Monica Hermann

Impact of the Ultrarapid CYP2C19*17 Allele on Serum Concentration of Escitalopram in Psychiatric Patients

Recently, a novel allelic variant of cytochrome P450 2C19 encoding ultrarapid enzyme activity was described (denoted CYP2C19*17). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of CYP2C19*17 on serum concentration of escitalopram in psychiatric patients. One hundred and sixty‐six patients treated with escitalopram were divided into the following subgroups according to CYP2C19 genotype: CYP2C19*17/*17 (n=7), CYP2C19*1/*17 (n=43), CYP2C19*1/*1 (n=60), CYP2C19*17/def (n=16), CYP2C19*1/def (n=34), and CYP2C19def/def (n=6) (def=defective allele, i.e., CYP2C19*2 or *3). Dose‐adjusted serum concentrations of escitalopram were compared using the CYP2C19*1/*1 subgroup as reference. Geometric mean of the escitalopram serum concentration was 42% lower in patients homozygous for CYP2C19*17 (P<0.01) and 5.7‐fold higher in subjects homozygous for defective CYP2C19 alleles (P<0.001). Of the heterozygous subgroups, only CYP2C19*1/def was significantly different from CYP2C19*1/*1 (P<0.001). In conclusion, a homozygous CYP2C19*17 genotype is associated with lower serum concentration of escitalopram, which might imply increased risk of therapeutic failure.

Exposure of atorvastatin is unchanged but lactone and acid metabolites are increased several‐fold in patients with atorvastatin‐induced myopathy

The most serious side effect from statin treatment is myopathy, which may proceed to rhabdomyolysis. This is the first study to investigate whether the pharmacokinetics of either atorvastatin or its metabolites, or both, is altered in patients with atorvastatin‐related myopathy compared with healthy controls.

Substantially elevated levels of atorvastatin and metabolites in cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients

o the Editor: In the work of Hedman et al recently presented in the ournal, a 10-fold higher systemic exposure of pravastatin comined with unaffected terminal half-life was observed in pediatic patients undergoing immunosuppressive therapy compared ith hypercholesterolemic children. We here report similar reults for atorvastatin and cyclosporine (INN, cicloporin). Previously, we performed a study to investigate the pharmaokinetic interaction between atorvastatin and cyclosporine in enal transplant recipients, where analysis of atorvastatin was erformed by an enzyme inhibition assay. We have now perormed additional analyses by specific HPLC with tandem mass pectrometric detection and included a control group to enable urther investigation of the effect of cyclosporine on the pharacokinetics of atorvastatin and metabolites. In brief, 18 renal transplant recipients undergoing yclosporine-based immunosuppressive therapy were adminisered 10 mg atorvastatin daily for 4 weeks. At the end of 4 eeks of treatment, plasma samples for pharmacokinetic analyis were drawn at fixed time intervals from 0 hours (before dose dministration) to 24 hours after dosing. Eighteen age-matched, ealthy individuals (median age, 47 years [range, 30-60 years]; edian serum creatinine level, 93 mol/L [range, 70-115 mol/ ]) were included in the study to serve as a control group and ere administered 10 mg atorvastatin daily for 1 week. All articipants gave written informed consent. The mean plasma level versus time curves for both acid and actone forms of atorvastatin, oand p-hydroxyatorvastatin, are hown in Fig 1. Systemic exposure of atorvastatin and its meabolites was substantially higher in the patient group compared ith the control group, and the differences were about 2-fold reater for acid forms than for lactones (Table I). No statistically ignificant difference was observed for the terminal half-life etween the 2 groups (Table I). The mechanism of the interaction between atorvastatin and yclosporine is probably complex, as both drugs are metablized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and as cyclosporine as the potential to inhibit several drug transporters expected o be involved in the disposition of atorvastatin. The subtantial increase in systemic exposure combined with unalered terminal half-life could indicate an increased bioavailbility of atorvastatin by inhibition of intestinal efflux

Serum concentrations of sertraline and N-desmethyl sertraline in relation to CYP2C19 genotype in psychiatric patients

ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of CYP2C19 genotype on serum concentrations of sertraline and N-desmethyl sertraline in psychiatric patients.MethodsPatients treated with sertraline (n = 121) were divided into six subgroups according to CYP2C19 genotype: CYP2C19*17/*17, CYP2C19*1/*17, CYP2C19*1/*1, CYP2C19*17/def, CYP2C19*1/def and CYP2C19def/def (def = allele encoding defective CYP2C19 metabolism, i.e. *2 and *3). Dose-adjusted serum concentrations were compared by linear mixed model analyses using the CYP2C19*1/*1 subgroup as reference.ResultsSubgroups carrying one or two alleles encoding defective CYP2C19 metabolism achieved significantly higher mean dose-adjusted serum concentrations of sertraline and N-desmethyl sertraline compared to the CYP2C19*1/*1 subgroup (P < 0.05). The effect of CYP2C19 genotype was expressed as 3.2-fold (sertraline) and 4.5-fold (N-desmethyl sertraline) higher dose-adjusted serum concentrations in the CYP2C19def/def subgroup compared to the CYP2C19*1/*1 subgroup (P < 0.01). The CYP2C19*17 allele had no influence on the dose-adjusted serum concentrations of sertraline and N-desmethyl sertraline.ConclusionThe significantly higher serum concentrations associated with alleles encoding defective CYP2C19 metabolism might be of relevance for the clinical outcome of sertraline treatment.

Influence of comedication on serum concentrations of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole.

Aripiprazole, a relatively new antipsychotic drug, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) and CYP2D6 to an active metabolite, dehydroaripiprazole. As studies on pharmacokinetic drug interactions with aripiprazole are so far limited, the aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of comedication on serum concentrations of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole in psychiatric patients in a clinical setting. A therapeutic drug monitoring database was screened for patients receiving aripiprazole tablets as part of their treatment. Of the 361 samples included, 78% were from patients receiving comedication. The remaining 79 samples constituted the control group. Steady-state dose-adjusted serum concentrations (concentration to dose ratios, C:D ratios) of aripiprazole, dehydroaripiprazole and the sum of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole, and the metabolic ratio (dehydroaripiprazole/aripiprazole) in the different comedication groups were compared with controls. Coadministration of a CYP3A4 inducer resulted in approximately 60% lower mean C:D ratios of aripiprazole, dehydroaripiprazole, and the sum of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively). Combination with a CYP2D6 inhibitor resulted in a 45% higher mean C:D ratio of aripiprazole (P < 0.05), with no effect on the C:D ratio of dehydroaripiprazole. When aripiprazole was coadministered with alimemazine or lithium, a 56% (P < 0.01) and 43% (P = 0.05) higher mean C:D ratio of aripiprazole, respectively, was observed. Olanzapine, risperidone injections, escitalopram, or lamotrigine also had statistically significant effects on aripiprazole disposition but to a lesser extent. In conclusion, concurrent treatment with CYP3A4 inducers, CYP2D6 inhibitors, alimemazine, or lithium resulted in changes in the systemic exposure of aripiprazole between 40% and 60%. This is of such a magnitude that dose adjustments of aripiprazole may be required.

Metabolism of quetiapine by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in presence or absence of cytochrome B5.

The antipsychotic drug quetiapine is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4, but little is known about the possible influence of the polymorphic enzyme CYP3A5. This in vitro study investigated the relative importance of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in the metabolism of quetiapine and compared the metabolic pattern by the two enzymes, in the presence or absence of cytochrome b5. Intrinsic clearance (CLint) of quetiapine was determined by the substrate depletion approach in CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 insect cell microsomes with or without coexpressed cytochrome b5. Formation of the metabolites quetiapine sulfoxide, N-desalkylquetiapine, O-desalkylquetiapine, and 7-hydroxyquetiapine by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 were compared in the different microsomal preparations. CLint of quetiapine by CYP3A5 was less than 35% relative to CYP3A4. CLint was higher (3-fold) in CYP3A4 microsomes without cytochrome b5 compared with CYP3A4 microsomes with coexpressed cytochrome b5, whereas in CYP3A5 microsomes CLint was similar for both microsomal preparations. Metabolism of quetiapine by CYP3A5 revealed a different metabolic pattern compared with CYP3A4. The results indicated that O-desalkylquetiapine constituted a higher proportion of the formed metabolites by CYP3A5 compared with CYP3A4. In conclusion, the present study indicates that CYP3A5 is of minor importance for the overall metabolism of quetiapine, regardless of the presence of cytochrome b5. However, a different metabolic pattern by CYP3A5 compared with CYP3A4 could possibly result in different pharmacological and/or toxicological effects of quetiapine in patients expressing CYP3A5.

Impact of CYP2D6 genotype on steady-state serum concentrations of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone in patients using long-acting injectable risperidone.

