Monica Turazza

The promher study: An observational Italian study on adjuvant therapy for her2-positive, pT1a-b pN0 breast cancer

Background The management of pT1a-b pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer is controversial and no data about the efficacy of trastuzumab in this setting are available from randomized clinical trials. The aims of this retrospective study were to assess how patients are managed in clinical practice in Italy, which clinical or biological characteristics influenced the choice of adjuvant systemic therapy and the outcome of patients. Methods Data of consecutive patients who underwent surgery from January 2007 to December 2012 for HER2-positive, pT1a-b pN0 M0 breast cancer were retrospectively collected from 28 Italian centres. Analysis of contingency tables and multivariate generalized logit models were used to investigate the association between the baseline clinical and biological features and the treatment strategy adopted. Results Among 303 enrolled patients, 204 received adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab, 65 adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab and 34 did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy. At the multivariate analysis age, tumor size, proliferation index and hormone receptor status were significantly associated with the treatment choice. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) probability was 95%, 94.3% and 69.6% for patients treated with adjuvant systemic therapy and trastuzumab, with adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab and for patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusions The majority of patients (66%) with pT1a-b pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer enrolled in this retrospective study received adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab, whereas only 11% patients did not receive any adjuvant systemic therapy. The choice of treatment type seems to be mainly influenced by tumor size, proliferation index, hormone receptor status and age. The 5-year DFS probability was significantly higher for patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab compared with patients not receiving adjuvant systemic therapy or receiving adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab.

Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Breast: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

UNLABELLED : Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast is considered a rare entity, and for this reason there are no data from prospective clinical trials on its optimal management. Early stage tumors are usually treated with the same strategy used for the other types of invasive breast cancer. Anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens represent the most frequently administered chemotherapy in neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting, as well as for metastatic disease, although combinations of platinum compounds and etoposide have been widely used, in particular for small-cell histology and tumors with a high proliferation index. For metastatic disease, a multimodality therapeutic strategy can be considered on an individual basis, with chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, radiation therapy, surgery, or a combination of the above. In the near future, a better knowledge of the biology of these tumors will hopefully provide new therapeutic targets for personalized treatment. In this review, we discuss the current evidence and the future perspectives on diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast (NECB) is a distinct entity of breast cancer. Clinical features and morphology are not helpful to distinguish NECB from other subtypes of breast cancer; therefore, immunohistochemistry markers for neuroendocrine differentiation, mainly chromogranin and synaptophysin, should be routinely used to confirm the diagnosis, especially in cases of mucinous or solid papillary carcinoma in which the suspicion of NECB may be relevant. Adjuvant treatment should be offered according to the same recommendations given for the other types of invasive breast cancer. An accurate diagnosis of NECB is also important in the metastatic setting, in which a multimodality approach including specific therapies such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy can be considered.

Phase II open-label study of bevacizumab combined with neoadjuvant anthracycline and taxane therapy for locally advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy is frequently administered in breast cancer. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates vary according to clinical disease stage and biology of breast cancer. The critical role of angiogenesis in the progression of breast cancer, together with significantly improved efficacy when bevacizumab is combined with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting, provides a strong rationale for evaluating the integration of bevacizumab into neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens. METHODS A single-arm, multicentre, phase II, open-label study evaluated four 3-weekly cycles of FEC (5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2), epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)) followed by 12 cycles of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-negative stage III locally advanced or inflammatory breast carcinoma. The primary endpoint was pCR rate. RESULTS Planned treatment was completed in 49 of the 56 enrolled patients. In the intent-to-treat population, the pCR rate was 21% and the clinical response rate was 59%. Breast-conserving surgery was achieved in 34% of patients. In the subgroup of 15 patients with triple-negative disease, the pCR rate was 47%. Grade 3 adverse events in ≥5% of patients were neutropenia, leucopenia, asthenia, and rash. One case each of hypertensive retinopathy and post-operative wound complication, both after treatment completion, were considered probably related to bevacizumab. There were no treatment-related deaths and no cardiac function abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that FEC followed by weekly paclitaxel with bevacizumab is an active neoadjuvant regimen for locally advanced breast cancer, with no major safety concerns. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT00559845.

Cardiotoxicity of Aromatase Inhibitors in Breast Cancer Patients

Abstract Aromatase inhibitors represent an effective endocrine treatment for patients with hormone receptor‐positive breast cancer, in early stage and in metastatic disease. However, by decreasing levels of serum estrogens they also potentially reduce the protective effect of estrogens on the cardiovascular system. Patients treated with aromatase inhibitors, in fact, compared with those who receive tamoxifen, more often develop hyperlipidemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension, which are recognized risk factors for cardiovascular disease. This might raise some concerns especially in the adjuvant setting where the aim of treatment is the cure, and for postmenopausal patients who are already at risk for cardiovascular disease. However, whether the relative higher incidence of cardiac adverse events reported with aromatase inhibitors compared with tamoxifen is related to an actual cardiac toxicity of aromatase inhibitors rather than a cardioprotective effect of tamoxifen is still unclear. In this article we review the available literature on cardiotoxicity of aromatase inhibitors and provide some practical advice to improve the cardiovascular safety profile of these drugs.

Body mass index and circulating oestrone sulphate in women treated with adjuvant letrozole

Background:Obesity is an independent adverse prognostic factor in early breast cancer patients, but it is still controversial whether obesity may affect adjuvant endocrine therapy efficacy. The aim of our study (ancillary to the two clinical trials Gruppo Italiano Mammella (GIM)4 and GIM5) was to investigate whether the circulating oestrogen levels during treatment with the aromatase inhibitor letrozole are related to body mass index (BMI) in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.Methods:Plasma concentration of oestrone sulphate (ES) was evaluated by radioimmunoassay in 370 patients. Plasma samples were obtained after at least 6 weeks of letrozole therapy (steady-state time). Patients were divided into four groups according to BMI. Differences among the geometric means (by ANOVA and ANCOVA) and correlation (by Spearman’s rho) between the ES levels and BMI were assessed.Results:Picomolar geometric mean values (95% confidence interval, n=patients) of circulating ES during letrozole were 58.6 (51.0–67.2, n=150) when BMI was <25.0 kg m−2; 65.6 (57.8–74.6, n=154) when 25.0–29.9 kg m−2; 59.3 (47.1–74.6, n=50) when 30.0–34.9 kg m−2; and 43.3 (23.0–81.7, n=16) when ⩾35.0 kg m−2. No statistically significant difference in terms of ES levels among groups and no correlation with BMI were observed.Conclusions:Body mass index does not seem to affect circulating oestrogen levels in letrozole-treated patients.

Predictive Factors of Lapatinib and Capecitabine Activity in Patients with HER2-Positive, Trastuzumab-Resistant Metastatic Breast Cancer: Results from the Italian Retrospective Multicenter HERLAPAC Study

Background There are no validated predictive markers for lapatinib and capecitabine in patients with trastuzumab-resistant HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer. Methods Data of 148 consecutive patients treated with lapatinib and capecitabine from March 2007 to December 2013 were collected from 13 Italian institutions. Estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were obtained with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with logrank test. The association of clinicopathological variables and the outcome was studied by binary logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard analysis. Results At a median follow-up of 41 months, median PFS and OS were 7 and 21 months, respectively. Patents with a PFS longer than 7 months had a significantly longer OS, compared with patients with a PFS equal to or shorter than 7 months (36 vs 15 months; p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed the benefit of lapatinib-based therapy in terms of PFS and OS was significantly associated with time-to-progression (TTP) on prior first-line trastuzumab-based therapy. In particular, each additional month on first-line trastuzumab based therapy was associated with a reduction in hazard of progression and death after the initiation of lapatinib-based therapy of 2% and 4%, respectively. Conclusions A longer TTP to first line trastuzumab seems to predict a prolonged PFS and OS with subsequent lapatinib and capecitabine.

Progesterone receptor status and clinical outcome in breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-positive locoregional recurrence.

Aims and background The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate the impact of progesterone receptor (PgR) loss on locoregional recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary breast cancer and ER-positive locoregional recurrence. Patients and Methods Eight Italian oncology centers collected data from consecutive patients with ER-positive breast cancer and a subsequent ER-positive locoregional recurrence. Results Data were available for 265 patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 1990 and 2009. Median metastasis-free survival was 111 months in patients with PgR-positive primary tumors and locoregional recurrence (PgRpos), 38 months in patients with PgR-negative primary tumors and locoregional recurrence (PgRneg), and 63 months in patients with PgR-positive primary tumors and PgR-negative locoregional recurrence (PgRloss). In multivariate analysis, PgR status was independently associated with metastasis-free survival, with a hazard ratio of 2.84 (95% CI 1.34-6.00) for PgRneg compared with PgRpos, and 2.93 (95% CI: 1.51-5.70) for PgRloss compared with PgRpos. Conclusions PgR absence was found to be a negative prognostic factor in breast cancer patients with ER-positive locoregional recurrence. Thus, PgR status could be a biological marker in ER-positive recurrent breast cancer.

When and how to treat women with HER2-positive, small (pT1a-b), node-negative breast cancer?

Small (pT1a-b), node-negative (pN0) breast cancer generally has a good prognosis. However, HER2-positive status is associated with an increased risk of relapse and decreased survival even in these tumors. Although there are only few data from prospective randomized trials, results of retrospective studies suggest adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab may improve outcomes of patients with pT1a-b pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer. On the other hand, trastuzumab is potentially associated with increased cardiac toxicity, especially when combined with anthracycline-based chemotherapy. A valid strategy for improving cardiac safety is the addition of trastuzumab to non-anthracycline chemotherapy, whereas a shorter duration of trastuzumab should be not routinely considered although might represent an option for selected patients at low risk of relapse and very high risk of cardiac events. Therefore, the choice of adjuvant treatment for patients with pT1a-b pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer should be done on individual basis, carefully weighing benefits and risks.

Abstract P5-18-05: The Promher Study: An observational Italian study on HER2+ve, pT1a-b, pN0, M0 breast cancer (BC) patients (pts)

Background. The management of small (≤ 1 cm), node-negative, HER2+ve BC is controversial, since data from randomized clinical trials specifically addressing the benefit of adjuvant systemic treatment with or without Trastuzumab in this setting are still lacking. The aims of this retrospective study are to assess how pts are managed in routinary clinical practice in Italy, whether clinical or biological features may influence the choice of adjuvant systemic therapy and if there is any difference in the outcome between treated and not treated pts. Patients and methods. Data of 268 consecutive pts who underwent surgery from January 2007 to December 2012 for HER2+ve, pT1a-b pN0 BC, were collected from 25 Italian centres. Descriptive statistical analyses and multivariate logistic regression models were used, with the aim of investigating the relationship between the baseline clinical and biological features and the adjuvant treatment strategy. Results. Pts characteristics were: median age 57, 69% postmenopausal status, 77% had conservative surgery, 32% pT1a, 68% pT1b, 48% G3, 66% ER+ve, 75% Ki67 ≥14%. Ninety percent of pts received adjuvant systemic therapy: 19% hormone therapy (HT) alone, 3% chemotherapy (CT) +/- HT, 64% Trastuzumab + CT +/- HT and 4% Trastuzumab + HT. At the multivariate analysis, the odds of being treated with adjuvant systemic therapy with or without Trastuzumab, resulted higher in presence of conservative surgery (p=0.002), pT1b (p Conclusion. This preliminary analysis shows that in Italy the majority of these pts received systemic adjuvant treatment and about 2/3 were treated with Trastuzumab. Pathological tumor size (pT1b) and negative hormone receptor status represent the main factors influencing the choice of including Trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment. Survival data are still not mature to drive definitive conclusions about outcome. Citation Format: Stefania Gori, Monica Turazza, Simona Duranti, Elena Fiorio, Jennifer Foglietta, Marcella Gulisano, Ilaria Marcon, Marta Gubbiotti, Maria Giovanna Cavazzini, Simon Spazzapan, Valeria De Simone, Giancarlo Bisagni, Chiara Saggia, Luigi Cavanna, Emilio Bria, Laura Iezzi, Elisabetta Cretella, Patrizia Vici, Daniele Santini, Alessandra Fabi, Ornella Garrone, Antonella Ferro, Silvana Saracchini, Lucia Evangelisti, Sandro Barni, Lucia Mentuccia, Lucio Laudadio, Alessandro Inno, Gianluigi Lunardi, Francesca Coati, Luca Boni. The Promher Study: An observational Italian study on HER2+ve, pT1a-b, pN0, M0 breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-05.

Abstract P5-19-25: Multi-institutional retrospective analysis of clinical and pathological factors predicting resistance to lapatinib-based therapy in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ MBC)

Background The combination of the dual HER1/HER2 inhibitor lapatinib (L) and capecitabine (C) is a therapeutic option for patients (pts) with HER2+MBC whose disease progresses after treatment with the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab. At present time, no clinical or pathological factors except HER2 status are clearly recognized as predictors of the activity of LC. We conducted a retrospective analysis of pts with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer receiving LC after trastuzumab failure to identify factors associated with resistance to LC. Materials and methods We collected clinical and pathological data from 151 pts with HER2+ MBC receiving LC after failing a prior trastuzumab-based treatment (either adjuvant or for metastatic disease) treated at 13 Italian Institutions between March 2007 and December 2013. Time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS), calculated by the Kaplan Meier (KM) method, were from LC treatment beginning to disease progression or to death in the absence of progression (TTP), and to the date of death or to the date of last follow-up (OS), respectively. LC resistance was defined as TTP from treatment initiation lower or equal to the median TTP for the overall population. KM curves were compared by the Log-rank test. Logistic regression analysis was used to study predictors of TTP below the median value for patients receiving LC. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Results At a median follow-up of 41 months (IQR 23-62), median TTP to LC therapy was 7 months (IQR 5.5-8.5) and median OS was 18 months (IQR 10-28). Fifteen pts were excluded because of short follow-up (i.e. on LC treatment and Conclusions A short time to progression during capecitabine and lapatinib (LC-R) is associated with reduced OS in patients failing prior trastuzumab based therapy for HER2+ MBC. Patients who had modest clinical benefit from previous trastuzumab-based therapy could experience LC-R indicating the possibility of primary resistance to anti HER2-treatment. For these patients, alternative targeting strategies are urgently needed. Citation Format: Stefania Gori, Valentina Rossi, Monica Turazza, Elena Fiorio, Alessandra Fabi, Giancarlo Bisagni, Jennifer Foglietta, Daniele Santini, Ida Pavese, Alberto Zambelli, Patrizia Vici, Vita Leonardi, Sandro Barni, Silvana Saracchini, Giuseppe Bogina, Simona Duranti, Alessandro Inno, Gianluigi Lunardi, Filippo Montemurro. Multi-institutional retrospective analysis of clinical and pathological factors predicting resistance to lapatinib-based therapy in HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-19-25.