Mohan S. Gundeti

Pediatric Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Augmentation Ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff Appendicovesicostomy: Complete Intracorporeal—Initial Case Report

INTRODUCTION To the best of our knowledge, we report the first case of complete intracorporeal robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy in a pediatric patient, outlining the surgical technique and short-term results. TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS The operative steps of the open procedure were replicated laparoscopically using robotic-assistance. In brief, 5 transperitoneal laparoscopic ports were placed before docking the da Vinci S robotic system. A 20-cm ileal segment was isolated, and the gastrointestinal anastomosis was performed in an end-to-end fashion using intracorporeal suturing. The appendix was anastomosed to the right posterior wall of the bladder over an 8F feeding tube in an extravesical fashion. The bladder was incised in a coronal plane, and the simple ileal on-lay patch was anastomosed to the posterior and anterior walls of the bladder. A suprapubic catheter and pelvic drain were placed, and the Mitrofanoff stoma was then fashioned. Cystography was performed at 4 weeks postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS This preliminary first successful report suggests that robotic-assisted ileocystoplasty and appendicovesicostomy is feasible. A reasonable outcome with early recovery, resumption of normal activities, and excellent cosmesis can be achieved in selected patients. However, whether a robotic-assisted approach provides any significant advantages over conventional open procedures is yet to be determined with a large case series.

Paediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic augmentation ileocystoplasty and Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy (RALIMA): feasibility of and initial experience with the University of Chicago technique.

Study Type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4

Robotic paediatric urology

Whats known on the subject? and What does the study add?

Further Experience With the Vascular Hitch (Laparoscopic Transposition of Lower Pole Crossing Vessels): An Alternate Treatment for Pediatric Ureterovascular Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

PURPOSE Standard treatment for ureterovascular ureteropelvic junction obstruction has been dismembered pyeloplasty. We previously reported the alternative technique of laparoscopic transposition of lower pole vessels (the vascular hitch) in pediatric patients. This report is an update of this select group of pediatric patients with intermediate followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients underwent diagnostic renal sonography and (99m)technetium-mercaptoacetyltriglycine diuretic renography with additional magnetic resonance angiography in candidate patients. Radiographic criteria included moderate hydronephrosis with no caliceal dilatation and a well preserved cortex, poor renal drainage with preserved split function and lower pole crossing vessels. Intraoperative criteria included a normal ureter and ureteropelvic junction with peristalsis. Postoperatively patients were followed clinically, and with renal sonography and (99m)technetium-mercaptoacetyltriglycine renography at 1 and 2 months, respectively. Success was defined as symptom resolution with radiographic improvement in hydronephrosis and drainage with preserved renal function. RESULTS Nine boys and 11 girls 7 to 16 years old (mean age 12.5) underwent laparoscopic transposition of crossing vessels, including 3 with da Vinci robot assistance. Mean operative time was 90 minutes (range 47 to 140). Median hospital stay was 24 hours. No ureteral stents or urethral catheters were placed intraoperatively. At a mean followup of 22 months (range 12 to 42) 19 of 20 patients (95%) had been successfully treated. One patient who had recurrent pain underwent successful laparoscopic pyeloplasty. CONCLUSIONS At intermediate followup the laparoscopic vascular hitch procedure has been successful in treating patients with ureterovascular ureteropelvic junction obstruction. In these select patients this technique offers a feasible and durable alternative to standard dismembered pyeloplasty. Ongoing evaluation continues to ensure that the promising results endure.

Outcomes of Infants Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Compared to Open Repair

PURPOSE Robotic surgery has evolved from simple extirpative surgery to complex reconstructions even in infants. Data are lacking comparing surgical and direct costs to open approaches. We describe the feasibility, salient tips and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to an open approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated patients undergoing open pyeloplasty or robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ten patients in each group met inclusion criteria. RESULTS Mean patient age was 3.31 months in the open group and 7.3 months in the robotic group (p=0.02). Postoperative outcomes including length of stay (2.2 vs 2.1 days), estimated blood loss (6.5 vs 7.6 ml), days to regular diet (1 vs 1.1) and days to Foley catheter removal (1.3 vs 1.3) were similar between the open and robotic groups. Total operating time (199 vs 242 minutes) was significantly longer in the robotic group. Postoperative improvement in hydronephrosis was identical in both groups. Direct costs, excluding amortization, robotic cost, maintenance and depreciation, were

Continence Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Mitrofanoff Appendicovesicostomy

4,410 in the open group and

Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Multi-institutional experience in infants

4,979 in the robotic group (p=0.10). CONCLUSIONS In our preliminary experience robotic pyeloplasty in infants is feasible and safe. The immediate outcomes are similar to those of an open approach. The robotic technique in infants currently has the benefits of improved esthetic appearance, improved pain control and similar direct costs compared to the traditional open approach.

Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: Results of the multi-institutional laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty collaborative group

PURPOSE Continent catheterizable channels for emptying the bladder are typically performed via an open surgical approach. We present our surgical approach and initial outcomes with specific attention to continence for robotic assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between February 2008 and April 2010, 13 patients were considered for robotic assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy and 11 underwent the procedure (2 open conversions). Five patients underwent enterocystoplasty with appendicovesicostomy and 6 underwent isolated appendicovesicostomy. The appendicovesicostomy anastomosis was performed on the anterior (without augmentation) or posterior (with augmentation) bladder wall and the stoma was brought to the umbilical site or right lower quadrant. Detrusor backing (4 cm) was ensured except in 1 patient (number 5). RESULTS Mean patient age at surgery was 10.4 years (range 5 to 14). Mean estimated blood loss was 61.8 cc. Mean operative time for isolated appendicovesicostomy was 347 minutes and there were no intraoperative complications. Incontinence through the stoma developed in 1 patient with inadequate detrusor backing (less than 4 cm), which resolved with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection into the appendicovesicostomy anastomosis. This patient had resolution of incontinence with an increase in bladder capacity to 300 cc. Three patients required skin flap revision for cutaneous scarring. To date all patients are catheterizing without difficulty and are continent. Median followup was 20 months (range 3 to 29). CONCLUSIONS We are encouraged by our preliminary experience with the robotic assisted laparoscopic Mitrofanoff appendicovesicostomy continent urinary diversion with or without ileocystoplasty. Early in the experience we emphasize the importance of 4 cm of detrusor backing to maintain stomal continence.

Outcomes and fate of the remnant moiety following laparoscopic heminephrectomy for duplex kidney: A multicenter review

INTRODUCTION Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) has been gaining acceptance among pediatric urologists. Over 300 have been described in the literature, but few studies have evaluated the role of RALP in infants alone. OBJECTIVE We sought to examine the operative experience and outcomes of RALP in a cohort of infants treated at multiple institutions across the United States. Our primary aim was to describe the safety and efficacy of RALP within this cohort. We recognize the challenges of performing minimally invasive surgery in small patients. In our paper, we address some technical considerations for the infant population. STUDY DESIGN This multi-centered observational study collected data on subjects one year of age or less who underwent RALP between April 2006 and July 2012 at five institutions. The primary outcome was resolution of hydronephrosis, and secondary outcomes included surgical time and complications. RESULTS A total of 60 patients (62 procedures) underwent RALP by six surgeons during the study period. All surgeons had > 5 years of experience beyond fellowship training. Mean surgical age was 7.3 months (SD ± 1.7 mo), 56 patients (95%) were diagnosed prenatally, and 59 patients (95%) had follow up imaging. Of these patients, 91% showed resolution or improvement of hydronephrosis. Two patients had recurrent obstruction and required additional surgery. Mean surgical time was 3 hours 52 minutes (SD ± 43 minutes). Seven (11%) patients reported intra-operative or immediate post-operative complications. DISCUSSION This series found a 91% success rate for reduction or resolution of hydronephrosis, and an 11% complication rate. This is equivalent to modern series comparing open pyeloplasty to pure laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty, which report success rates ranging from 70-96%, and complication rates ranging from 0-24% for open pyeloplasty. We lacked a standardized technique amongst institutions. This was not surprising since there are not established technical benchmarks for this surgery. However, we specified multiple technical considerations for this unique patient population. CONCLUSION The advantages of using robot-assistance to perform pyeloplasty in infants remain to be defined. This study cannot make that assessment due to small sample size. Nonetheless, this cohort is the largest robotic pyeloplasty series in infants to date. Seeing an excellent success rate and a low complication rate in this infant cohort is encouraging.

Patient Positioning and Port Placement for Robot-Assisted Surgery

PURPOSE We compared laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty to identify factors associated with procedural efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective multicenter trial incorporating 865 cases from 15 centers. We collected perioperative data including anatomical and procedural factors. Failure was defined subjectively as pain that was unchanged or worse per medical records after surgery. Radiographic failure was defined as unchanged or worsening drainage on renal scans or worsening hydronephrosis on computerized tomography. Bivariate analyses were performed on all outcomes and multivariate analysis was used to assess factors associated with decreased freedom from secondary procedures. RESULTS Of the cases 759 (274 laparoscopic pyeloplasties with a mean followup of 15 months and 465 robotic pyeloplasties with a mean followup of 11 months, p <0.001) had sufficient data. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty, previous endopyelotomy and intraoperative crossing vessels were associated with decreased freedom from secondary procedures on bivariate analysis, with a 2-year freedom from secondary procedures of 87% for laparoscopic pyeloplasty vs 95% for robotic pyeloplasty, 81% vs 93% for patients with vs without previous endopyelotomy and 88% vs 95% for patients with vs without intraoperative crossing vessels, respectively. However, on multivariate analysis only previous endopyelotomy (HR 4.35) and intraoperative crossing vessels (HR 2.73) significantly impacted freedom from secondary procedures. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic and robotic pyeloplasty are highly effective in treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction. There was no difference in their abilities to render the patient free from secondary procedures on multivariate analysis. Previous endopyelotomy and intraoperative crossing vessels reduced freedom from secondary procedures.