Mohammed Jemal

High-throughput quantitative bioanalysis by LC/MS/MS

This review article discusses the most recent significant advances in the sample preparation and mass spectrometry aspects of high-throughput bioanalysis by LC/MS/MS for the quantitation of drugs, metabolites and endogenous biomolecules in biological matrices. The introduction and implementation of automated 96-well extraction has brought about high-throughput approaches to the biological sample preparation techniques of solid-phase extraction, liquid-liquid extraction and protein precipitation. The fast-flow on-line extraction technique is a different high-throughput approach that has also significantly speeded up analysis by LC/MS/MS. The use of pierceable caps for biological tubes further enhances the analysis speed and improves the safety in handling biological samples. The need for adequate chromatographic separation in order to eliminate interferences due to metabolites and/or matrix effects in LC/MS/MS is discussed. To highlight our limited understanding of atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry, results from recent investigations that appear to be counter-intuitive are presented. Looking ahead to the future, multiplexed LC/MS/MS systems and capillary LC are presented as areas that can bring about further improvements in analysis speed and sensitivity to quantitative bioanalysis by LC/MS/MS.

It is time for a paradigm shift in drug discovery bioanalysis: from SRM to HRMS

It can be argued that the last true paradigm shift in the bioanalytical (BA) arena was the shift from high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet (UV) detection to HPLC with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) detection after the commercialization of the triple quadrupole mass spectrometer in the 1990s. HPLC-MS/MS analysis based on selected reaction monitoring (SRM) has become the gold standard for BA assays and is used by all the major pharmaceutical companies for the quantitative analysis of new drug entities (NCEs) as part of the new drug discovery and development process. While LC-MS/MS continues to be the best tool for drug discovery bioanalysis, a new paradigm involving high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) and ultrahigh-pressure liquid chromatography (uHPLC) is starting to make inroads into the pharmaceutical industry. The ability to collect full scan spectra, with excellent mass accuracy, mass resolution, 10-250 ms scan speeds and no NCE-related MS parameter optimization, makes the uHPLC-HRMS techniques suitable for quantitative analysis of NCEs while preserving maximum qualitative information about other drug-related and endogenous components such as metabolites, degradants, biomarkers and formulation materials. In this perspective article, we provide some insight into the evolution of the hybrid quadrupole-time-of-flight (Qq-TOF) mass spectrometer and propose some of the desirable specifications that such HRMS systems should have to be integrated into the drug discovery bioanalytical workflow for performing integrated qualitative and quantitative bioanalysis of drugs and related components.

Phospholipids in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry bioanalysis: comparison of three tandem mass spectrometric techniques for monitoring plasma phospholipids, the effect of mobile phase composition on phospholipids elution and the association of phospholipids with matrix effects.

Because plasma phospholipids may cause matrix effects in bioanalytical liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) methods, it is important to establish optimal mass spectrometric techniques to monitor the fate of phospholipids during method development and application. We evaluated three MS/MS techniques to monitor phospholipids using positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI). The first technique is based on using positive precursor ion scan of m/z 184, positive neutral loss scan of 141 Da and negative precursor ion scan of m/z 153. The second technique is based on using class-specific positive and negative selected reaction monitoring (SRM) transitions to monitor class-representative phospholipids. The third technique, previously reported, utilizes in-source collision-induced dissociation (CID)-based positive SRM of m/z 184 --> 184. We recommend the all-inclusive technique 1 for use in qualitative assessment of all classes of phospholipids and technique 2 for use in quantitative assessment of class-representative phospholipids. Secondly, we evaluated the elution behaviors of the plasma phospholipids under different reversed-phase mobile phase conditions. The phospholipid-eluting strength of a mobile phase was mainly dependent on the type and amount (%) of the organic eluent and the strength increased in the order of methanol, acetonitrile and isopropyl alcohol. Under the commonly used gradient and isocratic elution schemes in LC/MS/MS bioanalysis, not all the phospholipids are eluted off the column. Thirdly, we investigated the association between phospholipids and matrix effects in positive and negative ESI using basic, acidic and neutral analytes. While the phospholipids caused matrix effects in both positive and negative ESI, the extent of ionization suppression was analyte-dependent and was inversely related to the retention factor and broadness of the phospholipids peaks. The lysophospholipids which normally elute earlier in reversed-phase chromatography are more likely to cause matrix effects compared to the later-eluting phospholipids in spite of the larger concentrations of the latter in plasma.

Systematic LC‐MS/MS bioanalytical method development that incorporates plasma phospholipids risk avoidance, usage of incurred sample and well thought‐out chromatography

This treatise summarizes the underlying principle and the road map for systematic LC-MS/MS bioanalytical method development. The three themes that have recently emerged as central to building quality during method development-phospholipids, incurred sample and sound chromatographic considerations-are the main focus of this article. In order to reduce the bioanalytical risk associated with plasma phospholipids, a dual approach involving extraction and chromatography is recommended. The use of incurred sample during method development is essential to avoid interference arising from drug-related components. This is different from the current practice of incurred sample reanalysis, which tests reproducibility during method application. LC column/mobile phase optimization is needed to achieve appropriate peak shape, sensitivity and the separation of the analyte from interfering metabolites and phospholipids. Related to sound chromatographic considerations, we lay out facts and myths related to UPLC, vis-à-vis HPLC. Incorporation of quality during method development avoids the costly experience of finding out by chance about the invalidity of a method after it has been used in support of a number of pivotal clinical and non-clinical studies. To this end, we put forth an outline of a protocol for a systematic LC-MS/MS bioanalytical method development.

Quantitation of the acid and lactone forms of atorvastatin and its biotransformation products in human serum by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry

A method for simultaneous quantitation of both the acid and lactone forms of atorvastatin, a new synthetic inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase that is being marketed for the treatment of high serum cholesterol, and both the acid and lactone forms of its two biotransformation products, 2-hydroxyatorvastatin and 4-hydroxyatorvastatin, in human serum (a total of six analytes) by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry was developed and validated. A deuterium labeled analog was used as internal standard for each of the six analytes. Each point of the calibration standard curve, which ranged from 0.5 to 200 ng/mL, contained the six analytes at equal concentrations. Three groups of quality control (QC) samples were used. In the first group, combination QC samples contained all six analytes at equal concentrations. In the second group, acid-only QC samples contained only the acid forms (i.e. three analytes) at equal concentrations. In the third group, lactone-only QC samples contained only the lactone forms (i.e. three analytes) at equal concentrations. After adding the internal standard to 0.5 mL of each standard and the QC sample kept at 4 degrees C, the samples were acidified with sodium acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and then extracted with methyl tert-butyl ether. Detection was by positive ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry using eight selected reaction monitoring channels. The acid compounds were stable in human serum at room temperature but the lactone compounds were unstable as they hydrolyzed rapidly to their respective acid forms. The conversion of the lactone compounds in both QC and post-dose human serum samples was nearly complete after 24 h at room temperature. The lactone compounds in serum could be stabilized by lowering the working temperature to 4 degrees C or lowering the serum pH to 6.0. The acid-only and the lactone-only QC samples showed that, under the sample processing conditions used, the degree of the hydrolysis of the lactone compounds or the lactonization of the acid compounds during the assay procedure was minimal (< 5%). The intra-day C.V., inter-day C.V. and the deviations from the nominal concentrations for all six analytes were within 15%, demonstrating good precision and accuracy. The required lower limit of quantitation (LLQ) of 0.5 ng/mL was achieved for each analyte.

The need for adequate chromatographic separation in the quantitative determination of drugs in biological samples by high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry

This work describes real examples of classes of drugs (drug candidates) whose quantitative determination in biological matrices by high performance liquid chromatography with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) may be hampered by interferences from drug-related biotransformation products (or prodrugs), unless the chromatographic conditions used achieve the separation of the drug from drug-related compounds. The classes of drugs investigated include: (a) a lactone drug, with the open-ring acid as the potential biotransformation product; (b) a phenolic drug and its prodrug; (c) an E-isomer methyloxime drug, with its Z-isomer as the potential biotransformation product; (d) a carboxylic acid drug, with its acylglucuronide as the potential biotransformation product; and (e) a thiol drug, with its disulfide as the potential biotransformation product. For each pair of a drug and the associated compound (except for the isomeric pair), the full-scan electrospray single mass spectrum of the associated compound gave an in-source collisionally induced dissociation (CID) generated fragment ion identical to the parent ion of the drug. Thus, the associated compound, if present in the biological sample, would interfere with the quantitative determination of the drug by LC/MS/MS using the selected reaction monitoring (SRM) transition of the parent ion of the drug, unless the LC conditions utilized achieve clearcut separation of the drug from the associated compound. Thus, LC/MS/MS bioanalytical methods with very short retention times, where there are minimal chromatographic separations, should be used only for biological samples which are known to not contain analyte-related compounds that can undergo the SRM transition used for the drug determination. Copyright

The use of high-flow high performance liquid chromatography coupled with positive and negative ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry for quantitative bioanalysis via direct injection of the plasma/serum samples.

