Molly L. Pope

Comparison of speech perception abilities in deaf children with hearing aids or cochlear implants

The speech perception abilities of deaf children with a single- or multi-channel cochlear implant are compared with those of deaf children who derive substantial benefit from conventional hearing aids. The children with hearing aids have unaided pure-tone thresholds ranging from 90- to 110-dB HL through at least 2000 Hz, and aided thresholds of 30- to 60-dB HL. The group data show that the speech perception scores of the subjects with hearing aids were significantly higher than those of the subjects with implants on a range of speech perception measures. Although a few subjects with implants achieved scores as high as those who used hearing aids, the majority did not. Even though the children with implants receive substantial benefit from their devices, they continue to have limited auditory perception abilities relative to their peers who derive benefit from conventional hearing aids. The data highlight the importance of establishing hearing aid benefit in potential candidates for implant.

Cochlear implants for deaf children.

Fifteen profoundly deaf patients under the age of 18 years have received a 3M/House cochlear implant. The surgical procedure employed is essentially the same as that used in adults with a few modifications to accommodate for the smaller dimensions of the mastoid process and the thinness of the scalp and temporal squama. Pediatric subjects.receive timing and intensity information at similar thresholds as adults implanted with this device which contributes to improvement in speech production to various degrees. All subject groups demonstrated significant language delays as a result of their profound hearing losses. Postimplantation, more growth was seen in receptive than in expressive language skills. However, the growth observed did not exceed that expected in profoundly deaf children as reported in the literature. Language growth as a result of the cochlear implant aloneis yet to be documented in our patients.

Relationships among selected measures of single-channel cochlear implant performance

Relationships among a number of pre- and postimplant variables measured in 20 adults implanted with a single-channel cochlear implant were examined through a variety of univariate and multivariate statistical techniques. A large number of variables were analyzed to yield information on the relationships between pre- and postimplant performance, and among a variety of postimplant measures. Variables included: age; etiology and nature of deafness; type of implant worn; pre- and postimplant warble tone and speech detection thresholds; postimplant performance on the Monosyllable-Trochee-Spondee (MTS) and Environmental Sounds tests; postimplant electrical thresholds, uncomfortable loudness levels, and dynamic range; I.Q. scores; and postimplant discourse tracking performance with and without the implant. The difference score on the discourse tracking task, representing the auditory advantage over performance with lipreading alone, related substantively to a combination of variables including type of unit worn (Sigma versus Alpha), nature of deafness (progressive versus sudden), and etiology (meningitis versus nonmeningitis). Additionally, MTS and Environmental Sounds test scores were found to relate to one another and to etiology and nature of deafness.

Long-Term Intracochlear Implantation in Man

Whether long-term intracochlear implantation and direct electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve will induce intracochlear bone growth or cause further degeneration of a severely compromised auditory system is an important clinical consideration. Thinsection CT evaluations of the cochleas of six subjects who have used their cochlear implant devices on a daily basis for 3 or more years demonstrated no evidence of osteoneogenesis of the cochlea in the vicinity of the active electrode. No corrosion of the electrode or insulation material was noted on electron microscopy of an explanted electrode system. Electrical threshold and dynamic range measurements have remained stable or even improved during the period of observation. Performance measures using a variety of audiologic tests and speech-tracking scores have demonstrated stability of performance.

Cochlear implant candidate selection

In recent years there has been an increased acceptance of the cochlear implant as an appropriate sensory aid for selected hearing-impaired individuals with profound losses. With the Food and Drug Administrations release of the 3M/House single channel cochlear implant on November 29, 1984 and the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant on October 31, 1985 it is anticipated that many new groups of otologists and audiologists will have direct involvement in this exciting new approach to the management of patients with profound hearing impairments. This report reviews our cochlear implant selection protocol for the severe to profound adult hearing-impaired population.