Mohammad Fazaelizadeh
University of Calgary
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Mohammad Fazaelizadeh.
Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology | 2010
Bernt Sigve Aadnoy; Mohammad Fazaelizadeh; Geir Hareland
This paper presents a new friction model for application in petroleum wells. Although very simple, it applies for all wellbore shapes such as straight sections, drop-off bends, buildup bends, side bends or a combination of these. The drillstring is modelled as a soft string. In high tension the string weight is negligible as compared to the tension. This leads to simplified equations where the friction caused by the weight is negligible. For this case the friction in a bend is formulated in terms of the 3D dogleg. The same model therefore applies for 2D and 3D wellbores. The entire well can be modelled by two sets of equations, one for straight wellbore sections and one for curved wellbores. The latter is based on the absolute directional change, or the dogleg of the wellbore. Three worked examples are given in the paper: a 2D well, a 3D well and combined hoisting and rotation in the 3D well. One main purpose of this paper is to provide a simple explicit tool to model and to study friction throughout the well by separating gravitational and tensional friction effects.
Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference | 2010
Mohammad Fazaelizadeh; Behrad Rashidi; Geir Hareland
A drilling simulator has been used during the past four years to improve the drilling performance in Western Canada. Rate of penetration improvement and subsequent cost and time reductions are the key elements for drilling these wells. A drilling simulator is required to generate the “Apparent Rock Strength Log” (ARSL) using available offset well data. The ARSL calculation is based on using inverted Rate of Penetration (ROP) models for different bit types, reported bit wear, lithological information and pore pressure in addition to the drilling parameters. The generated ARSL can be modified and correlated for different and new formation tops for planned wells. The obtained ARSL logs for the wells in the same field have shown an acceptable overlay for the common lithologies using different bit runs and drilling parameters. Furthermore, it can be shown that the ROP match with the new simulated ROP in the same well applying another wells drilling parameters once their ARSL are adjusted. It has been shown that a typical cost reduction can be achieved for the planned wells utilizing the drilling simulator when previously drilled wells exist. The effect of using the combination of different bit runs and drilling parameters can also be explored through use of the simulator. In this paper, a study was conducted for two wells in an Albertan, Canada field to investigate the effect of using the bits used in a well to reduce cost and optimize the next well. The ARSL logs of two wells were separately obtained and compared. The comparison between the new simulated ROP for the first well, using another wells drilling data, and the available ROP for the second well is also discussed. Final results are showing an acceptable match obtained for ROP values as well as for the corresponding drilling time and final bit wear status in each of the bit run sections. Utilizing the simulator in these type wells shows a significant cost and time reduction potential and can be helpful to apply in preplanning analysis for new wells to be drilled using previously utilized bit types and designs. Introduction The rig cost is a major part of an overall drilling cost. Rig cost depends on the drilling time used to rotate the bit, connections and tripping in or out of the well. The use of the drilling cost equation is useful in finding the better solutions of drilling optimization. The calculation of cost per meter is done by the following conventional cost equation: ......................................................................................................... (1) D C C t C t t t C b m r r c t r f ∆ + + + + = ) (
Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences | 2010
Mohammad Fazaelizadeh; Geir Hareland; Bernt Sigve Aadnoy
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition | 2010
Seyed Ahmad Ahmad Mirhajmohammadabadi; Mohammad Fazaelizadeh; Eirik Kaarstad; Bernt Sigve Aadnoy
Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences | 2011
Andrew Wu; Geir Hareland; Mohammad Fazaelizadeh
SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference | 2007
Seyed Ahmed Mirhaj; Reza Shadizadeh; Mohammad Fazaelizadeh
IOSR Journal of Engineering | 2012
Andrew Wu; Geir Hareland; Mohammad Fazaelizadeh
Brasil Offshore | 2011
Mohammad Fazaelizadeh; Geir Hareland; Andrew Wu; Mazeda Tahmeen
SPE Production and Operations Conference and Exhibition | 2010
Mohammad Fazaelizadeh; Seyed Ahmad Ahmad Mirhaj; M. Bahari-Moghadam; Mehdi Bahonar; Zhangxin John Chen
44th U.S. Rock Mechanics Symposium and 5th U.S.-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium | 2010
Behrad Rashidi; Geir Hareland; Mohammad Fazaelizadeh; M. Svigir