Mohammad Azab

Safety and tolerability of guadecitabine (SGI-110) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia: a multicentre, randomised, dose-escalation phase 1 study

BACKGROUND Hypomethylating agents are used to treat cancers driven by aberrant DNA methylation, but their short half-life might limit their activity, particularly in patients with less proliferative diseases. Guadecitabine (SGI-110) is a novel hypomethylating dinucleotide of decitabine and deoxyguanosine resistant to degradation by cytidine deaminase. We aimed to assess the safety and clinical activity of subcutaneously given guadecitabine in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. METHODS In this multicentre, open-label, phase 1 study, patients from nine North American medical centres with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukaemia that was refractory to or had relapsed after standard treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous guadecitabine, either once-daily for 5 consecutive days (daily × 5), or once-weekly for 3 weeks, in a 28-day treatment cycle. Patients were stratified by disease. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used in which we treated patients with guadecitabine doses of 3-125 mg/m(2) in separate dose-escalation cohorts. A twice-weekly treatment schedule was added to the study after a protocol amendment. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability of guadecitabine, determine the maximum tolerated and biologically effective dose, and identify the recommended phase 2 dose of guadecitabine. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of guadecitabine. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses to determine the biologically effective dose included all patients for whom samples were available. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01261312. FINDINGS Between Jan 4, 2011, and April 11, 2014, we enrolled and treated 93 patients: 35 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and nine patients with myelodysplastic syndrome in the daily × 5 dose-escalation cohorts, 28 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and six patients with myelodysplastic syndrome in the once-weekly dose-escalation cohorts, and 11 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and four patients with myelodysplastic syndrome in the twice-weekly dose-escalation cohorts. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events were febrile neutropenia (38 [41%] of 93 patients), pneumonia (27 [29%] of 93 patients), thrombocytopenia (23 [25%] of 93 patients), anaemia (23 [25%] of 93 patients), and sepsis (16 [17%] of 93 patients). The most common serious adverse events were febrile neutropenia (29 [31%] of 93 patients), pneumonia (26 [28%] of 93 patients), and sepsis (16 [17%] of 93 patients). Six of the 74 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia and six of the 19 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome had a clinical response to treatment. Two dose-limiting toxicities were noted in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome at 125 mg/m(2) daily × 5, thus the maximum tolerated dose in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome was 90 mg/m(2) daily × 5. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Potent dose-related DNA demethylation occurred on the daily × 5 regimen, reaching a plateau at 60 mg/m(2) (designated as the biologically effective dose). INTERPRETATION Guadecitabine given subcutaneously at 60 mg/m(2) daily × 5 is well tolerated and is clinically and biologically active in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia. Guadecitabine 60 mg/m(2) daily × 5 is the recommended phase 2 dose, and these findings warrant further phase 2 studies. FUNDING Astex Pharmaceuticals, Stand Up To Cancer.

Inhibition of HSP90 by AT13387 Delays the Emergence of Resistance to BRAF Inhibitors and Overcomes Resistance to dual BRAF and MEK Inhibition in Melanoma Models

Emergence of clinical resistance to BRAF inhibitors, alone or in combination with MEK inhibitors, limits clinical responses in melanoma. Inhibiting HSP90 offers an approach to simultaneously interfere with multiple resistance mechanisms. Using the HSP90 inhibitor AT13387, which is currently in clinical trials, we investigated the potential of HSP90 inhibition to overcome or delay the emergence of resistance to these kinase inhibitors in melanoma models. In vitro, treating vemurafenib-sensitive cells (A375 or SK-MEL-28) with a combination of AT13387 and vemurafenib prevented colony growth under conditions in which vemurafenib treatment alone generated resistant colonies. In vivo, when AT13387 was combined with vemurafenib in a SK-MEL-28, vemurafenib-sensitive model, no regrowth of tumors was observed over 5 months, although 2 of 7 tumors in the vemurafenib monotherapy group relapsed in this time. Together, these data suggest that the combination of these agents can delay the emergence of resistance. Cell lines with acquired vemurafenib resistance, derived from these models (A375R and SK-MEL-28R) were also sensitive to HSP90 inhibitor treatment; key clients were depleted, apoptosis was induced, and growth in 3D culture was inhibited. Similar effects were observed in cell lines with acquired resistance to both BRAF and MEK inhibitors (SK-MEL-28RR, WM164RR, and 1205LuRR). These data suggest that treatment with an HSP90 inhibitor, such as AT13387, is a potential approach for combating resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibition in melanoma. Moreover, frontline combination of these agents with an HSP90 inhibitor could delay the emergence of resistance, providing a strong rationale for clinical investigation of such combinations in BRAF-mutated melanoma. Mol Cancer Ther; 13(12); 2793–804. ©2014 AACR.

The Novel, Small-Molecule DNA Methylation Inhibitor SGI-110 as an Ovarian Cancer Chemosensitizer

Purpose: To investigate SGI-110 as a “chemosensitizer” in ovarian cancer and to assess its effects on tumor suppressor genes (TSG) and chemoresponsiveness-associated genes silenced by DNA methylation in ovarian cancer. Experimental Design: Several ovarian cancer cell lines were used for in vitro and in vivo platinum resensitization studies. Changes in DNA methylation and expression levels of TSG and other cancer-related genes in response to SGI-110 were measured by pyrosequencing and RT-PCR. Results: We demonstrate in vitro that SGI-110 resensitized a range of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin (CDDP) and induced significant demethylation and reexpression of TSG, differentiation-associated genes, and putative drivers of ovarian cancer cisplatin resistance. In vivo, SGI-110 alone or in combination with CDDP was well tolerated and induced antitumor effects in ovarian cancer xenografts. Pyrosequencing analyses confirmed that SGI-110 caused both global (LINE1) and gene-specific hypomethylation in vivo, including TSGs (RASSF1A), proposed drivers of ovarian cancer cisplatin resistance (MLH1 and ZIC1), differentiation-associated genes (HOXA10 and HOXA11), and transcription factors (STAT5B). Furthermore, DNA damage induced by CDDP in ovarian cancer cells was increased by SGI-110, as measured by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry analysis of DNA adduct formation and repair of cisplatin-induced DNA damage. Conclusions: These results strongly support further investigation of hypomethylating strategies in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Specifically, SGI-110 in combination with conventional and/or targeted therapeutics warrants further development in this setting. Clin Cancer Res; 20(24); 6504–16. ©2014 AACR.

Guadecitabine (SGI-110) in treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: phase 2 results from a multicentre, randomised, phase 1/2 trial

BACKGROUND The hypomethylating drugs azacitidine and decitabine have shown efficacy in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia, but complete tumour responses are infrequent and of short duration, possibly because of the short half-lives and suboptimal bone marrow exposure of the drugs. Guadecitabine, a next-generation hypomethylating drug, has a longer half-life and exposure than its active metabolite decitabine. A phase 1 study established 60 mg/m2 guadecitabine for 5 days as an effective treatment schedule. In this phase 2 study, we aimed to assess the safety and activity of two doses and schedules of guadecitabine in older (≥65 years) patients with treatment-naive acute myeloid leukaemia who were not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. METHODS We did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 1/2 study of guadecitabine in cohorts of patients with treatment-naive acute myeloid leukaemia, relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes; here we report the phase 2 results from the cohort of treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. We included patients aged at least 65 years from 14 US medical centres (hospitals and specialist cancer clinics) who were not candidates for intensive chemotherapy and randomly assigned them (1:1) using a computer algorithm (for dynamic randomisation) to guadecitabine 60 or 90 mg/m2 on days 1-5 (5-day schedule) of a 28-day treatment cycle. Treatment allocation was not masked. We also assigned additional patients to guadecitabine 60 mg/m2 in a 10-day schedule in a 28-day treatment cycle after a protocol amendment. The primary endpoint was composite complete response (complete response, complete response with incomplete platelet recovery, or complete response with incomplete neutrophil recovery regardless of platelets). Response was assessed in all patients (as-treated) who received at least one dose of guadecitabine. We present the final analysis, although at the time of the database lock, 15 patients were still in follow-up for overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01261312. FINDINGS Between Aug 24, 2012, and Sept 15, 2014, 107 patients were enrolled: 54 on the 5-day schedule (26 randomly assigned to 60 mg/m2 and 28 to 90 mg/m2) and 53 were assigned to the 10-day schedule. Median age was 77 years (range 62-92), and median follow-up was 953 days (IQR 721-1040). All treated patients were assessable for a response. The number of patients who achieved a composite complete response did not differ between dose groups or schedules (13 [54%, 95% CI 32·8-74·4] with 60 mg/m2 on the 5-day schedule; 16 [59%; 38·8-77·6] with 90 mg/m2 on the 5-day schedule; and 26 [50%, 35·8-64·2] with 60 mg/m2 on the 10-day schedule). The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events, regardless of relationship to treatment, were febrile neutropenia (31 [61%] of 51 patients on the 5-day schedule vs 36 [69%] of 52 patients on the 10-day schedule), thrombocytopenia (25 [49%] vs 22 [42%]), neutropenia (20 [39%] vs 18 [35%]), pneumonia (15 [29%] vs 19 [37%]), anaemia (15 [29%] vs 12 [23%]), and sepsis (eight [16%] vs 14 [27%]). The most common serious adverse events, regardless of relationship to treatment, for the 5-day and 10-day schedules, respectively, were febrile neutropenia (27 [53%] vs 25 [48%]), pneumonia (14 [27%] vs 16 [31%]), and sepsis (eight [16%] vs 14 [27%]). 23 (22%) patients died because of adverse events (mainly from sepsis, eight [8%]; and pneumonia, five [5%]); four deaths were from adverse events deemed treatment-related (pneumonia, two [2%]; multiorgan failure, one [1%]; and sepsis, one [1%], all in the 10-day cohort). INTERPRETATION More than half of older treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukaemia achieved a composite complete response with guadecitabine at all drug doses and schedules investigated, with tolerable toxicity. The recommended guadecitabine regimen for this population is 60 mg/m2 in a 5-day schedule. A phase 3 study in this patient population is ongoing (NCT02348489) to assess guadecitabine 60 mg/m2 in a 5-day schedule versus standard of care. FUNDING Astex Pharmaceuticals and Stand Up To Cancer.

