Mohd Azhari Yakub

Is rheumatic aetiology a predictor of poor outcome in the current era of mitral valve repair? Contemporary long-term results of mitral valve repair in rheumatic heart disease †

OBJECTIVES Contemporary experience with mitral valve (MV) repair in the rheumatic population is limited. We aimed to examine the long-term outcomes of rheumatic MV repair, to identify the predictors of durability and to compare the repair for rheumatic and degenerative MVs. METHODS MV repairs for both rheumatic and degenerative lesions were analysed prospectively from our valve-repair registry. The primary outcomes investigated were mortality, survival, freedom from reoperation and freedom from valve failure. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to define the predictors of reoperation and valve failure. RESULTS Between 1997 and 2010, 627 consecutive rheumatic MV repairs were performed (46.7% of all mitral repair procedures). The mean age of our study group was 32 ± 19 (range 3-75 years). In-hospital mortality was 2.4% and late mortality was 0.3%. Freedoms from reoperation for rheumatics at 5 and 10 years were 91.8 ± 4.8 and 87.3 ± 3.9%, respectively, comparable with that for degenerative valves at 92.0 ± 1.7 and 91.8 ± 4.8%, respectively (P = 0.79). Freedoms from valve failure for rheumatics at 5 and 10 years were 85.6 ± 2.3 and 72.8 ± 4.6%, respectively, whereas those for degenerative repairs were 88.7 ± 5.1 and 82.4 ± 7.7%, respectively (P = 0.45). Independent predictors for reoperation and valve failure in rheumatic patients were residual mitral regurgitation >2+ and performance of commissurotomy. CONCLUSIONS The durability of MV repair for rheumatic disease in the current era has improved and is comparable with the outstanding durability of repairs for degenerative disease. Modifications of standard repair techniques, adherence to the importance of good leaflet coaptation and strict quality control with stringent use of intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography have all contributed to the improved long-term results.

Leaflet extension in rheumatic mitral valve reconstruction

OBJECTIVES Type IIIa mitral regurgitation (MR) due to rheumatic leaflet restriction often renders valve repair challenging and may predict a less successful repair. However, the utilization of leaflet mobilization and extension with the pericardium to increase the surface of coaptation may achieve satisfactory results. We reviewed our experience with leaflet extension in rheumatic mitral repair with emphasis on the technique and mid-term results. METHODS Between 2003 and 2010, 62 of 446 rheumatic patients had leaflet extension with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium as part of their mitral repair procedure. Their clinical and echocardiographic data were prospectively analysed. RESULTS The mean age of the rheumatic patients was 20.2 ± 11.7 years; range 3-60 years. Fourty-eight (77.4%) patients had predominant MR, while 22.6% had mixed mitral stenosis and mitral regurgitation (MS/MR). Leaflet extension was performed in the posterior, anterior and both leaflets in 77, 13 and 10% of patients, respectively. Additional repair procedures included neo-chordal replacement, chordal transfer/shortening/fenestration/resection, commissurotomy and papillary muscle splitting. All repairs were stabilized with annuloplasty rings. The follow-up was complete in all patients with a mean follow-up of 36.5 ± 25.6 months. There was no mortality in this series. At the latest follow-up, the MR grade was none/trivial in 64.5 of patients, mild in 22.6, moderate in 6.5, moderately severe in 4.8 and severe in 1.6%. Two patients had redo mitral surgery. At 5 years postoperatively, the estimated rates of freedom from reoperation and valve failure were 96.8 and 91.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Repair with leaflet extension in rheumatic disease resulted in good early and mid-term outcomes. A wider utilization of this technique may increase the feasibility and durability of repair in complex rheumatic mitral valve disease.

Comparative long-term results of mitral valve repair in adults with chronic rheumatic disease and degenerative disease: Is repair for “burnt-out” rheumatic disease still inferior to repair for degenerative disease in the current era?