Two bioanalytical methods have been developed and validated utilizing high flow high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for on-line purification of plasma and serum samples and electrospray tandem mass spectrometry for detection and quantitation. Each plasma or serum sample, after mixing with an aqueous solution of the internal standard, was injected into a small diameter (1 x 50 mm) column packed with large particles of OASIS (30 microns), with a 100% aqueous mobile phase at a high flow rate (3-4 mL/min). The combination of the high linear speed (6-8 cm/s) of the aqueous mobile phase and the large particle size resulted in the rapid passage of the proteins and other large biomolecules through the column while the small-molecule analytes were retained on the column. During this purification period, the HPLC effluent was directed to waste. After the purification step, the HPLC mobile phase was rapidly changed from 100% aqueous to < or = 100% organic, the flow was reduced to 0.5-0.8 mL/min, and the column effluent was directed towards the mass spectrometer. The small molecule analytes were eluted during this period. In the method developed and validated for the quantitative determination of compound I in rat plasma (method A), the same OASIS column (1 x 50 mm, 30 microns) served as the purification and analytical (elution) column. In the method developed for the simultaneous determination of pravastatin and its positional isomer biotransformation product (SQ-31906) in human serum (method B), the purification column was connected to a conventional C18 analytical column (3.9 x 50 mm, 5 microns) to achieve the required chromatographic separation between the two isomers. For method A, where 50 microL of rat plasma mixed 1:1 with water containing the internal standard was injected, the standard curve range was 1 to 1,000 ng/mL. For method B, where 200 microL of a human serum sample mixed 4:1 with water containing the internal standard was injected, the standard curve range was 0.5 to 100 ng/mL. The total analysis time for each method was < or = 5 min per sample. The accuracy, inter-day precision and intra-day precision were within 10% for both methods.

Direct-injection LC–MS–MS method for high-throughput simultaneous quantitation of simvastatin and simvastatin acid in human plasma

A direct-injection liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) method was developed and validated for the simultaneous quantitation in human plasma of the widely used cholesterol-lowering prodrug simvastatin and its in vivo generated active drug, simvastatin acid. The plasma samples were injected into the LC-MS-MS system after simply adding the internal standard solution in an aqueous buffer and centrifuging. The analytes in the buffered plasma samples were found to be stable for at least 24 h at 4 degrees C. The method was successfully validated under the challenging condition of using a large number of quality control (QC) samples including those in which the ratio of the simvastatin concentration to the simvastatin acid concentration was different from the concentration ratio in the calibration curve standards. Under the dual stabilizing conditions of lower temperature (4 degrees C) and lower plasma pH of 4.9, the in-process hydrolysis of simvastatin to simvastatin acid or the lactonization of simvastatin acid to simvastatin was minimized to < or = 1.0%. Although the entire run time for on-line cleanup and analysis was only 2.5 min, chromatographic base-line separation of simvastatin from simvastatin acid, which was required to avoid the interference by simvastatin acid with the simvastatin selected reaction monitoring channel, was achieved. The desired lower limit of quantitation of 0.5 ng/ml was achieved by injecting only an equivalent of 8.0 microl of the plasma sample. The extraction column lasted for at least 500 injections.

Pellet digestion: a simple and efficient sample preparation technique for LC–MS/MS quantification of large therapeutic proteins in plasma

BACKGROUND There is a need for a simple and efficient sample preparation technique for LC-MS/MS quantification of large therapeutic proteins in plasma. RESULTS The sample preparation technique presented here is based upon trypsin digestion of the pellet obtained following precipitation of the protein analyte from plasma. The pellet digestion technique was shown to facilitate efficient digestion of large therapeutic proteins, with concomitant removal of a substantial amount of potentially problematic plasma phospholipids. The technique was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of a large therapeutic protein. CONCLUSION This simple sample preparation approach will be beneficial to bioanalytical laboratories engaged in the LC-MS/MS quantification of large therapeutic proteins in biological matrices.

Targeted quantitative bioanalysis in plasma using liquid chromatography/high-resolution accurate mass spectrometry: an evaluation of global selectivity as a function of mass resolving power and extraction window, with comparison of centroid and profile modes.

There is a growing interest in exploring the use of liquid chromatography coupled with full-scan high resolution accurate mass spectrometry (LC/HRMS) in bioanalytical laboratories as an alternative to the current practice of using LC coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Therefore, we have investigated the theoretical and practical aspects of LC/HRMS as it relates to the quantitation of drugs in plasma, which is the most commonly used matrix in pharmacokinetics studies. In order to assess the overall selectivity of HRMS, we evaluated the potential interferences from endogenous plasma components by analyzing acetonitrile-precipitated blank human plasma extract using an LC/HRMS system under chromatographic conditions typically used for LC/MS/MS bioanalysis with the acquisition of total ion chromatograms (TICs) using 10 k and 20 k resolving power in both profile and centroid modes. From each TIC, we generated extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of the exact masses of the [M + H](+) ions of 153 model drugs using different mass extraction windows (MEWs) and determined the number of plasma endogenous peaks detected in each EIC. Fewer endogenous peaks are detected using higher resolving power, narrower MEW, and centroid mode. A 20 k resolving power can be considered adequate for the selective determination of drugs in plasma. To achieve desired analyte EIC selectivity and simultaneously avoid missing data points in the analyte EIC peak, the MEW used should not be too wide or too narrow and should be a small fraction of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the profile mass peak. It is recommended that the optimum MEW be established during method development under the specified chromatographic and sample preparation conditions. In general, the optimum MEW, typically ≤ ±20 ppm for 20 k resolving power, is smaller for the profile mode when compared with the centroid mode.