Mojca Matičič

Restrictions for reimbursement of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral drugs for HCV infection in Europe

All-oral direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus, which have response rates of 95% or more, represent a major clinical advance. However, the high list price of DAAs has led many governments to restrict their reimbursement. We reviewed the availability of, and national criteria for, interferon-free DAA reimbursement among countries in the European Union and European Economic Area, and Switzerland. Reimbursement documentation was reviewed between Nov 18, 2016, and Aug 1, 2017. Primary outcomes were fibrosis stage, drug or alcohol use, prescriber type, and HIV co-infection restrictions. Among the 35 European countries and jurisdictions included, the most commonly reimbursed DAA was ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir, with dasabuvir, and with or without ribavirin (33 [94%] countries and jurisdictions). 16 (46%) countries and jurisdictions required patients to have fibrosis at stage F2 or higher, 29 (83%) had no listed restrictions based on drug or alcohol use, 33 (94%) required a specialist prescriber, and 34 (97%) had no additional restrictions for people co-infected with HIV and hepatitis C virus. These findings have implications for meeting WHO targets, with evidence of some countries not following the 2016 hepatitis C virus treatment guidelines by the European Association for the Study of Liver.

Hepatitis C virus genotypes in 1,504 patients in Slovenia, 1993-2007.

In order to identify the main routes of hepatitis C (HCV) transmission and to determine the HCV genotype distribution and its dynamics during a 15‐year period in Slovenia, HCV genotypes were detected using the INNO‐LiPA HCV II (Innogenetics) test for serum samples obtained from 1,504 patients representing 72.6% of all patients with chronic hepatitis C diagnosed from 1993 to 2007. HCV genotype 1 was predominant (56%), followed by genotypes 3, 2, and 4, with a prevalence of 37.8%, 5%, and 1.2%, respectively. HCV genotypes 5 and 6 were not detected in any patient. Patients infected with HCV genotype 3 were significantly younger (mean age 28.9 ± 8.5 years) than those infected with genotype 1 (mean age 38.9 ± 14.8 years; P < 0.0001) and those infected with HCV genotype 2 (mean age 50.3 ± 18.2 years; P < 0.0001). Intravenous drug use was identified as the most frequent possible HCV transmission route (34.3%), followed by medical‐related transmission such as transfusion of HCV‐contaminated blood or blood products, and hemodialysis (12.5%). Being an intravenous drug user was found to be strongly associated with HCV genotype 3 (OR, 3.71 [95% CI, 2.97–4.65]; P < 0.0001) and reporting infection by transfusion of blood or blood products was found to be strongly associated with HCV genotype 1 (OR, 3.28 [95% CI, 2.18–4.95]; P < 0.0001). During the 15‐year period, the proportion of genotype 3 increased substantially, reflecting the fact that the HCV epidemic in Slovenia is driven mostly by intravenous drug use. J. Med. Virol. 81:634–639, 2009

A systematic review of Hepatitis C virus treatment uptake among people who inject drugs in the European Region.

BackgroundFifteen million adults in the World Health Organization European Region are estimated to have active hepatitis C infection. Intravenous drug use is a major hepatitis C transmission route in this region, and people who inject drugs (PWID) constitute a high-risk and high-prevalence population. A systematic review was conducted to assess levels of hepatitis C treatment uptake among PWID in Europe.MethodsSearches in MEDLINE and EMBASE were carried out for articles in any language published between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2012. Articles were included in the review if they presented original research findings about hepatitis C treatment uptake levels among people who reported injecting drugs currently or formerly, as well as those who reported using drugs currently or formerly (mode of consumption not specified). Treatment uptake data were extracted if uptake was measurable in relation to the number of patients who either: (a) tested HCV antibody-positive; (b) tested positive for HCV-RNA; or (c) tested positive for HCV-RNA and met additional treatment criteria.ResultsTwenty-five articles from 12 countries were included in the review. Among groups of drug-using study participants who were hepatitis C antibody-positive, the median treatment uptake level was 17%, and among those who were hepatitis C RNA-positive, the median was 30%. In the 11 studies reporting specifically on treatment uptake among current and former injecting drug users, hepatitis C RNA-positive study populations had a median treatment uptake level of 32%. Only one study reported on treatment uptake for current drug users.ConclusionsThis systematic review indicates that hepatitis C treatment uptake is relatively low among drug users in several European countries, and also points to considerable knowledge gaps regarding treatment uptake levels in this population. There was large variability in treatment uptake levels, suggesting that there may be major differences between and within countries in relation to treatment availability, drug-using populations in need of treatment, and the existence of integrated health care services targeting drug users. Stronger national hepatitis C treatment policies are needed, along with efforts to increase knowledge and reduce misconceptions among physicians regarding the feasibility and importance of treating drug users who have hepatitis C.

Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from Slovenia, 2006–12: rise and fall of the multidrug-resistant NG-MAST genogroup 1407 clone?

OBJECTIVES To determine the phenotypic and molecular characteristics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates obtained between 2006 and 2012 in Slovenia. METHODS Gonococcal isolates obtained between 2006 and 2012 in Slovenia (n = 194) were investigated with Etest for susceptibility to cefixime, ceftriaxone, penicillin, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, tetracycline, gentamicin and spectinomycin. All isolates were examined with N. gonorrhoeae multiantigen sequence typing for molecular epidemiology and sequencing of the major extended-spectrum cephalosporin (ESC) resistance determinants (penA, mtrR and penB) was performed. RESULTS The overall prevalence of decreased susceptibility or resistance to cefixime and ceftriaxone (MIC ≥0.125 mg/L) was 11% and 5%, respectively. The decreased susceptibility or resistance showed an epidemic peak in 2011 (33% for cefixime and 11% for ceftriaxone), decreasing to 6% and 4%, respectively, in 2012. ST1407 (9% of isolates), ST21 (6%) and ST225 (6%) were the most common sequence types (STs) during 2006-12. Genogroup G1407 (ST1407 most prevalent ST), an internationally spread clone with decreased susceptibility or resistance to ESCs, was most prevalent (48%) in 2009. However, the G1407 prevalence then declined: in 2010, 30%; in 2011, 28%; and in 2012, 8%. Instead, in 2012 the ESC- and ciprofloxacin-susceptible G21 was the predominant genogroup (26%). CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of gonococcal resistance to ESCs in Slovenia has been high, but fluctuating. Fortunately, in 2012 some ESC- and ciprofloxacin-susceptible clones, such as genogroups G21, G1195 and G2992, appeared to have mainly replaced the multidrug-resistant G1407 clone, a replacement also seen in several European countries.

Lack of evidence for hepatitis C virus infection in association with lichen planus.

Background  The association between hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and lichen planus (LP) is a subject of controversy. Prevalence studies of HCV infection in LP patients in various countries reveal diverse results. The Slovenian population is rather homogenous with specific geographic and epidemiological characteristics. Lack of data or contradictory results from neighboring countries urged the need for a case‐controlled study in our LP patients.

Impact of added fluvastatin to standard-of-care treatment on sustained virological response in naïve chronic hepatitis C Patients infected with genotypes 1 and 3.

Objectives: The combination of pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin is a standard-of-care (SOC) treatment for chronic hepatitis C (CHC), and it achieves a sustained virological response (SVR) in 41-52% of genotype 1 and in 73-79% of genotype 3 patients. In a few clinical trials, the combination of fluvastatin and SOC increased the SVR in genotype 1 patients. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 179 naïve CHC patients. In the fluvastatin group patients received the combination of SOC and fluvastatin 80 mg daily; historical controls matching the study group in genotype, age and gender were treated with the SOC treatment only. Results: On-treatment viral responses as well as the SVR did not differ significantly between the two groups, except for the genotype 1 patients with a high viral load presenting a significantly higher SVR rate in the fluvastatin group (75%) compared to the control group (41%; p = 0.024). Multivariate logistic regression identified hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 infection (p < 0.001), age ≤40 years (p < 0.001), liver steatosis <5% (p < 0.01) and low viral load (p < 0.001) as independent predictors of an SVR. Conclusion: A combination of fluvastatin and SOC significantly improved the SVR in naïve CHC patients infected with HCV genotype 1 and high viral load, but it did not improve the SVR in patients infected with HCV genotype 3.