Efficacy and epigenetic interactions of novel DNA hypomethylating agent guadecitabine (SGI-110) in preclinical models of hepatocellular carcinoma

ABSTRACT Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a deadly malignancy characterized at the epigenetic level by global DNA hypomethylation and focal hypermethylation on the promoter of tumor suppressor genes. In most cases it develops on a background of liver steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Guadecitabine (SGI-110) is a second-generation hypomethylating agent, which inhibits DNA methyltransferases. Guadecitabine is formulated as a dinucleotide of decitabine and deoxyguanosine that is resistant to cytidine deaminase (CDA) degradation and results in prolonged in vivo exposure to decitabine following small volume subcutaneous administration of guadecitabine. Here we found that guadecitabine is an effective demethylating agent and is able to prevent HCC progression in pre-clinical models. In a xenograft HCC HepG2 model, guadecitabine impeded tumor growth and inhibited angiogenesis, while it could not prevent liver fibrosis and inflammation in a mouse model of steatohepatitis. Demethylating efficacy of guadecitabine on LINE-1 elements was found to be the highest 8 d post-infusion in blood samples of mice. Analysis of a panel of human HCC vs. normal tissue revealed a signature of hypermethylated tumor suppressor genes (CDKN1A, CDKN2A, DLEC1, E2F1, GSTP1, OPCML, E2F1, RASSF1, RUNX3, and SOCS1) as detected by methylation-specific PCR. A pronounced demethylating effect of guadecitabine was obtained also in the promoters of a subset of tumor suppressors genes (CDKN2A, DLEC1, and RUNX3) in HepG2 and Huh-7 HCC cells. Finally, we analyzed the role of macroH2A1, a variant of histone H2A, an oncogene upregulated in human cirrhosis/HCC that synergizes with DNA methylation in suppressing tumor suppressor genes, and it prevents the inhibition of cell growth triggered by decitabine in HCC cells. Guadecitabine, in contrast to decitabine, blocked growth in HCC cells overexpressing macroH2A1 histones and with high CDA levels, despite being unable to fully demethylate CDKN2A, RUNX3, and DLEC1 promoters altered by macroH2A1. Collectively, our findings in human and mice models reveal novel epigenetic anti-HCC effects of guadecitabine, which might be effective specifically in advanced states of the disease.

Dose, schedule, safety, and efficacy of guadecitabine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are poor. Guadecitabine, a next‐generation hypomethylating agent, could be useful in treating such patients.

