Monica Giacomuzzi

Effective environmental sampling strategies for monitoring Legionella spp contamination in hot water systems

BACKGROUND The prevention and control of legionellosis in hospital settings involves environmental sampling, among other measures. The data yielded by sampling constitute an important means of risk assessment and provide a valid basis on which to plan remedial (cleansing and disinfection) and preventive (maintenance) interventions. This retrospective study had 2 objectives: (1) to evaluate the utility of biofilm sampling at distal sites and (2) to identify an efficient environmental sampling strategy. METHODS Samples of hot water and biofilm were collected between June 1999 and March 2008 from 41 hospitals in Italys Piemonte region. We analyzed results of the samples (water and biofilm) taken from the same site and results of the water samples taken from the recirculation loop and water samples taken from the distal sites during the same sampling run. RESULTS Microbiological analysis was performed on 3910 pairs of samples (water/biofilm). In 81% of the pairs, the results were concordant; in 17% of the pairs, Legionella was isolated only from the water samples, and in only 2% of the pairs was Legionella isolated from the biofilm sample alone. Data from 299 sampling runs show that 79% (236) of results from the water samples taken from the recirculation loop and water samples taken from the distal sites during the same sampling run were concordant, and 21% (63) were discordant. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that hospitals could safely adopt a simpler (water sampling only without biofilm sampling) and more efficient (monitoring of the entire system through sampling of recirculation loop water) environmental sampling policy.

Peracetic acid in the disinfection of a hospital water system contaminated with Legionella species

OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of an alternative disinfection method for hospital water distribution systems contaminated with Legionella. METHODS Disinfection with peracetic acid was performed in a small hospital contaminated with L. pneumophila serotype 1. The disinfectant was used at concentrations of 50 ppm (first three surveillance phases) and 1,000 ppm (fourth surveillance phase) for 30 minutes. RESULTS Environmental monitoring revealed that disinfection was maintained 1 week after treatment; however, levels of recontamination surpassing baseline values were detected after approximately 1 month. Comparison of water temperatures measured at the distal outlets showed a statistically significant association between temperature and bacterial load. The circulating water temperature was found to be lower in the two wards farthest away from the hot water production plant than in other wards. It was thought that the lower water temperature in the two wards promoted the bacterial growth even after disinfection. CONCLUSION Peracetic acid may be useful in emergency situations, but does not provide definitive protection even if used monthly.

Overestimation of the Legionella spp. load in environmental samples by quantitative real-time PCR: pretreatment with propidium monoazide as a tool for the assessment of an association between Legionella concentration and sanitary risk

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) offers rapid, sensitive, and specific detection of Legionella in environmental water samples. In this study, qPCR and qPCR combined with propidium monoazide (PMA-qPCR) were both applied to hot-water system samples and compared to traditional culture techniques. In addition, we evaluated the ability of PMA-qPCR to monitor the efficacy of different disinfection strategies. Comparison between the quantification obtained by culture and by qPCR or PMA-qPCR on environmental water samples confirms that the concentration of Legionella estimated by GU/L is generally higher than that estimated in CFU/L. Our results on 57 hot-water-system samples collected from 3 different sites show that: i) qPCR results were on average 178-fold higher than the culture results (Δ log10=2.25), ii) PMA-qPCR results were on average 27-fold higher than the culture results (Δ log10=1.43), iii) propidium monoazide-induced signal reduction in qPCR were nearly 10-fold (Δ log10=0.95), and that iv) different degrees of correlations between the 3 methods might be explained by different matrix properties, but also by different disinfection methods affecting cultivability of Legionella. In our study, we calculated the logarithmic differences between the results obtained by PMA-qPCR and those obtained by culture, and we suggested an algorithm for the interpretation of PMA-qPCR results for the routine monitoring of healthcare water systems using a commercial qPCR system (iQ-check real-time PCR kit; Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France).