Second-generation Hybrid capture test and Amplicor monitor test generate highly correlated hepatitis B virus DNA levels

The performance of the Digene Hybrid Capture II HBV DNA Test HC II and the Roche Cobas Amplicor Monitor Test (Cobas-HBV) was evaluated on 252 serum samples. One hundred and seventy-three samples were HBV DNA positive and 75 HBV DNA negative by both assays. Four samples were HBV DNA positive by Cobas-HBV only. Linear regression analysis showed that the HBV DNA concentrations obtained from both assays were significantly related (n=173, r=0.976, P<0.0001). The results of the study show that Hybrid capture II and Cobas-HBV could be used equally in the management for patients with chronic HBV infection.

Model projections on the impact of HCV treatment in the prevention of HCV transmission among people who inject drugs in Europe

BACKGROUND & AIMS Prevention of hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission among people who inject drugs (PWID) is critical for eliminating HCV in Europe. We estimated the impact of current and scaled-up HCV treatment with and without scaling up opioid substitution therapy (OST) and needle and syringe programmes (NSPs) across Europe over the next 10 years. METHODS We collected data on PWID HCV treatment rates, PWID prevalence, HCV prevalence, OST, and NSP coverage from 11 European settings. We parameterised an HCV transmission model to setting-specific data that project chronic HCV prevalence and incidence among PWID. RESULTS At baseline, chronic HCV prevalence varied from <25% (Slovenia/Czech Republic) to >55% (Finland/Sweden), and <2% (Amsterdam/Hamburg/Norway/Denmark/Sweden) to 5% (Slovenia/Czech Republic) of chronically infected PWID were treated annually. The current treatment rates using new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) may achieve observable reductions in chronic prevalence (38-63%) in 10 years in Czech Republic, Slovenia, and Amsterdam. Doubling the HCV treatment rates will reduce prevalence in other sites (12-24%; Belgium/Denmark/Hamburg/Norway/Scotland), but is unlikely to reduce prevalence in Sweden and Finland. Scaling-up OST and NSP to 80% coverage with current treatment rates using DAAs could achieve observable reductions in HCV prevalence (18-79%) in all sites. Using DAAs, Slovenia and Amsterdam are projected to reduce incidence to 2 per 100 person years or less in 10 years. Moderate to substantial increases in the current treatment rates are required to achieve the same impact elsewhere, from 1.4 to 3 times (Czech Republic and France), 5-17 times (France, Scotland, Hamburg, Norway, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden), to 200 times (Finland). Scaling-up OST and NSP coverage to 80% in all sites reduces treatment scale-up needed by 20-80%. CONCLUSIONS The scale-up of HCV treatment and other interventions is needed in most settings to minimise HCV transmission among PWID in Europe. LAY SUMMARY Measuring the amount of HCV in the population of PWID is uncertain. To reduce HCV infection to minimal levels in Europe will require scale-up of both HCV treatment and other interventions that reduce injecting risk (especially OST and provision of sterile injecting equipment).

Restrictions for reimbursement of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral therapies for HCV infection in Europe

[Marshall, A. D.; Cunningham, E. B.; Dore, G. J.; Grebely, J.] UNSW Sydney, Kirby Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia. [Nielsen, S.] Freelance Epidemiologist, Madrid, Spain. [Aghemo, A.] Univ Milan, Fdn IRCCS CA Granda Osped Maggiore Policlin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Milan, Italy. [Alho, H.] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Abdominal Ctr, Helsinki, Finland. [Alho, H.] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. [Backmund, M.] Univ Hosp Munich, Dept Med 2, Munich, Germany. [Bruggmann, P.] Arud Ctr Addict Med, Zurich, Switzerland. [Dalgard, O.] Univ Oslo, Akershus Univ Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Oslo, Norway. [Dalgard, O.] Univ Oslo, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway. [Flisiak, R.] Med Univ Bialystok, Dept Infect Dis & Hepatol, Bialystok, Poland. [Foster, G.] Queen Mary Univ London, London, England. [Gheorghe, L.] Fundeni Clin Inst, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Bucharest, Romania. [Goldberg, D.] Hlth Protect Scotland, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland. [Goulis, I.] Dept Internal Med, Thessaloniki, Greece. [Hickman, M.] Univ Bristol, Social Med, Bristol, Avon, England. [Hoffmann, P.] Minist Hlth Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg. [Jancoriene, L.] Vilnius Univ Hosp, Santariskiu Klin, Ctr Infect Dis, Vilnius, Lithuania. [Jarcuska, P.] Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med 1, Kosice, Slovakia. [Jarcuska, P.] Univ Pavol Jozef Safarik, Kosice, Slovakia. [Kaberg, M.] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Stockholm, Sweden. [Makara, M.] St Istvan & St Laszlo Hosp, Hepatol Ctr, Budapest, Hungary. [Maimets, M.] Univ Tartu, Dept Internal Med, Tartu, Estonia. [Marinho, R.] Hosp Santa Maria, Med Sch Lisbon, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Lisbon, Portugal. [Maticic, M.] Univ Med Ctr, Clin Infect Dis & Febrile Illnesses, Ljubljana, Slovenia. [Norris, S.; Tait, M.] Dr Steevens Hosp, Natl Hepatitis Treatment Programme C, Hlth Serv Execut, Dublin, Ireland. [Olafsson, S.] Landspitali Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Reykjavik, Iceland. [Ovrehus, A.] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Odense, Denmark. [Pawlotsky, J. -M.] Univ Paris Est, Hop Henri Mondor, Creteil, France. [Pocock, J.] Mater Hosp, Gastroenterol Dept, Msida, Malta. [Robaeys, G.] Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Genk, Belgium. [Robaeys, G.] UHasselt, Dept Med & Life Sci, Hasselt, Belgium. [Robaeys, G.] UZLeuven, Dept Hepatol, Leuven, Belgium. [Roncero, C.] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Hosp Univ Vall dHebron, Psychiat Serv, Addict & Dual Diag Unit, Barcelona, Spain. [Simonova, M.] Mil Med Acad, Dept Gastroenterol HPB Surg & Transplantol, Sofia, Bulgaria. [Sperl, J.] Inst Clin & Expt Med, Dept Hepatogastroenterol, Prague, Czech Republic. [Tolmane, I.] Infectol Ctr Latvia, Dept Hepatol, Riga, Latvia. [Tomaselli, S.] Off Publ Hlth, Vaduz, Liechtenstein. [van der Valk, M.] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Infect Dis, Amsterdam, Netherlands. [Vince, A.] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Univ Hosp Infect Dis, Zagreb, Croatia. [Lazarus, J. V.] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, CHIP, Copenhagen, Denmark. [Lazarus, J. V.] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Barcelona Inst Global Hlth ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.

Are there national strategies, plans and guidelines for the treatment of hepatitis C in people who inject drugs? A survey of 33 European countries

BackgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents a major global health problem, which in high-income countries now mostly affects people who inject drugs (PWID). Many studies show that the treatment of HCV infection is as successful among PWID as among other populations and recently PWID have been included in the international guidelines for the treatment of HCV infection. The aim of this survey was to collect data from European countries on the existence of national strategies, action plans and clinical guidelines for HCV treatment in the general population and PWID in particular.MethodsThirty-three European countries were invited to participate. Data on available national strategies, action plans and guidelines for HCV treatment in general population and in PWID specifically were collected prospectively by means of a structured electronic questionnaire and analyzed accordingly.ResultsAll of the 33 invited European countries participated in the survey. Twenty-two responses came from non-governmental organizations, six from public health institutions, four from university institutions and one was an independent consultant. Fourteen (42.4%) of the countries reported having a national strategy and/or national action plan for HCV treatment, from which ten of them also reported having a national strategy and/or national action plan for treatment of HCV infection in PWID. Nearly three-quarters reported having national HCV treatment guidelines. PWID were included in the majority (66.7%) of the guidelines. Fourteen (42.4%) countries reported having separate guidelines for the treatment of HCV infection in PWID.ConclusionsGiven the high burden of HCV-related morbidity and mortality in PWID in Europe, the management of HCV infection should become a healthcare priority in all European countries, starting with developing or using already-existing national strategies, action plans and guidelines for this population.