OBJECTIVE Mitral valve repair is perceived to be of limited durability for advanced rheumatic disease in adults. We aim to examine the long-term outcomes of repair for rheumatic disease, identify predictors of durability, and compare with repair for degenerative disease. METHODS Rheumatic and degenerative mitral valve repairs in patients aged 40 years or more were prospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes investigated were mortality, freedom from reoperation, and valve failure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to define predictors of poor outcome. RESULTS Between 1997 and 2011, 253 rheumatic and 148 degenerative mitral valves were repaired. The age of patients in both groups was similar, with a mean of 54.1 ± 8.4 years versus 55.6 ± 7.3 years (P = .49). Freedom from reoperation for rheumatic valves at 5 and 10 years was 98.4%, comparable to 95.3% (P = .12) for degenerative valves. Freedom from valve failure at 5 and 10 years was 91.4% and 81.5% for rheumatic repairs and 82.5% and 75.4% for degenerative repairs, respectively (P = .15). The presence of residual mitral regurgitation greater than 2+ before discharge was the only significant independent predictor of reoperation, whereas residual mitral regurgitation greater than 2+ and leaflet procedures were significant risk factors for valve failure. CONCLUSIONS The durability of rheumatic mitral valve repair in the current era has improved and is comparable to the outstanding durability of repairs for degenerative disease, even in the adult rheumatic population. Modifications of standard repair techniques, adherence to the importance of good leaflet coaptation, and strict quality control with stringent use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography have all contributed to the improved long-term results.

Contemporary long-term outcomes of an aggressive approach to mitral valve repair in children: is it effective and durable for both congenital and acquired mitral valve lesions?

OBJECTIVES We analysed the long-term outcomes of mitral valve (MV) repair in children and compared the repairs for both congenital and acquired lesions. METHODS A review of 634 children (≤18 years) who underwent MV repair from 1992 to 2011 was conducted [excluding patients with complete atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD), single ventricle and atrioventricular (AV) discordance]. Associated cardiac anomalies were present in 473 patients (75%). Congenital mitral lesions were found in 270 (43%) patients compared with an acquired aetiology in 364 (57%) [mainly rheumatic: 329 patients (90%)]. Mitral regurgitation (MR) was predominant in 606 (96%) patients, and 544 (86%) of these showed ≥3+ MR. Modified techniques of MV reconstructions were used. RESULTS The early mortality rate was 2% (14 patients). The mean follow-up was 55 months (1-240 months; 85% complete). The late mortality rate was 4% (23 patients) and survival rates at 10 and 15 years were 91 and 86%, respectively. There was no significant difference in 10-year survival between repairing the congenital (98%) and acquired lesions (87%) (P = 0.17). The rate of freedom from reoperation after MV repair for the entire population was 79% at 10 years, with no significant difference between congenital (80%) and acquired lesions (79%) (P = 0.20). Fifty-six patients (9%) required reoperation. Mixed MV lesions, commissural fusions and residual MR (≥2+) were the predictors of valve failure and reoperation. All survivors remain in New York Heart Association class I and none had thromboembolism or pacemaker insertion. CONCLUSIONS MV repair can be successfully applied to both congenital and acquired MV disease in children. Aggressive repair techniques and avoidance of residual MR have improved durability and survival.

Leaflet extension for repairing rheumatic mitral valve regurgitation.

It has been established that mitral valve (MV) repair is preferred over replacement in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) caused by degenerative disease. In contrast, valve reconstruction for rheumatic MR remains controversial. Type IIIa MR due to rheumatic leaflet restriction often renders valve repair challenging and may predict a less successful repair. However, the utilization of leaflet mobilization and extension with autologous pericardium in order to increase leaflet area and surface of coaptation may achieve satisfactory results (1-3). This article represents our single-center experience of leaflet extension in rheumatic MR, with emphasis on description of the technique including tips on safeguards and pitfalls.

Primary Arterial Switch Operation for Late Referral of Transposition of the Great Arteries with Intact Ventricular Septum in the Current Era: Do We Still Need a Rapid Two-Stage Operation?

Objective: We introduced primary arterial switch operation for the patient with transposition of great arteries and intact ventricular septum (TGA-IVS) who had more than 3.5 mm of posterior left ventricle (LV) wall thickness. Methods: Between January 2013 and June 2015, a total of 116 patients underwent arterial switch operation. Of the 116 patients, 26 with TGA-IVS underwent primary arterial switch operation at more than 30 days of age. Results: The age and body weight (mean ± SD) at the operation were 120.4 ± 93.8 days and 4.1 ±1.0 kg, respectively. There was no hospital mortality. The thickness of posterior LV wall (preoperation vs postoperation; mm) was 4.04 ± 0.71 versus 5.90 ± 1.3; P < .0001; interval: 11.8 ± 6.5 days. The left atrial pressure (mm Hg; postoperative day 0 vs 3) was 20.0 ± 3.2 versus 10.0 ± 2.0; P < .0001; and the maximum blood lactate level (mmol/dL) was 4.7 ± 1.4 versus 1.4 ± 0.3; P < .0001, which showed significant improvement in the postoperative course. All cases had delayed sternal closure. The patients who belonged to the thin LV posterior wall group (<4 mm [preoperative echo]: n = 13) had significantly longer ventilation time (days; 10.6 ± 4.8 vs 4.8 ± 1.7, P = .0039), and the intensive care unit stay (days) was 14 ± 9.2 versus 7.5 ± 3.5; P = .025, compared with thick LV wall group (≥4.0 mm: n = 13). Conclusions: The children older than 30 days with TGA-IVS can benefit from primary arterial switch operation with acceptable results under our indication. However, we need further investigation for LV function.

