planning.