Viability-qPCR for detecting Legionella: Comparison of two assays based on different amplicon lengths

Two different real-time quantitative PCR (PMA-qPCR) assays were applied for quantification of Legionella spp. by targeting a long amplicon (approx 400 bp) of 16S rRNA gene and a short amplicon (approx. 100 bp) of 5S rRNA gene. Purified DNA extracts from pure cultures of Legionella spp. and from environmental water samples were quantified. Application of the two assays to quantify Legionella in artificially contaminated water achieved that both assays were able to detect Legionella over a linear range of 10 to 10(5) cells ml(-1). A statistical analysis of the standard curves showed that both assays were linear with a good correlation coefficient (R(2) = 0.99) between the Ct and the copy number. Amplification with the reference assay was the most effective for detecting low copy numbers (1 bacterium per PCR mixture). Using selective quantification of viable Legionella by the PMA-qPCR method we obtained a greater inhibition of the amplification of the 400-bp 16S gene fragment (Δlog(10) = 3.74 ± 0.39 log(10) GU ml(-1)). A complete inhibition of the PCR signal was obtained when heat-killed cells in a concentration below 1 × 10(5) cells ml(-1) were pretreated with PMA. Analysing short amplicon sizes led to only 2.08 log reductions in the Legionella dead-cell signal. When we tested environmental water samples, the two qPCR assays were in good agreement according to the kappa index (0.741). Applying qPCR combined with PMA treatment, we also obtained a good agreement (kappa index 0.615). The comparison of quantitative results shows that both assays yielded the same quantification sensitivity (mean log = 4.59 vs mean log = 4.31).

Legionella in water samples: how can you interpret the results obtained by quantitative PCR?

Evaluation of the potential risk associated with Legionella has traditionally been determined from culture-based methods. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is an alternative tool that offers rapid, sensitive and specific detection of Legionella in environmental water samples. In this study we compare the results obtained by conventional qPCR (iQ-Check™ Quanti Legionella spp.; Bio-Rad) and by culture method on artificial samples prepared in Pages saline by addiction of Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 (ATCC 33152) and we analyse the selective quantification of viable Legionella cells by the qPCR-PMA method. The amount of Legionella DNA (GU) determined by qPCR was 28-fold higher than the load detected by culture (CFU). Applying the qPCR combined with PMA treatment we obtained a reduction of 98.5% of the qPCR signal from dead cells. We observed a dissimilarity in the ability of PMA to suppress the PCR signal in samples with different amounts of bacteria: the effective elimination of detection signals by PMA depended on the concentration of GU and increasing amounts of cells resulted in higher values of reduction. Using the results from this study we created an algorithm to facilitate the interpretation of viable cell level estimation with qPCR-PMA.

Cultural and Molecular Evidence of Legionella spp. Colonization in Dental Unit Waterlines: Which Is the Best Method for Risk Assessment?

Legionella spp. are ubiquitous in aquatic habitats and water distribution systems, including dental unit waterlines (DUWLs). The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of Legionella in DUWLs and tap water samples using PMA-qPCR and standard culture methods. The total viable counts (TVCs) of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria in the samples were also determined. Legionella spp. were detected and quantified using the modified ISO 11731 culture method. Extracted genomic DNA was analysed using the iQ-Check Quanti Legionella spp. kit, and the TVCs were determined according to the ISO protocol 6222. Legionella spp. were detected in 100% of the samples using the PMA-qPCR method, whereas these bacteria were detected in only 7% of the samples using the culture method. The number of colony forming units (CFUs) of the TVCs in the DUWL and tap water samples differed, with the bacterial load being significantly lower in the tap water samples (p-value = 0). The counts obtained were within the Italian standard range established for potable water in only 5% of the DUWL water samples and in 77% of the tap water samples. Our results show that the level of Legionella spp. contamination determined using the culture method does not reflect the true scale of the problem, and consequently we recommend testing for the presence of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria based on the assumption that Legionella spp. are components of biofilms.

Virulence of Legionella pneumophila strains isolated from hospital water system and healthcare-associated Legionnaires’ disease in Northern Italy between 2004 and 2009

AbstractBackgroundWorldwide, L. pneumophila sg 1 is the most common agent of Legionnaires’ disease ( 80 to 90% of the reported cases). In contrast, L. pneumophila sg 2–14 account for only 15 to 20% of community-acquired cases, although they account for over 50% of the environmental isolates. The discrepancy between environmental isolates and clinical cases of disease suggested that there are differences in virulence.We decided to subtype the environmental Legionella strains isolated from health care facilities (HCFs) and to compare the distribution of strains with the occurrence of hospital-acquired legionellosis.MethodsObservational ecological study based on the data provided by the regional surveillance of legionellosis and on data obtained from hospitals environmental monitoring.Using the monoclonal antibody MAb 3/1 of the Dresden Panel we collected and typed environmental strains of L. pneumophila sg 1 obtained during routine testing in 56 health care facilities from 2004 to 2009.The results of the laboratory analyses of the environmental samples were compared with the number of cases that each health care facility reported during the study period.ResultsThe association between the type of colonisation (L. pneumophila sg 1 vs others serogroups) and the incidence of reported cases was statistically significant (p = 0.03 according to the χ2 test). Legionella strains with the virulence–associated epitope recognised by MAb 3/1 were isolated in 8 of the 26 HCFs colonised by L. pneumophila sg 1; 7 of the HCFs colonised by MAb 3/1-positive strains accounted for 85% of the cases of hospital-acquired legionellosis reported during the 6-year study period. There was a statistically significant association (p = 0.003) between the presence of cases and colonisation by MAb 3/1-positive Legionella strains.ConclusionThis study suggests that hospitals colonised by more virulent strains should be aware of the increased risk and consider the opportunities of increase their monitoring efforts and implement more effective contamination control strategies.