An increased risk of adverse effects and discontinuation of risperidone therapy is observed in patients with impaired cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) function on oral risperidone therapy. The present study is the first to investigate the impact of CYP2D6 genotype on serum concentrations of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone in patients using injectable long-acting risperidone. Two hundred three patients were divided into groups according to administered risperidone formulation (long-acting injection; n = 90) and CYP2D6 genotype. Dose-adjusted serum concentrations were compared using the CYP2D6*1/*1 subgroup as reference. The total serum concentration of risperidone plus 9-hydroxyrisperidone was 80% (P < 0.03) and 32% (P < 0.03) higher, whereas the risperidone-9-hydroxyrisperidone ratios were 6.3-fold (P < 0.01) and 12.5-fold (P < 0.01) higher in the CYP2D6def/def (def means defective allele, ie, CYP2D6*3, *4, *5, or *6) subgroup for long-acting and oral risperidone, respectively. In conclusion, CYP2D6 genotype significantly affects the pharmacokinetics of both oral and long-acting risperidone formulations.

Immunological response as a source to variability in drug metabolism and transport

Through the last decades it has become increasingly evident that disease-states involving cytokines affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs through regulation of expression and activity of drug metabolizing enzymes, and more recently also drug transporters. The clinical implication is however difficult to predict, since these effects are dependent on the degree of inflammation and may be changed when the diseases are treated. This article will give an overview of the present understanding of the effects of cytokines on cytochrome P450 enzymes and drug transporters, and highlight the importance of considering these issues in regard to increasing use of the relatively new class of drugs, namely therapeutic proteins.

Serum concentrations of venlafaxine and its metabolites O-desmethylvenlafaxine and N-desmethylvenlafaxine in heterozygous carriers of the CYP2D6*3, *4 or *5 allele.

ObjectiveIncreased systemic exposure of the antidepressant venlafaxine and increased risk of side effects has previously been observed in patients with defective CYP2D6 function [poor metabolisers (PMs)]. The aim of this study was to evaluate venlafaxine pharmacokinetics in carriers of one functional and one defective CYP2D6 allele [heterozygous extensive metabolisers (HEMs)].MethodsData was collected retrospectively from a therapeutic drug-monitoring database. All CYP-genotyped patients with steady-state serum concentration measurements of venlafaxine and metabolites were included in the study. Patients were divided in groups: *1/*1 [homozygous extensive metabolisers (EMs)], *1/*3, *4 or *5 (HEMs) and *4/*4 (PMs). Dose-adjusted serum concentrations of venlafaxine, O-desmethylvenlafaxine, N-desmethylvenlafaxine, and the metabolic ratio (O-desmethylvenlafaxine/venlafaxine) were compared between the different genotype groups.ResultsThe sum of venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine serum concentrations was not significantly different between genotype groups. Metabolic ratio was 50% lower in HEMs (n = 18) than in EMs (n = 20) (p < 0.05). Serum concentration of N-desmethylvenlafaxine was 5.5-fold higher in HEMs (p < 0.01) and 22-fold higher in PMs (p < 0.001) than in EMs.ConclusionThe study showed a shift in the metabolic pathway resulting in substantially higher levels of N-desmethylvenlafaxine in HEMs than in EMs. The metabolic pattern of venlafaxine in HEMs was similar to previous observations in PMs and possibly represents an increased risk of venlafaxine-related side effects in HEM patients.

Intake of grapefruit juice alters the metabolic pattern of cyclosporin A in renal transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin A (CsA), as Sandimmun Neoral, and its main metabolites, M1, M9 and M4N, in renal transplant recipients. METHODS Ten renal transplant recipients, on CsA-based immunosuppressive therapy, were included in this open, randomized crossover study. Patients were given their individualized morning dose of CsA, administered with either 250 ml water or 250 ml grapefruit juice and 12-hour CsA pharmacokinetic investigations were performed. The 2 investigation days were separated by at least 7 days. RESULTS Administration of CsA with grapefruit juice compared with water significantly increased the area under the whole blood concentration versus time curve in the interval from 0-12 hours (AUC(0-12)) of CsA, by an average of 25 +/- 19% (p = 0.002). Intake of grapefruit juice did not have any significant influence on maximum whole blood concentration (Cmax) or time to Cmax (tmax) of CsA. AUC(0-12) and Cmax of M9 decreased significantly with intake of grapefruit juice, on average 22 +/- 11% (p = 0.0007) and 36 +/- 6% (p = 0.0001), respectively. AUC(0-12) of M1, however, was on average 13 +/- 14% (p = 0.02) higher upon co-administration of CsA with grapefruit juice as compared with water. The level of M4N was below the limit of quantification in most samples, and an effect of co-administration of CsA with grapefruit juice could not be determined for this metabolite. CONCLUSION The present study shows that co-administration of grapefruit juice with CsA compared with water affects the formation and/or elimination of the 2 metabolites M1 and M9 differently. In addition, administration of CsA with grapefruit juice compared with water induced a moderate, but significant increase in systemic exposure of CsA in renal transplant recipients.