Is it worth repairing rheumatic mitral valve disease in children? Long-term outcomes of an aggressive approach to rheumatic mitral valve repair compared to replacement in young patients†

OBJECTIVES Contemporary experience in mitral valve (MV) repair for children with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is limited, despite the potential advantages of repair over replacement. We reviewed our long-term outcomes of rheumatic MV repair and compared them with the outcomes of MV replacement in children with RHD. METHODS This study is a review of 419 children (≤18 years) with RHD who underwent primary isolated MV surgery between 1992 and 2015, which comprised MV repair (336 patients; 80.2%) and MV replacement (83 patients; 19.8%). The replacement group included mechanical MV replacements (MMVRs) (n = 69 patients; 16.5%) and bioprosthetic MV replacements (n = 14 patients; 3.3%). The mean age with standard deviation at the time of operation was 12.5 ± 3.5 (2-18) years. Mitral regurgitation (MR) was predominant in 390 (93.1%) patients, and 341 (81.4%) patients showed ≥3+ MR. The modified Carpentier reconstructive techniques were used for MV repair. RESULTS Overall early mortality was 1.7% (7 patients). The mean follow-up was 5.6 years (range 0-22.3 years; 94.7% complete). Survival of patients who underwent repair was 93.9% both at 10 and 20 years, which was superior than that of replacement (P < 0.001). Freedom from reoperation at 10 and 20 years after MV repair was 81.7% and 72.6%, respectively, compared to 83.2% for MV replacement (P = 0.580). Forty patients underwent reoperation after the initial surgery with no operative deaths. Mixed mitral lesion and postoperative residual MR (≥2+) were the predictors for reoperation in the repair group, whereas lower body surface area and usage of bioprosthesis were significant factors for the replacement group. Freedom from thrombotic, embolic and haemorrhagic events at 10 and 20 years for patients with repair was 98.2% compared to 90.1% in patients with replacement and 67.6% for patients with MMVR (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Twenty-three years of follow-up shows that MV repair is superior to MMVR in children with RHD. Hence, the rheumatic MV should be repaired when technically feasible to maximize the survival and reduce the valve-related morbidity with comparable durability to MMVR.

Mitral Valve Replacement via Anterolateral Right Thoracotomy without Cross-Clamping in a Patient with Fungal Infective Endocarditis and Functioning Internal Mammary Artery after Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Mitral Valve Repair

A 55-year-old man developed severe mitral regurgitation with persistent fungal infective endocarditis 8 months after coronary artery bypass grafting with a left internal mammary artery and 2 saphenous veins, as well as mitral valve repair with a prosthetic ring. Echocardiography demonstrated severe mitral regurgitation and a valvular vegetation. Computed tomography coronary arteriography indicated that all grafts were patent and located intimately close to the sternum. Median resternotomy was not attempted due to the risk of injury to the bypass grafts, and therefore, a right anterolateral thoracotomy approach was utilized. Mitral valve replacement was performed with the patient under deep hypothermia and ventricular fibrillation without aortic cross-clamping. The patient`s postoperative course was uneventful. Thus, right anterolateral thoracotomy may be a superior approach to mitral valve surgery in patients who have undergone prior coronary artery bypass grafting.

Strategy for ventricular septal defect closure after prior gastric pull-through

A 9-year-old boy was referred with a perimembranous ventricular septal defect. At birth, he had undergone a right thoracotomy with ligation of a tracheoesophageal fistula, cervical esophagostomy, and feeding gastrostomy. At 2 years of age, he had gastric tube reconstruction with a pull-through retrosternally, anterior to the heart, and an end-to-end esophagogastric anastomosis. Via a right anterolateral thoracotomy through the previous scar, the entire gastric tube was mobilized away from the sternum to facilitate a median sternotomy. With the patient supine, a median sternotomy was performed without difficulty, and the ventricular septal defect was closed under cardiopulmonary bypass.