Abstract 2320: Clinical epigenetic resensitization of platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer patients with SGI-110, a novel, second-generation, subcutaneously administered hypomethylating agent (HMA)

Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2014; April 5-9, 2014; San Diego, CA Background: Epigenetic changes have been implicated in acquired resistance to platinum. SGI-110 is a second generation SQ HMA with improved pharmaceutical properties compared to decitabine. Here we report the clinical results and pharmacodynamic analyses of the phase 1 study of SGI-110 in combination with carboplatin in patients with recurrent platinum resistant high-grade serous, epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) or fallopian tube (FT) cancer. Methods: SGI-110 was administered SQ QD x 5 followed by carboplatin IV on Day 8 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were required to have either measurable disease according to RECIST v1.1 or detectable disease (modified Rustin) with clinical response assessed using the applicable criteria. Safety assessments were graded using CTCAE v4. Results: Twenty patients (18 EOC, 1 PPC, 1 FT) were enrolled and treated in the phase 1 portion of the trial. Median age was 55.8 years (38-72); ECOG PS of 0/1/2 was 10/10/0, respectively. Median number of prior regimens was 7 (1-9). The starting doses were SGI-110 45 mg/m2 SQ QD x 5 and carboplatin AUC5 in the first cohort of 6 patients. Four DLTs of myelosuppression (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) in the first cohort led to dose reduction to SGI-110 30 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC4 with granulocyte-CSF permitted at the discretion of the physician. No DLTS were observed in 14 patients and this dose was recommended for the subsequent phase 2 study. Grade 3/4 AEs regardless of relationship to the combination ≥ 10% included anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, constipation, small intestinal obstruction, infusion related reaction and pulmonary embolism. Three PRs and 9 SDs as best response were observed in 20 patients for an overall response rate and clinical benefit rate of 15% and 60%, respectively. All PRs and 3 SDs were accompanied by CA-125 decrease. LINE-1 hypomethylation, a marker of global DNA methylation, was recorded in PBMCs with SGI-110 30 mg/m2 (avg: -19.5%, n=14) and 45 mg/m2 (avg: -17.4%, n=6). Gene specific methylation of RASSF1A and BRCA-1 measured by pyrosequencing was significantly decreased at C2D8 compared to baseline in paired tumor biopsies/ascites (n=9). Gene re-expression measured by quantitative RT-PCR was observed in tumor biopsies. Conclusions: Priming treatment with SGI-110 prior to carboplatin induced clinical responses in a heavily-pretreated platinum resistant ovarian cancer population with expected and manageable safety profile. Potent LINE-1 demethylation and demethylation and re-expression of silenced tumor genes were recorded. The phase 2 portion of the trial is currently ongoing with patients randomized to either the RP2D dose combination or a physician choice of 1 of 4 treatment options (topotecan; liposomal doxorubicin; weekly paclitaxel; or weekly gemcitabine). Citation Format: Gini Fleming, Sharad Ghamande, Yvonne Lin, Angeles Alvarez Secord, John Nemunaitis, Merry-Jennifer Markham, Kenneth Nephew, Fang Fang, Shweta Gupta, Sue Naim, Gavin Choy, Simone Jueliger, Pietro Taverna, Yong Hao, Harold Keer, Mohammad Azab, Daniela Matei. Clinical epigenetic resensitization of platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer patients with SGI-110, a novel, second-generation, subcutaneously administered hypomethylating agent (HMA). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2320. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2320

Abstract LB-214: Interim results from a randomized Phase 1-2 first-in-human (FIH) study of PK/PD guided escalating doses of SGI-110, a novel subcutaneous (SQ) second generation hypomethylating agent (HMA) in relapsed/refractory MDS and AML

SGI-110 is a novel second generation HMA, formulated as a low volume SQ injection. It is designed as a dinucleotide incorporating decitabine and guanosine, to prolong in vivo exposure and potentially improve efficacy of its active component, decitabine by protecting decitabine from rapid deamination by cytidine deaminase. Preclinically, SGI-110 demonstrated potent activity in-vivo using different routes of administration. A randomized Phase 1-2 FIH PK/PD-guided, dose-escalation study is being conducted in subjects with relapsed/refractory intermediate or high-risk MDS or AML. The objective of the first stage of the study is to determine the safety and tolerability of SGI-110 and to establish the MTD and the biologically effective dose (BED). Subjects are randomized to one of two SQ regimens (daily x5 or once weekly x3, both given in 28-day courses). PD is evaluated by LINE-1 global DNA hypomethylation. The second stage of the study will be a randomized Phase 2 dose expansion, once the BED and MTD have been determined. Currently, 5 dose-cohorts have been fully enrolled, (n= 55) at doses ranging from 3mg/m2 to 60 mg/m2 daily x5, and 6mg/m2 to 90 mg/m2 weekly x3 but are not yet fully evaluable. PK guidance has allowed rapid dose escalation, and PD assessment of global hypomethylation has been correlated with increased dose and exposure levels. Apart from manageable local injection site pain, SGI-110 has been well tolerated. Other AE9s were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or anemia. There have been 3 remissions in relapsed AML subjects: 1 CR with weekly (60mg/m2) and 1 PR and 1 CR with daily (36 and 60 mg/m2 respectively). The PK profile showed efficient conversion of SGI-110 to decitabine achieving exposures in the therapeutic range as predicted from the SGI-110 rational design, characterized by decitabine AUC in therapeutic range (cohorts 4-5), lower Cmax, and longer effective half life, as compared to historical data based on molar equivalent doses of IV decitabine. Dose-dependent hypomethylation induction in the first 5 cohorts was observed. The subject who achieved a CR had the highest degree of hypomethylation induction of all subjects tested to date, and also the highest decitabine AUC in the cohort. Updated efficacy, safety, PK, and PD data of both regimens will be presented. SGI-110 is safe and well tolerated to date; biologically effective and therapeutic dose levels have been achieved with little toxicity so far with both regimens. Preliminary efficacy (PR+CR) has been observed in relapsed AML subjects. The PK profile showed efficient conversion of SGI-110 to decitabine with achievable therapeutic exposures, longer apparent half life, and lower Cmax than predicted equivalent decitabine doses given IV. Global Hypomethylating effects were observed at all dose levels, evaluated to date with both regimens. The results justify the progress of the study to the second dose-expansion Phase 2 stage after establishing the BED and MTD. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-214. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-LB-214

A phase i clinical trial of guadecitabine and carboplatin in platinum-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer: Clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic analyses

Purpose: Epigenetic changes are implicated in acquired resistance to platinum. Guadecitabine is a next-generation hypomethylating agent (HMA). Here, we report the clinical results, along with pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic analyses of the phase I study of guadecitabine and carboplatin in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant high-grade serous ovarian cancer, primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC), or fallopian tube cancer (FTC). Experimental Design: Guadecitabine was administered once daily on days 1 to 5 followed by carboplatin i.v. on day 8 of a 28-day cycle. Patients had either measurable or detectable disease. Safety assessments used CTCAE v4. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled and treated. Median age was 56 years (38–72 years). The median number of prior regimens was 7 (1–14). In the first cohort (N = 6), the starting doses were guadecitabine 45 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC5. Four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; neutropenia and thrombocytopenia), leading to dose deescalation of guadecitabine to 30 mg/m2 and of carboplatin to AUC4. No DLTs were observed in the subsequent 14 patients. Grade ≥3 adverse events ≥10% were neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, nausea, vomiting, ascites, constipation, hypokalemia, pulmonary embolism, small-intestinal obstruction, and thrombocytopenia. Three patients had a partial response (PR), and 6 patients had stable disease (SD) >3 months, for an overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate of 15% and 45%, respectively. LINE-1 demethylation in PBMCs and promoter demethylation/gene reexpression in paired tumor biopsies/ascites were recorded. Conclusions: Guadecitabine and carboplatin were tolerated and induced clinical responses in a heavily pretreated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer population, supporting a subsequent randomized phase II trial. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2285–93. ©2018 AACR.

Simultaneous Modeling of Biomarker and Toxicity Response Predicted Optimal Regimen of Guadecitabine (SGI-110) in Myeloid Malignancies

Guadecitabine (SGI‐110) is a novel next‐generation hypomethylating agent (HMA) administered as s.c. injection with extended decitabine exposure. Dose/exposure‐response analyses of longitudinal measures of long interspersed nucleotide element‐1 (LINE‐1) methylation and absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) pooled from 79 and 369 patients in 2 phase I/II trials, respectively, were performed to assist, through modeling and simulation, the selection of dosing regimens for phase III. Simulation of ANC predicted a decrease after a 5‐day regimen of 60 mg/m2 with partial recovery before the next cycle, whereas the nadir of 90 mg/m2 on the same schedule was below 100/µl. ANC following a 60 mg/m2 10‐day regimen was predicted to be suppressed below 100/µl as long as treatment continued without recovery. The developed models provided useful tools to assist simultaneous evaluation of the relative dynamics of the two effects (DNA demethylation and the effect on ANC).