Mongi Bacha

Risk factors and consequences of delayed graft function.

The impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on the outcome of renal transplantation remains controversial. We analyzed the risk factors for DGF and its impact on graft and patient survival. A total of 354 renal transplants performed between June 1986 and April 2000 were analyzed. Variables analyzed included donor and recipient age, method and duration of renal replacement therapy, HLA mismatch, cold and warm ischemia times, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, length of stay in the hospital, serum creatinine at the end of first hospitalization as well as graft and patient survival at one, three, five and ten years. The study patients were divided into two groups: patients with DGF (G1) and those without DGF (G2). DGF occurred in 50 patients (14.1%), and it was seen more frequently in patients transplanted from deceased donors (60% vs. 40%, P <0.0001). The cause of DGF was acute tubular necrosis, seen in 98% of the cases. Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups G1 and G2 in the following parameters: average duration on dialysis (52.3 vs. 36.4 months, P = 0.006), HLA mismatch (44.9% vs. 32.11% P = 0.015), donor age (35.9 vs. 40.2 years, P = 0.026), cold ischemia time (23 vs. 18.2 h, P = 0.0016), warm ischemia time (41.9 vs. 38.6 mn, P = 0.046), length of stay in the hospital during first hospitalization (54.7 vs. 33.2 days, P <0.0001), serum creatinine at the end of first hospitalization (140 vs. 112 μmol/L, P <0.0001) and at three months following transplantation (159 vs. 119 μmol/L, P = 0.0002). Multivariate analysis revealed the following independent risk factors for DGF: deceased donor (RR = 13.2, P <0.0001) and cold ischemia time (RR = 1.17, P = 0.008). The graft survival at one, three, five and ten years was 100%, 93%, 88.3% and 78.3% in G1 versus 100%, 95.9% 92.8% and 82.3% in G2; there was no statistically significant difference. The patient survival at one, three, five and ten years was 100%, 91.3%, 83.6% and 74.4% in G1 versus 100%, 95.9%, 94% and 82.6% in G2 with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.04). Prolonged cold ischemia time and transplantation of kidneys from deceased donors were the main risk factors for DGF in our study. Also, DGF significantly affected patient survival but had no influence on graft survival.

Toll-Like Receptor 4 and CD14 Gene Polymorphisms in Tunisian Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND Acute and chronic rejections remain an important cause of graft loss after renal transplantation. Currently, activation of innate immune responses through Toll-like receptors (TLRs) is suspected to be implied in the loss of the transplant tolerance. OBJECTIVES We investigated functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of TLR4 and its coreceptor CD14 in kidney transplantation and looked for any potential role in acute rejection (AR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) and impact on graft survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS TLR4 (Asp299Gly) and CD14 (C/T -159) SNPs were detected using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) in 209 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) including 132 treated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF+). AR occurred in 59 patients and 24 were identified as having CAN by biopsy and scored according to the Banff criteria. RESULTS There were no significant associations between TLR4 and CD14 genotypes and alleles and the occurrence of both AR episodes and CAN. Moreover, TLR4 and CD14 SNPs did not seem to influence kidney graft survival. Analysis according to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility status, positivity of anti-HLA antibodies, and immunosuppression by MMF confirmed the absence of correlation of the investigated SNPs with the graft outcome. In addition, incidence of post-transplantation infections, including cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, was not influenced by both TLR4 and CD14 SNPs. CONCLUSION These results suggest that TLR4 (Asp299Gly) and CD14 (C/T -159) functional SNPs do not play a major role in AR, CAN, and kidney graft survival. Therefore, intragraft monitoring of TLR4/CD14 genes expression by messenger RNA (mRNA) would provide clarity on the exact role of these receptors in graft injuries.

The role of IL‐23/IL‐17 axis in human kidney allograft rejection

Th17 cell subset has been implicated in autoimmune diseases, tumor immunity and, transplant rejection. In order to investigate the role of IL‐17/IL‐23 pathway in allograft outcome, intragraft expression of IL‐17 mRNA and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of IL‐17A, IL‐17F, IL‐17RC, and IL23R genes were evaluated with a quantification of IL‐17A, IL‐17F, and IL‐23 plasma levels. This study revealed that recipients with acute rejection (AR) had a significant increase in IL‐17A mRNA expression levels after transplantation compared to controls (P = 0.037). Moreover, IL‐17A plasma levels were significantly higher in AR group; pretransplantation (Day–1 [D–1]): P = 0.00022 and posttransplantation (Day 7 [D7]): P < 10–14. IL‐17F and IL‐23 plasma levels were significantly higher in AR at D7 only (47.86 vs. 22.99 pg/ml; and 33.82 vs. 18.811 pg/ml; P = 0.015 and P < 10–17, respectively). Using receiver‐operating characteristic curves, D7 IL‐17A and IL‐23 plasma levels exhibited excellent sensitivities and specificities for predicting AR. Genetic study revealed no association between IL‐17A, IL‐17F, IL‐17RC, and IL23R studied SNPs and AR. Nevertheless, a significant improvement of graft survival was found in kidney transplant recipients carrying IL‐17F‐rs763780*A/A, IL‐17RC*G/G, and *G/A genotypes. Besides, IL‐17A mRNA levels were significantly higher in patients carrying the IL‐23R*G/G genotype comparatively to those with *G/A genotype. Based on these findings, significant increase of IL‐17A mRNA and protein levels in AR recipients that are genetically controlled highlights the role of this cytokine that can be a useful clinical biomarker to predict early acute renal allograft rejection.