Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Mohammad U. Malik is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Mohammad U. Malik.


Laryngoscope | 2012

Technical skills improve after practice on virtual‐reality temporal bone simulator

Howard W. Francis; Mohammad U. Malik; David A. Diaz Voss Varela; Maxwell Barffour; Wade W. Chien; John P. Carey; John K. Niparko; Nasir I. Bhatti

To assess whether practice on a virtual‐reality (VR) temporal bone simulator improves acquisition of technical skills in mastoid surgery.


Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives | 2015

Critical gastrointestinal bleed due to secondary aortoenteric fistula

Mohammad U. Malik; Enver Ucbilek; Amanpreet S. Sherwal

Secondary aortoenteric fistula (SAEF) is a rare yet lethal cause of gastrointestinal bleeding and occurs as a complication of an abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Clinical presentation may vary from herald bleeding to overt sepsis and requires high index of suspicion and clinical judgment to establish diagnosis. Initial diagnostic tests may include computerized tomography scan and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Each test has variable sensitivity and specificity. Maintaining the hemodynamic status, control of bleeding, removal of the infected graft, and infection control may improve clinical outcomes. This review entails the updated literature on diagnosis and management of SAEF. A literature search was conducted for articles published in English, on PubMed and Scopus using the following search terms: secondary, aortoenteric, aorto-enteric, aortoduodenal, aorto-duodenal, aortoesophageal, and aorto-esophageal. A combination of MeSH terms and Boolean operators were used to device search strategy. In addition, a bibliography of clinically relevant articles was searched to find additional articles (Appendix A). The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive update on the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of SAEF.


Laryngoscope | 2013

Determinants of resident competence in mastoidectomy: Role of interest and deliberate practice

Mohammad U. Malik; David A. Diaz Voss Varela; EunMi Park; Hamid Masood; Kulsoom Laeeq; Nasir I. Bhatti; Howard W. Francis

This study explores the influence of selected factors on achievement of competency in mastoid surgery.


Laryngoscope | 2012

Spectrum of immune-mediated inner ear disease and cochlear implant results.

Mohammad U. Malik; Vinciya Pandian; Hamid Masood; David A. Diaz; Voss Varela; Alfredo José Dávalos-Balderas; Martha Parra-Cardenas; P. Seo; Howard W. Francis

To characterize the progression of hearing loss in patients with immune‐mediated inner ear disease (IMIED), and to identify disease‐ and patient‐specific factors associated with cochlear implant (CI) performance.


Laryngoscope | 2011

Learning styles in otolaryngology fellowships

David A. Diaz Voss Varela; Mohammad U. Malik; Kulsoom Laeeq; Vinciya Pandian; David J. Brown; Robert A. Weatherly; Charles W. Cummings; Nasir I. Bhatti

Previous studies have identified a predominant learning style in trainees from different specialties, more recently in otolaryngology residents. The purpose of our study was to determine a predominant learning style within otolaryngology fellowships and to identify any differences between otolaryngology fellows and residents.


Laryngoscope | 2012

The timely completion of objective assessment tools for evaluation of technical skills

Kulsoom Laeeq; Howard W. Francis; David A. Diaz Voss Varela; Mohammad U. Malik; Charles W. Cummings; Nasir I. Bhatti

To this date the effect of the time taken to complete an evaluation on the psychometric properties of the instrument has not been reported. The goal of our study was to assess the effect of time taken to complete an evaluation on its validity.


Experimental and clinical transplantation : official journal of the Middle East Society for Organ Transplantation | 2016

Prophylaxis Among Hepatitis B Core Antibody-positive Deceased-donor Liver Transplant Recipients: Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin Plus Oral Antiviral Agents Versus Antiviral Agents Alone: A Single-center Experience.

Mohammad U. Malik; Enver Ucbilek; Panagiotis Trilianos; Andrew M. Cameron; Ahmet Gurakar

OBJECTIVES Hepatitis B core antibody immunoglobulin G seropositivity is evidence of past exposure to hepatitis B virus. Donor or recipient hepatitis B core antibody positivity may pose a risk of reactivation, especially early after liver transplant. Although most centers advocate using antiviral agents plus hepatitis B immunoglobulin, some have recently relied on antivirals only as prophylaxis after liver transplant. Here, we retrospectively investigated patient survival in hepatitis B core antibody-positive recipients, comparing those treated with antivirals plus hepatitis B immunoglobulin versus antivirals alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS After Internal Review Board approval, we reviewed medical records of deceased-donor liver transplant recipients between 1995 and 2013. Demographic characteristics, transplant indication, hepatitis B core antibody status, time to death, and type of posttransplant prophylaxis were recorded. We also recorded whether donors showed hepatitis B core antibody positivity. Patients who died within 30 days of liver transplant were excluded. RESULTS There were 148 hepatitis B core antibody-positive recipients. Prophylaxis was given to 75 recipients after transplant: 8 (5%) received hepatitis B immunoglobulin, 22 (15%) received antivirals, and 45 (30%) received the combination. There were 34 deaths: 3 (38%) in hepatitis B immunoglobulin only, 3 (14%) in antiviral only, 8 (18%) in the combination, and 20 (27%) in no prophylaxis groups. One- and 5-year survival rates were similar for binary comparisons among prophylaxis groups (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS Preliminary results support the current practice of using hepatitis B immunoglobulin plus antivirals for prophylaxis after liver transplant. The similar survival benefit with the combination versus antiviral agents alone suggests equal effectivity for prophylaxis posttransplant. However, a clear benefit of antivirals was not evident in our analysis. Future larger prospective studies are warranted to identify potential benefits of using antivirals alone as prophylaxis after liver transplant and to further clarify their role as the sole prophylactic regimen.


Journal of Graduate Medical Education | 2012

Barriers to Implementing the ACGME Outcome Project: A Systematic Review of Program Director Surveys

Mohammad U. Malik; David A. Diaz Voss Varela; Charles M. Stewart; Kulsoom Laeeq; Gayane Yenokyan; Howard W. Francis; Nasir I. Bhatti


Gastroenterología y Hepatología | 2014

Hepatitis C virus infection and its rheumatologic implications

Zeynel A. Sayiner; Uzma Haque; Mohammad U. Malik; Ahmet Gurakar


Hepatology International | 2016

The predictors of post-transplant coronary events among liver transplant recipients.

Mohammad U. Malik; Stuart D. Russell; Aliaksei Pustavoitau; Matthews Chacko; Arif M. Cosar; Carol B. Thompson; Panagiotis Trilianos; Nabil N. Dagher; Andrew M. Cameron; Ahmet Gurakar

Collaboration


Dive into the Mohammad U. Malik's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ahmet Gurakar

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kulsoom Laeeq

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Andrew M. Cameron

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hamid Masood

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge