Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Molly Richards is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Molly Richards.


Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology | 2014

Adolescents: Their Futures and Their Contraceptive Decisions.

Molly Richards; Jeanelle Sheeder

PURPOSE Pregnancy prevention counseling addresses future goals as a motivator for contraceptive use, but this is often unsuccessful. This study investigated how adolescent females define success and whether they believe teen childbearing will be a barrier to their success. METHODS A racially and ethnically diverse group of 84 nulliparous, high-risk adolescent females in teen clinics completed a survey asking about how they define success, future plans, and barriers to their success and future plans. RESULTS Most respondents defined a successful person as one who has a higher education (73%) and/or a good job (73%). Most saw themselves finishing high school (70%), in college (62%), or working at a job (75%) in 3-5 years. Participants who left with a prescription contraceptive method were not more likely to feel that education/career were important for success. Most reported that having a child would have no (52%) or a positive effect (30%) on their education. The majority felt childbearing would have a negative impact on many aspects of their life. But feeling their finances would be negatively affected was the only predictor of obtaining contraception. CONCLUSIONS We found that high-risk adolescents did not differ in conventional goals and aspirations regardless of their contraceptive choice. Although most girls felt that education/career was important, many of them felt that childbearing would not be a barrier to or may even improve their educational attainment. This challenges counseling that uses conventional goals as a motivator to remain non-pregnant. Further study of novel motivators for contraceptive use is needed.


Contraception | 2017

Risk of luteal phase pregnancy with any-cycle-day initiation of subdermal contraceptive implants

Molly Richards; Stephanie B. Teal; Jeanelle Sheeder

OBJECTIVES To determine rates of luteal phase pregnancy (LPP) in young women initiating subdermal implants on any day of the menstrual cycle. STUDY DESIGN We assessed a retrospective cohort of young women receiving contraceptive implants at an adolescent Title-X clinic. Patients with negative pregnancy tests were eligible for same-day insertion, regardless of cycle day, contraceptive use, or last intercourse. We computed LPP rates for those within manufacturer guidelines for insertion (≤5 days of menstrual onset or ≤7 days post-discontinuing hormonal contraception) and outside these guidelines. We reviewed medical records for last menstrual period (LMP), current hormonal contraception, emergency contraception (EC) provision, and pregnancy tests ≤12 weeks post-implant placement, or later evidence of pregnancy. For patients with positive pregnancy tests or reports, we used standard obstetrical dating (LMP and ultrasound) to determine if conception occurred ±2 weeks of implant placement. RESULTS Of 3180 insertions, 1868 (58.8%) were outside recommended guidelines. Women with insertions within-guidelines were older (20.2 vs. 19.3 years; p<0.001) and more likely to be white (40.4% vs. 29.5%; OR=1.6, 95% CI: 1.4-1.9). Definitive pregnancy data was documented for 1726 patients: 660 (50.3%) in the within guidelines group, and 1066 (57.0%) in the outside guidelines group. Rates of LPP were 0.3% (2/660; 95% CI=0.0-1.1%) in the within guidelines group and 0.9% (10/1066; 95% CI=0.5-1.7%) in the outside guidelines group. CONCLUSION The risk of LPP following any-cycle-day insertion of contraceptive implants with negative pregnancy testing is low, regardless of menstrual cycle timing, recent contraceptive use or use of EC. IMPLICATIONS Adopting a protocol of contraceptive implant placement that includes insertion on any cycle day with a negative pregnancy test, and EC as indicated, does not increase the risk of luteal phase pregnancies, even in a young population with complex reproductive behaviors and challenging historical narratives.


Advances in Pediatrics | 2016

Update on Adolescent Contraception

Molly Richards; Eliza Buyers

ly and plan for the future. Providers can have more in-depth conversations about healthy and safe relationships, STI prevention and screening, intentions for child bearing, and the importance of contraception in meeting their


Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology | 2016

Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Continuation, Completion, and Missed Opportunities.

Molly Richards; Marissa Peters; Jeanelle Sheeder


Journal of Adolescent Health | 2016

Contraception and Adolescent Males: An Opportunity for Providers

Molly Richards; Marissa Peters; Jeanelle Sheeder; Paritosh Kaul


Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology | 2014

Emergency Contraception: What do Adolescent Males Know?

Marissa Peters; Molly Richards; Jeanelle Sheeder; Paritosh Kaul


Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology | 2015

Adolescents and IUDs: Are STIs Worth The Delay?

Molly Richards; Marissa Peters; Liz Romer; Jeanelle Sheeder


Journal of Adolescent Health | 2015

9. Promoting Adolescent and Young Adult Male Contraceptive Knowledge: Can Health Care Providers Make a Difference?

Molly Richards; Marissa Peters; Jeanelle Sheeder; Paritosh Kaul


Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology | 2014

Turning Plan B Into Plan A: A Missed Opportunity for Adolescent Reproductive Care

Molly Richards; Marissa Peters; Jeanelle Sheeder


Contraception | 2014

Does same-day initiation of subdermal implants increase the risk of luteal phase pregnancies?

Jeanelle Sheeder; Marissa Peters; Molly Richards; Stephanie B. Teal

Collaboration


Dive into the Molly Richards's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeanelle Sheeder

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Marissa Peters

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Paritosh Kaul

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Stephanie B. Teal

University of Colorado Boulder

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Eliza Buyers

University of Colorado Denver

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge