Monica R. Maiello

The RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and the PI3K/AKT signalling pathways: role in cancer pathogenesis and implications for therapeutic approaches

Introduction: The RAS/RAF/MAP kinase–ERK kinase (MEK)/extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) (MAPK) and the PI3K/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (PI3K) pathways are frequently deregulated in human cancer as a result of genetic alterations in their components or upstream activation of cell-surface receptors. These signalling cascades are regulated by complex feedback and cross-talk mechanisms. Areas covered: In this review the key components of the MAPK and AKT pathways and their molecular alterations are described. The complex interactions between these signalling cascades are also analysed. Expert opinion: The observation that the MAPK and the PI3K pathways are often deregulated in human cancer makes the components of these signalling cascades interesting targets for therapeutic intervention. Recently, the presence of compensatory loops that activate one pathway following the blockade of the other signalling cascade has been demonstrated. Therefore, the blockade of both pathways with combinations of signalling inhibitors might result in a more efficient anti-tumor effect as compared with a single agent. In addition, the MAPK and PI3K pathways are activated by mutations that coexist or can be mutually exclusive. In this regard, a large-scale characterization of the cancer genome might offer personalized cancer genomic information, which may improve the anti-tumor efficacy of signalling inhibitors.

The role of the EGFR signaling in tumor microenvironment

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family comprehends four different tyrosine kinases (EGFR, ErbB‐2, ErbB‐3, and ErbB‐4) that are activated following binding to epidermal growth factor (EGF)‐like growth factors. It has been long established that the EGFR system is involved in tumorigenesis. These proteins are frequently expressed in human carcinomas and support proliferation and survival of cancer cells. However, activation of the EGFR in non‐malignant cell populations of the neoplastic microenvironment might also play an important role in cancer progression. EGFR signaling regulates in tumor cells the synthesis and secretion of several different angiogenic growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). Overexpression of ErbB‐2 also leads to increased expression of angiogenic growth factors, whereas treatment with anti‐EGFR or anti‐ErbB‐2 agents produces a significant reduction of the synthesis of these proteins by cancer cells. EGFR expression and function in tumor‐associated endothelial cells has also been described. Therefore, EGFR signaling might regulate angiogenesis both directly and indirectly. In addition, activation of EGFR is involved in the pathogenesis of bone metastases. Within the bone marrow microenvironment, cancer cells stimulate the synthesis of osteoclastogenic factors by residing stromal cells, a phenomenon that leads to bone destruction. It has been shown that EGFR signaling regulates the ability of bone marrow stromal cells to produce osteoclastogenic factors and to sustain osteoclast activation. Taken together, these findings suggest that the EGFR system is an important mediator, within the tumor microenvironment, of autocrine and paracrine circuits that result in enhanced tumor growth. J. Cell. Physiol. 214: 559–567, 2008.

The ErbB receptors and their ligands in cancer: an overview.

This review article provides an overview on the most recent advances on the role of ErbB receptors and growth factors of the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-family of peptides in cancer pathogenesis and progression. The ErbB tyrosine kinases and the EGF-like peptides form a complex system. In fact, the interactions occurring between receptors and ligands of these families affect the type and the duration of the intracellular signals that derive from receptor activation. Interestingly, activation of ErbB receptors is also driven by different classes of membrane receptor, suggesting that ErbB kinases can amplify growth promoting signals carried by different pathways. The importance of ErbB receptors and EGF-like peptides in development of organs and tissues has been demonstrated by using different mouse models. In vitro and in vivo studies have also shown that ErbB receptors and their ligands can act as transforming genes. However, evidence suggests that cooperation of different receptors and ligands is necessary to induce a fully transformed phenotype. Indeed, co-expression of different ErbB receptors and EGF-like growth factors is a common phenomenon in human primary carcinomas. This observation suggests that the growth and the survival of carcinoma cells is sustained by a network of receptors/ligands of the ErbB family. In this respect, the contemporary expression of different ErbB tyrosine kinases and/or EGF-like growth factors in human carcinomas might also affect tumor response to target based agents directed against the ErbB receptor/ligand system.

The MEK/MAPK pathway is involved in the resistance of breast cancer cells to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib.

We investigated the role of the MEK/MAPK pathway in the sensitivity/resistance of breast carcinoma cells to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (IRESSA). We assessed the effects of gefitinib on the growth of three breast cancer cell lines that showed high (SK‐Br‐3; IC50 4 µM), intermediate (MDA‐MB‐361; IC50 5.3 µM), and low (MDA‐MB‐468; IC50 6.8 µM) sensitivity to the drug. Although treatment with gefitinib inhibited EGFR activation in the three cell lines in a similar fashion, significant reduction of both p42/p44‐MAPK and AKT phosphorylation was observed in SK‐Br‐3 and MDA‐MB‐361, but not in MDA‐MB‐468 cells. The growth of MDA‐MB‐468 cells was significantly inhibited by treatment with either the PI3K‐inhibitor LY294002 or the MEK‐inhibitor PD98059. In agreement with these findings, treatment of MDA‐MB‐468 cells with a combination of PD98059 and gefitinib produced a synergistic anti‐tumor effect, whereas this combination was only additive in SK‐Br‐3 and MDA‐MB‐361 cells. The combination of gefitinib and PD98059 also produced a significant increase in the levels of apoptosis in MDA‐MB‐468 cells as compared with treatment with a single agent. This phenomenon was associated with a profound decrease in MAPK activation, reduction of BAD (ser112) phosphorylation and a paradoxical increase in the levels of AKT activation. Finally, overexpression of a constitutively activated form of p42‐MAPK in MCF‐10A non‐transformed human mammary epithelial cells resulted in a two‐ to three‐fold increase in the IC50 to gefitinib. Taken together, these data strongly support the role of the MEK/MAPK pathway in the resistance to gefitinib, and provide the rationale for novel therapeutic approaches based on combinations of signal transduction inhibitors. J. Cell. Physiol. 207: 420–427, 2006.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs): Simple drugs with a complex mechanism of action?

A range of target‐based agents for the treatment of solid tumors are in development. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been identified as a relevant target as it is involved in regulating several cellular functions important in the proliferation and survival of cancer cells, is commonly expressed at high levels in a range of tumors, and high expression is often related to poor prognosis. EGFR is a member of the ErbB family of receptors which also includes ErbB‐2, ErbB‐3, and ErbB‐4. These receptors form dimers of the same type (homodimers) or with other family members (heterodimers), each combination resulting in different downstream effects. Some of the most advanced targeted agents in development are the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs), of which ZD1839 (‘Iressa’) is an example. In Phase II monotherapy trials, oral ZD1839 was well tolerated and demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity and symptom relief in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. Preclinical studies have suggested that the antitumor activity of ZD1839 does not depend on the level of EGFR expression. Furthermore, in addition to an effect on EGFR signaling, treatment with ZD1839 as well as with other quinazoline EGFR‐TKIs, may also affect signaling of other ErbB family members. EGFR‐TKIs have been shown in preclinical studies to increase the efficacy of cytotoxic drugs and Phase III trials of such combinations are ongoing. On the basis that different signal transduction pathways contribute to the control of tumor growth, future therapeutic approaches are likely to involve combination of different targeted agents.

Target-based therapies in breast cancer: current status and future perspectives

Identification of molecular alterations in key proteins involved in breast cancer cell proliferation and survival resulted in the development of a new treatment strategy with target-based agents. The anti-ErbB-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) trastuzumab and the dual epidermal growth factor receptor/ErbB-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib are effective in patients with breast cancer that overexpresses ErbB-2. The anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-A mAb bevacizumab is approved in combination with taxanes for treatment of unselected patients with metastatic breast cancer. In addition, preclinical data suggest that signaling inhibitors can prevent or overcome resistance to endocrine therapy in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. However, the majority of signaling inhibitors explored in breast cancer patients has shown little activity, at least when used as monotherapy; and the results of clinical trials in ER+ breast cancer of combinations of signaling inhibitors and endocrine therapies are rather disappointing. Negative findings are likely due to mechanisms of intrinsic or acquired resistance to target-based agents. Breast carcinoma is a complex and heterogeneous disease and several different molecular alterations are involved in its pathogenesis and progression. The redundancy of oncogenic pathways activated in cancer cells, the heterogeneity of the mechanisms of resistance, and the plasticity of tumor cells that are capable to adapt to different growth conditions, significantly hamper the efficacy of each signaling inhibitor in breast cancer. Therefore, a comprehensive approach that takes into account the complexity of the disease is definitely required to improve the efficacy of target-based therapy in breast cancer.

Cripto-1 Overexpression Leads to Enhanced Invasiveness and Resistance to Anoikis in Human MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells

Cripto‐1 (CR‐1) is an epidermal growth factor (EGF)‐CFC protein that has been shown to signal through nodal/Alk‐4, PI3K/Akt, and/or ras/raf/MEK/MAPK pathways in mammalian cells, and that is frequently expressed in human primary breast carcinomas. In the present study, the human estrogen receptor positive, MCF‐7 breast cancer cell line, that expresses low levels of endogenous CR‐1, was transfected with a CR‐1 expression vector. MCF‐7 CR‐1 cells expressed high levels of a 25 kDa recombinant CR‐1 protein that was not detected in MCF‐7 cells transfected with a control vector (MCF‐7 neo). Overexpression of CR‐1 did not induce an estrogen independent phenotype in MCF‐7 cells. In fact, MCF‐7 CR‐1 cells showed a response to exogenous estrogens that was similar to MCF‐7 neo cells, and failed to grow in immunosuppressed mice in absence of estrogen stimulation. However, MCF‐7 CR‐1 cells showed a rate of proliferation in serum free conditions, and an ability to form colonies in soft‐agar that were higher as compared with MCF‐7 neo cells. More importantly, overexpression of CR‐1 enhanced the resistance to anoikis and the invasion ability of MCF‐7 cells. MCF‐7 CR‐1 cells showed levels of activation of both Akt and Smad‐2 that were significantly higher as compared with MCF‐7 neo. These findings suggest that CR‐1 overexpression might be associated with the progression towards a more aggressive phenotype in breast carcinoma, through the activation of both Akt and Smad‐2 signalling pathways. J. Cell. Physiol. 198: 31–39, 2004.

Effects of the combined blockade of EGFR and ErbB-2 on signal transduction and regulation of cell cycle regulatory proteins in breast cancer cells

Treatment of breast cancer cells with a combination of the EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) gefitinib and the anti-ErbB-2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab results in a synergistic antitumor effect. In this study, we addressed the mechanisms involved in this phenomenon. The activation of signaling pathways and the expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins were studied in SK-Br-3 and BT-474 breast cancer cells, following treatment with EGFR and/or ErbB-2 inhibitors. Treatment with the gefitinib/trastuzumab combination produced, as compared with a single agent, a more prolonged blockade of AKT and MAPK activation, a more pronounced accumulation of cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle, a more significant increase in the levels of p27kip1 and of hypophosphorylated pRb2, and a decrease in the levels of Cyclin D1 and survivin. Similar findings were observed with the EGFR/ErbB-2 inhibitor lapatinib. Gefitinib, trastuzumab, and their combination increased the stability of p27kip1, with the combination showing the highest effects. Blockade of both receptors with gefitinib/trastuzumab or lapatinib induced a significant increase in the levels of p27kip1 mRNA and in the nuclear levels of the p27kip1 transcription factor FKHRL-1. Inhibition of PI3K signaling also produced a significant raise in p27kip1 mRNA. Finally, down-modulation of FKHRL-1 with siRNAs prevented the lapatinib-induced increase of p27kip1 mRNA. The synergism deriving from EGFR and ErbB-2 blockade is mediated by several different alterations in the activation of signaling proteins and in the expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins, including transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of p27kip1 expression.

Breast cancer cells with acquired resistance to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib show persistent activation of MAPK signaling

Although the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently expressed in human primary breast carcinoma, the majority of breast cancer patients do not respond to treatment with EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib. We isolated through a stepwise dose escalation of the drug two gefitinib-resistant SK-Br-3 clones, ZD6 and ZD10 (ZD) cells, which showed, respectively, a three- to five-fold increase in the IC50 for gefitinib as compared with parental cells. The levels of expression of EGFR were increased in ZD cells as compared with wild-type SK-Br-3 cells. The phosphorylation of EGFR, ErbB-2, ErbB-3 and Akt was significantly reduced in gefitinib-resistant cells. In contrast, ZD cells showed levels of MAPK phosphorylation similar to untreated wild-type cells when cultured in presence of gefitinib. Persistent activation of MAPK was also observed in gefitinib-resistant clones isolated from MDA-MB-175 and MDA-MB-361 breast cancer cell lines. ZD cells showed an increased sensitivity to the MEK inhibitor PD98059 as compared with SK-Br-3 cells, and a synergistic anti-tumor effect was observed when ZD cells were treated with a combination of gefitinib and PD98059. Overexpression of a constitutively activated form of p42-MAPK in SK-Br-3 cells resulted in an approximately 50% increase in the IC50 to gefitinib. Finally, culture of ZD10 resistant cells in absence of gefitinib led to reversion of the resistant phenotype. These observations suggest that MAPK signaling might play a role in the resistance that develops in breast cancer cells after long-term exposure to gefitinib.

Src and CXCR4 are involved in the invasiveness of breast cancer cells with acquired resistance to lapatinib

Lapatinib is a dual EGFR and ErbB-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has significantly improved the clinical outcome of ErbB-2-overexpressing breast cancer patients. However, patients inexorably develop mechanisms of resistance that limit the efficacy of the drug. In order to identify potential targets for therapeutic intervention in lapatinib-resistant patients, we isolated, from ErbB-2-overexpressing SK-Br-3 breast cancer cells, the SK-Br-3 Lap-R-resistant subclone, which is able to routinely grow in 1 µM lapatinib. Resistant cells have a more aggressive phenotype compared with parental cells, as they show a higher ability to invade through a matrigel-coated membrane. Lapatinib-resistant cells have an increased Src kinase activity and persistent levels of activation of ERK1/2 and AKT compared with parental cells. Treatment with the Src inhibitor saracatinib in combination with lapatinib reduces AKT and ERK1/2 phosphorylation and restores the sensitivity of resistant cells to lapatinib. SK-Br-3 Lap-R cells also show levels of expression of CXCR4 that are higher compared with parental cells and are not affected by Src inhibition. Treatment with saracatinib or a specific CXCR4 antibody reduces the invasive ability of SK-Br-3 Lap-R cells, with the two drugs showing cooperative effects. Finally, blockade of Src signaling significantly increases TRAIL-induced cell death in SK-Br-3 Lap-R cells. Taken together, our results demonstrate that breast cancer cells with acquired resistance to lapatinib have a more aggressive phenotype compared with their parental counterpart, and that Src signaling and CXCR4 play an important role in this phenomenon, thus representing potential targets for therapeutic intervention in lapatinib-resistant breast cancer patients.