Mohannad Abou Saleh

Prevalence of Eosinophilic Gastroenteritis and Colitis in a Population-Based Study, From 2012 to 2017

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Although eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been extensively studied, there have been few epidemiology studies of other eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs). Using a large, population‐based database, we investigated epidemiologic features of eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EoGE) and eosinophilic colitis (EoC) in the United State. METHODS: We collected data from a commercial database (Explorys Inc, Cleveland, OH) that provided electronic health records from 26 major integrated U.S. healthcare systems from 1999 to March 2017. We identified a cohort of adult and pediatric patients with EoGE and EoC from March 2012 to March 2017, based on the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms. We calculated the overall prevalence of EoGE and EoC among different patient groups, and performed age‐ and gender‐adjusted analyses to assess for differences in the prevalence of associated medical conditions in patients with EoGE and EoC and control patients (patients in the database between March 2012 and March 2017 without EGID‐associated diagnoses). RESULTS: Of the 35,826,830 individuals in the database, we identified 1820 patients with EoGE and 770 with EoC. The overall prevalence rate of EoGE was 5.1/100,000 persons; the overall prevalence rate of EoC was 2.1/100,000 persons. Each of the non‐EoE EGIDs was more prevalent in Caucasians than in African‐Americans and Asians, and in female patients than male patients. Although EoGE was more prevalent in children (under 18 years of age) than in adults, EoC was more prevalent in adults (older than 18 years of age). Compared with control patients, individuals with non‐EoE EGIDs were more likely to have been diagnosed with other gastrointestinal or allergic disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In a population‐based study in the United States, using the Explorys database, we found the overall prevalence rate of EoGE to be 5.1/100,000 persons and the prevalence rate of EoC to be 2.1/100,000; these values are at the lower end of prevalence rates previously reported in the United States.

Characterization of long-term prognosis in acute pancreatitis: An explorative analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Severity classification systems of acute pancreatitis (AP) assess inpatient morbidity and mortality without predicting outpatient course of AP. To provide appropriate outpatient care, determinants of long-term prognosis must also be identified. The aim of this study was to define clinical groups that carry long-term prognostic significance in AP. METHODS A retrospective study that included patients admitted with AP was conducted. Determinants of long-term prognosis were extracted: These included Revised Atlanta and Determinant Based Classification (RAC), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Modified CT Severity Index (MCTSI), etiology, and local complications (LCs). Seven surrogates of morbidity up to 1 year after discharge were also collected and subsequently imputed into a clustering algorithm. The algorithm was set to produce three categories and multinomial regression analysis was performed. RESULTS 281 patients were included. The incidences of morbidity endpoints were similar among the 3 RAC categories. Three clusters were identified that carried long-term prognostic significance. Each cluster was given a name to reflect prognosis. The limited AP had the best prognosis and included patients without LCs with a low co-morbidity burden. The brittle AP had a low co-morbidity burden and high MCTSI (LCs 94%). It ran a very morbid course but had excellent survival. The high-risk AP had the worst prognosis with the highest mortality rate (28%). They had a high co-morbidity burden without local complications. CONCLUSION Categories that carry long-term prognostic significance in AP have been developed. This study could help formulate appropriate follow-up and ultimately improve AP outcomes.

Case of familial hyperlipoproteinemia type III hypertriglyceridemia induced acute pancreatitis: Role for outpatient apheresis maintenance therapy

Hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis (HTGP) accounts for up to 10% of acute pancreatitis presentations in non-pregnant individuals and is the third most common cause of acute pancreatitis after alcohol and gallstones. There are a number of retrospective studies and case reports that have suggested a role for apheresis and insulin infusion in the acute inpatient setting. We report a case of HTGP in a male with hyperlipoproteinemia type III who was treated successfully with insulin and apheresis on the initial inpatient presentation followed by bi-monthly outpatient maintenance apheresis sessions for the prevention of recurrent HTGP. We also reviewed the literature for the different inpatient and outpatient management modalities of HTGP. Given that there are no guidelines or randomized clinical trials that evaluate the outpatient management of HTGP, this case report may provide insight into a possible role for outpatient apheresis maintenance therapy.