Mohamed Loutfi

Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of In-Hospital Major Adverse Cardiac Events, New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation, and No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background Neutrophil/lymphocyte (N/L) ratio represents the balance between neutrophil and lymphocyte counts in the body and can be utilized as an index for systemic inflammatory status. The no-reflow phenomenon is defined as inadequate myocardial perfusion through a given segment of the coronary circulation without angiographic evidence of mechanical vessel obstruction. Systemic inflammatory status has been associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) as well as no-reflow. Aim To evaluate the predictive value of N/L ratio for in-hospital major adverse events, NOAF, and no-reflow in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Patients Two hundred consecutive patients with STEMI presenting to Alexandria Main University Hospital and International Cardiac Center Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt, from April 2013 to October 2013 were included in this study. Methods Laboratory investigation upon admission included complete blood count with mean platelet volume (MPV) and N/L ratio, and random plasma glucose (RPG) level. The results of coronary angiography indicating the infarct-related artery (IRA), initial thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow in the IRA, and the TIMI flow after stenting were recorded. The patients were studied according to the presence of various clinical and laboratory variables, such as age, gender, pain-to-balloon time, location of the infarction, RPG level and complete blood count including N/L ratio and MPV on admission, and initial TIMI flow in the IRA. They were also evaluated for the final TIMI flow after the primary percutaneous coronary intervention, incidence of NOAF, and the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Results The incidence rate of no-reflow, NOAF, and in-hospital MACE was 13.2%, 8%, and 5%, respectively, with cardiac death as the predominant form of in-hospital MACE. The group of no-reflow, NOAF, and/or MACE showed significantly older age (62.29 ± 7.90 vs 56.30 ± 10.34, P = 0.014), longer pain-to-balloon time (15.90 ± 7.87 vs 6.08 ± 3.82 hours, P < 0.001), higher levels of RPG, N/L ratio (8.19 ± 3.05 vs 5.44 ± 3.53, P < 0.001), and MPV (11.90 ± 2.09 vs 8.58 ± 1.84 fL, P < 0.001) on admission. After adjustment of confounding factors, the independent predictors of NOAF, no-reflow, and in-hospital MACE were higher N/L ratio (odds ratio [OR] = 3.5, P = 0.02) and older age (OR = 3.1, P = 0.04). Conclusions Older patient age, longer pain-to-balloon time, hyperglycemia, higher N/L ratio, and MPV on admission are useful predictive factors for the occurrence of no-reflow postprimary percutaneous coronary intervention, NOAF, and/or in-hospital MACE. N/L ratio is a new strong independent predictor of no-reflow, NOAF, and/or in-hospital MACE in patients with STEMI. The use of this simple routine biomarker may have a potential therapeutic implication in preventing NOAF and improving prognosis in STEMI revascularized patients.

Impact of the Residual SYNTAX Score on Outcomes of Revascularization in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) has become the preferred reperfusion strategy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when performed by an experienced team in a timely manner. However, no consensus exists regarding the management of multivessel coronary disease detected at the time of P-PCI. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of the residual SYNTAX score (rSS) following a complete vs. culprit-only revascularization strategy in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease (MVD) to quantify the extent and complexity of residual coronary stenoses and their impact on adverse ischemic outcomes. Methods Between October 1, 2012, and November 30, 2013, we enrolled 120 consecutive STEMI patients with angiographic patterns of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) who had a clinical indication to undergo PCI. The patients were subdivided into those who underwent culprit-only PCI (60 patients) and those who underwent staged-multivessel PCI during the index admission or who were staged within 30 days of the index admission (60 patients). Both the groups were well matched with regard to clinical statuses and lesion characteristics. Clinical outcomes at one year were collected, and the baseline SYNTAX score and rSS were calculated. Results The mean total stent length (31.07 ± 12.7 mm vs. 76.3 ± 14.1 mm) and the number of stents implanted per patient (1.34 ± 0.6 vs. 2.47 ± 0.72) were higher in the staged-PCI group. The rSS was higher in the culprit-only PCI group (9.7 ± 5.7 vs. 1.3 ± 1.99). The angiographic and clinical results after a mean follow-up of 343 ± 75 days demonstrated no significant difference in the occurrence of in-hospital Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) between both the groups (6.7% vs. 5%, P = 1.000). However, patients treated with staged PCI with an rSS ≤8 had significant reductions in one-year MACCE (10.7% vs. 30.5%, P = 0.020*), death/Myocardial infarction (MI)/Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (5% vs. 13.8%, P = 0.016*), and repeat revascularization (4.8% vs. 25%, P = 0.001*). We found that culprit-only, higher GRACE risk scores at discharge and an rSS >8 were independent predictors of MACCE at one year. Conclusions Staged PCI that achieves reasonable complete revascularization (rSS ≤8) improves mid-term survival and reduces the incidence of repeat PCI in patients with STEMI and MVD. Nonetheless, large-scale randomized trials are required to establish the optimal revascularization strategy for these high-risk patients.

Outcomes of DES in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients with Complex Coronary Artery Disease after Risk Stratification by the SYNTAX Score

Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of adverse outcomes after coronary revascularization. Controversy persists regarding the optimal revascularization strategy for diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD). Aim The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of drug-eluting stent (DES) insertion in DM and non-DM patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) after risk stratification by the percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) score. Methods and Results We performed multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for 601 lesions in 243 DM patients and 1,029 lesions in 401 non-DM patients. All included patients had MVD and one or more lesions of type B2/C. The two-year outcomes and event rates were estimated in the DM and non-DM patients using Kaplan–Meier analyses. The baseline SYNTAX score was ≤22 in 84.8% vs. 84%, P = 0.804, and 23-32 in 15.2% vs. 16%, P = 0.804, of the DM and non-DM patients, respectively. The number of diseased segments treated (2.57 ± 0.75 vs. 2.47 ± 0.72; P = 0.066) and stents implanted per patient (2.41 ± 0.63 vs. 2.32 ± 0.54; P = 0.134) were similar in both groups. After a mean follow-up of 642 ± 175 days, there were no differences in the major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; 26.7% vs. 20.9%; P = 0.091), composite end point of all-cause death/myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke (12.3% vs. 9%; P = 0.172), individual MACCE components of death (3.7% vs. 3.2%; P = 0.754), MI (6.6% vs. 4%; P = 0.142), and absence of stroke in the DM and non-DM patients. An increased need for repeat revascularization was observed in DM patients (18.5% vs. 10.2%; P = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis, DM was an independent predictor of repeat revascularization (hazard ratio: 1.818; 95% confidence interval: 1.162-2.843; P = 0.009). Conclusions DES implantation provides favorable early and mid-term results in both DM and non-DM patients undergoing PCI for complex lesions. After a mean follow-up of two years, DM and non-DM patients with complex CAD treated by PCI using new-generation DES showed no differences with regard to MACCE and other secondary end points. However, higher rates of ischemia-driven repeat revascularization were observed in DM patients.

Analysis of Bleeding Complications in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Comparison of Effect of Tirofiban in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients

Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most prevalent manifestation of cardiovascular diseases and is associated with high mortality and morbidity. The clinical presentations of CAD include silent ischemia, stable angina pectoris, unstable angina, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, and sudden death. Objective: This study was designed to define the frequency of hemorrhagic complications and to identify clinical variables associated with increased risk of bleeding complications in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients presented with acute coronary syndrome whom received aspirin, clopidogrel and heparin only or in combination with GPIIb/IIIa receptors blockade (Tirofiban) and to detect any bleeding complications in all patients during the period of admission in the hospital. Patients and Methods: 150 patients with ACS were divided into two groups, 82 diabetic patients and 68 nondiabetic patients. 40 patients out of total sample received tirofiban. Assessment of in hospital TIMI bleeding, GRACE and CRUSADE risk scores was estimated for all of them. Results: We observed that, there is no statistically significant difference in TIMI bleeding in both heparin and tirofiban group in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients. Cardiac catheterization access site was the most frequent location of bleeding most likely secondary to the high rate of coronary angiography performed in the study. Tirofiban added to heparin did not increase the risk of bleeding at the vascular access site.Conclusion: There was no statistically significant increase in all TIMI bleeding, thrombocytopenia or blood transfusions with the combination of tirofiban with heparin in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

TCT-651 Feasibility and clinical outcomes of ≥38 mm long drug eluting stent treatment for diffuse coronary artery disease in Egyptian population

Diffuse long lesions are commonly encountered in routine clinical practice and often lead to use long or overlapping stents. Limited data are available on the long-term efficacy and safety of long drug-eluting stents (DES) in this complex lesion subset. We investigated the long-term efficacy and