Recovery of Legionella species from water samples using an internal method based on ISO 11731: suggestions for revision and implementation

The study aim was to determine retrospectively whether the parallel use of 2 media [buffered charcoal yeast extract (BCYE) and medium of Wadowsky and Yee (MWY)] to isolate Legionella spp. from water samples taken from hospital water supply systems increased the sensitivity of the culture method as compared with methods/protocols in which only seeding on a selective medium is used. We analyzed the results obtained from 931 positive water samples. In 484 of the 931 positive water samples, Legionella spp. was isolated in the presence of other microorganisms; in 83% (400/484), we used MWY to count suspected colonies, which gave a lower number of unreadable plates. In the 447 samples containing only Legionella spp., the highest frequency of positive samples (93%, 418/447) was obtained with BCYE, whereas seeding on MWY yielded 78% (348/447) (P < 0.001). Evaluation of the influence of the media on the Legionella spp. counts obtained by the 2 media showed that BCYE agar produced significantly higher counts than MWY (P < 0.001). The major conclusions that may be drawn from our data are as follows: 1) BCYE gives a high recovery rate of positive samples (93%) and a much greater yield of Legionella spp. than MWY; 2) BCYE was necessary for the detection of non-L. pneumophila spp. which grew poorly on selective media; 3) selective media [MWY or GVPC (glycine, vancomycin, polymyxin B, and cycloheximide)] were necessary for the recovery of Legionella spp. when the non-selective medium (BCYE) was difficult to interpret because of contaminating background flora. The use of different media is recommended for routine water tests in hospitals.

Incidence of legionellosis in hospitals contaminated by Legionella pneumophila other than serogroup 1.

From the Department of Occupational Health (K.W.) and the Department of Occupational Mental Health (Y.S., K.T.), Graduate School of Medical Sciences, and the Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (M.T., Y.A.), Faculty of Medicine, Kitasato University, and the Health Promotion Centre, Mazda Motor Corporation, Hiroshima (R.N.), Sagamihara, and the Institute for Science of Labour, Kasawaki (T.Y), Kanagawa, Japan; and the Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (K.W.). Address reprint requests to Koji Wada, MD, MSc, 1-15-1 Kitasato Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 228-8555, Japan, Department of Occupational Health, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan (kwada-sgy@umin.ac.jp). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28:507-509

Efficacy of a Low Dose of Hydrogen Peroxide (Peroxy Ag⁺) for Continuous Treatment of Dental Unit Water Lines: Challenge Test with Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 1 in a Simulated Dental Unit Waterline.

This study was designed to examine the in vitro bactericidal activity of hydrogen peroxide against Legionella. We tested hydrogen peroxide (Peroxy Ag+) at 600 ppm to evaluate Legionella survival in a simulated dental treatment water system equipped with Water Hygienization Equipment (W.H.E.) device that was artificially contaminated. When Legionella pneumophila serogroup (sg) 1 was exposed to Peroxy Ag+ for 60 min we obtained a two decimal log reduction. High antimicrobial efficacy was obtained with extended periods of exposure: four decimal log reduction at 75 min and five decimal log reduction at 15 h of exposure. Involving a simulation device (Peroxy Ag+ is flushed into the simulation dental unit waterlines (DUWL)) we obtained an average reduction of 85% of Legionella load. The product is effective in reducing the number of Legionella cells after 75 min of contact time (99.997%) in the simulator device under test conditions. The Peroxy Ag+ treatment is safe for continuous use in the dental water supply system (i.e., it is safe for patient contact), so it could be used as a preventive option, and it may be useful in long-term treatments, alone or coupled with a daily or periodic shock treatment.