Monchand Vanichapuntu

Anti-Sm: Its predictive value in systemic lupus erythematosus

SummaryThe clinical manifestations of 131 rheumatic disease patients with anti-Sm antibody were studied. A variety of standard tests was utilized in the study, namely, the FANA test with mouse kidney as substrate for the assay of ANA, the Crithidia test for anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) and double immunodiffusion for detecting antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens. The patients were grouped according to the presence of anti-Sm alone, or anti-Sm with some other antibodies. There were 17 with anti-Sm alone; 55 with anti-Sm + anti-RNP; 15 with anti-Sm + anti-dsDNA; and 44 with anti-Sm + anti-RNP. The result of our study showed that although anti-Sm could be found in other diseases, it was exclusively detected in SLE only if anti-dsDNA was also present. Further, the SLE patients with anti-Sm alone had more frequent central nervous system manifestations than other groups of patients. The renal manifestation was observed more frequently in the group of SLE patients with anti-Sm + anti-dsDNA (92.9%). Among other major manifestations, haematologic involvement had a tendency to be less common in the group of patients with anti-Sm alone. The study concludes that the presence of anti-Sm antibody may be of some value to predict the clinical outcome.

Specificity and sensitivity of anti-β2-glycoprotein I as compared with anticardiolipin antibody and lupus anticoagulant in Thai systemic lupus erythematosus patients with clinical features of antiphospholipid syndrome

Antibodies to β2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2-GPI) have been reported to have stronger association with clinical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) than anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and lupus anticoagulant (LAC). We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA for anti-β2-GPI in Thai systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with clinical features of APS and compared the results with IgG/IgM aCL and LAC to find the test with the best association. The hospital records of 151 Thai SLE patients whose sera had been sent for either IgG/IgM anticardiolipin antibodies or lupus anticoagulant testing were reviewed. Sera of patients either without complete clinical records or those with APS-related manifestations other than vascular thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity (according to the international consensus statement on preliminary classification criteria for definite APS) were excluded. For the remaining subjects (112 patients), their sera were tested for anti-β2-GPI antibody, IgG and IgM anticardiolipin, and lupus anticoagulant. The sensitivity and specificity of each method were compared by using the chi-square test. Among the 112 (74.2%) SLE patients in the study, 35 (31.3%) presented with preliminary clinical criteria for APS (i.e., vascular thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity) whereas 77 (68.7%) did not. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-β2-GPI determination were 57.1 and 79.2%, respectively, whereas those of IgG aCL were 25.7 and 94.8%, of IgM aCL were 5.7 and 98.7%, and of LAC were 44.8 and 77.3%, respectively. The accuracy of the four tests showed similar association with clinical APS (accuracy of test = 72.3, 73.2, 69.6, and 68.3%, respectively). Concerning the sensitivity, specificity, and difficulty of the methods, the combination of anti-β2-GPI and IgG aCL tests was the best for the diagnosis of APS in Thai SLE patients.

Are anti-citrulline autoantibodies better serum markers for rheumatoid arthritis than rheumatoid factor in Thai population?

The aim of the study is to evaluate the prevalence of anti-citrulline antibodies (anti-CCP) versus rheumatoid factor (RF) in a cohort of Thai patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a variety of rheumatic diseases other than RA and healthy controls. The association between anti-CCP and RA disease activity was also examined. Serum from 125 RA patients, 60 from other rheumatic diseases (non-RA) and 60 from healthy controls were tested for IgM RF and second generation anti-CCP. The association between anti-CCP, RF, the Disease Activity Score (DAS 28) and other relevant laboratory tests (CBC, ESR and CRP) were assessed. The sensitivity and specificity of anti-CCP antibody were 58.7 and 100% when compared with 63.5 and 98.3% for RF. These differences were not statistically significant. The anti-CCP outperformed RF in terms of the positive-predictive values (100 vs. 97.6%); however, the negative-predictive values were 72.4% for RF and 69.6% for anti-CCP. The sensitivity when either anti-CCP or RF was positive increased to 71.2%. Nine out of 45 RF-negative patients had a positive anti-CCP test. Anti-CCP was significantly correlated with parameters of inflammation, but not with DAS 28. In conclusion, although anti-CCP is better than RF in distinguishing RA from other rheumatic diseases, its cost, which is 3.3 times higher than the RF test precludes it from replacing RF as a serum marker for Thai patients with RA. The treatment decisions cannot be based on the test alone, as it has no correlation with DAS 28. Its usefulness is in patients with suspected RA who have had a negative RF test.

Incidence and clinical correlation of anticentromere antibody in Thai patients.

Anticentromere antibodies (ACA) are useful in assessing and classifying patients with mild variant of systemic sclerosis called calcinosis, Raynauds phenomenon, esophageal dysmotility, sclerodactyly, telangiectasias (CREST) syndrome. From their prognostic significance, we are interested in the prevalence and disease correlation in Thai patients. A total of 3,233 serum samples of patients with any musculoskeletal symptoms were sent for antinuclear antibody determination at Ramathibodi Immunology Laboratory Service between the years 1998 and 2001. Forty sera (1.23%) were ACA positive. These sera were from 27 patients with autoimmune diseases and 13 with nonautoimmune diseases. Among autoimmune group, scleroderma was the most common diagnosis (33.3%) with limited sclerosis being the most frequent variant. The percentages of autoimmune disease were almost the same among the low-titer (1:40) and the high-titer (1:640) groups. The study suggests that the prevalence of ACA in Thai patients is low. The presence of ACA detected in patients with vague musculoskeletal symptoms does not suggest a diagnosis of CREST syndrome. Even high-titer ACA can be found in nonautoimmune diseases.